Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Street Epistemology

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:20 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

Londoner2015 wrote:
Somewhat (I am certainly no legal scholar). Are you?

Fairly. Let's stick with that, shall we, so that we're sure that we agree on the basics.

The person who proposes any EU directive, appoints a rapporteur, and drafts the legislation: who are they, and how accountable are they to you, or to any other EU voter?

[Relevant because it speaks to the willing subservience to a self appointed priesthood]
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:46 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Londoner2015 wrote:
Somewhat (I am certainly no legal scholar). Are you?

Fairly. Let's stick with that, shall we, so that we're sure that we agree on the basics.

The person who proposes any EU directive, appoints a rapporteur, and drafts the legislation: who are they, and how accountable are they to you, or to any other EU voter?

[Relevant because it speaks to the willing subservience to a self appointed priesthood]


Oh, so you are one of the millionth Brexiters who can’t answer the question: “what EU law do you want to get rid of, and why?” And who doesn’t comment on all the Brexit lies, like the NHS bus, the “we hold all the cards”, etc. I see. Why am I not surprised? Anyway…

AFAIK most EU legislation starts from a proposal by the Commission, which is a kind of cabinet government, with one member per member state. There are other channels, too (citizens’ initiative and others) but I think they are rarer. A proposal is then reviewed by the EU Parliament (with EMPs elected in each member state) and by the EU Council, which is made up of the prime ministers )or equivalent) of each member state, plus the president of the Council itself (and maybe the president of the EU commission, not sure about that).

I am sure the process is way more complex and there are lots of subtleties, but AFAIK this is how it works in summary. Like I said, I am no legal scholar, so, by all means, please do highlight any material errors or omissions.

How are these institutions accountable to me? Well, my PM is in the Council, which nominates the members of the Commission. And of course I have voted for the European Parliament.

It’s an imperfect, indirect, representative democracy. But then so are all democracies.

I’ll also add that the proportional system used for the European Parliament is much much fairer and more representative than the first-past-the-post used here. What do you think of a system where a party can get 90% of the seats with 55% of the votes? Yet that’s what happened to the SNP with Scottish seats last time (I don’t remember if it was 55-90 or 57-85 or what, but somewhere in that region – you get the gist). Or of a system where your vote may always be wasted and never make a difference? This is precisely what happens if you are a Tory in a Labour stronghold, and viceversa; this happens much less in a proportional system, which doesn’t “waste” as many votes: the votes for tiny parties end up not counting, but the votes for the major parties are not “wasted” like they are here. This is also why first-past-the-post systems lends themselves to manipulation by changing constituency boundaries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering ).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:59 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

Londoner2015 wrote:
AFAIK most EU legislation starts from a proposal by the Commission, which is a kind of cabinet government

Kind of, in the sense that nobody on it has to be elected.


Londoner2015 wrote:
There are other channels, too

Are there? Have any of them every actually been used?


Londoner2015 wrote:
A proposal is then reviewed by the EU Parliament

We may differ on our interpretation of what "reviewed" means. They can suggest changes, but the legislation continues until it reaches the Parliament for a vote. It can't be stopped.

If yes, it passes. If no, it goes through committee again... until it passes.


Londoner2015 wrote:
How are these institutions accountable to me?

That's not the question that I asked though, is it?

All EU diktats originate from a single person.

Without looking it up, who is our Commissioner?

Did you vote for them? Were you asked if you wanted them?

This person has more power over us than our Prime Minister. They have power over the 500 million people (plus illegals) in the EU.

They were never voted for by a single European citizen.


Londoner2015 wrote:
It’s an imperfect, indirect, representative democracy. But then so are all democracies.

The significant difference is that all members of the UK parliament are directly elected, and every piece of legislation is initiated by a directly elected representative.

Even when it's proposed by "the government", it's a parliament of notional peers. Any one of them can initiate legislation, even Quixotically.


Londoner2015 wrote:
the European Parliament is

An irrelevance. It's democracy theatre. It has no power to initiate legislation. It has a foot on the brake, it can gesticulate at the driver, but it does not decide the direction of the EU, only the speed.

That's my objection to the EU. It's not rayguns, it's not even that I don't trust the Hun and the Frogs (although I don't), it's that it's a bureaucracy run by 50,000 unelected, unaccountable, self appointed priests who cannot be removed, or rebuked, and who fear and loathe democracy.

Belief in the EU as some sort of benevolent higher power, set apart from and above the mere electorate, seems to me to be fairly irrational.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:28 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

As for the other channels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Citizens%27_Initiative
Like I wrote, rarely used – which is why I didn’t focus on this point.

The only thing I understand is that you are either unable or unwilling to answer my other points: the NHS bus, the “we hold all the cards” lies, the idiocy of our electoral system which is way more distortive and unfair than that of the European Parliament, etc. But I am not surprised, I understand it’s tough when all the Brexit fantasies are exposed for what they are.

I am however not sure I understand what your point is. Any official who is not directly elected by the people is … what? Illegitimate? I don’t remember voting for the countless council and ministry bureaucrats who have a huge say in all aspects of our lives – do you? For that matter, we do not even directly vote for the PM! In fact, there are many situations where the British PM changes not because “the will of the people” has changed, but because of some backdoor, under-the-table political stabbing internal to the ruling party. Does this make British PMs… what? Illegitimate? Oh, and how about the House of Lords? Did you vote for any of them?

So, let’s see, you have no objection against an electoral system (ours) where 55% of the votes can lead to 90ish% of the seats (SNP in Scotland 2 elections ago), where most votes are wasted and don’t count for anything, where the results are so sensitive to how you design the boundaries of each constituency, where if you are an X supporter in a Y stronghold your vote will always be wasted etc etc, but you have huge objections with the EU legislative system, which is driven by the PMs (or equivalent) of each member states, by the commissioners they appoint, and by democratically elected MEPs.

Oh, and so far we haven’t got into the details of what EU laws are so bad that you can’t wait to get rid of them, nor about what happens in the post-Brexit world.

Oh, and what does that link you posted supposedly mean? Any reasonable person should be very worried by what is happening in Poland and Hungary. Or are you one of those who think that a “mandate from the people” is a blank cheque to do whatever the hell you want? If so, may I humbly remind you of a certain Adolf who did enjoy a fair share of popular support…?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bhinso
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:52 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

lol I think this thread has gone off topic.
But if we are heading down this route, I'd say the main problem with proportional representation is that we'd end up with a lot of Hung Parliaments
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:09 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, right, it’s not like we got 2 hung parliaments out of the last 3 general elections here, right?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:47 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

Londoner2015 wrote:
I am however not sure I understand what your point is.

I'm pretty certain you don't. Perhaps you could pray for enlightenment?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Londoner2015
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:02 - 11 Apr 2018    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately the gods don't listen to my prayers. I have been praying for years to get an answer to the very banal question: "what horrible EU laws will you want to get rid of, and why?". To no avail.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 6 years, 9 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.08 Sec - Server Load: 0.27 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 66.31 Kb