Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


VTR Firestorm ..... any good?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Nick 50
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:09 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: VTR Firestorm ..... any good? Reply with quote

Got chatting to a fellow biker at Uni this morning. He was asking what big bike I was looking at after passing my test. I said ideally I would like a CBR600f.

He suggested a VTR Firestorm might be a good cheaper alternative. I looked at bit bemused at the idea of a 1000cc bike as a 1st big bike. He said it is same insurance group and less HP and Top Speed of a CBR but still a honda. Turns out he was right.


I know mpg is way down due to the engine size and being a V-twin but there is 2001 models going around the £2k mark which is a fair bit cheaper than I have seen CBR6's going for of the same age and mileage.

So are they any good? And am I being a bit foolish even considering it as a 1st bike??
____________________
Current Bikes: ZX7r 97 (Black Beauty), VFR400 NC24 (The banana)
Previous Bikes: Aprilia Tuono 03 (The Beast), CBR600f (97)
First bike: A GZ125 Lemon.......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nexus Icon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:14 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

They sound great and the late 2001 machines had a bigger tank.

That's about all I know I'm afraid.
____________________
Greetings from Shitsville!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:15 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not bad as a first bike.

They're heavy, not that quick, the suspension's a bit crap and they lack ground clearance. Rubbish on fuel too.

I think a CBR6 is a better all round bike, depends what you want it for really. The Firestorm's a bit of a relic in comparison to a CBR600F of similar vintage.

This makes it sound like I'm slating then, when that's not really my intention. They aren't bad bikes, just that the CBR600F's a better bike in every way IMO.

If it's a first bike why not consider a Honda Hornet as an alternative. Same engine as the CBR600F ( just a few different parts to bring the power down a touch), no expensive fairings to worry about and big wide bars so it's easier to hustle.

All of them are decent enough first bikes, just the CBR and Hornet are "easier" for someone inexperienced to get along with. Thumbs Up
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

salty21
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:16 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

pretty sure you could get a decent firestorm for £1000-£1500. There were loads going for about that when i was looking a year or two ago. dont see any reason not to go for one over a 600 if it works out cheaper. The firestorm would probably be just as suitable to a new rider in my opinion but be prepared for shocking fuel economy Laughing
____________________
04 NSR 125(sold) Sad ---- 03 CBR 600rr(sold)Sad Smile ----90 pan euro ST1100 'Shocked' ----02 CG 125 Smile
94 CB400 Super Four ---- 2000 VTR SP1 (sold) ---- 08 ninja p8f(sold, meh) ----05 CBR600rr Smile
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bridlad
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 29 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:23 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had one 10 or 12 years ago and I loved it ,grunty pick their feet up well,decent top end,good build quality,easy to work on and a little bit different to the usual sports bikes ,yeh was a bit thirsty but I dont ride a bike to woorie about the fuel it uses,I ran it for 2 years only got rid because my old shoulders and wrists didnt like it,Ive now got an sv1000n a similar beast tbh ,try and blag a go on one and I bet you anything it will leave grinning like a self abusing ape Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:44 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you were closer and insured for other bikes I'd let you have a test ride.

In before G tells you its a V2 bike and therefore shite (see sig)Laughing

I've had my Storm for 18 months now and I honestly cant see me getting rid of it. If it dies a death and no longer cost effective to fix I'll probably get another one. They have the plus and negs like all bikes and I'll do my best.

Positives:
Handle great for new riders, very forgiving.
Deceptivly quick with the low revving engine, you could be sitting at 70 thinking your doing 40.
Great torque
Comfortable riding position in comparison to a sports bike. Its slightly more upright but still feels sporty.
They have character, they hiccup, burble and fart their way along.
They sound like the devil and his horsemen with after market cans and even standard cans they sound great.

Negs:
Budget bikes and sometimes it shows.
Not as powerful as a modern 600IL4
Not the prettiest of bikes around but you either love them or loath them.
Thirsty with an average of 35mpg.
Suspension, some people find it a bit soft but easy fixed by uprating the springs.


And the biggest neg is the pre 2001 models have a 16L tank which only gives you between 75 - 90 before the little light comes on telling you to feed the beastie.

One thing I have noticed with Storms is they grow on you, if you get on with them and like them then you do end up loving them and in another forum dedicated to the VTR there are many members who have sold theirs only to find themselves back on the Storm or members that have owned their bikes for many years and still love it as much as they did at the start.

