|
|
| Triumph or KTM? |
| Triumph |
|
48% |
[ 14 ] |
| KTM |
|
51% |
[ 15 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 29 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Faraz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Faraz Nearly there...

Joined: 26 May 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| nick606 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 nick606 World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| T0MMY |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 T0MMY World Chat Champion

Joined: 08 Jun 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:12 - 22 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
What he said
Have you only had a 50? ____________________ ZX6R + CBR600RR |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| c_dug |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 c_dug Super Spammer

Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 18:15 - 22 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
The KTM in 640 or 690 size would probably be alright wouldnt suggest the 990 to be honest but that is your choice in the end.
Always fancied a daytona myself too, as above though maybe not an ideal first bike, again that is up to you.
Just to clarify, the KTM, but a smaller one
c_dug ____________________ I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Valver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Valver World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Faraz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Faraz Nearly there...

Joined: 26 May 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Valver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Valver World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Faraz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Faraz Nearly there...

Joined: 26 May 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Valver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Valver World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:54 - 22 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Ok so you'd probably manage with the seat height. I'm 5'11" and I can just get the tips of my toes down.
I'm not trying to put you off, it's just not the most sensible option but who wants to be sensible anyway? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dr. DaveJPS |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dr. DaveJPS World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 May 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:55 - 22 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
wierdly enough i compared teh same bikes myself last year, but coming from my fzs600 i found teh daytona was too much of the same (says a lot about the old fazers competency) so i bought the KTM!
nb the ktm is revolutionised if you get rid of the original scorps and fit 2ct's
but it may be a bit much off a 50  ____________________ "intelligent inattention is preferable to unintelligent tinkering"
www.davejps.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| swiftb |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 swiftb World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Valver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Valver World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dr. DaveJPS |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dr. DaveJPS World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 May 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Seb |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Seb World Chat Champion

Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 20:51 - 22 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'd be willing to wager that a 990 KTM is going to be far more of a handful than a Daytona 600, not good for your first big bike as your just not going to be able to learn to ride it properly. Get something that you can abuse for a year and you'll be the better rider for it  ____________________ 2010 Triumph 1050 Sprint ST |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Smooth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Smooth Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 21 Apr 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Tot |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Tot World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JAMSXR |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JAMSXR World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rhys |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rhys Trackday Trickster

Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 09:36 - 23 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I test rode a KTM 950 SMR a few weeks ago. Although it was tall and its big it didn't feel heavy with it being high up. I'm 5ft 10 and got on well with it. I've been riding my RVF for 3 years now which is about 60bhp and although you say just less than 100bhp for the KTM it feels like loads more as its torquey as hell! was abit of a handful ...but then if sensible it could be ridden sedately. I felt alright moving onto it but front brakes were very very powerful and quite snappy; which would put me off as a first big bike, come the first fist full of front brake in a bad situation could probably do more harm!
Like others say maybe have a look at the 640, still have that supermoto mean look to them etc.
Out of those two bikes I'd definately go with the KTM to answer original question, its what I want next anyway, but maybe one you'd be better moving onto  ____________________ Current Bike: '94 RVF 400R
Bike Pics Youtube Myspace |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Valver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Valver World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 10:37 - 23 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
There is also another way to look at it, one which you wouldn't have considered if you are quite new to bikes. I was chatting to a friend the other day who started riding bikes in 1999, just a few years after me. His biking started at 17yrs old with a Mito then an SV650, GSXR600, SP1, Blade (55), R1 (07) to his current GSXR (09). He said the biggest jump in performance (best wow factor) was going from the SV650 to the GSXR600 but generally each step up to the Blade was a massive jump in power and brought with it loads of smiles and giggles. Since chopping in the blade neither the R1 nor the GSXR1000 have felt significantly better, ok maybe the R1 was slightly better but the feeling where you jump on a bike, wind the throttle on and scream inside you're lid has been lost forever. They are never going to make a bike significantly quicker than the thous of today, not IMO. Where do you go next after an 09 GSXR? His father owns a ZZR1400 and had a busa before that so he's riden faster bikes but neither he or myself believe post 1000cc is where the future lies for either of us and neither of these bikes actually feel quicker than the big4 thous, we both feel these barges are for the over 50's
Personally i've never owned a post Y2K 1000cc inline4. Don't get me wrong i've had a 98 R1, 99 RSV, 02 TLR and riden plenty of my mates latest and greatest machines but I want to keep some excitement in reserve for the next 30/40 years of my life which is why i've dropped down the scale again to a Duke748.
I've rambled off topic here I know but what i'm trying to say is you can have too much too soon and ruin things for yourself. Take smaller steps and you might find you enjoy the next few years more and maybe learn the craft quicker too. I guess the same can be said for a lot of things in life.
Just my 2p
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| t121anf |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 t121anf World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Faraz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Faraz Nearly there...

Joined: 26 May 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dr. DaveJPS |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dr. DaveJPS World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 May 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 11:02 - 23 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
the service costs for the KTM are more expensive (circa £200 odd quid for a major) it hurts  ____________________ "intelligent inattention is preferable to unintelligent tinkering"
www.davejps.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JAMSXR |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JAMSXR World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Faraz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Faraz Nearly there...

Joined: 26 May 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JAMSXR |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JAMSXR World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 13:03 - 23 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
[url]Just checked, £830. Sad[/url]
Well a good K4 can be had for around the £3,500 mark, and a good 990 is around £4000. Use the money saved to pay for the extra £200 insurance.
If you haven't hunted around for insurance prices, do it! I did a little re-search on the forum and found that Simple Insurance was used by a number of people on here, and it was by far the best price for me. ____________________ Honda SFX50 > Aprilia SR125 > Aprilia RS125 > Honda RFV400 > K4 GSXR600 > KTM Duke > C1H 636 > K3 GSXR1000 > Aprilia RSV-R > Triumph Street Triple R > Ducati 899 Panigale > Aprilia Tuono 1100 > Triumph Daytona 675R > KTM SuperDuke 1290 2.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 17 years, 126 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|