What are the non-R Street Triples like?

[slowside]

The standard Striples are now getting into a price range I can afford, there is a decent looking 2016 one not too far from me.

I know the R gets the adjustable suspension and radial brakes, but what is the stock bike like? I'm hardly going to tax its abilities I suspect, if the stock suspension is just par with things like the SV650, MT07 etc that's going to be more than adequate for me.
____________________
Triumph Sprint RS 955i - If I don't reply to your post, I'm probably busy fixing it.

[Polarbear]

The non R's were actually preferred by some people. The suspension was set up pretty well out of the box and softer than the R (which was terrible on my STR until I got it set up professionally).

Brakes were fine on the one I rode. Maybe not quite as sharp as my STR but perfectly adequate. Motor on those I'm not sure if there was much difference but I certainly don't remember noticing anything.

I got the R for the same reason 90% of people got the R and the same reason people buy cars with the M or Arbarth badge, pose value

To sum up, I would happily have a non R and pocket the difference but I'm not the hooligan I once was.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition

[MarJay]

I have an R. I rode a non R before I bought it and it did not suit me. It wouldn’t turn and the brakes felt weak. The R felt great and now it’s been set up it’s fantastic. Mine needs new fork oil and I’m told that the front springs vary massively from the factory but I’ve not ridden many other bikes that handle as well. Certainly no middleweight nakeds.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.

[rpsmith79]

Another R owner here, but like Polarbear pointed out, i primarly bought my R because its an R, and at the time there wasn't much in it in terms of price difference

I am on several forums/FB Groups for the Striples, and while the vast majority seem to own R's, the non R's always get good feedback/reviews from new members joining

I certainly don't think you will be dissappointed, and of the other bikes you mentioned, any review i read of the MT-07 always mentions the "budget" suspension setup, never read a review of the Striple where any mention was made of budjet or poor suspension of the standard model
____________________
Current Bike: Honda CG125 ES4 // Honda CB600FS Hornet // Triumph Street Triple R

[andys675]

if you just want better than the SV or MT thats what you'll find, enjoy

I took a non R out to try the braking versus the R, got up on the A5 pinned it the same way and fed the gears in, hit the brakes at the same marker and sailed past the turning I wanted
____________________
Some people feel the rain, others just get wet.

[P.]

I think if I was fast riding on decent roads, an R would be great but I absolutely loved my standard ST, so much so I'm looking at another.

[struan80]

I have 2009 Triple and it is more bike than I could ever manage to get close to the limit. R sounds good but will it really make that much difference on fucked up roads in the UK? Track maybe.