For me. (sorry G I cant help it buddy). I love the power delivery, what it lacks in top end (145 ish) it more than makes up for in grunt and personality. It was my second big bike having owned an old GSXR for 6 months before buying the Storm and I love the thing. It always brings a smile when you open it up and the gentle whirring of the engine gets replaced by the clatter of the exhaust.

Edit: It is cheap on insurance, mine comes in at 97 a year TPFT and theres always parts on Ebay.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

jjdugen
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:21 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Probably the worst bike honda have made (IMHO), and Honda have made some royal cock-ups. First thing to kow is that if you havent changed out the cam chain tensioners for manuals, you are riding a grenade with the pin pulled. Acess to anything you actually need to get to on the engine is poor. Fuel consumption is BAD, compounded by the stupid small tanks (either version), you spend more time looking for a fill-up than you do riding the thing.
Power delivery is typical big V, lurchy, lumpy, a pain in traffic and semi lethal on greasy roudabouts.
To add to the fun, many of them have an inherant clutch grab problem, you think you are slipping the clutch at take-off, and the thing locks solid. Great for unintentional wheelies, but not good for the state of your underpants.

These things are cheap, for a reason, they are crap. (Built one up after the CCT failed, tried to ride it, gave up in disgust).
____________________
The CBR900RR has been sold. Aprilia Falco worms its way into my heart.
Try Soi 23 on Amazon for a good read.... Self promotion? Moi?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Blau Zedong This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

400bandit
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Dec 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:37 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd have to agree with Pinky, I loved mine. Like yourself, I was young when I had it (20) but found it to be cheap to insure. I know people will tell you they are slow etc etc, I thought it was far from slow.

If nothing else, it's worth paying 1500 quick just for the sound track!

Go for it.

Joe
____________________
Current Bikes 650 Honda Bros, VTR1000 Firestorm // Past Bikes: Sachs Madass 50/110cc - Bandit 400 - FZR750
(+ a XS650 in lots of pieces in my garage and other places...)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:50 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seeing that he got here first, I'll present a more reasonable view:
pinkyfloyd wrote:

Negatives:
Don't handle that great.
Deceptively quick with the low revving engine, you could be sitting at 70 thinking your doing 40.
Great (range of) torque
Riding position in comparison to a sports bike. Its slightly more upright but still feels sporty.
They lack character.
They sound like the devil and his horsemen on the toilet with after market cans and even standard cans they sound great dull and monotone.

More negs:
Budget bikes and sometimes it shows.
Not as powerful as a modern 600IL4
Not the prettiest of bikes around but you either love them or loath them.
Thirsty with an average of 35mpg.
Suspension, some people find it a bit soft but easy fixed by uprating the springs.


It does depend what you want - if you want to go quickly without feeling it and aren't that worried about really pushing corners etc, they're a good choice.

If you prefer a bike that you have to work to get your rewards, less good. Similar if you like an exhaust that sounds like it's doing something, rather than a tractor Wink.

I'd expect a few more horses than a CBR600F and a load more in the midrange.

I suspect it's equivalent to a modern litre bike in first gear, it's just where you've got to change up on the VTR, the litre bike still has another 25mph to go, where the engine continues to build power.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:03 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

And G smells of wee!Laughing
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:13 - 11 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinkyfloyd wrote:
And G smells of wee!Laughing

Well, a firestorm certainly won't make you pee yourself from excitement, so you're safe there Wink.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:33 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjdugen wrote:
Probably the worst bike honda have made (IMHO), and Honda have made some royal cock-ups. First thing to kow is that if you havent changed out the cam chain tensioners for manuals, you are riding a grenade with the pin pulled.


As it turns out many Honda's of the same years had the CCT issue, The VFR, arguably one of the best bikes Honda made, had the same issue.

jjdugen wrote:
Acess to anything you actually need to get to on the engine is poor.


I disagree, its no poorer than any other bike, you need to remove the tank and carbs to get to the engine block, just like on many bikes.

jjdugen wrote:
Fuel consumption is BAD, compounded by the stupid small tanks (either version), you spend more time looking for a fill-up than you do riding the thing.
Part True, Fuel consumption is around average for a 1000cc bike and the tank is piss poor small but you dont spend more time looking for a fill up. I spend my time enjoying my ride, I only start looking for a fill up when I get to around 75 miles. On the plus side, a long ride out feels less cramped as you have had to jump off and stretch your legs more often than a bigger tanked engine. You may arrive later but you do not arrive knackered from the cramped riding position. Wink

jjdugen wrote:
Power delivery is typical big V, lurchy, lumpy, a pain in traffic and semi lethal on greasy roudabouts.
To add to the fun, many of them have an inherant clutch grab problem, you think you are slipping the clutch at take-off, and the thing locks solid. Great for unintentional wheelies, but not good for the state of your underpants.


