|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 10:56 - 09 Jul 2012 Post subject: What happened to the old carole nash? |
 |
|
In my second year with carole nash insurance.
last year I started the policy with one bike, added a further 3 at a cost of ~£30 each (admin fee i assume)
This year....
I just bought a NTV650, booked in for mot today so phone to take off a ST1100 Pan European from cover and add a NTV650.
Simple, but how much?
£439
Why I ask? Because it's a courier policy is what i'm told.
So what about adding several bikes last year to my courier policy?
I only paid £430 for the whole policy with 3x pan euros and a 250 scoot on it a couple of months back.
I've left it an hour and called back, spoken to someone sounding more helpful and waiting on a verdict.
Looking like I may be selling an mot ready NTV650 shortly unless they sort their act out. ____________________ Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Snorty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Snorty World Chat Champion

Joined: 13 Oct 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 11:29 - 09 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
There can't be that many underwriters who'll touch courier policies though, so ultimately, they'll just laugh and wish you good luck getting it cheaper elsewhere.  ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Redoko |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Redoko World Chat Champion

Joined: 04 Nov 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:20 - 09 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Carole nash WERE the least hassle. not the cheapest but being able to add multiple bikes for £30-£35 a go made it a good option.
If they have now dumped this idea then at renewal they can stick it up their arse and i'll just go with the cheapest.
Taking out the policy originally took about 20 mins. so far we're 24hrs into changing a bike.
And I've now missed my booked mot slot ____________________ Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| UnspeedySam |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 UnspeedySam World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 Nov 2009 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:41 - 09 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Och no... Not another, We hate '****** Insurance Pricks' thread?
 ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 17:53 - 09 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
It's not another we hate insurance thread.
I've up to now been happy with carole nash, the price overall is good, staff are friendly and seem to know whats on.
It's just yesterday and today it seems they've gone to shit and a simple bike change has confused them somehow.
Maybe it's their 'wrong week'.
They are still better than some of the previous monkeys I've been insured with, although he didn't email the docs as promised but we're getting there slowly.
On a side note, if anyone from carol nash does read this. WHY do i have to run through occupation, mobile, home number , email etc every single time I call AND if i don't have my reference number number with me you find my details using my postcode, then run through security questions which includes 'what is your postcode?' minor stuff but still a niggle.
Forgot to add, had a call at 4pm to say they policy has been amended to add the NTV and remove ST1100. £32.50  ____________________ Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:10 - 09 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Marmalade wrote: | It's not another we hate insurance thread.
I've up to now been happy with carole nash, the price overall is good, staff are friendly and seem to know whats on.
It's just yesterday and today it seems they've gone to shit and a simple bike change has confused them somehow.
Maybe it's their 'wrong week'.
They are still better than some of the previous monkeys I've been insured with, although he didn't email the docs as promised but we're getting there slowly.
On a side note, if anyone from carol nash does read this. WHY do i have to run through occupation, mobile, home number , email etc every single time I call AND if i don't have my reference number number with me you find my details using my postcode, then run through security questions which includes 'what is your postcode?' minor stuff but still a niggle.
Forgot to add, had a call at 4pm to say they policy has been amended to add the NTV and remove ST1100. £32.50  |
They wanted £+600 to insure me on my S1000RR the silly Faggots... ____________________ W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| UnspeedySam |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 UnspeedySam World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 Nov 2009 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dilyan |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dilyan World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Nov 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:08 - 11 Jul 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 07:57 - 23 Aug 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
They are definitely out to piss me off.
Got pulled in south Wales yesterday evening.
No insurance sir, we'll have to detain you for ages while we piss about checking as despite having the docs on your phone (no paper ones as above) we don't believe you.
Hopefully Carole Nash will actually put it on the MID at some point in the near future.  ____________________ Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 09:11 - 23 Aug 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Bad show all round.
| Marmalade wrote: | we'll have to detain you for ages while we piss about checking as despite having the docs on your phone (no paper ones as above) we don't believe you. |
If you fancy chasing that up:
The Motor Vehicles (Electronic Communication of Certificates of Insurance) Order 2010
| MV(ECCI)O 2010 6 wrote: |
(2B) In the case of a certificate transmitted to a person as described in section 147(1A)(a) of this Act, the person is to be treated for the purposes of this section as producing the relevant certificate of insurance if—
(a)using electronic equipment provided by him or made available to him by the constable or examiner, he provides the constable or examiner with electronic access to a copy of the certificate |
See also Pryor vs CC of GMP. The certificate is definitive, not the MID or even what they're told when they contact an insurer.
Their (dis)belief was unreasonable, and ignorance of the law is no excuse.  ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 09:19 - 23 Aug 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Thank you sir.
Wish I'd known that yesterday. Showed the policy, in full as a pdf on my phone and they still just kept on hold to carole nash.
I was a little concerned if it happened at 6pm and they couldn't get clarification if they would impound the bike.
Saved that law file as a pdf and got that on phone now too.
Seen the doc, can I go now?
No!?
Read the law occifer  ____________________ Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 09:23 - 23 Aug 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Marmalade wrote: | ...No insurance sir, we'll have to detain you for ages while we piss about checking as despite having the docs on your phone (no paper ones as above) we don't believe you... |
As I understand it there is an amendment to the Road Traffic Act 1988 for exactly this event.
I know it seems radical and surprising that the governemnt amends the law to bring it at least into the 20th century if not the 21st.
The fact the police are ignoring it appears an issue. Why aren't the police following the law?
