Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Hardtail Converstions... why?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:51 - 21 Oct 2019    Post subject: Hardtail Converstions... why? Reply with quote

I've been following a series on YouTube with a guy who does Bullet hardtail conversions. He's just moved onto a BSA...

Fascinating stuff watching the process but no one's ever mentioned in the videos: why?

Lose some weight and lose some comfort. Surely not as simple as that?!
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:23 - 21 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

It makes no sense; don’t worry about it.

Rigids are awful to ride.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:29 - 21 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very direct riding experience outweighed by haemarrhoids.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bhud
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:16 - 21 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's funny - I've been looking into hardtails myself.

You can get the bike to sit very low, which, depending on the type of bike, can look a lot cooler than with shocks. It's the original form of motorcycle, because originally, all bikes were hardtails. The WW2 BMW R75s are all hardtails, and mechanical works of art. Urals kept that rugged look going for decades afterwards. In most other cases, it was made obsolete by manufacturers moving to rear shocks.

In the case of my currently-in-the-pipeline project, it's (potentially) also a way to deal with a galvanically corroded swingarm pivot bolt which just won't come out no matter what. This is because any bike can be hardtailed by replacing the rear shocks with struts, although the more usual way is to fit an extended welded-on rear frame.

There are mixed reviews on how hardtails ride. In general, people say they ride poorly. Quite a few people say they're really awful to ride, and cause back injuries. A minority say they can be sort of OK, as long as you push down on the pegs and lift off the seat as soon as you see a bump. Very early classic bikes (such as 1930s Indians) had a very carefully sprung (forward and back) and large, very soft, seat, to make up for the rough ride. They also had long rubber stretchy "reins" attached to the end of the handlebars, to let the front end wallow over rough terrain. The idea was probably to let the bike wander and waft around beneath you as you went down a dirt track (roads were bad) in a straight line at about 30-40mph.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:24 - 21 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

It was a big thing with Harleys and other chopped bikes in the 70's/80's but we were hard as nails back then. Whistle (or too young for piles Laughing )

As shown by the film Easyrider where both bikes were hard tails. Maybe they made some sense in the US Thinking The thing was it was copied religiously by chop builders over here.

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/2016/06/15/NJGroup/AsburyPark/636016017005608148-Easy-Rider-image-01.jpg?width=1080&quality=50
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:24 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm starting to appreciate the beauty of them - something to be said for the simplicity of construction.

However, the closest I've come to "hardtails" is mountain bikes and you never want to go back once you've had a go on a decent rear suspension system, a saddle can only do so much!
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:33 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot 'old' bikes from before the 1950's had no rear suspension, cops it was easier & cheaper to build that way and before the Girling gas/oil damper, suspension was crude anyways.

These 'old' bikes were the earliest candidates for chopperisation, in the 1950's, cos old, old fashioned and cheap, hence the 'easy-rider' look given to cruisers.

As an aside, the chopper fashion, starting in the USA, started most often with poor unsuspecting Triumphs, BSA's and Enfields etc. as Brit-Bikes were exported over the pond by the bucket-load to help get in $-Cash top repay the war-debt, and UK manufacturers that exported to the US got exemptions on the rationing/ministry of supply restrictions that dogged other industries. Treated with more than a little disdain in the US by existing bike shops, rather like chinky 125's have been here for the last 2 decades; US owners struggled for support to keep these 'imports' running, they looked at UK DI|Y mags.

In the UK the sport of 'Trials' was popular, as the tarmac machine spread tar on most, then un-made gravel or dirt tracks, and 'pool' 2* petrol limited the scope for engine tuning for both factories and amateurs alike. With the lets get together club mentality left behind by WWII and the ideals of consumerism spreading, Motorcycle 'trials' was, like car rallying, an 'every-man motor-sport, the average chap in the street could have a crack at. All you needed was an old army surplus dispatcher bike, strip off the heavy pannier rack, and when they got bent, replace the steel mudguards with some aluminium hammered from a bit of Lancaster bomber wing littering some-one's paddock, and you were on your way to making, a 'Trials Chop', as in a bike for trials with all the unnecessary bits 'chopped off'.

Significant bit is, that as the tarmac spread, the 'roads' used for trials events started to a) dissapear and b) get tamed; leading to the vogue for 'pocket trials' held on short technical sections on folks farms and stuff. This lead to the separation of the sport into what is now 'Enduro', an off-road 'race' and 'observed-section' trials, that is more like the modern sport, at walking pace over obstacles.

But, the 'CHOP'; came about as folk trying to make a standard road bike more competent on the rough started to cut the frames to shorten the wheelbase and steepen the steering angle to make them more nimble 'off-road'.

This was what was described in the magazines that crossed the Atlantic, where the 'mericans did the same thing, but backwards, stretching frames and raking fork-angles to make the high-way cruiser of Easy-Rider renown, and the term 'Chopper' got switched from the builder, who 'choppped' bikes for sport, to the bike itself.