Complete tosh and piffle. I ride my bike to work and its as comfortable at 30mph as it is at 80mph. Its called being in the correct gear for the speed. As for the clutch grab, once in a blue moon the clutch lurches but with it being a hydraulic clutch it does take a little getting used to. On the plus side to that is you dont go though countless clutch cables from riding the clutch at slow traffic speeds.

jjdugen wrote:
These things are cheap, for a reason, they are crap. (Built one up after the CCT failed, tried to ride it, gave up in disgust).


You must have rebuilt it wrong then.

V Twins are marmite bikes, you either love them or hate them. If you cant get on with them, and not everyone can, you tend to feel like the poor bugger above. Just because he couldnt get along with the bike does not mean its a crap bike. It just means he couldnt ride the bike. Thousands of VTR's were made and sold and thousands are still on the road today. I've passed many of them myself when being out and about either on the bike, or on foot. Theres a dedicated following of people who love these bikes and tend to stick with them. Many people change their bikes every year or 2 while many keep the Storm for many years, there must be a reason for that.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:47 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjdugen wrote:
Probably the worst bike honda have made (IMHO), and Honda have made some royal cock-ups. First thing to kow is that if you havent changed out the cam chain tensioners for manuals, you are riding a grenade with the pin pulled. Acess to anything you actually need to get to on the engine is poor. Fuel consumption is BAD, compounded by the stupid small tanks (either version), you spend more time looking for a fill-up than you do riding the thing.
Power delivery is typical big V, lurchy, lumpy, a pain in traffic and semi lethal on greasy roudabouts.
To add to the fun, many of them have an inherant clutch grab problem, you think you are slipping the clutch at take-off, and the thing locks solid. Great for unintentional wheelies, but not good for the state of your underpants.

These things are cheap, for a reason, they are crap. (Built one up after the CCT failed, tried to ride it, gave up in disgust).


Oh well, more good bikes for us people with taste then I guess!!! Smile
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:55 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinkyfloyd wrote:

As it turns out many Honda's of the same years had the CCT issue, The VFR, arguably one of the best bikes Honda made, had the same issue. .


Err... the VFR is gear driven cam.

jjdugen wrote:
Probably the worst bike honda have made (IMHO), and Honda have made some royal cock-ups.


Saying that a Firestorm is a worse bike than, say a VF500, VF750 or a Deauville is doing it a disservice IMO. Its not as iconic as, say a CBR, but it is still a Honda and it is still quirky. As a rule Honda don't make quirky bikes... however the Firestorm is the one Honda I would consider owning. Its still more reliable than an average Buell, more quirky than a CBR600 and more comfy than most sportsbikes.

jjdugen wrote:
First thing to kow is that if you havent changed out the cam chain tensioners for manuals, you are riding a grenade with the pin pulled.


The above quote is total and utter nonsense jibberish. It just is.

Cam chain tensioners are weak on the 'storm, but they aren't any worse than the weaknesses of many other Hondas. If the bike starts to rattle, you address the Camchain tensioner. It's an easy fix and as long as your aware of it, you'll never find it to be a major problem. If the cam chain tensioner doesn't work, then the bike rattles. The cam chain shouldn't jump any teeth on the cam gear unless you really leave it for ages, and even then I'd say it was pretty unlikely. In fact, you're more likely to encounter an issue with poorly set up manual camchain tensioners than a new OE Honda item.

Lots of nonsense spouted in this thread, as seems to be the norm on this forum these days.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:40 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marjay, the VFR Vtec has issues with CCT rattle but then a quick google shows people have experienced the same issues with CBR Fireblades, CBR600's CBF's Blackbirds and I am sure I could find more.

Ultimately you could throw scare monger stories about many Honda's of the same years. Reg/Rec issues being another one Honda screwed up on. They would overheat and burn out causing the battery to fry but again it was not confined to the VTR but it was across the whole Honda range.

