bridgestone bt92 v dunlop gpr80

[beatnck]

this is kind of a carry on thread from my bt45 thread, thought i'd start a new one as the topic has changed a bit..
have anyone any experience of bt92 tyres? the bike is a cb1 400, i have a bt92 on the front, with a (nearly on the limit) bt45 on the rear.
how do the bt92's compare to the bt45's?
the other option is a pair of dunlop gpr80's for £100 delivered. im led to believe these are similar in grip/wear to a bt45, any experience?
cheers
____________________
no silly comment here!!

[SoND]

A pair of GPR80s for £100? Where?

Just paid £100~ for 1 GPR70
____________________
Go back to bed - You have no rights - "Streetfighters ~ Mainstream motorcycling's crackwhore sister."

[EuropeanNC30R...]

I like GPR80's, much better profile than BT92's in my opinion.

You may be getting them cheap because they have been replaced by the GPR100, I've had one on the rear since last summer and it's been great, grippy and has lasted a good 6k miles.

[The Tot]

Bt92's because they're good all-round, all year and are dual compound. But i've not used another tyre other than the BT92 on my old bike.
____________________
The Tot 2019 Z1000SX - 2007 R1
Never argue with autism

[beatnck]