Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


First Supermoto Advice.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Offroad & Supermoto
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Project9928
Traffic Copper



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:38 - 19 Apr 2007    Post subject: First Supermoto Advice. Reply with quote

I have an R1 which I bought because it was good value and a good bike, but its not really me and isn't really floating my boat. I'm getting a car soon for long distance journeys, so I'm thinking of getting a Supermoto as my next bike.

I have never ridden a Supermoto bike before so obviously I need to test ride one to see what I think.

I would be using the bike for fun weekend blats and commuting 14 miles 5 day a week.

But what I would like to know is what are they like to live with?

What are they like on petrol? I've seen that most have 9l tanks, how many miles do you get out of them?

How reliable are the engines? Not a big issue as I'll have a car and push bike to get me where I need to encase.

How would the bike hold up on runs to Box Hill from the Ealing area?

Just trying to get a good idea what they are like really.

Thanks.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Sparks!
Sir Tart-a-lot



Joined: 30 Aug 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:51 - 19 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends mostly on what supermoto you get.

30 mile a day commute should be fine for the likes of the DRZ400, KTM LC4/660 etc.. you'd be able to do it on a more racey bike like a Yamaha WR426 or a KTM 525.. but would need to change the oil very regularily and keep on top of the maintenance.

DRZ400 is an ideal bike, try and get a test ride Thumbs Up
____________________
Current Toys: 06 Yamaha WR250F | Nissan 350Z GT | Tech 4 Homes
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

lanester
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 04 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:13 - 20 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a Suzuki DRZ400SM. So hope this helps.

Remember that supermotos are mainly single cylinder beasts and a tall riding stance. So compared to an R1 they are at the opposite end of the scale. The single cylinder engine will feel completely different to your in-line 4, vibby and more torque but they don't have no where near the power of a 150bhp R1, more like 37bhp (DRZ400SM). So if you like the power you will miss it I would assume. Oh and a lot of engine breaking, which I personally like.

It does have a small tank and you'll get 100-70 miles to reserve depending on how you ride it, which will cost the grand sum of about £7 in petrol. Therefore it will do 70-50 mpg which in my opinion is pretty good.

With nice wide big bars you can easily chuck it into the corners, and with wheels that'll take the same rubber as sports bikes, the handling is where it's at in my opinion. If you got your favourite twisties you'll love an SM, sticking you leg out, backing it in (hard to do imo)

As far as commuting goes, i ride mine to work every day and its fine, mainly twisty A roads. As far as reliability goes if you listen to any DRZ owner the engine is very reliable.

hth
____________________
2003 - 2006 Honda XR125L, 2006 - 2011 Suzuki DR-Z 400 SM
2011 - 2014 Yamaha FZ6 Fazer S2, 2014 + KTM 690 SMC-R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Project9928
Traffic Copper



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:31 - 20 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks guys, this has helped.

Sparks: I've actually been looking at the KTM LC4 640, which i think looks the muts nuts and also I can get an 18ltr tanks for it as well. Supermoto's don't really hold there money too well so I can pick one up quite cheap.

Lanester: I'm actually looking forward to having less power, one of the reasons I'm thinking of the Supermoto is because it has a good amount of torque but less topend. I really looks forward to the handling Smile Also milage isn't too bad as I'll get an LC4 and slap an 18ltr tank on Very Happy

The R1 is good but its just makes all your favorite roads too short.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:35 - 20 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

You won't have near the torque of your r1. You will however have relatively less power than torque and possibly a wider range of torque, though the r1 is hardly lacking in midrange.

The bikes you're looking at make sense, but aren't awfully light, although different geometry may mean they feel that way. The LC4 has a claimed dry weight only 6kg less than the new CBR600RR.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lanester
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 04 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:32 - 21 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
You won't have near the torque of your r1. You will however have relatively less power than torque and possibly a wider range of torque, though the r1 is hardly lacking in midrange.


Sorry if I confused you i did mean in relative terms.
____________________
2003 - 2006 Honda XR125L, 2006 - 2011 Suzuki DR-Z 400 SM
2011 - 2014 Yamaha FZ6 Fazer S2, 2014 + KTM 690 SMC-R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Project9928
Traffic Copper



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:40 - 21 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

G - I'll be getting 60nm of torque as opposed to the 90nm odd on the R1 but I would expect a wider range of torque though.

The weight I'm not really too bothered with as I've had some quite heavy bikes in the past, maybe not on a bike thats as tall but its something I'll get used to.

Lanester - Its probably me not putting my words across right as usual lol.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

alpine
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Apr 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:14 - 21 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, I own the Honda FMX650, and i cant fault it.

The seat is very good for a supermoto, its not rock solid as some of the more !hardcore! types (CRF's, etc).

