Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bike safety

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Mr Pants!
I Karma



Joined: 29 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:03 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Bike safety Reply with quote

Did anyone see the news this week. They had a story on how there has been an increase of middle aged men over the last few years buying super fast race bikes. Me being one of them.

This has now been recognised by the government as becoming a serious issue as we speed and are a danger to others and ourselves.

Some interesting stats here btw - https://www.thinkroadsafety.gov.uk/statistics.htm

Unfortunately, we are not all like that, again there is a handfull of idiots who insist on going out and running a mock. They showed this video from a helicopter of a guy on a race bike doing 130mph and he was S'ng in and out of all the traffic on the motorway!! It also showed a couple of fairly tight over takes down a country road. Now they were riding like complete pratts!

The sad thing is, just like the change in gun laws, the people who are sensible and enjoy these machines as a hobby or interest, are going to be persecuted because of idiots like that, so we all have to suffer.

I am worried about what the government are going to do about it, are they going to insist on a mass restriction of all these mad machines, or perhaps a secondary test you must complete within a couple of years, or are insurance companies just going to price the race style bike off the road completely...... Who knows.....

Any points of view on this?
____________________
Mr Pants! (Alex or Al)
Its better to burn out, than to fade away....
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

izzi81
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 24 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:26 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

one thing they never mention when they have lists of statistics like that is the one thing I would really be interested to know..

Quote:
Motorcyclists represent 1% of traffic but suffer 19% of deaths and serious injuries
Motorcyclists are 30 times more likely to be killed in a road accident than car users, and four times more likely to be killed than pushbike riders


but how many of those accidents, deaths and injuries were the *motorcyclists fault* and how many were *other drivers faults*?
There are some bikers who drive recklessly at speed and get injured or die because of it. But how many die or get injured because a car driver drove badly? They never compile those kind of facts as far as I know..

(Interesting point to add, while watching the GP today they showed the 'now you see him' road safety advert with the motorbike being knocked over. I remarked to my brother that a friend of mine had an argument about that advert because he thought the biker was in the wrong! My brother said that a good friend of his had also commented that he thought the biker was in the wrong as well. So despite it being an official advert suggesting car drivers take care, car drivers watch it and think the car driver did nothing wrong Rolling Eyes )
____________________
"The problem with the French is they have no word for 'entrepreneur' " George W Bush
Age doesn't matter unless you're a cheese
https://www.bikepics.com/members/izzi81
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Laura
Playboy Bunny



Joined: 28 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:29 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think every rider and driver on the road should br restricted for 12 months no matter on the age.
____________________
Good girls ride motorcycles bad girls thrash them.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rvf_FiRe
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:34 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

17 year old Johnny can go out and buy a top of the line motor fully tuned up capable of 200mph+ if he can afford it the day after he passes his test and yet nothing is ever mentioned Evil or Very Mad

The laws need radical changes in many areas but i cant see it happening. Bikes and bikers are massively easy targets to hit. I cant see what the second test would do tho, you just get it right on the day and then can still be a loon. I was thinking for the car test that it should be a 3 part plan, theory, practical and then a mandatory advanced course to be completed before a machine over a certain cc is allowed. Not sure as to reactions this would bring but i think it would highlight the new drivers that maybe scrapped through the easier first test. I think it would also teach a lot of new drivers a lot of techniques that would not only help them but everyone else as a whole.

If the goverment was to do something radical to the bike laws i for one would be willing to go to any such legal lengths to sort it out and overhaul it in some way. I know many people say things like this but when it comes down to it many cant be bothered to get off their arses to do it. Like the trucks and the fuel protest, they showed some what the power they had when it came to being able to make their point, maybe not a great example - fuel prices are still rising etc but it was a start.

Dunno if any of this is making sense etc but just trying to get more views across. It shouldn't just be down to this goverment, which are frankly inadequate in many ways, to be able to destroy something which many people love and don't take for granted because of a small few that think they can handle something the way they want.

*breathe breathe * lol hope this helps keep this subject alive, i love bikes and all they are, nothing can give you a buzz the way they do and as such i don't wanna lose them or what they are!

Stepping away from the top step now and stop shouting, lol, stay safe ! Thumbs Up
____________________
If a word is misspelled in the dictionary, how would we ever know?

