|
Author |
Message |
JonB |
This post is not being displayed .
|
JonB Afraid of Mileage
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 19:33 - 03 Mar 2008 Post subject: Hard Shoulder use to extend to rest of UK. |
|
|
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7275004.stm
I have used the M42 many times since this was brought in and I think it is a good idea.
However no-one ever really uses the hard shoulder I have found.
It's also a pain in the arse at junctions. ____________________ Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
TheDonUK World Chat Champion
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Kickstart The Oracle
Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :
|
Posted: 19:47 - 03 Mar 2008 Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I hate those bits. Just feel, well, numb when using them with the reduced limit and hard shoulder running. The signs generally say to only use the hard shoulder if you are going off at the next exit.
Basically a real cheapskate way of increasing motorway capacity. What is really required is a bit of effort in building new and desperatly required motorways.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
JonB |
This post is not being displayed .
|
JonB Afraid of Mileage
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 20:34 - 03 Mar 2008 Post subject: |
|
|
That's never going to happen though Keith, Labour will never inject money into road building, even though it would reduce emissions by a huge amount.
However apparantly there are still plans to upgrade the M6 from Stafford to the M6 toll to as many as 6 lanes each way. That would be confusing as hell.
As for an accident happening, I presume in an accident with your normal three lanes in operation, nobody is going to be passing the scene very quickly. You'd have to have a major breakdown to not make the designated refuse areas that are every 500m. ____________________ Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Kickstart The Oracle
Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
JonB |
This post is not being displayed .
|
JonB Afraid of Mileage
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Itchy Super Spammer
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :
|
Posted: 21:01 - 03 Mar 2008 Post subject: |
|
|
problem is a lack of will not engineering posibilties.
My solution would be prefab concrete roads made in china to double or triple deck the motorway network.
https://www.hel2.fi/kkansl/jugendsali/Nayttelyt/Kaunis%20Kiina/3.jpg
Sort of like above I've been on that bridge in Shanghai on a bus with a mad driver.
you can effectively have the T columns like in the above pic planted into the middle of the motorways (moving all the lanes out a bit and eating slightly into the shoulder) and have a deck above and below, need more capacity build a triple deck , need more capacity? , build a 4th deck. ____________________ Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
TheDonUK World Chat Champion
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Skudd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Skudd Super Spammer
Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Walloper Super Spammer
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :
|
Posted: 03:05 - 04 Mar 2008 Post subject: |
|
|
"Congestion's down and traffic flows are smoother, but crucially, because the traffic goes down to 50 mph, air pollution went down, carbon emissions went down and accidents went down."
Well some @bcf will disagree. ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Kickstart The Oracle
Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :
|
Posted: 10:17 - 04 Mar 2008 Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
Most of those come easily when you add an extra lane!
Try it though. It is just unpleasant. And the lack of difference in speed just encourages the centre lane owners club.
As to deaths. There are (2005 figures) 2201.88 miles of motorway, and the M42 bit using the hard shoulder is 11 miles long. So roughly 1/2% of the motorway network . From 1994 – 2004, 124 people were killed and 1355 were injured in accidents involving vehicles on the hard shoulder. As such you would expect a death on a section that long every 16 years and a serious injury every 1.5 years. In other words it is hardly a large enough number to yet be statisticaly relevant.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 60 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|