Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Topic at work - BMW or KTM

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  

Which and why?
BMW
19%
 19%  [ 5 ]
KTM
80%
 80%  [ 21 ]
Total Votes : 26

Author Message

craigs23
Mr Muscle



Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:36 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Topic at work - BMW or KTM Reply with quote

What are your impressions of each brand?

Including model range, image, performance, the Ewan and Charlie effect (whether KTM were wrong in denying them free bikes), advertising, etc.

Doesn't matter if you have or haven't owned/ridden one - this is a product perception thread.

Discuss.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

the grim reaper
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:40 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

KTM for me, they have that slightly mental side to them which interests me far more than the BMW brand image of durability at the expense of excitement. I'm sure the K1200R is a quick bike but I'd still rather have the RC8, even if the build quality isn't as good.

Plus, BMW riders have that superiority complex that drives me nuts (cue BMW owners turning up with pitchforks). It may be a cliche but it seems to be true.

Cheers

Grim
____________________
Adverts don't always work: Remember that advert, where the army are running across the desert and they have a wounded man on a stretcher. They get to a ravine, the bridge is down and a caption pops up that says, 'What are you thinking?'. I don't know about you but I was thinking, 'Christ, I'm glad I'm not in the f***ing army'.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:40 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Immediate perception wise.

BMW - Reliable plodders, good for touring use and fairly solidly built.

KTM - quirky off roaders built for competition use and rarely seen.

Both perceptions are probably at least a decade out of date.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kwaks
I'm not a fast rider



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:42 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

BMW for me, reputation for reliability, bikes are functional and designed for their purpose, regardless of how fugly they end up. A lot of new innovations coming from BMW and seeping into mainstream.

KTM on the otherhand come across as more fun but less reliable.
____________________
Fallen Angel "Nae sniffing my seat now!!!!! "
www.cliqueycuntsmcc.co.uk
I AM NOT A FAST RIDER!!!!!!!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:44 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Re: Topic at work - BMW or KTM Reply with quote

craigs23 wrote:
What are your impressions of each brand?...

BMW bikes have been used by those who travel the world for years.
It's tried and tested.
Even known to work on dodgy fuel.

KTM on the other hand I liken to a thoroughbred racehorse.
Very picky and choosy and does not take abuse.
Ok, they enter the Paris-Dakar but only with the help of a mega support crew.

Charly and Ewan did have support but they were making films and a bit of charity work after all.
Many solo world travels have done it on a BMW without.


Just my thoughts.
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

brooky
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:46 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say that one of the major differences between these bikes would be the build quality. Up until recently BMW have always been renowned for their excellent build quality and bomb-proof desgin.

With KTM the complete opposite seems to apply, I have come accross many posts on various forums where the owner has complained at the complete lack of trust they have in their bike due to relentless problems their KTM has given.

I don't speak from experience as I have owned neither, I'm just expressing what I have heard.

I would like to own a BMW in the future though, I'm not so fussed about KTM as there are plenty of other brands which can do the same job but better.
____________________
Suzuki GSX-R 750 K6.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:47 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

BMW = more innovative with their technology (or at least prepared to do something different), well built, look good, designed for the rider rather than the press. Boxer engines, which unfortunately seem to be going out quietly.

KTM = Orange. Off road focus. Road bikes have different styling but ultimately don't offer much that Aprillia/Ducati don't, other than perhaps better build quality. (Although perhaps I should revise this having just read some of the other posts!!)

Can think of at least three beemers I'd like to own, can't say that about KTM. In fact I don't really fancy any KTM.

BMW for me.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dr. DaveJPS
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:00 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

KTM for me

(though am biased as i own a KTM 950SM)

as for the question about build quality, there are a few problems with the KTM that all of the LC8 engines run the risk of sufferering. ( i've had one which is the clutch slave cylinder dieing and having to be replaced at the cost of ~£100)
but generally bolts and corrosion are not a problem. mine comes just as nice (when i do clean it) as when i bought it.

BMW's range might be wider, but generally seems duller. Also BMW's are far too pricey.
____________________
"intelligent inattention is preferable to unintelligent tinkering"
www.davejps.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mystery
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:18 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

KTM for me better for looks and off roading and bmws are good there build quality but are to bulky looking for me
____________________
Carbon knuckles assure you maximum protect against debris and unfortunate accidents or if someone cuts you off, their side mirror.Mopeds are like chubby chicks.. they are really fun to ride until you're friends catch you on one
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:19 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I had to choose between a BMUU and a KTM for build quality it would have to be the Honda. Wink
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:43 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

BMW - Plodding along with pipe, slippers and Belstaff waxed cotton jacket, service with a mallet and crowbar.
KTM - Screaming the nuts off it, dressed like a Transformer, rebuild every couple of hours using jeweler's screwdrivers and a loupe.
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bendy
Mrs Sensible



Joined: 10 Jun 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:46 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

One's orange and one's grey.

Both are very tall.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rob
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Mar 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:52 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess, similar to Keith, my initial impressions of both are:

BMW, solid, reliable, but a bit dull.
KTM, moto-x, trailie, off-roaders, possibly a little unreliable.

But saying that, there are some lovely looking KTM's out there and if that was my sort of bike they are predominantly the brand of choice that you see on the road so it's probably where I would look first!

