Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Public opinions count. Not.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

owdamer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:12 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Public opinions count. Not. Reply with quote

Bill to pave way for road pricing

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6678915.stm

2 million people opposing it obviously doesn't mean diddly squat.

I dont know how the congestion problems should be tackled, but pricing the poorer folk isn't the answer, nor is it fair.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:27 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well what do you expect from a bunch of people who were communists in their university days? ,


note I do not vote Labour and will never do so.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:31 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Re: Public opinions count. Not. Reply with quote

60million people probably also don't want to pay any tax.
Doesn't mean the government should abolish it.

I really don't like the idea of being constantly monitored, however nor do I like at the moment that I'm paying a lot more tax for my 5/6 road legal vehicles as a single individual than someone who does 20x the distance I do in a year.

Not, of course, that I expect that to chance.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:39 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

But it is recognised that tax has to be paid for the basics:

basic health
basic police
basic education

thats is,

this = a tax on jobs , I travel average 200 miles a week to get to work thus

£268 in tolls at the £1.34 mile level (motorways and innercity A roads there is NO other choice), I don't make this much in a week in pay, thus I'd think sack this and go on the dole , where I'd be given £60 a week rent paid , council tax free, and utilities paid for,

the tipping limit has become so incredibly high its barely worth working anymore if you make less than £14K, Nu Labour doesn't care though , ALL its voters are career dolists which this won't affect them one jot.

add in this road toll and ALL jobs paying less than 35K will be not worth taking on with the average being around 22k (with many lower due to super high income distortions) out of 33 million workers when like 15 million of them face up to this better off on the dole choice , they'd take the dole choice. with you get 25 milliom unemployed there will be serious trouble (there are already 10 million unemployed in the UK).

be interesting how much cost of living expenses would be come pay rise time , I'm not staying for anything less than 4500% pay increase. (at which would make inflation go insane and interest rates fly too).

there is something wrong with that, where the tipping point of work vs dole is so incredibly high.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

owdamer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:04 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've no problems with paying my fair share of tax.
I do have a problem with a government that seems to want to tax every last penny out of me and seems to want to take away my freedom to travel.
I also have a problem with a government that imports a cheap workforce, who then post their money out of the country. That may mean that the employers can get the manpower for a pittance, but it doesn't help the local economy.
God knows what other plans they have for us. I worry, I really do.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:55 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

They still don't realise that they way to fairly tax vehicles both on the mileage they do and the fuel efficiency is to do away with the whole road tax system and the entire government department that administers it.

Put the tax on the fuel instead.

You drive a 6litre V8 range rover from Birmingham to London every day, you use more fuel, you pay more tax. You're a pensioner who drives his 850cc ford fiesta to the shops for a paper every Sunday, you use hardly any fuel, you pay less tax.

Has the added advantage that you don't need to hide from the DVLA computer, declare SORN or any such rubbish. You want to drive it, you have to put fuel in, you pay tax. Even if you're a Nigerian immigrant with no driving licence and a cloned registration.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

owdamer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:30 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Has the added advantage that you don't need to hide from the DVLA computer, declare SORN or any such rubbish. You want to drive it, you have to put fuel in, you pay tax. Even if you're a Nigerian immigrant with no driving licence and a cloned registration.


Thats probably why they wont do it. They want to know who you are, what you own, where you drive and how many shits a day you take. its not about tax. its about control.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

veeeffarr
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:36 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
They still don't realise that they way to fairly tax vehicles both on the mileage they do and the fuel efficiency is to do away with the whole road tax system and the entire government department that administers it.

Put the tax on the fuel instead.

You drive a 6litre V8 range rover from Birmingham to London every day, you use more fuel, you pay more tax. You're a pensioner who drives his 850cc ford fiesta to the shops for a paper every Sunday, you use hardly any fuel, you pay less tax.

Has the added advantage that you don't need to hide from the DVLA computer, declare SORN or any such rubbish. You want to drive it, you have to put fuel in, you pay tax. Even if you're a Nigerian immigrant with no driving licence and a cloned registration.