The CCT issue that affected several bikes became an issue because they would let go, it is an issue that the VTR owners seem more aware of because of the lay out of the engine, the front CCT is in a position that does not make it easy for the oil to get up there and would let go under heavy throttle release. As a result many changed perfectly fine CCT's for manual ones as a precaution. (better to have a condom and not need it than need one and not have it)

With many bike companies there are issues in certain models should it be Ducati and their famous electrical failures, Suzuki with their Rotary suspension on their TLS. I'm sure if you dig around you could find many bike models with issues to watch out for. It happens. But still does not make the bike a bad bike.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:31 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinkyfloyd wrote:
Marjay, the VFR Vtec has issues with CCT rattle but then a quick google shows people have experienced the same issues with CBR Fireblades, CBR600's CBF's Blackbirds and I am sure I could find more.


Yeah but the VFR was about the worst example as it was made to be gear driven cam in order to overcome Honda's inherent camchain issues. The VTEC was not arguably one of the best bikes Honda ever made. The 750 and the 800 might be, but the VTEC no. I was not aware that the VTEC was chain driven cam.

pinkyfloyd wrote:
Ultimately you could throw scare monger stories about many Honda's of the same years. Reg/Rec issues being another one Honda screwed up on. They would overheat and burn out causing the battery to fry but again it was not confined to the VTR but it was across the whole Honda range.


Of course... Both of my Buell's were perfectly reliable... go figure.

pinkyfloyd wrote:

The CCT issue that affected several bikes became an issue because they would let go, it is an issue that the VTR owners seem more aware of because of the lay out of the engine, the front CCT is in a position that does not make it easy for the oil to get up there and would let go under heavy throttle release. As a result many changed perfectly fine CCT's for manual ones as a precaution. (better to have a condom and not need it than need one and not have it)
I've never heard of one let go... I'm not an expert, but I'm certain its rare. If it was common, Honda would have lost face in the same way they did with the VF750 of the early eighties...

pinkyfloyd wrote:

With many bike companies there are issues in certain models should it be Ducati and their famous electrical failures, Suzuki with their Rotary suspension on their TLS. I'm sure if you dig around you could find many bike models with issues to watch out for. It happens. But still does not make the bike a bad bike.


Agreed.
Suzuki: Corrosion
Kawasaki: Head gasket failure etc etc.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:07 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marjay, I'm on the VTR forum and there is a few that have posted that they let go on them. But then my bike has done 32K miles and still on the originals. That said they'll probably pack in now I have mentioned them.

To the OP. If you want your first big bike to be a 1L bike but still as practical, easy to ride, forgiving for new riders, and reliable as a Honda then the Firestorm is a hoot to ride. Check the reviews, everyone from MCN to the every day joe all claim it is a great fun bike.

A few review sites to give you some unbiased info.

https://www.visordown.com/road-tests-used/used-review-honda-vtr-firestorm/4309.html

https://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/bikereviews/searchresults/Bike-Reviews/Honda/HONDA-VTR1000F-FIRESTORM-1997--2005/

https://www.bikez.com/bike/show_review.php?review=376

Even the Americans loved it.

https://www.motorsports-network.com/honda/vtrtest8/vtrtest.htm

Personally I think they are a seriously underated bike. People often bypass them for the more powerful TLR Suzuki or the Honda SP and even the Ducati's but the Storm is a great little bike that has done everything I have asked of it and more.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

jjdugen
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:19 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I usually let the comments made about my posts go, I've said my piece, up to whoever to take note or ignore.
But in the case of the 'srorm, I do have to reply.
I am no starnger to all types of macine and manufacturers, I buy up the fails on E-Bay and turn them back into good runners. I have also been riding and repairing bikes since the mid 60's, so I know a bit about 'character' bikes. The Firestorm has a disatrous fail rate on its CCT's, for Gods sake, just read the dedicated forums.
These do not 'rattle' a bit, they just GO! Result is bent valves if you are lucky, damaged piston, scoured bores if you are not.
You can get to the top of the carbs easily enough, thats not the important bit, to get to the (all important) air screws you have to have the dexterity and hands of a four year old. (I found an easy way to gain access after a monumental struggle, but thats for me to know).
As for the pitiful fuel range, riding for 70 miles before looking for a fill? Now that IS utter tosh and idiotic on a road machine.
The clutch grab thing is common and downright dangerous (once again, just scan the relavant forums, I dont tell porky pies). After a few instances of this happening to me I did think I had assembled the engine incorrectly.... I hadn't, Honda did.
Look at the average selling price for one of these horrors (E-Bay). Roughly £1200. A comparable CBR6 is anything from 1600 upwards, 'nough said.
Please, as a newish rider, save your money for something not so badly flawed.
____________________
The CBR900RR has been sold. Aprilia Falco worms its way into my heart.
Try Soi 23 on Amazon for a good read.... Self promotion? Moi?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:22 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjdugen wrote:
As for the pitiful fuel range, riding for 70 miles before looking for a fill? Now that IS utter tosh and idiotic on a road machine.


