Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


How has she not been shot yet?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

staffo
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 26 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:44 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

CaNsA wrote:
I claim my 5 units of untraceable currency.


If you just put all your details down on this form...
____________________
Daytona 675R Road - 5EB R6 Track sold Sad
15:58:19 Ste: your spelling it worse than a retards.
15:58:23 Ste: *is
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:51 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

staffy50 wrote:
an innocuous search for twin flex wire on amazon


So last month when I was searching for some decent wire to build my vaping mech mod, ordered it then jumped on to the TOR network to grab some magnet links....

What time can I expect my backdoors to be smashed in?

Do you see how idiotic the dragnet method is?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:58 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

CaNsA wrote:
staffy50 wrote:
an innocuous search for twin flex wire on amazon


So last month when I was searching for some decent wire to build my vaping mech mod, ordered it then jumped on to the TOR network to grab some magnet links....

What time can I expect my backdoors to be smashed in?

Do you see how idiotic the dragnet method is?


Paranoia man...you must be hiding something Laughing

You're assuming that they think you've done enough to be considered a risk. But I think it would take more than a few purchases of items that could be used for nefarious purposes before you got the rear entrance treatment I'm beginning to suspect you crave Razz

Sorry, still not convinced.
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:10 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:


I understand what you're saying, but if it could be shown to be absolutely necessary...


It's called a Warrant Laughing
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

staffo
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 26 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:30 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

CaNsA wrote:
staffy50 wrote:
an innocuous search for twin flex wire on amazon


So last month when I was searching for some decent wire to build my vaping mech mod, ordered it then jumped on to the TOR network to grab some magnet links....

What time can I expect my backdoors to be smashed in?

Do you see how idiotic the dragnet method is?


If you use it as the only source, then yes. However if you combine it with other sources, Timmy tout saying you’re attending a bomb making class at your local paddy’s bar, extremist views on MySpace and you’re Irish, it all adds up to paint a clearer intelligence picture.
____________________
Daytona 675R Road - 5EB R6 Track sold Sad
15:58:19 Ste: your spelling it worse than a retards.
15:58:23 Ste: *is
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:31 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
chickenstrip wrote:


I understand what you're saying, but if it could be shown to be absolutely necessary...


It's called a Warrant Laughing


Look, just explain to me what exactly you're afraid of if such powers are introduced; and none of this 'principles' bullshit. My views aren't set in stone, so come on, convince me it's not needed, or it will in some way harm me if it is introduced? I quite accept that I might be missing something, I'm not infallible y'know Laughing

You say "that isn't the point" - what are you saying the point is?
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:42 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Earlier this year we had a couple of threads knock on the subject of the "Snoopers Charter"

https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=302942
https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=303822

In both threads I said the same thing.

CaNsA wrote:
I think that those who are in favour of, or have no problem with, the snoopers charter should create a thread in random banter.
Each person should:-
Post their location every hour.
Upload their browsing history at the end of each day.
Post the contents of all text messages and emails.
Upload recordings of all incoming and outgoing phonecalls.


Not one single person provided any info what-so-ever.
Why?
Because it's none of my, or anyone else's, fucking business.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:52 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

We have a human right to privacy, a quick think to the sorts of places that do not/did not have these freedoms leads will give you such pleasant places to live as USSR, North Korea, China, places where the state can/could do what they wanted for whatever reason. Can you think of a place where the state/police can invade your life as much as they see fit that is a pleasant place to live? Sorry I didn't clarify I thought it was obviously TBH.

Think of the requirement of a warrant to be a check on the fuzz.

e.g. Dave shacks up with Jane. Jane's ex John, is a copper. John doesn't like this so decides to get his mates to raid Dave's house, many just to irritate him maybe just to plant something and fuck his life up. But if they have to go to a judge first the judge would fuck them off.

I know having unlimited access to our internet records isn't the same as police kicking down doors as and when they feel like it, but (and I hate using this word because it is bandied about by morons.) fascism/totalitarian has to start somewhere, it is also a LOT easier to lose Freedoms than reclaim them, look at all the rules America smashed through on the back of 9/11, now that saga is dead and buried have any been reverted?
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

staffo
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 26 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:06 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
Dave shacks up with Jane. Jane's ex John, is a copper. John doesn't like this so decides to get his mates to raid Dave's house, many just to irritate him maybe just to plant something and fuck his life up. But if they have to go to a judge first the judge would fuck them off.


Bit of a daft example. A local magistrate issues search warrants, so it still would have to go to an external authority. John would be fired if he lied about a warrant.

If a magistrate has to sign off on the police looking at the data, then it would still need a robust justification, like a house search warrant would.