Er, Stinkwheel for president?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:10 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Government = rapists?

Ie we say no , and have said no many many many many times in a serious non joking way, yet they
decide to arse rape us with such policies anyway.

Kind of fits in with Blair in 2006 when he dodged the is rape not a serious crime question (the British
crime survey does NOT record rape, infact it doesn't record a helluva lot of things I've personally
not reported at least 6 crimes this year alone (chain nicked, NTV vandalised, mirror nicked,
attempted murder guy pulling a knife at me , guy trying to drag me off the bike rock cobbed at
me head ) cus nothing will be done.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rookie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:35 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
They still don't realise that they way to fairly tax vehicles both on the mileage they do and the fuel efficiency is to do away with the whole road tax system and the entire government department that administers it.

Put the tax on the fuel instead.

You drive a 6litre V8 range rover from Birmingham to London every day, you use more fuel, you pay more tax. You're a pensioner who drives his 850cc ford fiesta to the shops for a paper every Sunday, you use hardly any fuel, you pay less tax.

Has the added advantage that you don't need to hide from the DVLA computer, declare SORN or any such rubbish. You want to drive it, you have to put fuel in, you pay tax. Even if you're a Nigerian immigrant with no driving licence and a cloned registration.


That's a brilliant idea, but then it's hard to milk as much cash as possible from road users when they're only being taxed through one source. Evil or Very Mad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bandit_engineer
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:51 - 22 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

be prepaired for everything to rise in price so businesses can pass this on.

I can see why its being done but supposidly it will vary on the road, more for motorways cheaper for country lanes.

So all people will do is migrate to smaller roads that have never been designed to take the volumes that will use them, thus just moving the congestion.

What about the people who work around the country, like myself. I do 30k a year in a car and go where the work is. I work on high voltage electricty pylons.

Regards

John
____________________
Previous: 2002 Speedfight 50, 2000 RS125, 2002 RS125, 1997 Bandit 600N, 2003 SV1000S
Current: 2007 GSXR 750 (Isle of Man)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:42 - 23 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

bandit_engineer wrote:
be prepaired for everything to rise in price so businesses can pass this on.

I can see why its being done but supposidly it will vary on the road, more for motorways cheaper for country lanes.
John


therin lies the problem , people will dodge this tax and move to cheaper country lanes, (note the London charge actually LOSES money)

government sees its revenue drop , so it'll increase the price of these country lanes, force too many out of cars = no revenue , lose masses on IPT, road tax VAT/corp tax on vehicle ancilaries, they really haven't thought this plan out at all. Its like when the super rich used to pay whatever income tax they wanted a certain boss of a big London department store used to pay 45million a year , Labour wanted him to pay 100% of his taxes, (at around 600 mil) what did he do? , he left the country.

The same thing is happening with the most of Britain , just look at how many people plan to migrate overseas.

eventually EVERYwhere will be at maximum price to prevent avoidance


[quote="bandit_engineer"]
What about the people who work around the country, like myself. I do 30k a year in a car and go where the work is. I work on high voltage electricty pylons.
bandit_engineer wrote:
be prepaired for everything to rise in price so businesses can pass this on.



two thoughts your tax code will be ENOURMOUS you should get 522L right now in future as it is a work related expense you will get
45425L (ie your first 45K is tax free) ,

or they will disallow this as commuting and you will have a £40,000 road tax bill and thus either have to ask your boss for a 45K rise at the very least (unlikely)

Or just go onto the dole since your job would not be worth doing unless it paid the cost of the road pricing bill ontop of what you get now which is unrealistic I have no idea what you are on £ wise but I don't reckon your boss would be too happy at a 45K pay rise demand.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:41 - 23 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gordan Brown all over really. He's going to be our prime minister for the next 2-3 years too. This country is going to the dogs where criminals and dossers are supposed, but the honest grafters get nothing.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

owdamer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:08 - 23 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big_Ham wrote:
Gordan Brown all over really. He's going to be our prime minister for the next 2-3 years too. This country is going to the dogs where criminals and dossers are supposed, but the honest grafters get nothing.