See The Motor Vehicles (Electronic Communication of Certificates) Order 2010
| Parliament wrote: | This order may be cited as the Motor Vehicles (Electronic Communication of Certificates of Insurance) Order 2010 and shall come into force on 30th April 2010. |
As amendments to the RTA, Section 6 states... | Section 6 wrote: | Power of constables and vehicle examiners to require production of evidence of insurance
6. In section 165 (power of constables to obtain names and addresses of drivers and others, and to require production of evidence of insurance or security and test certificates), after subsection (2), insert—
“(2A) Subsections (2B) and (2C) below apply where a certificate of insurance is treated as having been delivered to a person under section 147(1) of this Act by virtue of section 147(1A) of this Act.
(2B) In the case of a certificate transmitted to a person as described in section 147(1A)(a) of this Act, the person is to be treated for the purposes of this section as producing the relevant certificate of insurance if—
(a)using electronic equipment provided by him or made available to him by the constable or examiner, he provides the constable or examiner with electronic access to a copy of the certificate, or
(b)he produces a legible printed copy of the certificate.
(2C) In the case of a certificate made available to a person as described in section 147(1A)(b) of this Act, the person is to be treated for the purposes of this section as producing the relevant certificate of insurance if—
(a)using electronic equipment provided by him or made available to him by the constable or examiner, he provides the constable or examiner with electronic access on the website in question to a copy of the certificate, or
(b)he produces a legible printed copy of the certificate.
(2D) Nothing in subsection (2B) or (2C) above requires a constable or examiner to provide a person with electronic equipment for the purpose of compliance with a requirement imposed on the person by this section.”.
|
So you have an electronic copy of the certificate, you show it to the police and that should be treated the same as showing them a paper version (although the paper one would have to be an original ).
Appears the police do not recognise the new legislation.
<damn beaten to the punch by my slow cut and paste skills > ____________________ ...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 10:48 - 23 Aug 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Come on then.
Who is good at getting the relevant facts down in a letter that i can email off?
I make myself sound (in my mind) like a ranting idiot when I do it myself.
It was 16:45 ish on 22/8 at B4591, Chartist Drive, Rogerstone
https://goo.gl/maps/RxQJL ____________________ Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| bikertomm |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 bikertomm World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Marmalade |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marmalade World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:02 - 23 Aug 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
I was thinking more along the lines of saying how disappoint I am at their lack of compliance with the updated law and still detaining me for an inappropriate amount of time despite showing the officers legally acceptable documentation as to my insurance cover.
Plus that they should advise their officers on this law as it is such commonplace that people are pulled up for no insurance and the risk of them not knowing can wrongly result in loss of use of a perfectly road legal vehicle with no recompense to the deprived person due to officers not knowing the law. ____________________ Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:04 - 23 Aug 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
(Need some [editorial] work)
[email protected]
Dear [PSD goons],
I write to inform you that I was unreasonably and in my opinion unlawfully detained by two South Wales Police officers.
The incident occurred around 16:45 on 22/8/012 on the B4591, Chartist Drive, Rogerstone while I was riding my blah blah motorcycle registration number [FUK P1G5]. [One|Two] uniformed constable(s) directed me to stop and then informed me that my vehicle was not showing as being registered on the Motor Insurance Database.
I [was|was not] issued the required warning that unless I provided evidence that the vehicle was insured then it would be seized. (Road Traffic Act 1988 Section 165A (6) (a)).
I immediately showed the constable(s) my valid certificate of insurance on electronic equipment provided by myself, fully satisfying Road Traffic Act 1988 Section 165 (2B).
However, the constable(s) chose not to believe the validity of the certificate. They gave no grounds for this decision. Instead, they spent some considerable time telephoning my insurers to ask if the vehicle was insured. This prevented me from going about my lawful business. Their actions were unnecessary, unreasonable and wrong.
Having provided the required certificate in a proscribed form, the constable(s) had no grounds to proceed any further. Even had they been unable to contact my insurer, or even had my insurer told them (in error) that the vehicle was not insured, it would have been wrong, and actionably so, for them to have seized it.
I draw your attention to Road Traffic Act 1988 165A (3) (b), "(b)the person fails to produce such evidence [of insurance], and".
This issue has been settled in the Court of Appeal, by Pryor v The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police[1] in which it was held that:
"Thus condition 165A(3)(b) was not satisfied. [The driver] did not fail to produce what was required. The police constables' belief, misled as they may have been by some person within [the insurer] that [the driver was not insured] was flatly contradicted by the plain words of the certificate: the police constable's belief, no doubt honestly held, that the certificate did not mean what it said is neither here nor there. Having failed to satisfy condition (3)(b) of section 165A , we simply do not get to section 165A(c) [...] It all seems to me as plain as a pikestaff. The police have failed to establish grounds for their seizure of the Honda. The defendant has in those circumstances wrongly interfered with the claimant's goods. The appeal must be allowed and judgment entered for the claimant with damages to be assessed."
While I accept that the constable(s) acted in good faith based on their understanding of the law, their understanding is wrong or out of date, and ignorance is not an excuse.
I would like to be assured that the constable(s) in question are given words of advice and South Wales Police policy and training is updated to comply with the relevant statute and case law.
Yours irately,
Marmalade.
[1]
Mr David Ashley Pryor v The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police
Case No: B2/2010/2057
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
30 June 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 749
2011 WL 933890 ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| LordShaftesbu... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 LordShaftesbu... World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Sep 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 317 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|