Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


3 years on in Iraq: big mistake or the greater good?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  

3 years on in Iraq: big mistake or the greater good?
Big mistake
73%
 73%  [ 31 ]
We did/are doing the right thing
26%
 26%  [ 11 ]
Total Votes : 42

Author Message

byke95
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:19 - 21 Mar 2006    Post subject: 3 years on in Iraq: big mistake or the greater good? Reply with quote

So, I'm not wanting to open a can of worms or bore people but I do think it is important to keep this issue on people's minds.

This isn's a debate really, they tend to result in overly long posts that become impossible to read. In an attempt to keep it simple I've added a (possibly overly simple) poll. Of course there are grey areas but where do you stand?

The numbers so far:
3000 American soliders dead

6000 Iraqi soldiers dead

37 000 Iraqi civilians dead

Number of British soldiers dead? ITV surprisingly didn't report this number last night... Rolling Eyes
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:27 - 21 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

3 years on the instability is worse than when they went in. Big Mistake. Oil prices went up also. Sad
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

akaDAVE
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:00 - 21 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't believe it's a full three years that I was watching the first wave of attacks live on Sky News.
I got the impression that it was going to be a short blitz follwed by a period of recovery and policing. It still looks like all out war to me.
It's turned into background noise in the news with countless bombings and deaths going unnoticed.
I have no real grip on the political complexities of it all but I can't see a satisfactory ending very soon.
Hopefully they won't be tempted to pull out troops just to remove the media interest along with them.
Whatever happened to Afganistan? Don't hear anything about that now.
____________________
GSXR600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

veeeffarr
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:01 - 21 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not like we had a choice in what we should do in the first place.

The UK should never have gotten involve.

Democracy my fucking arse, more like DemolitionCrazy.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

8316
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:06 - 21 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

when i first woke up to see that they had caught saddam hussein i wondered, "is it all finished now?"
i did wonder however, how long it would take to stabilize the country... Rolling Eyes
don't think it will end-we are there to stay for a long time......
sad really
____________________
Now own a Fireblade!! Speed Limits? Bah!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

SoND
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:17 - 21 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's great watching politicians trying to explain why they went to war.

First it starts as terrorists, then saddam has nukes and now because he was just a bad person because he used torture.

What gets me is that america has been known for torturing terrorist suspects and still haven't answered properly about the suspicious CIA flights.

The bush administration is just as bad as saddam. Saddam at least had kept the Sunnis and the shiites away from each other because this would happen.

I hate Bush and that brown nosing shit bag Blair. Thumbs Down Evil or Very Mad
____________________
Go back to bed - You have no rights - "Streetfighters ~ Mainstream motorcycling's crackwhore sister."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:54 - 21 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

A justified war, superbly executed.

A muddled follow-up, poorly executed.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

akaDAVE
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:56 - 22 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A justified war, superbly executed.

A muddled follow-up, poorly executed.



But where did the 'war' end and the 'follow up' begin?

I got the impression from the start that the air strikes in the initial 'shock and awe' campaign were meant to stun the enemy into submission.
They didn't really achieve that objective however impressive and well executed.
____________________
GSXR600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

biggerjohn
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:40 - 22 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

First I will ask you to ask yourself has your opinion on the war changed in any way in the 3 years since it started.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing right or wrong basing your views on any one fixed point in time is an easy thing to do. But think about the big picture I honestly do believe that in 5 10 20 years from now the war will be seen as a necessary evil.

Maybe not for what it did for Iraq but for the world political situation.

Do you honestly think any one in North Korea would even be listening to the UN USA Russia and China and the UK atm and be brokering a deal stopping nuclear proliferation if the coalition hadn’t back up a decade of impotent UN declaration and sanctions against Iraq with a good hard kicking.

Right or wrong the carrot now has a stick to back it up.

Even now while Iran is on it high horse over its nuclear program and is attempting to be as belligerent as possible even they will listen once the stance the UN taking goes from “talk to us” to “talk to us or you will be sorry” not for fear of the UN as they have proven to be about as much use as a chocolate fire guard but for real honest fear the nations that care will act just as they did in Iraq.

I honestly think Iraq is better of without Sadam I think it would be better of again if the “insurgent” large majority of them from other countries with there own agenda’s nothing to do with Iraq would also just fuck off and let Iraq sort out governing itself in a way that benefits all its peoples and not just one small set or another as in the past.

