|
Author |
Message |
TheInternet |
This post is not being displayed .
|
TheInternet Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 14 Dec 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Azoth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Azoth Brolly Dolly
Joined: 07 Jul 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
NJD |
This post is not being displayed .
|
NJD World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Mar 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Fizzoid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Fizzoid World Chat Champion
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Fizzoid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Fizzoid World Chat Champion
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 12:00 - 15 Nov 2016 Post subject: |
|
|
To be fair, if you see a bike actually riding around during the day in a city it's more likely to have L plates and a big giant box on it. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha |
This post is not being displayed .
|
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Nov 2012 Karma :
|
Posted: 16:00 - 15 Nov 2016 Post subject: Re: Should I start with 125cc? Or straight to bigger bikes? |
|
|
en_garde wrote: | Hi all
I tried my friend's bike and decided I want to get one too. I'm 24 so I can sit the test for A directly.
Obviously biking is known as somewhat risky - so my question is - should I start with a 125cc on L plates or sit my A test and get a bigger bike straight away?
Would like to hear the arguments.
If you recommend 125cc - would you say around £2000 is a reasonable price for a starter?
Thanks! |
Before answering I'd need to know what the bike will primarily be used for. If 90% of its miles will be urban - i.e. commuting type riding - I'd say a 125 will be fine, if well-ridden. I can make slightly better progress on a 500 than many 125s - but that's primarily because they're ridden by numpties who aren't planning far enough ahead. By contrast, one rider I often encounter in town favours something like a 250 Serow. He's an absolute master of "slow to flow" and will coast up to and through lights, making up 95% of the ground lost to those riders who treat traffic signals like a moto GP.
But if most of your miles will be fun miles on open roads a 125 *can* be stressful. I personally don't mind it - good rearward observation reveals approaching traffic wanting to pass, north of seventy. Just move over to the left third of your lane and let them come by. Of course, there's no fun in being the slowest thing on the road. But there's even less fun overcooking a bend on a big bike, target fixating on some piece of scenery, then face-planting into it. In my experience, and coming to bikes from cars, they're A LOT more difficult to control. Not surprising since they've only got half the number of wheels, and twice etc. the power to weight. ____________________ "Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is one hundred percent."
Mobylette Type 50 ---> Raleigh Grifter ---> Neval Minsk 125 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Hawkeye1250FA |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Hawkeye1250FA World Chat Champion
Joined: 14 Oct 2016 Karma :
|
Posted: 16:14 - 15 Nov 2016 Post subject: |
|
|
I did:
80
125
400
1200
1250
Still got the last 3 and use them all for different reasons. The 400 is for fun, the bigger bikes are commuters.
The 400 is no use at all long distance
The 1250 is no use in cities
So it depends what you want it for as others have said.
But definitely get your full license - or you don't have a choice. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Azoth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Azoth Brolly Dolly
Joined: 07 Jul 2016 Karma :
|
Posted: 16:26 - 15 Nov 2016 Post subject: Re: Should I start with 125cc? Or straight to bigger bikes? |
|
|
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha wrote: | I personally don't mind it - good rearward observation reveals approaching traffic wanting to pass, north of seventy. Just move over to the left third of your lane and let them come by. Of course, there's no fun in being the slowest thing on the road. But there's even less fun overcooking a bend on a big bike, target fixating on some piece of scenery, then face-planting into it. In my experience, and coming to bikes from cars, they're A LOT more difficult to control. Not surprising since they've only got half the number of wheels, and twice etc. the power to weight. |
Very interesting post. I've been thinking of going back to a smaller bike over the past week or so, and that's part of the reason I've been thinking about this thread. Not going back to a 125, but scaling down to something like a 250. But most of the fun in biking is, for me, done out of town on faster roads. My old 125 was almost unuseable on the same roads I enjoy now, and riding them on a 125 was almost an act of bravery. However, a lot of the advantages of small bikes are completely lost on big bikes. I have to consider, why did I like bikes in the first place? If the roads aren't already 40 years too busy, then it's the purity of 2-wheel motorised fun, seeing new places, breathing the air and smelling and noticing things for the first time. Just a single cylinder, ridden to the rev limiter everywhere without care or abandon. A sort of Royal Enfield experience. That's what's pulling me back to the small bikes world. But I could be making a mistake. ____________________ Safety in numbers |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 16:48 - 15 Nov 2016 Post subject: |
|
|
I'd encourage doing more with less. My Nazi Tractor is a very competent bike and my poor-weather or long-distance choice, but for commuting / shopping / cocking around, I get more active enjoyment out of ragging the Enfield and the Ninja. They're both very decent commuters.
I often want just a bit more from them, but that's rather the point, I'm aware that I'm riding them to the limit of their engines for maximum manpoints. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
sr7492 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
sr7492 L Plate Warrior
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Alpineandy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Alpineandy World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Mar 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
sr7492 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
sr7492 L Plate Warrior
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 7 years, 148 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|