|
Author |
Message |
ipip |
This post is not being displayed .
|
ipip Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 18 Nov 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 08:40 - 26 Oct 2014 Post subject: |
|
|
What is the best speed you've had? The fact that your download is speed is lower than upload suggests a fault or problem somewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
ipip |
This post is not being displayed .
|
ipip Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 18 Nov 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 08:43 - 26 Oct 2014 Post subject: |
|
|
There's no reason you shouldn't be getting 40Mb over wifi unless there's a lot of interference. Have you tried different wireless channels? |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :
|
Posted: 08:44 - 26 Oct 2014 Post subject: |
|
|
Ipip wrote: |
What is the best speed you've had? The fact that your download is speed is lower than upload suggests a fault or problem somewhere. |
To be fair, around 1MB download is typical. Reset the router twice (it dropped out after I'd done it once) and it's chugging along ok again.
Might just log a fault again.
https://www.speedtest.net/result/3860181403.png
Spoke too soon. At least I managed to watch Moto2 before it died. ____________________ My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
recman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
recman World Chat Champion
Joined: 26 Mar 2012 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Kickstart The Oracle
Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :
|
Posted: 11:47 - 26 Oct 2014 Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
Longer longer the distance the worse it is. At 7km we were very lucky to get 1mb (direct line of sight we are only 3.5km from the exchange). To add to the fun there is another (rural) exchange that is far closer to us, but whose area stops about 20 yards away. Would have been far better for ADSL (but doubt it will get FTTC for years).
A couple we know bought a new build about 12 years ago. At the time BT have connected the whole estate with fibre. But at the time they wouldn't support any broadband over fibre! And no satellite dishes allowed. They were stuck with a modem long after our crappy long old cables supported ADSL.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
sabian92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
sabian92 World Chat Champion
Joined: 21 Oct 2012 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
bEN_ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
bEN_ World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
trevoriv |
This post is not being displayed .
|
trevoriv World Chat Champion
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Karma :
|
Posted: 15:22 - 26 Oct 2014 Post subject: |
|
|
Sky's homehub is the bottleneck according to the BT engineer that connected our fibre line. Here's the result from my wired connection:
https://www.speedtest.net/result/3860759536.png
Ipip wrote: |
There's no reason you shouldn't be getting 40Mb over wifi unless there's a lot of interference. Have you tried different wireless channels? |
____________________ Past: '96 Thundercat, '02 ZX636R (A1P), '58 KTM 690 SM LC4 Current: '06 ZX636R (C6F)
Mudskipper wrote: Someone just has to sig that... |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 9 years, 183 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|