But sadly Iraq is ripe for these people to sow misery and hatred witch that will use to forward there own goals at the expenses of the peoples of Iraq.

If any think the war has also shown the world there are people that can talk up a grate new world but will stand by idly and do nothing if it hurts there own selfish interest (France and most of the rest of the UN members) and other that will stand and act on the ideas and ideals they signed up for when joining the UN in the face of nepotism and self interest.


War is not now nor ever will be a pleasant thing with all side “playing” by the rules it is by its nature an evil thing but it some times the only way to fight one evil is with another evil. Something I very am grateful for every 8th of May and take time to remember all that fought and died for my freedoms.


P.S. sorry if it’s a little rambling but I am at work and board.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

WR450_geezer
Nobody likes me



Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:56 - 22 Mar 2006    Post subject: Re: 3 years on in Iraq: big mistake or the greater good? Reply with quote

byke95 wrote:


Number of British soldiers dead? ITV surprisingly didn't report this number last night... Rolling Eyes


I think its about 103 (correct me if I'm wrong)

If you check on some sites figures for civillians are averaged 100,000 with some going as far as 200, 000. Guess we'll never really know.

When the war first started I was very Pro war, and stayed that way for the first two years. I still believe that the actual war was nessersary, and Iraq will be better off without Suddam. Jesus, just read some of the accounts by civillians of what him, his sick party, and sons used to do to people.

What I don't like about the situation is its no longer a war, we are still out there and nothing seems to be done to help rebuild the country. It seems there wasn't much of an after war plan. I believe that instead of a government helping to rebuild the country its The Pentagon who are millitary. Which is why its a fook up.

War and getting rid of Suddam Thumbs Up

After war and the country as a fooking mess Thumbs Down

WR
____________________
Siggi, ''Fack, having Daz around is like living next door to PC-World, with a hole in the wall.''
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Whosthedaddy
Super Spammer



Joined: 11 Dec 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:14 - 22 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iaq is the new N Ireland
____________________
Current : MSX 125 Past : CBR 900RR Monkeybike : c50 LAC : ZXR750 H2 : FZR600 : ZX7R P3 : YW100 : TRX850: Trophy 900 T309 : GSXR 600 L0: Monkeybike : XJ6S Whosthedaddy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:07 - 22 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

akaDAVE wrote:
Quote:
A justified war, superbly executed.

A muddled follow-up, poorly executed.



But where did the 'war' end and the 'follow up' begin?


I think military operations against the Iraqi armed forces were officially over in something like 23 days - regardless of the exact figure, the commonly held date is the fall of Saddam's statue that was widely reported.

Basically, after the Iraqi military faded away or was demolished, it became a police action against insurgents, for different reasons.

Quote:

I got the impression from the start that the air strikes in the initial 'shock and awe' campaign were meant to stun the enemy into submission.
They didn't really achieve that objective however impressive and well executed.


Again, it comes down to the delination between the 'War' and the 'Insurgency/Uprising/Civil War'. Shock and Awe was aimed at overwhelming the regular Iraqi forces. It achieved this with total success, totally unrelated to the mess that ensued.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:08 - 22 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

biggerjohn wrote:

P.S. sorry if it’s a little rambling but I am at work and board.


Bored perhaps, but pretty much spot on. Thumbs Up
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

killa
Won't Shut Up



Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:38 - 23 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are incidents that I have heard and seen in Iraq that I didn’t agree with, but I don’t kid myself into thinking I know enough to say whether it is right or wrong. The first part of the war was great, as Ricky Gervais said, much better coverage than the Gulf war, not all the filming was at night time. lol
Which, I think highlights the point that due to media and reporting being right in the thick of it now and more filming going on, we see a lot more going on which can be a bad thing IMO.
____________________
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Spiral
Traffic Copper



Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:56 - 27 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

The situation in iraq just shows us how weak america and britain is when it comes to being strong, or at the very least run by governments that have the strength and conviction to deal with situations rather than fuck about the way we are doing now.

Blair and bush went into to secure the oil not to free the oppressed people of iraq in fact they could'nt give a fuck about the people.

But being the 2 idiots that they are, they have got us into a war that as a country which is run by weak politicians (who pretty much do a good job of showing how thick the majority is because they voted for these idiots) we have no hope of winning because the west does not have the will to win a war in the middle east.