And yet people will vote him in again at the next general election.
He'll continue to screw us and the country will just get worse.
Makes me glad to be in my 40's sometimes. I'd hate to be starting out my life in these times.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pobbly06
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:55 - 24 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
They still don't realise that they way to fairly tax vehicles both on the mileage they do and the fuel efficiency is to do away with the whole road tax system and the entire government department that administers it.

Put the tax on the fuel instead.

You drive a 6litre V8 range rover from Birmingham to London every day, you use more fuel, you pay more tax. You're a pensioner who drives his 850cc ford fiesta to the shops for a paper every Sunday, you use hardly any fuel, you pay less tax.

Has the added advantage that you don't need to hide from the DVLA computer, declare SORN or any such rubbish. You want to drive it, you have to put fuel in, you pay tax. Even if you're a Nigerian immigrant with no driving licence and a cloned registration.



Agreed



but closing the might mean ministers making ministers unemployed ......... never going to happen - Old schoolboy/funny handshakes and all that


I recently had a job where i covered a shade over 61k business miles in 10 months ( I left) so at the £1.34 rate that would have been a charge of £81,740 - christ on a bike thats heading towards half a decades worth of wages !!!!!!!!


but I think the main reason it wont be done is because its sensible, easy and (probably) more popular
____________________
Resident Goldfrapp, Ladytron and Client nut
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

tsmith
Traffic Copper



Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:44 - 24 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with specifically taxing fuel guzzling vehicles, but a general tax on fuel may not be the way to go.

The main reason I ride a motorcycle is the fuel effeciency. My GPZ regularly returns an mpg in the 70s, and thats not going everywhere at 50mph either. I rack up around 15,000 miles a year though, just commuting to and from work. If fuel tax went up significantly I would be hit hard even though I own a fuel efficient vehicle. I can't relocate closer to where I work as the cost of housing in that area is very high.

Perhaps a tax could be brought in that only targets vehicles that get less than 30mpg?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Shay HTFC
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:21 - 24 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know this is not likely to have much support, but what ever happened to living close to where you work?

No wonder the UK has so many of these commuter towns that are like ghost towns and the inner cities are full of dole seekers.
People travel miles every day clogging up the roads and leaving the places where they live to become void of any business.
It doesn't bother me about the people who come down the M6 from Wednesbury or something into Birmingham, but those who drive for 3 hours to get to central London do my head in. Fair enough, I don't live or work there so I can't really comment, but it seems totally irrational to complain about getting road pricing charges, but live 100 miles from where you work.

Maybe we should be questioning the government why all the jobs crop up in central London leaving everywhere else a complete dive.
Even London is crap when you drive 5 mins out of the classy central area.

Seeing pictures of the M5 being packed every rush hour makes me lose any sort of sympathy for those who do the 2 hour commute.

Maybe I'm a naive northerner who tries to live close to where I work, but it seems sensible to me?
The UKs road system is over crowded and people commuting ridiculous distances is only supporting it!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:55 - 24 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

While there might be plenty of merit on charging tax on fuel, we are already seriously screwed over on it and they do not dare raise it any further.

What they do want to do is spready the traffic out. Get people to use the roads at less busy times of day / less bust areas. Similar to how buses and trains charge nominal ticket costs outside the peak commuter times.

However to do this the proposal is the track cars. This will be hideously expensive, and the government want the same tax revenue so the road users will have to pay for this extra cost.

Added to which a tax on vehicle miles takes no account of fuel consumption, and the government is fully commited to charging for CO2 emissions. So reducing the costs of fuel to compensate for the direct road use charge would not be politically viable (as it would make it cheaper to run large engined cars, and more expensive for small engined cars).

Basically they are engineered a situation where there is a serious congestion problem, have talked themselves into a position where they only see congestion charging as a solution, and now cannot do anything right.

Real killer is that they are now basically bribing local authorities to introduce congestion charging "trials".

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:06 - 24 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomsmith wrote:
but a general tax on fuel may not be the way to go.