Don't think of yourself as an ugly person. Think of yourself as a beautiful monkey!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy99
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:10 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Last i heard the largest increase in the motorcycle accident rate was when only 1 vehicle was involved. This was last years figures but i've heard the trend has sadly continued this year. However until all motorcycle accidents get all the details accurately recorded for the study we'll never know.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:22 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Re: Bike safety Reply with quote

Mr Pants! wrote:
They showed this video from a helicopter of a guy on a race bike doing 130mph and he was S'ng in and out of all the traffic on the motorway!!

Sounds like a crap race bike if all he was doing was 130mph. Razz Razz

It's possible for them to twist any statictics to show or prove whatever they want, and if someone is going to drive dangerously they will do if they're in a car or on a bike. And as Izzie says it doesn't even go into if those accidents were the motorcyclists fault which would be much more a useful point for them to be making. It is daft how anyone once they pass their car test is allowed to drive whatever car they want. ? Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy99
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:22 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rvf_FiRe wrote:
17 year old Johnny can go out and buy a top of the line motor fully tuned up capable of 200mph+ if he can afford it the day after he passes his test and yet nothing is ever mentioned


Very true,but in the real world this doesn't happen.
Via direct access any 25 year old with very little riding experience and only a few grand in their hand can have access to 170mph. As bike riders we're lucky as we can get loads of performance for very little cash but in the car world to match the performance of a 1000cc bike costs a hell of a lot more.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rvf_FiRe
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:51 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very true to an extent. I know a guy i used to go to college with, 22 but able to get his hands on an M3 evo, not drove that long but had the money, but look at the amount of young guys going around in their souped up nova's with heavy kit in it, weights a hell of a lot more than a bike, that ploughing into you would do slightly more damage than a bike, i know that a bike would still do the damage that could prove fatal but its less likely. How many of these young drivers do you see trying to impress the girls in their little cars, loud music and halfords alloys. How many load up their cars with their mates and cruise at speed just to impress. Again a car gives the driver an impression of total security and therefore are able to take a hell of a lot less care with their driving, young drivers especially, anyone in the real world knows thats fact.

They say its 1 vehicle statistics..... why the hell don't they do something about this then, i bet the 1 vehicle is the bike but why does it crash, yes rider error some times and maybe showing off but what about the state of the roads, we pay good money to use them but their a disgrace. What about the oil slicks that we have to contend with. What about all the horse shit on country roads, people are made to clean up after their dogs , why not their horses? i know they couldn't ride round with bags full of shite but they could take a bit more care with where it is. Is a small fold away shovel too much to carry and possible save a life by shovelling a little crap out from the centre of a road into the edge.

The statistics are twisted to a point but their are so many angles to look at that this is a much wider issue than just to say its older riders getting on newer bikes.
____________________
If a word is misspelled in the dictionary, how would we ever know?

Don't think of yourself as an ugly person. Think of yourself as a beautiful monkey!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy99
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:06 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think whats needed is proper stats showing bike size,rider age/experience,road type & condition etc.. This way we can get the true picture of bike casualties and then maybe do something about it. If it is mr no experience on big bike he needs to be stopped as his accidents could end up getting good bikes killed off,does anyone remember the 100bhp arguments a few years back? If it's the state of roads then we can point and shout at the government to do something about it. At the moment all the safety lobby see is bike deaths up and cry out "told you so,dangerous things those motorcycles we need to save these idiots from themselves"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rvf_FiRe
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:30 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats a couple of the points i mean, actually doing something about the roads and whats contained on them etc and the fact that all the goverment and the followers seem to want to do is simply point a finger and not bother to explain to people who, what, why, where and when etc this is happening too. Do they really think we want to go out and die for a bit of 'fun' ? A in depth statistical view of whats happening on our roads would be great but again the goverment isnt going to be bothered with this as its far easier to just point and decide.
____________________
If a word is misspelled in the dictionary, how would we ever know?

Don't think of yourself as an ugly person. Think of yourself as a beautiful monkey!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mchaggis
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:21 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

izzi81 wrote:


(Interesting point to add, while watching the GP today they showed the 'now you see him' road safety advert with the motorbike being knocked over. I remarked to my brother that a friend of mine had an argument about that advert because he thought the biker was in the wrong! My brother said that a good friend of his had also commented that he thought the biker was in the wrong as well. So despite it being an official advert suggesting car drivers take care, car drivers watch it and think the car driver did nothing wrong Rolling Eyes )


I saw it too, and the motorcyclist is in the wrong from what I can tell... The car indicates well before he turns, does all the mirror checks, and even had he looked in his blind spot, probably wouldn't have seen the motorcyclist trying to overtake. The car driver was turning right, so the motorcyclist was an eejit to overtake a right-turning car.

