Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


2009 Space Elevator Games

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:31 - 23 Jul 2009    Post subject: 2009 Space Elevator Games Reply with quote

https://www.spaceelevatorgames.org/

Basic idea is teams have to build a robot that climbs up a cable 1km in the air. This wire is held up by a helicopter.

The robots cannot have any energy stored on them so the teams are transmitting the power to the robots with laser beams.

If they can reach 5ms then they could win $2 million.

Quite interesting for the geeks among us.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

damz
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:22 - 23 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

been reading up on the space elevator concept which is pretty sound and glad to see that they are takin the idea seriously. the potential for a fully functioning lift is so great yet few people have even heard of it
____________________
Current Bikes RVF400 - 94
Cars: RX7 FD, Eunos Roadster
Former Bikes: FZR 250R 89, ZX7R 98
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ms51ves3
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:27 - 23 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

This was on one of James May's documentaries. Isn't it all rather pointless?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:03 - 24 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

ms51ves3 wrote:
This was on one of James May's documentaries. Isn't it all rather pointless?


No, imagine putting robot on the moon or any other planet which they can do, then not worrying about it having to have a power source.

Just line of sight, via satellites or whatever.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

5v3d3b0
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:16 - 24 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem comes when the robot is a million km away... What kind of laser can shine bright at that distance, and how accurate can we be? A thousandth of a degree angle difference will be a large distance on the surface of that planet.
But definitely a good idea and I think it has potential.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:53 - 24 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Svedebo wrote:
The problem comes when the robot is a million km away... What kind of laser can shine bright at that distance, and how accurate can we be? A thousandth of a degree angle difference will be a large distance on the surface of that planet.
But definitely a good idea and I think it has potential.


If we have something a million km away then we will have developed some other things to by then i think. e.g. bridge the connection with satellites
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mellow Matt
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:28 - 24 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't the point that getting things into space is dead expensive using current methods, whereas if we had a big lift going into space it'd be relatively cheap. And we could have a load of spacecraft that don't need to be able to fly/survive in the Earth's atmosphere.

I find the idea pretty interesting! Get a lift into space, then a space taxi to the moon for a day trip Very Happy (unless it takes longer to get to the moon, no idea!).
____________________
1999 GSX-R 600, 1999 TL1000R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:43 - 24 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mellow Matt wrote:
Isn't the point that getting things into space is dead expensive using current methods, whereas if we had a big lift going into space it'd be relatively cheap. And we could have a load of spacecraft that don't need to be able to fly/survive in the Earth's atmosphere.

I find the idea pretty interesting! Get a lift into space, then a space taxi to the moon for a day trip Very Happy (unless it takes longer to get to the moon, no idea!).


At 5ms it would take a while Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

5v3d3b0
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:01 - 24 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Think that once you get out of the atmosphere a some distance away from Earth, you can reach MUCH higher speeds cause air resistance and gravity seize to be a problem.
Ever heard of the spacecraft with 2km sails they thought about building? Was supposed to run only on the sun's "push"
Acceleration is VERY slow, but after say 10 days of constantly accelerating at say 0.001 ms^-2 you'd be up to a speed of 864 ms^-1, which is 3110.4 kmh^-1
Not bad if you ask me... The truth however is that the force acceleration would be a lot slower than that cause the force emitted by photons is miniscule
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ncrn
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:56 - 24 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of my friends on my course at uni has done some stuff with transmitting power using lasers, so I've linked him to this. My degree is in robotics so if its possible I might give this a shot Laughing.
____________________
Past: 55 Sym Jet, 91 ZZR250, 03 NSR125R. Present: 97 ER-5.
https://www.nsr125.co.uk - NSR Owners forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:53 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The hard part is building the cable, not whatever it is that goes up it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Omega
Crazy Courier



Joined: 07 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:53 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I understand this is a challenge to push technology but why not just use the cable itself to provide the power? Is the next step in the challenge to remove the cable or something?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

SoND
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:20 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omega wrote:
I understand this is a challenge to push technology but why not just use the cable itself to provide the power? Is the next step in the challenge to remove the cable or something?


