|
Author |
Message |
TravisBickle |
This post is not being displayed .
|
TravisBickle Formerly known as DUCAUDI
Joined: 17 May 2019 Karma :
|
Posted: 20:08 - 15 Mar 2021 Post subject: Pushing motorcycle on pavement |
|
|
I was right behind this guy until right at the end when he pulled the race card with "racist little pricks".
Also can't stand the use of the word "arks". Go back to school. Retards.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjVCQNoYBms ____________________ 2007 Yamaha FZ1 S Fazer
2021 Honda CMX500 Rebel S
2016 Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Skudd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Skudd Super Spammer
Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
TravisBickle |
This post is not being displayed .
|
TravisBickle Formerly known as DUCAUDI
Joined: 17 May 2019 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rebel |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
Rebel Banned
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
F18 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
F18 Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 04 Mar 2019 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
MCN Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 10:50 - 17 Mar 2021 Post subject: |
|
|
Karen the Biker.
Road Blocks? Inconvenient but just ride around.
Plan your route.
If you canny too the maths get a bus.
Should have been pinned to the ground and removed using anti-terrorism act laws. ____________________ Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
arry |
This post is not being displayed .
|
arry Super Spammer
Joined: 03 Jan 2009 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Fat Angry Scotsman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Fat Angry Scotsman World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 Jan 2021 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
F18 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
F18 Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 04 Mar 2019 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rebel |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
Rebel Banned
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Easy-X |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Easy-X Super Spammer
Joined: 08 Mar 2019 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
MCN Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
pepperami |
This post is not being displayed .
|
pepperami Super Spammer
Joined: 17 Jan 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Islander |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Islander World Chat Champion
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Fat Angry Scotsman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Fat Angry Scotsman World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 Jan 2021 Karma :
|
Posted: 11:22 - 18 Mar 2021 Post subject: |
|
|
MCN wrote: | Ccoz the law is there to protect pedestrians.
The roads are there to provide routes for motor vehicles.
What part of the equation are you struggling with?
I think parts of the pavement in the video are narrow and with the railings the bike and rider present a broad encumberance to pedestrians.
If I had to slow down to let some prick with a motorbike pass me on a constricted pavement (when I'm just trying to get to wherever I'm going) I'd be pissed.
It's the 21st century not medieval London.
Get a recovery contract and maintain your vehicle properly.
Harsh but fair for pedestrians. We were here first.. And some of us on horseback too. |
Personally I think it's a load of bollocks. What's the difference in encumbrance between a guy wheeling a motorbike down a path and someone pushing a trolley, buggy, double-wide pram, etc? One has an engine and the rest don't? The other uses of the path have any more validity than the other?
My opinion only, but in my eyes the purpose and function of the path is the expedited conveyance of people and materiel (regardless of what constitutes that materiel, so long as it is physically possible to convey it) between two points. Obviously it is not a road for the powered conveyance of people and materiel, but pushing something across it is fair game to me.
Using your example where you would be upset at someone doing this if you were heading down the path: I wouldn't. I have no God-given right of use of the path over-and-above the other person. Equally: they have no God-given right of its' use either. We would simply compromise where one would move and let the other pass as it is no great inconvenience in the totality of the day. ____________________ PRESENT: 2018 BMW S1000XR SE Sport.
PAST: 2009 Kawasaki ER-6F. 2021 Zontes ZT-125U.
Last edited by Fat Angry Scotsman on 11:31 - 18 Mar 2021; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
doggone |
This post is not being displayed .
|
doggone World Chat Champion
Joined: 20 May 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
MCN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
MCN Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Jul 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 13:07 - 18 Mar 2021 Post subject: |
|
|
Fat Angry Scotsman wrote: | MCN wrote: | Ccoz the law is there to protect pedestrians.
The roads are there to provide routes for motor vehicles.
What part of the equation are you struggling with?
I think parts of the pavement in the video are narrow and with the railings the bike and rider present a broad encumberance to pedestrians.
If I had to slow down to let some prick with a motorbike pass me on a constricted pavement (when I'm just trying to get to wherever I'm going) I'd be pissed.
It's the 21st century not medieval London.
Get a recovery contract and maintain your vehicle properly.
Harsh but fair for pedestrians. We were here first.. And some of us on horseback too. |
Personally I think it's a load of bollocks. What's the difference in encumbrance between a guy wheeling a motorbike down a path and someone pushing a trolley, buggy, double-wide pram, etc? One has an engine and the rest don't? The other uses of the path have any more validity than the other?
My opinion only, but in my eyes the purpose and function of the path is the expedited conveyance of people and materiel (regardless of what constitutes that materiel, so long as it is physically possible to convey it) between two points. Obviously it is not a road for the powered conveyance of people and materiel, but pushing something across it is fair game to me.
Using your example where you would be upset at someone doing this if you were heading down the path: I wouldn't. I have no God-given right of use of the path over-and-above the other person. Equally: they have no God-given right of its' use either. We would simply compromise where one would move and let the other pass as it is no great inconvenience in the totality of the day. |
Well we can't exist on laws of our own opinions.
Societies exist and thrive when shared responsibilities and common understanding persists.
The law regarding vehicles on pavements is not obscure, ambiguous or un-fair in any respect.
In my opinion I should be allowed to roam around on motorways, railway tracks and airport runways.
It may appear an entrenched inconvenience to force vehicles to stay on the road but it has also become the norm to inconvenience pedestrians who wish to cross a road via an underpass (urban lavatory) or worse, a fcuking overpass. Arsewholes who put those in place deserve a paddling.
(From one who's pushed a motorbike or three along a pavement. In mitigation, I was able to put it on the road when pedestrians were around.) ____________________ Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Fat Angry Scotsman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Fat Angry Scotsman World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 Jan 2021 Karma :
|
Posted: 13:22 - 18 Mar 2021 Post subject: |
|
|
MCN wrote: | Well we can't exist on laws of our own opinions.
Societies exist and thrive when shared responsibilities and common understanding persists.
The law regarding vehicles on pavements is not obscure, ambiguous or un-fair in any respect.
In my opinion I should be allowed to roam around on motorways, railway tracks and airport runways.
It may appear an entrenched inconvenience to force vehicles to stay on the road but it has also become the norm to inconvenience pedestrians who wish to cross a road via an underpass (urban lavatory) or worse, a fcuking overpass. Arsewholes who put those in place deserve a paddling.
(From one who's pushed a motorbike or three along a pavement. In mitigation, I was able to put it on the road when pedestrians were around.) |
I must admit, I was impressed by the wordsmithing in "It may appear an entrenched inconvenience"
Cap: doffed. Chapeau! ____________________ PRESENT: 2018 BMW S1000XR SE Sport.
PAST: 2009 Kawasaki ER-6F. 2021 Zontes ZT-125U. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Skudd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Skudd Super Spammer
Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Freddyfruitba... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Freddyfruitba... World Chat Champion
Joined: 20 May 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Fat Angry Scotsman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Fat Angry Scotsman World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 Jan 2021 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 3 years, 39 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|