In that form I have no issue with it. And CANSA I'll log all that information, and when you get a warrant I'll show you.

If/When it turns out civilian companies, think FACT (faggots) can use it to produce civil claims, then it’s a huge issue, by which time it may well be too late.
____________________
Daytona 675R Road - 5EB R6 Track sold Sad
15:58:19 Ste: your spelling it worse than a retards.
15:58:23 Ste: *is
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:17 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

staffy50 wrote:
In that form I have no issue with it. And CANSA I'll log all that information, and when you get a warrant I'll show you.


Ok, just provide me with a list of websites you have visited each day.
I don't need the exact webpages that you viewed, I could probably find that out just from the domain name.

A warrant is not required for this information.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:28 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

staffy50 wrote:

Bit of a daft example. A local magistrate issues search warrants, so it still would have to go to an external authority. John would be fired if he lied about a warrant.

If a magistrate has to sign off on the police looking at the data, then it would still need a robust justification, like a house search warrant would.



That's my point...
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

staffo
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 26 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:32 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, totaly missed the fact they don't need a warrant to look. Thats fucking retarded. Thumbs Down

Quote:
They will still need a warrant to see the content of websites that you visit, unless, you know, they just visit one of those links from your browsing history.


Does this mean they will see;

Quote:
www.amazon.co.uk


or

Quote:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=white%20iranian%20twin%20flex


Big difference there.
____________________
Daytona 675R Road - 5EB R6 Track sold Sad
15:58:19 Ste: your spelling it worse than a retards.
15:58:23 Ste: *is
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:33 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:
will in some way harm me if it is introduced?

It's very unlikely to harm you.

However, in the unlikely event that you get into a Failbook spat with some slag and she accuses you of having a struggle-cuddle with her, or of being a nonce, then Dibble will have access to every site that your ISP says that you have visited in the previous year.

Let me stress carefully that they'll look at what your ISP says, and they will look only for the purposes of finding incriminating rather than exculpatory evidence.

They won't care if it was you browsing, or someone else in your household, or if someone has l0lh4xxx3d your wifi - and it does still happen, my inlaws just got hijacked.

They won't care if the information is even remotely correct - say you've moved house during that year - or if they've just been given some other random punter's logs because of ISP incompetence.

Then if they find anything even remotely whiffy in those logs (which may have nothing to do with you) then your door gets put in and at a minimum, even if there's no prosecution, every piece of electronic equipment in your home gets seized and that's the last you see of it in a working form, and you're labelled as a rape-paedo.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. But add some malice and it can get lol-worthy really fast.

Again: the accusation and interest is unlikely, but if it happens, it's likely that something will be found that can be used to mess up your life.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:39 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

staffy50 wrote:
Yeah, totaly missed the fact they don't need a warrant to look. Thats fucking retarded. Thumbs Down


Are you going to provide that info?
Or is it none of my, or anyone else's, fucking business?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

staffo
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 26 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:41 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

CaNsA wrote:
staffy50 wrote:
Yeah, totaly missed the fact they don't need a warrant to look. Thats fucking retarded. Thumbs Down


Are you going to provide that info?
Or is it none of my, or anyone else's, fucking business?


Quote:

Quote:
They will still need a warrant to see the content of websites that you visit, unless, you know, they just visit one of those links from your browsing history.


Does this mean they will see;

Quote:
www.amazon.co.uk


or

Quote:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=white%20iranian%20twin%20flex

____________________
Daytona 675R Road - 5EB R6 Track sold Sad
15:58:19 Ste: your spelling it worse than a retards.
15:58:23 Ste: *is
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

CaNsA
Super Spammer



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:43 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

A list of domains visited will suffice.

Please upload the list to https://www.pastebin.com and ensure it is viewable by the public.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Suntan Sid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:45 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

How has she not been shot yet?

She's one of the lizard people and, therefore, is surrounded by her own personal forcefield!

Resitance is futile! Wink
____________________
"Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!" Cool
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

staffo
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 26 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:52 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rolling Eyes Mr. Green

So you don't know if the police would just have a domain name to search? Or just an IP?

Does sound like it would be in breach of the much loved Human Rights..

Quote:
Any search which is not done lawfully will be in breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act which protects a suspect’s right to respect for his private and family life.


Lawfully requiring a warrant.
____________________
Daytona 675R Road - 5EB R6 Track sold Sad
15:58:19 Ste: your spelling it worse than a retards.
15:58:23 Ste: *is
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:20 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like sex, I have evidence that I have had sex (at least twice), but I don't want to tell everyone when and how I have had sex. It is a double edged sword, not bothered about people knowing that I have sex, but not wanting to give the fine detail. So knowing I look at porntube every now and then isn't an issue, but seeing what my fetish is is.