BMW's.. now there's an interesting beast.... I was always under the assumption that KTM were MAD refusing the bikes for the show (which I put solely down to reliability) but now (after a lot of sales after the show I'm sure) they seem to be suffering with people saying 'you only bought that cos you saw it on TV' kind of comments..

I havn't ridden a whole bunch of Beemers but have many times ridden a K1200R and the thing is a beast... it's like riding a bucking bronco! If that is your thing then great and a lot of people that would enjoy it are put put off by the brand image... and the price!

I do love all the little extras you can get for the beemers (at a price) but personally, I don't reckon they will ever become accepted in the way that Honda and Yammy etc etc are in the mainstream, but I'm sure BMW owners are happy about that. I have a similar feeling about Triumph. It's nice to be in a minority and frustrating to see more Trumpets on the road... but that can only be a good thing for the manufacturer... possibly not so good for the consumer though!
____________________
Love is 1050cc Smile
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Smooth
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:52 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

KTM - quirky off roaders built for competition use and rarely seen.

Both perceptions are probably at least a decade out of date.



Yes, In France/Switzerland there were quite a lot of KTM Adventures and the like.
____________________
TDM850
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rob
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Mar 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:55 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bendy wrote:


Both are very tall.


Surprisingly, the K1200 is much lower than the Sprint to my surprise!


.... but now I've got my M*Stars, the world is my oyster! Thumbs Up
____________________
Love is 1050cc Smile


Last edited by Rob on 10:10 - 07 Aug 2009; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:10 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

KTM for me.

BMW just seem really dull.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

JAMSXR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:10 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

BMW to me are big heavy bikes with as many optional extras as their cars.... They are expensive, well built and capable of touring the world. Unfortunately 'most' BMW riders from my experience don't really have a passion for bikes and just see them as an effective mode of transport!

KTMs on the other-hand seem to produce more ballsy in your face bikes! I think generally there bikes seem allot more 'fun' then any BMW. You have the highly strung 2t EXCs, Enduro, Adventure, Superduke and the RC8. I know BMW do some similar bikes but I don't believe they have been as well reviewed as the KTM. I know for a fact some of the BMW dirt bikes have been known for there poor reliability. I know KTMs also come fitted with top of the range parts like WP suspension as standard, I'm not sure about BMW?

I am a little bias having owned a KTM which was bullet proof and fun!

Summed up in people below, who represents the BMW and who represents the KTM?
____________________
Honda SFX50 > Aprilia SR125 > Aprilia RS125 > Honda RFV400 > K4 GSXR600 > KTM Duke > C1H 636 > K3 GSXR1000 > Aprilia RSV-R > Triumph Street Triple R > Ducati 899 Panigale > Aprilia Tuono 1100 > Triumph Daytona 675R > KTM SuperDuke 1290 2.0
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LeeR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:36 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Both too expensive to consider.
____________________
My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:00 - 07 Aug 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

LeeR wrote:
Both too expensive to consider.

My first KTM was £350, my first BMW was £500 Wink.

I've looked into models in two categories quite a bit.

First off, some facts:
Both KTM and BMW make competition spec enduro machines with similar light weight and nasty service intervals: EXC range/G450X

Both have made light-middle weight trail bikes (and SM etc) with fairly 'reliable' engines: LC4 / G650

Both have heavy-middle weight adventure and enduro bikes KTM 990 / BMW F800GS and HP2

Both make litre road bike twins with fairly light weight.

If you look at the ends of the spectrum, then KTM does have a lot more light-weight competition spec enduro machinery on offer and BMW has a lot more heavy weight road touring machinery (yes, I'm including the GSA in that.)

Sure more people have probably gone around the world on BMWs, but then a hell of a lot have on C90s. Nick Sanders has shown that a specific make or model of bike doesn't make too much difference.

Some general impressions from reading others experiences before I made my choice:
BMW really aren't too reliable these days. Their innovations generally don't work as well as KTMs improvement of existing technology.

For the bike I wanted to get (light middle weight) the KTM seemed to hold most of the advantages; it was a decent chunk lighter, had better and 'easier' suspension (the KTM has an air rear shock, which could be good, but reality informs me isn't so great.)
The BMW only had five gears, but actually had a wider ratio.
The KTM was a fair bit smoother ride (much more noticable vibes through the bars on the beemer), but the BMW had twice as high service intervals and better fuel consumption as stock.
The BMW sales person was much more honest, while the KTM ones tried to make up stuff on the spot that I knew not to be true.

When you get to the heavy-middle weight adventure bike class, I think the new F800GS offers some very real and interesting competition to the KTM adventure.
Sadly a lot of people will have had their 'adventure' sadly reduced in scope because of the long way around and choosing a stupidly heavy bike - though whether those sorts of people would make use of a light bike off-road is another matter.

Oh and it's not a case of free bikes, I think it was something like £50k that BMW offered on top at the last minute; forget the exact details.
To some degree I'm glad they didn't take KTMs.

Anyway, to conclude; for a lot of BMWs I do immediately think silly/heavy/old/slow; but not for all of them.
Given the choice, I'd have got a cheap TE610 if I could have found one. For the bigger bikes, I'd like to try a Highland, which offers similar power and facilities but a lot less weight than the BMW and KTM offerings. Reliability would definitely be questionable however.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 194 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.22 Sec - Server Load: 1.22 - MySQL Queries: 16 - Page Size: 110.7 Kb