My little 140 has the range of about 20 miles.. Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wave2k
G's Stalker



Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:08 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

IL4s are better at low speeds i find, as V-twins can get snatchy.

Dont look a graphs and bhp readings when buying a bike, a V-twin will have alot more useable road power then an IL4

Not sure if this is the same a firestorm as i havent ridden one, but its the same for the Sp1.

Simple tart factor is they sound better, deeper and more ballsey rather than 10,000 bees locked away in a small tin can like an IL4 does.
____________________
Ducati 1299 Panigale
2009 Corvette C6 z51
RS125->CBR400->RXS100->GSXR750K2->Ducati749S->CBR600RR5->TL1000R->DRz400->RSVR1000->Honda VTR SP1->CBR400->GSXR1000K6->Honda H100->CBR600RR3->Ducati1299
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:24 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjdugen wrote:
I usually let the comments made about my posts go, I've said my piece, up to whoever to take note or ignore.
But in the case of the 'srorm, I do have to reply.
I am no starnger to all types of macine and manufacturers, I buy up the fails on E-Bay and turn them back into good runners. I have also been riding and repairing bikes since the mid 60's, so I know a bit about 'character' bikes. The Firestorm has a disatrous fail rate on its CCT's, for Gods sake, just read the dedicated forums.
These do not 'rattle' a bit, they just GO! Result is bent valves if you are lucky, damaged piston, scoured bores if you are not.
You can get to the top of the carbs easily enough, thats not the important bit, to get to the (all important) air screws you have to have the dexterity and hands of a four year old. (I found an easy way to gain access after a monumental struggle, but thats for me to know).
As for the pitiful fuel range, riding for 70 miles before looking for a fill? Now that IS utter tosh and idiotic on a road machine.
The clutch grab thing is common and downright dangerous (once again, just scan the relavant forums, I dont tell porky pies). After a few instances of this happening to me I did think I had assembled the engine incorrectly.... I hadn't, Honda did.
Look at the average selling price for one of these horrors (E-Bay). Roughly £1200. A comparable CBR6 is anything from 1600 upwards, 'nough said.
Please, as a newish rider, save your money for something not so badly flawed.


Are they really that bad? TUG has one and he hasn't mentioned many problems.
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:10 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Dont look a graphs and bhp readings when buying a bike, a V-twin will have alot more useable road power then an IL4

Depends on the in line 4. If you're talking a 600cc bike, sure.
But for most litre bikes, they'll probably be at least as good - with longer gears adding to 'usability'. If you lowered the gearing to firestorm levels, they'd have masses more low down grunt.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nick 50
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:44 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for all the replies.

Seems to have sparked quite a few opposing views on the Storm. Seems a bit of a marmite (either you'll love or hate it) bike with added mechanical risk thrown in.

I guess if I want it to be a serious consideration I need to do some homework on the CCT which seems to be its biggest Achilles heel.

Excuse my naivety here, is the CCT issue the actual cam-chain? as in it stretches, becomes loose and jumps a tooth or even snaps? Or is it more a flawed design in the actual tensioner design?
____________________
Current Bikes: ZX7r 97 (Black Beauty), VFR400 NC24 (The banana)
Previous Bikes: Aprilia Tuono 03 (The Beast), CBR600f (97)
First bike: A GZ125 Lemon.......


Last edited by Nick 50 on 19:06 - 12 Apr 2012; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:56 - 12 Apr 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick 50 wrote:
Thanks for all the replies.

Seems to have sparked quite a few opposing views on the Storm. Seems a bit of a marmite (either you'll love or hate it) bike with added mechanical risk thrown in.

I guess if I want it to be a serious consideration I need to do some homework on the CCT which seems to be its biggest Achilles heel.

Excuse my naivety hear, is the CCT issue the actual cam-chain? as in it stretches, becomes loose and jumps a tooth or even snaps? Or is it more a flawed design in the actual tensioner design?


Its the tensioner that gives up. (can give up) You have a PM.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 282 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.16 Sec - Server Load: 0.72 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 154.62 Kb