Wars between countrys are not won simply because you have defeated the military of a nation you must win the hearts and minds and if you can not do that then there is only one option left, im not about to state what it is but it ain't gonna get anybody the noble peace prize any time soon.

IMO If a country is not prepared to do what must be done to win then do not invade other countrys your only going to sacrafice innocent lives and lose in the end, which is exactly what we are doing now losing!
____________________
****NORTHERN IRELAND NEWSFLASH!!**** According to a recent survey, 94% of loyalists said the best sex they ever had was in the shower; the other 6% haven't been to jail yet.***
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

RickHolt
Traffic Copper



Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:08 - 27 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have mixed view on the whole 'war'. The main bit that stuck in my mind was when they declared the end of major conflict. That's like stealing the ball, calling game over, running off, and complaining when the others try and get it back.

I don't bother thinking about it too much because we can only go off what the news tells us, which we know isn't true.

I do think about the soldiers we have over there though. What exactly does a soldiers contract cover? I found it odd that they could be called to kill animals following the foot and mouth, put out fires when the brigade is on strike, fight a war in Iraq, police Iraq and play at politics. They must be able to turn around and say "I'm not paid to do that" at some point? What's next? Londons tube drivers go on strike, army drivers called in to cover. Tony Blair goes on holiday... you get the idea. Do they have any rights in that respect?

Rick.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:16 - 27 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, not really.

It's ironic that the government who has emasculated the armed forces has relied so heavily on them.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:01 - 28 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice to see everyone thinks it wa a big mistake.

The thing that gets me is that if our leaders invaded Iraq on incorrect information, they havnt said whoops or sorry, they have said well its ok because Saddam was a bad man.

Id have a lot more respect for them if they said "hey what could we do, we really believed all that shit we were telling you. I know you didnt believe us but we believed us. Its terrible that we have killed thousands of people for no good reason and if we could only turn back the clock etc"

Id even prefer it if they believed that they were still right but saddam had somehow hidden the weapons rather than we invaded on false evidence but its still a good thing we did cos hes a bad man.

Id like to believe that they deliberatly lied to us for oil and strategic interests but unfortunately I beleive that our leaders really were that fucking stupid to believe their own stories. They really did believe that Saddam was a threat.

If we go invading any country that we think might be a threat, this will mean we are the threat and people will take action against us.

I hope Blair's successor isnt into saving the world by bombing the shit out of another county.

The problem with Iraq is that Iran knows that if america gets Iraq under control with a new governement set up by them running it, America may invade Iran next. So its in Iran's interest to make sure there is chaos in Iraq for as long as possible.

Anyone into this kind of oil politics stuff should see the movie syriana in the cinema. Quite good and way more in-depth on this kind of thing than most movies.

also heres a snippit from a website

"the U.S. death toll in Iraq has surpassed the number of American soldiers killed during the first three years of the Vietnam War, "

https://www.veteransforpeace.org/US_War_Dead_111403.htm
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:24 - 28 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

RickHolt wrote:
Do they have any rights in that respect?


Mister James wrote:
No, not really.


In theory they do have rights, servicemen have to obey any LEGAL order by a superior officer.

Some servicemen have refused to serve in Iraq as they claim that the war is not legal and so they do not have to obey the order to serve there.

f they were cout-maritalled and convicted of disobeying orders they could appeal and it would go to civil court where the legality of the law could be brought into question in open court. The government doesnt want this and so has allowed these men to do other duties or leave without a dishonourable discharge.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:48 - 28 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

The war has been over for years - what we are in now is a police action at the request of the Iraqi government. No quibbles about the legality of the initial military action will protect you from disobeying orders to fly out there now.

The fact that you can be charged and courtmartialed for it suggests that you do not actually have the right to choose what you want, as you have to fight the system to get the result you desire.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Spiral
Traffic Copper



Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:30 - 28 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Colinwall i do not belive that blair thought saddamn was a threat he just wanted to play the big statesman with his buddy bush.

Nice to know thousands died so these 2 fucking morons could play 'im a big boy now'. Also blair is running britain into the ground (okay he has a lot of help from the rest of the morons who claim to be politicans)

I once witnessed the idiot that blair is, once he was asked about illegal immigrants and what he was doing to handle the situation.