So where do I sit in all this? I don't know if I fall in the yes or no camp, not because I can't decide, but because I cover both camps with my views.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:20 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

So if we look at the reasons given for wanting this new legislation, they're not sufficient to justify it? Is there a point that is likely to be reached that would? Just prodding the discussion Smile
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

FlightRisk
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 08 Jul 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:46 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi

Do people not learn this stuff in school?

Quote:
One of its main tasks was spying on the population, mainly through a vast network of citizens turned informants, and fighting any opposition by overt and covert measures, including hidden psychological destruction of dissidents.

____________________
Honda CB500S
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ScaredyCat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:38 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:
So if we look at the reasons given for wanting this new legislation, they're not sufficient to justify it? Is there a point that is likely to be reached that would? Just prodding the discussion Smile


I am more concerned about what the government will do than I am about any terrorist attack.

These 'new' terrorists are pretty incompetent. There have, according to Mark Rowley (UK's most senior counter-terrorism police officer), been 50 foiled terror attacks since 7 July 2005.

How many successful attacks in the UK have you heard of?

They've stopped these 50 attacks without all this extra requirement to spy on the populace.

From 2000 to 2001 the IRA carried out more successful bombings than any of these 'new' terrorists.

In the 90's the IRA managed about 24. Why are we suddenly running scared like a load of pussies? The IRA posed a bigger threat, they were organised and capable and we didn't need any of this fake security to help us.

This is not about tracking terrorists, paedos or rapists.

This is why the Tories want rid of the EHCR, because

Quote:
The Human Rights Act which protects a suspect’s right to respect for his private and family life.


is getting in the way of them doing whatever they want.

I'd also wonder if politicians would be subject to this or if they'd try and invoke parliamentary privilege - I mean, how very dare you treat a member of parliament this way..

Oh and it's good that she hasn't been shot because that would give the government the excuse they really need to get this stuff in.


Wonders if there's a Tory plot to kill of May Thinking
____________________
Honda CBF125 ➝ NC700X
Honda CBF125 ↳ Speed Triple
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:15 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

So in summary, if you've tainted your browser history say by clicking on an innocently titled thread called "Last post wins" on a motorcycle website then you could go straight to prison. Thumbs Up

[img]nobcat.jpg[/img]
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Im-a-Ridah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:38 - 02 Nov 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpd72 wrote:
They only get to see the parent domain of the website, not what page you were viewing.
Unless you don't want people seeing that you frequently visit www.midgetsshagginganimals.com , why does this matter?


That's a separate issue. Animal porn and other porn considered "extreme" by the government is illegal and considered similarly to child pornography.

staffy50 wrote:
If all this just stops one terrorist attack would it be worth it? Or helps the police convict a paedo so he stops hurting children?

I can see the benefit. My biggest worry would be how the ISP keeps this data safe. Without clarification on that its a big worry.


They're not really interested in the paedos, it's just a pretext. If paedos were the concern they wouldn't have totally ignored all that abuse in places like Rotherham. This about getting more power for the intelligence services and police as demanded by Sir Humphrey.

chickenstrip wrote:


Look, just explain to me what exactly you're afraid of if such powers are introduced; and none of this 'principles' bullshit. My views aren't set in stone, so come on, convince me it's not needed, or it will in some way harm me if it is introduced? I quite accept that I might be missing something, I'm not infallible y'know Laughing

You say "that isn't the point" - what are you saying the point is?


You're taking this law in isolation and ignoring the wider intelligence picture in which the government is acquiring ever more draconian powers. Each time they want just a little bit more of your privacy, and for you to just weaken a few more of your rights.

It's a rights issue, of course. But it's also playing with fire in a much more serious ways. These ARE the tools of a totalitarian police state. Theresa May isn't the same as Hitler, but this does put all the sorts of tools in place that a person like Hitler would want at their disposal, and that's a very risky thing to do. It also leaves the door wide open for blackmail. OK, but is the domain name, but it'll be full web address next, and various other types of metadata, and so the temptation to blackmail will increase.

staffy50 wrote:
Rolling Eyes Mr. Green

So you don't know if the police would just have a domain name to search? Or just an IP?

Does sound like it would be in breach of the much loved Human Rights..

Any search which is not done lawfully will be in breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act which protects a suspect’s right to respect for his private and family life.

Lawfully requiring a warrant.


Yeah right! The Human Rights acts are hardly worth the toilet paper they were excreted on, they're absolutely riddled with exemptions.

There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Protection of morals eh? Could get a pretty wide coach as many horses as you like through that.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1/part/I/chapter/7
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 8 years, 210 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 0.21 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 152.01 Kb