HARD TAILS! The chopper vogue was still fairly strong in the 1970's and 80's, but as a style icon rather than sporting device. Customesers of that era were much more likely to try 'porting' a Japanese two-stroke for more speed, and/or doing something devious like fit a Metamachek swimg arm and mazzoci shocks, or just stick the usually pretty decent Niponese engine from a crashed and bent CB900 or Z1 into a fancy 'Kit' frame like a Harris, Spondon, or Bimota... the 'hard tail' became the tool of the die-hard hells angel type, who could make their own 'rigid' frame in their garage from scaffold pole with a gas-axe, and the virtues of simplicity offered opportunity fore a more successful DIY build.

The expedient of using solid-struts to replace` clapped out twin-shocks, was then a low rent way to go rigid and go 'chopper', on the cheap, and post `1990's UK restrictions on registration and approval, was, and still is, an expedient to create a suspensionless 'chopper', without cutting the actual frame, and running into the SVA restrictions to get a number-plate.

So ways and ways-about... hard-tail, as in no rear suspension, could some, as standard, from old bikes built before practicable hydraulic dampers, or could be from solid strutting a standard twin-shock road bike, OR from constructing a totally rigid replacement frame, with more or less cost/MOT/SVA vexations, but usually to ape US inspired 'Cruiser' looks, rather than for any performance benefit, most hard tail customs shun for that 'look'.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'


Last edited by Teflon-Mike on 00:38 - 22 Oct 2019; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

WD Forte
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:38 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

I reckon thats why they put weeny little fuel tanks on them
so you dont have to/cant ride them far
to give yer farmer giles some relief
____________________
bikers smell of wee
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DUCAUDI
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:01 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is a hardtail another term for a bobber?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ThatDippyTwat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Aug 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:30 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

From a build point of view, hardtails are easier to build. Fewer components mean less cost and complexity than pissing about with rear suspension. You can, if you're good, make a decent frame with rear suspension not look hugely out of place sat next to a hardtail, but it'll cost more and take longer.

It's purely an image thing now and has been since the 70's, there are no practical pro's, and they make your kidneys cry. I certainly struggled to do more than ride one 12 miles to deliver it for a mate who's laid up. Looked lovely, but I was very happy to get on the GL1000 he'd PX'd against the chop and ride that back.

Hardtail is the term for a frame without rear suspension, Bobber is an overall style or aesthetic. A bobber can be a hardtail or a softtail.
____________________
'98 VFR800 (touring) - '12 VFR800 Crosrunner (Commuting) - '01 KDX220 (Big Green Antisocial Machine)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:48 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tuberculosis wrote:
Is a hardtail another term for a bobber?

'Jargon' is so often applied so indiscriminately and inaccurately... It COULD be... but.. more conventionally, 'bob' just means short, like a woman's hair cut 'Bob'. Applied to bikes those early 'Trials Chops' I mentioned were often 'bobbed', to shorten the wheel-base, most usually by cutting out the rear drop-out plate the back-wheel-axle bolts through, and welding it back on an inch or two further forwards on the frame cradle.

Incidentally my own 1981 Montesa Cota competition trials bike had it's wheel-base shortened this way, the forst owner chopping the drop-out plates off the swing arm and welding them back on an inch further forward... took me twenty years to discover that! When former owners son, spotted it on the web, and sent me an e-mail... explaions a few things that duz.. like why drive chains were about five links too long, and why I had a habbit opf looping the fcuker on steep climbs... though that may just be me being crap!

Back sort of on topic though, more conventionally a 'bobber' is when the seat rails have been abbreviated or lopped down, usually just behind the top shock mounts if a T-Shock to avoid any MOT/SVA contention. Done when modding for cruisery style, and a long two person 'duel-seat', thrown away oft for a sprung solo push-bike saddle, again mostly for the aesthetic rather than any practical reasons, especially any performance related ones!

SMALL SIDE NOTE: 'Suspension' is over-rated! Proving the Luddites point in trials, probably 15 years or more ago, I thought I had done pretty good on one event I actually took my 'class' in... only to look more closely at the results, and spot that the chap that had won the 'Rigid' class for suspension-less old dinosaurs, had not done so 'cos he was the only idiot mad enough to try riding something with no springs up a river-bed, BUT he had actually got fewer penalties, not only than me in the T-Shock class, but most folk in the old iron Pre-65 class too! Just to add insult to injury Chap was more than twice my age too! He was in his 70's! And this is 'off-road' where modern bikes sport hyper travel table top landing gear suspension to cope with the bumps, and even modern road bikes owe thanks to earlier Scrambles bikes, heading suspension that way from the '70's on; goes to show how much technique beats technology oh-so-often.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

doggone
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:10 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Solid rear can actually handle better than bouncy old shocks, you don't have it for comfort though.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:35 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, interesting. I could see some advantage with slow, technical stuff but if you're gonna grab air at any point I'd want all the suspension I can get Shocked
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:32 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

doggone wrote:
Solid rear can actually handle better than bouncy old shocks, you don't have it for comfort though.


