Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


cagiva mito or aprillia rs (125's)

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

cleeve.
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:42 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: cagiva mito or aprillia rs (125's) Reply with quote

everyone seems to slag of the mito compared to the rs i think it is the wrong way round. the cagiva is a lot better looking and a lot more powerful that the rs.

this is generally to see what others think about the bikes. Razz

cagiva for the win Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ms51ves3
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:32 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot more powerful Rolling Eyes

The RS125 and Mito put out roughly the same amount of power.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cleeve.
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:36 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

in some cases but on straits mito's are supposed to leave rs behind or so i have been told (aint got on mine yet) and rs are supposed to be better on hills ect... Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

salty21
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:43 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

i usually hate it when people start picking at spelling and grammar in posts but i cant help myself..........

Quote:
in some cases but on straits mito's are supposed to leave rs behind or so i have been told (aint got on mine yet) and rs are supposed to be better on hills ect...


=straight


sorry, i know its annoying but it was bugging me Laughing
____________________
04 NSR 125(sold) Sad ---- 03 CBR 600rr(sold)Sad Smile ----90 pan euro ST1100 'Shocked' ----02 CG 125 Smile
94 CB400 Super Four ---- 2000 VTR SP1 (sold) ---- 08 ninja p8f(sold, meh) ----05 CBR600rr Smile
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ms51ves3
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:55 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

cleeve. wrote:
in some cases but on straits mito's are supposed to leave rs behind or so i have been told (aint got on mine yet) and rs are supposed to be better on hills ect... Thumbs Up


More bullshit from competitive NOOBS!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MaybeGuy
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:29 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont think there has EVER been a direct comparason, but id say they put out about the same amount...

im biased towards the mito because i think they look better, and are less common and chavvy (To a certain extent).

want to buy a mito? Cool
____________________
Blue_SV650S wrote: it was a sh1te wheelie, but it proves that he can get it up in 3rd and can do angles. In summery, mattsprattuk is a gobby little sh1tebag, dopehead tw4t, but sadly for all of us, he probably isn't THAT full of sh1te!! Mr. Green
Kickstart wrote: Hi I tend to agree with Matt. All the best Keith
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Alex-RS
Traffic Copper



Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:30 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

ms51ves3 wrote:
cleeve. wrote:
in some cases but on straits mito's are supposed to leave rs behind or so i have been told (aint got on mine yet) and rs are supposed to be better on hills ect... Thumbs Up


More bullshit from competitive NOOBS!


Exactly.

Seriously, why does it matter? How many times per day are you going to be racing an RS?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Spit-Fire
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:30 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

^^agree Thumbs Up
____________________
they say the good die young... i say we just live faster
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

ThoughtContro...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:38 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I could be hallucinating, but I seem to recall someone on here posting that you'll spend £3 maintaining a mito for every £2 on an RS to £1 on an NSR. I'd guess this relates to parts cost and availability?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

spitfire123
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 06 Nov 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:13 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

ThoughtControl wrote:
I could be hallucinating, but I seem to recall someone on here posting that you'll spend £3 maintaining a mito for every £2 on an RS to £1 on an NSR. I'd guess this relates to parts cost and availability?


yep as i found with my mito.


saying that though its a nice bike.


and my mate has an rs and it leavs it for dead and the mito hadles better.


then again its a 125...who cares
____________________
You won't be able to eat my dust......As it'll settle before you get there.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

twotakt
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:57 - 19 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

This topic has been covered on www.125ccsportsbikes.com loads of times with many members who have owned both bikes. Performance is pretty much identical in terms of both handling and power out of the factory of stock bikes (although there is a SP Mito Evo and a 'Racing' Mk2 Mito who claim more power out of the factory IIRC).

It all comes down to personal preferance, although I own an 2003 Rs125 I do prefer the mk2 Mito on the basis of looks only.

Ta,
Jack
____________________
R.I.P. Tareree Shiimi, 1985-2008
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Newbiker0507
Crazy Courier



Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:28 - 20 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Both a waste of money unless you can't do the DAS.

Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

twotakt
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:32 - 20 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think they are pretty valuable in terms of teaching people how to ride sportsbikes without giving them too much power too soon. This is in part due to them being amongst two of the best handling production bikes out there and are thus awesome fun to ride.

If they were such a waste of money then why other forum members i.e. Kickstart and Collywog19 own them?
____________________
R.I.P. Tareree Shiimi, 1985-2008
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bike_craze1
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:48 - 20 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prefer RS's but Cagiva's are a bit more powerful and a bit faster and considered better looking by some.
____________________
Yamaha R125 - Cagiva Mito 125 - Honda CBR 600
CBT passed: 22/07/08 Bike Theory passed: 28/03/09
Bike Test passed: 15/04/09
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Newbiker0507
Crazy Courier



Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:01 - 20 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

jackdim wrote:

If they were such a waste of money then why other forum members i.e. Kickstart and Collywog19 own them?