His answer was "Oh i'd hate to think what would happen to london if all the illegal workers were forced to leave"

Yes mr blair you truly are a fucking MORON. I can't think of a single person who in the last decade has done more damage to britain.

Saddamn a threat, i'd rather have the threat of saddamn any day than a dickhead like tony blair running britiain.
____________________
****NORTHERN IRELAND NEWSFLASH!!**** According to a recent survey, 94% of loyalists said the best sex they ever had was in the shower; the other 6% haven't been to jail yet.***
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

innominate
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:39 - 29 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wasted my tax money on a pointless war.



Remember the WMD's?
Conviniently that lie has been almost forgotten about.

Money for big business linked to governments seems to be the only benefit our country has got from this war.
____________________
I, as a responsible adult human being, will never concede the power to anyone to regulate my choice of what I put into my body, or where I go with my mind. From the skin inwards is my jurisdiction, is it not? I choose what may or may not cross that border. Here I am the customs agent. I am the coast-guard. I am the sole legal and spiritual government of this territory, and only the laws I choose to enact within myself are applicable.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:17 - 29 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
The war has been over for years - what we are in now is a police action at the request of the Iraqi government. No quibbles about the legality of the initial military action will protect you from disobeying orders to fly out there now.

The fact that you can be charged and courtmartialed for it suggests that you do not actually have the right to choose what you want, as you have to fight the system to get the result you desire.


if the was was illegal then the occupation is illegal.

members of the armed forces must obey orders unles they are illegal.

well it is protecting people. i cant remember the names, but it was discussed on 'any answers' on radio 4 a topical news phone in show

several members of the armed forces rang in to explain the situation fully. i think it was a medic.

Germans have a saying 'orders are orders' Befehl ist Befehl, meaning you dont think or question you just do as you are told. But the nuremburg war crimes trials held each man responsible for his own acts and did not accept the defence that they were only doing orders.

Thats why in theory, in english militairy law, a member off the armed forces does not have to obey an illegal order.

to spiral, i can see where you are coming from but i dont quite agree. i am glad blair is gonna be replaced but I hope its brown not cameron.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:41 - 29 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

COLINWALL wrote:


if the was was illegal then the occupation is illegal.


Not at all - as I said, it is authorised by the legitimate and UN-recognised Iraqi government - thus totally above board and legal.

Quote:

Germans have a saying 'orders are orders' Befehl ist Befehl, meaning you dont think or question you just do as you are told. But the nuremburg war crimes trials held each man responsible for his own acts and did not accept the defence that they were only doing orders.

Thats why in theory, in english militairy law, a member off the armed forces does not have to obey an illegal order.


I'm quite familiar with the theory - I was in the BRITISH armed forces for quite some time.

In practise, it means you have the technical right to disobey a tactical order, such as to kill civilians in reprisals, rather than ignore a strategic order such as "Get your arse over to Iraq".

Even then - it is not much of a defence, as the military frowns on people questioning orders for rather obvious reasons.

The last thing you want to happen when you are under enemy (or American) fire is for your oppo to start flicking through the latest edition of Hansard to see if he agrees with the latest political justification for the war, instead of laying down some covering fire and protecting your arse.


Quote:

to spiral, i can see where you are coming from but i dont quite agree. i am glad blair is gonna be replaced but I hope its brown not cameron.


You hope it's another member of a morally and financially corrupt party, who has personally taken thousands of pounds in extra taxes off each household in this country, and delivered nothing in return but more stifling regulations and petty rules?

You really want him in?!

Wow.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

innominate
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:04 - 30 Mar 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
You hope it's another member of a morally and financially corrupt party,


Whomever gets in will be a politician.
So that part of your statement will ring true for our next glorious leader, whomever they may be.

Labour = Tories at the moment anyway.
So both are bad. Looks like we will be fooked as a country for some time to come.
____________________
I, as a responsible adult human being, will never concede the power to anyone to regulate my choice of what I put into my body, or where I go with my mind. From the skin inwards is my jurisdiction, is it not? I choose what may or may not cross that border. Here I am the customs agent. I am the coast-guard. I am the sole legal and spiritual government of this territory, and only the laws I choose to enact within myself are applicable.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 60 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 0.48 - MySQL Queries: 18 - Page Size: 150.72 Kb