Well padded seat and big fat rear tyre all help to protect the rear end.

Also assless chaps types always like a good hard ramming up the rear Embarassed
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:44 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy-X wrote:
Hmm, interesting. I could see some advantage with slow, technical stuff but if you're gonna grab air at any point I'd want all the suspension I can get Shocked

The original Shelby/AC Cobra. was an AC Ace with a ford V8 shoe horned in it. The original Ace had all-round-independent-suspension, because basically to build it they took two crashed front wheel drive Fiat tipos, and welded the front ends together with some scaffold pole in the middle; used 'leaf-springs' like the back end of an old Escort.

When Ford decided to up the cubes, and the 'big-block' 427cubic inch engine was being promoted, they went back to Dearborn and the 'New' 417 Cobra got a whole new semi space frame, Coil spring chassis, 'cos even Shelby reckoned that the old buggy-spring frame wouldn't take the torque of the monster motor.

He was actually 'sort' of proved right when they built a 289 Cobra with a big 427 motor to demo it; it did shred tyres, bend it's frame and handle like a pig, so the coil springs and computer designed chassis were born out... ish...

On the Track, drivers actually posted near identical lap-times withe 289's to 427's. One team driver reporting that the 427, though 'fast' would also crash-quick, 'cos when it let go it went anywhere, where when a 289 let go, you could still predict where it was sort of headed and ride the drift.

Like I said Technique over Technology.

In classic scrambles, the matter had been debated my life-time and some, and never, I think ultimately settled.

On the loose, there is a point when the tyres cant grip, and the bike starts to slide. It's then a balancing act between the tyres unhooking and bumps helping them too.

With a Pogo-Stick arrangement, when the tyre breaks, the suspension rebounds and changes the steering geometry, and it can do it very suddenly. If you have a rigid or sort travel suspension, the tyre will 'bump' into a skid sooner, 'b-u-t' it is easier to control the slide .. more aggressive the tyres, so the more pronounced this 'on-limit' unpredictability tends to be..... in scrambles of old and contemporary 'classics', there is a school that shun soft long travel suspension and mega-knobly tyres for this reason, and get results with old T-Shocks or Rigid frame bikes, with very tame block tread or trials tyres... and like that old boy that beat me in trials, that are oft old-boys who more likely break a zimmer frame as a Cheaney one!

It can be very spectacular to watch an old master like that, duel it out on an old Geoff Smith Era BSA 440 Victor, against a similar era Dave Thorpe, Kwak KX440 air-cooled two stroke 'mono'shock.. sounds good the 4-banger against the bumble bee, too!

Yup, you DO have to pity their posteriors, b-u-t, on the dirt you should be 'feet-up' on the pegs, your legs acting as suspension, anyway, and on-the-road IF you are taking air... well you is a crash looking for a place to happen, really!!! It "shouldn't" be an issue!!

Actually something that grates when I see 'lads' out green-laning on KTM's and the like.. trying to balance on a high-wire saddle, convinced that they 'need' 20 inches of suspension or more to ride down a farm track! No, no you don't! but still, their Sunday fantasy, I suppose, no different to the lads on Ninjas trying for knee down up the Cat and Fiddle I guess.
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:50 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

I DO wonder though, where all-up, their bum would have an easier time on something with less suspension, and a seat that spread the load a bit, and absorbed some shocks, rather than taking air on a g-string hoping that a white power will save the piles occasionally!
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'


Last edited by Teflon-Mike on 20:49 - 22 Oct 2019; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

steve the grease
Crazy Courier



Joined: 26 Jan 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:23 - 22 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tuberculosis wrote:
Is a hardtail another term for a bobber?

Not necessarily, a bobber is a bike that as had the original massive deeply valenced mudguards, originally fitted to Harleys and Indians cut down to something far shorter and slimmer. Isn't there a short girls haircut called a 'bob' maybe the name comes from there ( all the extra cut off)? Many American servicemen in the war had ridden smaller lighter British bikes and liked them compared with the slower and larger Yankee bikes. Some ex- servicemen tried lightening their own bikes back at home, chopping away the excess weight , result, a chopper or a bobber . Someone fitted a pair of Telescopic forks to a Harley/ Indian to replace the heavy springer or leaf sprung american forks. As the american bikes were so low the forks were short and fitting British forks which were several inches longer introduced the idea of extended forks. OK forget the dog , but the picture shows , what for me is a classic bobbed mudguard, you can see the heavy valencing and flared end , but it has been turned round to expose loads more of the rear tyre.
picture is from an old Easyrider magazine
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:12 - 23 Oct 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always thought of a "bobber" as being a hardtail custom/chop WITHOUT raked out/over-standard forks.

Why a bobber? Pull on the brake/wind off the throttle and find out.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 4 years, 180 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.56 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 117.76 Kb