I saw a advert for motorcyclists a while ago, with a red Duke 999 in it, where all the random thinmgs by the road tell him things like diesel on the road, tractor round the corner etc. I've only ever seen it once though, was pretty good.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Born2bVile
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:50 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lies, damn lies and statistics.

The classic in my opinion has always been the 2.4 children.

What the fooking hell is .4 of a child?

Statistics can be used to argue any point. It all depends on the spin put on them.

Quote:
Last i heard the largest increase in the motorcycle accident rate was when only 1 vehicle was involved. This was last years figures but i've heard the trend has sadly continued this year. However until all motorcycle accidents get all the details accurately recorded for the study we'll never know.


MAG https://www.mag-uk.org/index2.html generally have a less politically-orientated/vote-winning agenda and have a very stong network to evaluate statistics.

Funnily enough, they seem differ in opinion with the official view........

Cheers,

Byrnie.
____________________
NABD Treasurer
National Association for Bikers with a Disability
Reg Charity No. 1040907
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:57 - 29 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rvf_FiRe wrote:
Very true to an extent. I know a guy i used to go to college with, 22 but able to get his hands on an M3 evo,


As against how many people on here who are 22 or less with 160mph bikes?

Rvf_FiRe wrote:
but look at the amount of young guys going around in their souped up nova's with heavy kit in it, weights a hell of a lot more than a bike, that ploughing into you would do slightly more damage than a bike, i know that a bike would still do the damage that could prove fatal but its less likely.


The number of people killed in bike / pedestrian accidents is many times higher tham those killed in car / pedestrian accidents per mile travelled.

Rvf_FiRe wrote:
The statistics are twisted to a point but their are so many angles to look at that this is a much wider issue than just to say its older riders getting on newer bikes.


True, but the unfortunate fact is that there are an awful lot of people (of many ages) riding bikes beyond their levels of experience. There are plenty of places where speeds well in excess of the speed limit are perfectly safe, but there are plenty of people who fail to choose these areas and instead push their bikes beyond the safe level in dangerous areas.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Tarmacsurfer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:08 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it's the advert I think it is, with the scooter rider getting knocked off then the car driver certainly doesn't indicate 'well before' he starts the maneuver. To my mind both are at fault, the rider for being a pillock and overtaking on a junction and the driver for not indicating early enough. That's just my take though /shrug.
On the subject of young drivers in performance cars, I personally know at least one 19 year old in an Impreza and a number of other sub-20 year olds who are driving fairly highly tuned hatchbacks. Some without declaring any modifications. Personally I'd like to see the bike restriction lifted rather than a car restriction imposed, but small chance of that.
____________________
I'm immortal. Well, so far.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Born2bVile
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:21 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
True, but the unfortunate fact is that there are an awful lot of people (of many ages) riding bikes beyond their levels of experience. There are plenty of places where speeds well in excess of the speed limit are perfectly safe, but there are plenty of people who fail to choose these areas and instead push their bikes beyond the safe level in dangerous areas.


But don't you have to get your knee down and pull wheelies to be a real biker?

Too many people seem to think that speed and taking risks are what biking is all about.

I got into bikes as a cheap form of transport and then learned all the bonuses that go with it. Parties, rallies etc.

I accepted the 'vunerable' part as a fair trade-off for the benefits.

I can't understand why people need to push a bike beyond common-sense limits to enjoy it.

It's like taking up parachute jumping, but insisting the plane lets you jump at 100 feet.

Cheers,

Byrnie.
____________________
NABD Treasurer
National Association for Bikers with a Disability
Reg Charity No. 1040907
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:35 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Totally agree (although never tempted with the rallies).

Work colleague learnt to ride a bike last year. Couple of hundred miles and then did his test. Wanted an R6 as a first bike, then one day texted me asking what I knew about a TL1000R as he had been offered one and thought it would not be that much faster than a 600 Rolling Eyes . Eventually persuaded him to buy something more sensible as a first bike and he got a 600 Fazer. Now thinking of upgrading but also thinking about things other than hot shot sports bikes.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Andy99
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:52 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:


MAG https://www.mag-uk.org/index2.html generally have a less politically-orientated/vote-winning agenda and have a very stong network to evaluate statistics.

Funnily enough, they seem differ in opinion with the official view........