Talking about hardcore, the FMX650 wont satisfy your needs straight away on power. Im on a restricted lisence at the moment, so 33bhp for me. But they come with 37bhp standard. Fit an Arrow exhaust system, new air flets, etc etc, and you will be looking at the 40bhp+ mark, which is alot nicer.

The tank on mine is a 12l. I usually get 90 miles if im throwing it around, and around 110 if im riding normally.

They are fantastic if your a city / b road rider like me. I also use the leg out technique around corners, which os so much f**king fun.

Hope this helps Smile

Alpine.
____________________
Current bike - FMX650.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

BARRIE
L Plate Warrior



Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:04 - 22 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

i had a mz 660cc supermoto the handling was great 50bhp and could pull 100-110 mph long service intervals 100% reliable yamaha xt 660 engine worth a look cost a lot less than a ktm BARRIE
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:17 - 22 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Project9928 wrote:
G - I'll be getting 60nm of torque as opposed to the 90nm odd on the R1 but I would expect a wider range of torque though.

You'll have a wider range of more torque on the R1 I'm pretty sure (providing you're comparing the rev range, not the rpm, as the single will rev out a lot earlier).

Even the KTM690 has a claimed peak torque of 43.5nm, so I'd have thought 60nm was rather optomistic? Though I thought the (07) r1 was listed as 78nm peak torque.

The high CoG does mean you can't accelerate quite as hard also, but my Hussy will wheelie off the power in third at mid revs - with top gear geared for about 110. Which can be fun - though of course an r1 would easily wheelie at this point and probably only use two gears for that speed where the Hussy has 6.

Just noticed your question about petrol. Not sure how good mine is, but if you are worried about it, I wouldn't go for a comp spec (ie properly light) one - as there will be lots of costs per mile.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Project9928
Traffic Copper



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:43 - 22 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:

You'll have a wider range of more torque on the R1 I'm pretty sure (providing you're comparing the rev range, not the rpm, as the single will rev out a lot earlier).

Even the KTM690 has a claimed peak torque of 43.5nm, so I'd have thought 60nm was rather optomistic? Though I thought the (07) r1 was listed as 78nm peak torque.

The high CoG does mean you can't accelerate quite as hard also, but my Hussy will wheelie off the power in third at mid revs - with top gear geared for about 110. Which can be fun - though of course an r1 would easily wheelie at this point and probably only use two gears for that speed where the Hussy has 6.

Just noticed your question about petrol. Not sure how good mine is, but if you are worried about it, I wouldn't go for a comp spec (ie properly light) one - as there will be lots of costs per mile.


The 60Nm of torque I got from here https://www.tuscanmototours.com/aboutthebike.htm and according to here https://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/yamaha_yzf-r1_2003.php my R1 has 105Nm. I was just going on random sites, exactly how true these are I don't know lol. But I know the torque isn't going to be anywhere near the R1's.

Having a limit of 110 and having to go through the gears more is what I'm looking. This bike is going to be more for fun more then anything and the R1 is too quick for small B roads that I've been riding lately.

Fuel wise I should be ok as I'm intending on getting the larger 18ltr tank, unfortunately it will make it more top heavy but hey what can you do.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:55 - 22 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Embarassed, sorry I think I was getting confused with the other supermoto thread where someone was looking at more focused bikes, my bad.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Project9928
Traffic Copper



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:55 - 22 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Embarassed, sorry I think I was getting confused with the other supermoto thread where someone was looking at more focused bikes, my bad.


Lol thats cool.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

steveh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:17 - 23 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Embarassed, sorry I think I was getting confused with the other supermoto thread where someone was looking at more focused bikes, my bad.


prolly my thread Wink

intresting read tho.
____________________
Current : 06 Zx10r, 07 Wr450f SM, 74 850 norton commando, 63 bsa b40, 1962 Triton 650, 67 Triumph Tr6r, 1955 Triton 750, 1978 TY250E.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lanester
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 04 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:25 - 23 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

80mph + on a supermoto (well mine anyway) isn't much fun hence good on twisty A and B roads
____________________
2003 - 2006 Honda XR125L, 2006 - 2011 Suzuki DR-Z 400 SM
2011 - 2014 Yamaha FZ6 Fazer S2, 2014 + KTM 690 SMC-R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

janie
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:25 - 24 Apr 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

i had a yamaha ttr600 which i had excel rims put on and road tyres.......it was lots of fun to ride, stuck like glue round the twisties and cos of the sit and beg ridin position you can see over the cars when in traffic............

downsides

the seat was like a plank of wood...colonic implant
80/90 to the tank

they are really worth havin and such a great laugh to ride...the ktm is a really good choice.............go for it........
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 364 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Offroad & Supermoto All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.08 Sec - Server Load: 0.22 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 96.2 Kb