|
|
| Author |
Message |
| M1ghtyDUck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ghtyDUck Scooby Slapper

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 19:06 - 27 Dec 2007 Post subject: Restricted bikes get better mpg? |
 |
|
Hey,
I've had my NSR125R1 (2001 model) for about 6 months now. It's the swiss import one, still restricted.
Up until recently I'd just fill it up every time I'd done around 150 miles. It was never empty, and I only had it on reserve once, so I never really knew how far it could go on a tank. For some reason I have in my head that it's a 10 litre tank (8 + 2 reserve), but I might be wrong.
In any case, last couple weeks I've decided to let it run down to reserve from full to see how many miles I get per gallon. So far I've got 180 miles, and not hit reserve yet! This means I'm at AT LEAST 102mpg.. and considering all my riding is harsh and stop/start, (I'm a learner having fun and have a very trafficky commute, no long cruise motorways or anything) it means one of 2 things.
1) My nsr gets incredible mileage to the gallon (leading me to think restricted ones get better mileage, best quotes I've seen for mileage are 90mpg at the max)
2) I'm dumb, and I've got my fuel tank size or something wrong. I don't think so though, because when I fill it up when I think its close to reserve I can only pack in about 7 1/2 litres.. which fits in with the 8 litre main and 10 litre total idea.
So what's going on? Is my bike really getting this good mileage?
Not that I'm complaining.
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Charlie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Charlie World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 May 2007 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M1ghtyDUck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ghtyDUck Scooby Slapper

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Stiffler |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Stiffler World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| spike_Alike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spike_Alike Spanner Monkey

Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| iooi |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iooi Super Spammer

Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M1ghtyDUck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ghtyDUck Scooby Slapper

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ravo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ravo Scooby Slapper
Joined: 19 May 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M1ghtyDUck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ghtyDUck Scooby Slapper

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Finglonga |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Finglonga World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Scotch Bonnet |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Scotch Bonnet Scooby Slapper

Joined: 23 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:34 - 28 Dec 2007 Post subject: |
 |
|
| M1ghtyDUck wrote: | Well, I would agree with the idea that the more power an engine makes, the more fuel, but that's over a set period of time. It stands to reason that more power also makes you go faster, so you're using fuel for less time. It's just whether that balance swings it in the way of using more fuel or less fuel? Someone will know I'm sure. |
Don't think in terms of a set period of time, think of a set distance.
Assuming constant gearing,and disregarding clutch slip, it's going to take exaclty the same number of revolutions of the engine to cover a set distance, regardless of the speed you do it at.
As fuel consumption is miles per gallon, and it uses more fuel per rev to go fast, fuel consumption is better the slower you go. ____________________ Hmmmm..... is it supposed to do that?
2001 CB500 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:39 - 28 Dec 2007 Post subject: |
 |
|
might be cus of the restrictors you can't wring its neck and thus burn more fuel ,
A common complaint with anybody and everybody who has ridden with me is that I absolutely devastate fuel, the Longridge Clitheroe route ridden mildly should take only 8-9 litres , ridden hard it can eat up to 19 litres Gman always complains about this.  ____________________ Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 18 years, 6 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|