If you use the cable for power then you're restricted to a material that's conductive.
____________________
Go back to bed - You have no rights - "Streetfighters ~ Mainstream motorcycling's crackwhore sister."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Paulington
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:25 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The cable will inevitably be constructed out of some form of carbon, they are hinting at carbon nanotubes due to their very high tensile strength and specific strength.

The idea of the cable carrying the power if we use armchair nanotubes could work but lest we forget we are building a HUGE cable. Armchair nanotubes are up to 1000 times more conductive than copper but are slightly heavier and weaker than other forms.

Simply to put in into scale, to maintain the same place on the Earth's surface it would have to be in geosynchrous orbit. This would mean the cable would have to be 35,786 km long and even the lightest cable at this length would be around 10000-40000 tons or so so must support it's own weight etc etc.

In other words, it's hard.
____________________
"Four wheels move the body, two wheels move the soul."
Current Vehicles: '89 Kawasaki KDX200, '99 Yamaha XV535, '00 Honda ST1100 Pan-European, '08 Suzuki GSX-R1000, '08 Mitsubishi Lancer GS4 2.0 TDCi, '15 BMW 1 Series 116d Sport Turbo.
CBT: 27/08/08. Theory: 04/09/09. Module 1: 16/09/09. Module 2: 01/10/09.


Last edited by Paulington on 12:16 - 29 Jul 2009; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:37 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would have thought they would not use a cable in space. Some sort of laser guidance system with lasers providing power aswell.

With little gravity there would be no need for a cable, and use the power to propel it some other way.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Paulington
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:55 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Then what will the 'lift' be guided by if not a cable?

The whole point is they want to find something they can use as a lift that can climb a cable that is anchored to something on the surface of the Earth and a satellite in a geosynchronous orbit with the Earth so as to have a permanent cable there from the surface of the Earth to space to transport items easily.
____________________
"Four wheels move the body, two wheels move the soul."
Current Vehicles: '89 Kawasaki KDX200, '99 Yamaha XV535, '00 Honda ST1100 Pan-European, '08 Suzuki GSX-R1000, '08 Mitsubishi Lancer GS4 2.0 TDCi, '15 BMW 1 Series 116d Sport Turbo.
CBT: 27/08/08. Theory: 04/09/09. Module 1: 16/09/09. Module 2: 01/10/09.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:51 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why not run electrified tracks up the cable?

Like I said, the interesting part is building the cable. Currently there are no materials strong enough that can be manufactured in sufficient quantities to make it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ncrn
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:50 - 28 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think one of the main issues with cable power is if the cable gets damaged then the lift loses all power and it is a costly and lengthly process to repair the cable. If you can transmit the power wirelessly then it could potentially be easier to repair a damaged to the power system as you can replace a section rather than say an entire massive cable.
____________________
Past: 55 Sym Jet, 91 ZZR250, 03 NSR125R. Present: 97 ER-5.
https://www.nsr125.co.uk - NSR Owners forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

5v3d3b0
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:51 - 29 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The should mimic the material in spider web... A cable just a few cm thick can support ridiculous weight!
But I trust they know what they're doing Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:17 - 30 Jul 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

ncrn wrote:
I think one of the main issues with cable power is if the cable gets damaged then the lift loses all power and it is a costly and lengthly process to repair the cable. If you can transmit the power wirelessly then it could potentially be easier to repair a damaged to the power system as you can replace a section rather than say an entire massive cable.


Or in those rare cases where the quadruply-redundant power fails, you could use a rocket to run up the cable to the failed section ...

Svedebo wrote:
The should mimic the material in spider web... A cable just a few cm thick can support ridiculous weight!
But I trust they know what they're doing Wink


Which still wouldn't be strong enough, and even if it was they still can't make enough of it. The only thing theoretically strong enough are carbon nanotubes, and they can't make enough of those either.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 192 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.28 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 109.82 Kb