They probably had excess money and love bikes to death

All the best,

James
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ms51ves3
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:45 - 20 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bike_craze1 wrote:
Prefer RS's but Cagiva's are a bit more powerful and a bit faster and considered better looking by some.


Have you read the other replies to this thread?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Blau Zedong This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Bike_craze1
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:29 - 21 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

ms51ves3 wrote:
Bike_craze1 wrote:
Prefer RS's but Cagiva's are a bit more powerful and a bit faster and considered better looking by some.


Have you read the other replies to this thread?

??
I gave my opinion.
____________________
Yamaha R125 - Cagiva Mito 125 - Honda CBR 600
CBT passed: 22/07/08 Bike Theory passed: 28/03/09
Bike Test passed: 15/04/09
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:36 - 21 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

BLUEX5 wrote:
125's are gay.

That is all.


No you're wrong. 16 and 17 year olds are tremendously uncool, whereas 125's are good. Its just the drag factor from the pining 16 year olds and the mechanically unsympathetic 17 year olds.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ms51ves3
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:26 - 21 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bike_craze1 wrote:
ms51ves3 wrote:
Have you read the other replies to this thread?

??
I gave my opinion.


Yes, but you also stated 'facts' that were untrue.

Bike_craze1 wrote:
Cagiva's are a bit more powerful and a bit faster


MarJay wrote:
BLUEX5 wrote:
125's are gay.

That is all.


No you're wrong. 16 and 17 year olds are tremendously uncool, whereas 125's are good. Its just the drag factor from the pining 16 year olds and the mechanically unsympathetic 17 year olds.


I'm cool Wink Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bike_craze1
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:38 - 21 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Am I wrong when I say Mito's are a bit faster then?
____________________
Yamaha R125 - Cagiva Mito 125 - Honda CBR 600
CBT passed: 22/07/08 Bike Theory passed: 28/03/09
Bike Test passed: 15/04/09
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:42 - 21 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bike_craze1 wrote:
Am I wrong when I say Mito's are a bit faster then?


Yes.

Because they are pretty much equal.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:43 - 21 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Performance wise they are within a gnats of each other. Generally the Mito came out in comparison tests as being marginally quicker, but the difference is tiny (and likely to be down to gearing rather than power, although on an early 7 speed Mito you could gear them for power without having to sacrifice as much go off the line). You would make more difference to performance taking the mirrors off than you would by swapping bikes, and you would make massively more difference going for an older and more powerful version of either.

Mito does seem fairly reliable, but can go bang. RS is pretty reliable if treated well (ie, service it and change the rings regularly).

NSR is mechanically more reliable than either (electrically maybe not) but also quite a bit slower.

I have an early RS125 (one of the first batch in the country), but to be honest looks wise the Mito Evo is better (indeed, I think it is one of the best looking bikes made, far better than the 916 effort).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Bike_craze1
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:53 - 21 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Hi

Performance wise they are within a gnats of each other. Generally the Mito came out in comparison tests as being marginally quicker, but the difference is tiny (and likely to be down to gearing rather than power, although on an early 7 speed Mito you could gear them for power without having to sacrifice as much go off the line). You would make more difference to performance taking the mirrors off than you would by swapping bikes, and you would make massively more difference going for an older and more powerful version of either.

Mito does seem fairly reliable, but can go bang. RS is pretty reliable if treated well (ie, service it and change the rings regularly).

NSR is mechanically more reliable than either (electrically maybe not) but also quite a bit slower.

I have an early RS125 (one of the first batch in the country), but to be honest looks wise the Mito Evo is better (indeed, I think it is one of the best looking bikes made, far better than the 916 effort).

All the best

Keith


Very Happy
____________________
Yamaha R125 - Cagiva Mito 125 - Honda CBR 600
CBT passed: 22/07/08 Bike Theory passed: 28/03/09
Bike Test passed: 15/04/09
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

binge
Emo Kiddy



Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:32 - 22 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I havnt ridden either bike, And personally not too interested. With that sort of bike / spec / power. Any gains are in the rider. The bikes are of a similar spec. And a similar size/weight/power.

Anyway, What is good about having a faster straight line bike? Surely the fun is in the handling.




Slightly off topic, But I had a kid come into my work the other day on his Aprilia MX 125. He Swore blind it was capable of 108mph, He was clocked by a THREE LITRE BMW on the A2. And its pushing 44bhp. Laughing


I told him it really doesn't do 108mph and what is so great about a THREE LITRE bmw clocking him. Laughing

He got really done in and started to get his helmet and gloves back on to ride away. Laughing Laughing Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 223 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 1.21 - MySQL Queries: 16 - Page Size: 138.85 Kb