This very same idea was mooted 20+ years ago where it was proposed to abolish RFT and add 20p a gallon in tax. One of the loudest anti mob were the bikers as we pay so little in RFT.
Don't take a genius to work out that bikers would be hit hardest, especially as a high proportion of bikers mileage is pleasure and not work related.
But i feel that it is time it was introduced as it would stop the RFT avoiders.
As to road charging, they seem to have lost the polt on getting people to change to public transport, as the best way would be to reduce prices so its cheaper to travel by bus/train than it is via car now....
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:07 - 24 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shay HTFC wrote:
I know this is not likely to have much support, but what ever happened to living close to where you work?

Indeed. It is natural that some areas will be more popular than others, but it would be nice to see the government trying to encourage companies to diversify their locations - which might not be such a big problem for people to get around for meetings in the long run if the roads were less crowded Smile.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:13 - 24 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:
Don't take a genius to work out that bikers would be hit hardest, especially as a high proportion of bikers mileage is pleasure and not work related.


Depends how many bikes you have. Average bike milage is something like 4k a year, compared to something like 12k for a car. So even if you did the same mpg the bike would pay 1/3 of the extra tax.

Always have thought it would make sense. The only problem would be that I cannot see them scrapping road tax totally. I would expect them to keep a small registration charge (which would probably be pretty close to the VED on a 125), and if it was a registration charge I would expect them to demand it every year the vehicle was inexistance, irrespective of whether it was on the road. And I would expect it to rapidly ride ahead of the current VED levels.

iooi wrote:
As to road charging, they seem to have lost the polt on getting people to change to public transport, as the best way would be to reduce prices so its cheaper to travel by bus/train than it is via car now....


It is already subsidised, with VAT exemption and fuel duty rebates, and on rural services there are direct subsidies as well. How much more are you prepared to pay to have a bus available that is marginally cheaper?

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:00 - 25 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:

Indeed. It is natural that some areas will be more popular than others, but it would be nice to see the government trying to encourage companies to diversify their locations - which might not be such a big problem for people to get around for meetings in the long run if the roads were less crowded Smile.


my company is doing that changing a 20-45 mile commute to a 140 mile commute! , genius! (in and out btw)
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:03 - 25 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

But are they moving to somewhere that house prices are cheaper so that in the long term it makes more sense for people to live close to work?

One of the definite plus points for my work is that it's about a mile's walk or 1.4miles drive, so even if I take the car I'm not adding to congestion/clogging up the roads etc.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:06 - 25 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

No , they are moving into footballer alley all the staff are from North Mancs Bolton and beyond , where the house prices are utterly insane , and there is a traffic junction that even on a bike is horrendous. to a business park specifically built , thus all staff have to commuite farther than before , and public transport compared to city centre is crap.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:41 - 25 May 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Depends how many bikes you have. Average bike milage is something like 4k a year, compared to something like 12k for a car. So even if you did the same mpg the bike would pay 1/3 of the extra tax.
Keith


I agree and would prefer to pay extra on fuel rather then RFT.
But look at it this way.

These are rough ball park figures....
RFT for bike say £35
RFT for car say £100
Thats a diffrence of £65 a year. @ 20p a gallon and a average of 30 mpg how many extra miles can a car cover compared to a bike before they are worse off than paying RFT. I make that at just under 10,000 a year. Which is higher than the average car milage a year. So in the end a bike user is going to be worse off by quite a large chunk.

Or put it this way
my bike £46 RFT
my car £115 RFT
miles per year 10,000 on bike, which with a 20p a gall extra on petrol and a average of 50mpg means i would be £6.00 better off.
Car doing same miles and 30 mpg would be a saving to me of £48.
Now i only do like 5000 a year in the car as the bike is my main form of transport to and from work. So my savings on the car would be double.
Hardly a incentive to keep the bike... But the saving of at least a hour a day in travling time is more than enough for me...

But do we really think the goverment would do this... Hell no as they would be losing out on tax.... It would have to be at least 20p a ltr now.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 224 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.17 Sec - Server Load: 0.59 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 146.39 Kb