Just been there couldn't find stats but found they agreed that a
"significant proportion of fatal accidents suffered by motorcyclists involve no-one other than the rider."

Some of us ride bikes not for the rally/party scene but because we want performance, i don't want to see bike casualties up or legislation to reduce power. Up until a few years ago bike accidents were down now they are on the increase,why? Granted bike sales have been higher but that should lead to an increase in all types of bike accidents,why the apparent increase in single vehicle accidents? The police must have all the info from all the serious accidents,is it being used to help?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Shade_BW
I'm better than you



Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:15 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funnily enough, no-one has done an adequate study (for cars or bikes), into single vehicle accidents. It is assumed that the driver lost control through inexperience, being too cocky etc.

A recent article in a bike magazine showed a corner where most oncoming traffic was across the centre lane, and in the paths of where bikes would be. Any avoiding action which resulted in a crash for the biker (or another car), without hitting the oncoming car would be deemed as a single vehicle accident, and the biker would be assumed to be going too fast and losing it.

Riding home yesterday, found a massive diesel spill which took up almost the entire width of the road, and lasted for some length, round a few bends. If I had come off, there would have been no other vehicle involved, yet could that have only been my fault? (unfortunately I didn't know accurately enough where I was to report it).

Statistics have their place, but they don't always tell the full story, or even enough of it.

Shade
I am not a number.
____________________
If you like this post, rate it!
Karma is there for a reason.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:18 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shade_BW wrote:

Any avoiding action which resulted in a crash for the biker (or another car), without hitting the oncoming car would be deemed as a single vehicle accident, and the biker would be assumed to be going too fast and losing it.


I wasn't aware of that. I suspect quite a significant proportion of bike accidents are related to other vehicles' actions, despite only the bike and biker being injured.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iain12345
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 08 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:21 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was reading in RIDE that the governments are pushing the manufacturers in to pushing sales of midd range road bikes and less sports bikes in the comming future. I personally don't understand how this is going to work.

Who knows - 10 years from now we all might be going around on Fazers and CG's. (no offence intended there) For the time being though, all I want is my high performance sport bike to have alot of smiles and happy moments on and I don't see that changing.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:23 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

that now you see him now you dont advert as odd i thought there was blame on both sides. the bikers was moving around a hell of alot close behind the car. the car driver checks both mirrors yet still hits the bike. surely the biker was a bit retarded for overtaking at that point. unless i missed something obvious like the car didnt indicate Razz
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:25 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

iain12345 wrote:
I was reading in RIDE that the governments are pushing the manufacturers in to pushing sales of midd range road bikes and less sports bikes in the comming future. I personally don't understand how this is going to work.


If you could get a porsche for £10k brandnew I suspect our roads would have a slightly different 'average' road user.

People like power, so I can't see that working too well.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Shade_BW
I'm better than you



Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:30 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:

I wasn't aware of that. I suspect quite a significant proportion of bike accidents are related to other vehicles' actions, despite only the bike and biker being injured.


Friend of mine braked (hard, in the wet) to avoid being cut up on the M25, lost it and fell off, very lucky in the end. The car that caused the accident carried on his journey, either oblivious, or not wanting to stop.

If witnesses hadn't stayed around, this would have been deemed a single vehicle accident with the blame on the rider.

But becuase the analysis is not done, no-one knows how common this is. I've heard of similar things on here.

Shade
Be careful out there.
____________________
If you like this post, rate it!
Karma is there for a reason.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

NickD
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:33 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

DaFrostyOne wrote:
surely the biker was a bit retarded for overtaking at that point. unless i missed something obvious like the car didnt indicate Razz


The biker was overtaking where there was the possibility of the car turning right, so whether the car was indicating or not the biker was at fault. (but in the ad you could hear the sound of the indicator)
____________________
I was only doing what it said on my licence officer....
Tear along the dotted line!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

hustler
Crazy Courier



Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:34 - 30 Aug 2004    Post subject: Reply with quote

Middle aged (nearly Wink ), fast bike, DAS'd just over a year ago, clearly I'm a statistic waiting to happen - am I worried? No.

There will always be something (someone) that causes accidents and there will always be some figures backing the latest slant on things - as long as they don't interrupt my nice sunday ride and I can arrive home put my my feet up on the arm chair with smoking jacket, slippers and my pipe.
____________________
As I said to that guy with the crutches and full camouflage gear, you can hide but you can't run.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 21 years, 72 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 1.35 - MySQL Queries: 16 - Page Size: 150.4 Kb