|
|
| Which and why? |
| BMW |
|
19% |
[ 5 ] |
| KTM |
|
80% |
[ 21 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 26 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| craigs23 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 craigs23 Mr Muscle

Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| the grim reaper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 the grim reaper World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kwaks |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kwaks I'm not a fast rider

Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 08:42 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
BMW for me, reputation for reliability, bikes are functional and designed for their purpose, regardless of how fugly they end up. A lot of new innovations coming from BMW and seeping into mainstream.
KTM on the otherhand come across as more fun but less reliable. ____________________ Fallen Angel "Nae sniffing my seat now!!!!! "
www.cliqueycuntsmcc.co.uk
I AM NOT A FAST RIDER!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| brooky |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 brooky Brolly Dolly
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| D O G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 D O G World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dr. DaveJPS |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dr. DaveJPS World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 May 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 09:00 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
KTM for me
(though am biased as i own a KTM 950SM)
as for the question about build quality, there are a few problems with the KTM that all of the LC8 engines run the risk of sufferering. ( i've had one which is the clutch slave cylinder dieing and having to be replaced at the cost of ~£100)
but generally bolts and corrosion are not a problem. mine comes just as nice (when i do clean it) as when i bought it.
BMW's range might be wider, but generally seems duller. Also BMW's are far too pricey. ____________________ "intelligent inattention is preferable to unintelligent tinkering"
www.davejps.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mystery |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mystery World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Jul 2009 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Skudd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Skudd Super Spammer

Joined: 01 Oct 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 09:19 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
If I had to choose between a BMUU and a KTM for build quality it would have to be the Honda.  ____________________ Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm". |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Shaggy D.A. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Shaggy D.A. Super Spammer

Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 09:43 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
BMW - Plodding along with pipe, slippers and Belstaff waxed cotton jacket, service with a mallet and crowbar.
KTM - Screaming the nuts off it, dressed like a Transformer, rebuild every couple of hours using jeweler's screwdrivers and a loupe. ____________________ Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bendy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bendy Mrs Sensible

Joined: 10 Jun 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 Mar 2002 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 09:52 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I guess, similar to Keith, my initial impressions of both are:
BMW, solid, reliable, but a bit dull.
KTM, moto-x, trailie, off-roaders, possibly a little unreliable.
But saying that, there are some lovely looking KTM's out there and if that was my sort of bike they are predominantly the brand of choice that you see on the road so it's probably where I would look first!
BMW's.. now there's an interesting beast.... I was always under the assumption that KTM were MAD refusing the bikes for the show (which I put solely down to reliability) but now (after a lot of sales after the show I'm sure) they seem to be suffering with people saying 'you only bought that cos you saw it on TV' kind of comments..
I havn't ridden a whole bunch of Beemers but have many times ridden a K1200R and the thing is a beast... it's like riding a bucking bronco! If that is your thing then great and a lot of people that would enjoy it are put put off by the brand image... and the price!
I do love all the little extras you can get for the beemers (at a price) but personally, I don't reckon they will ever become accepted in the way that Honda and Yammy etc etc are in the mainstream, but I'm sure BMW owners are happy about that. I have a similar feeling about Triumph. It's nice to be in a minority and frustrating to see more Trumpets on the road... but that can only be a good thing for the manufacturer... possibly not so good for the consumer though! ____________________ Love is 1050cc  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Smooth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Smooth Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 21 Apr 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 Mar 2002 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 10:10 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
KTM for me.
BMW just seem really dull. ____________________ My Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JAMSXR |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JAMSXR World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| LeeR |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 LeeR World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 10:36 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Both too expensive to consider. ____________________ My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 12:00 - 07 Aug 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| LeeR wrote: | Both too expensive to consider. |
My first KTM was £350, my first BMW was £500 .
I've looked into models in two categories quite a bit.
First off, some facts:
Both KTM and BMW make competition spec enduro machines with similar light weight and nasty service intervals: EXC range/G450X
Both have made light-middle weight trail bikes (and SM etc) with fairly 'reliable' engines: LC4 / G650
Both have heavy-middle weight adventure and enduro bikes KTM 990 / BMW F800GS and HP2
Both make litre road bike twins with fairly light weight.
If you look at the ends of the spectrum, then KTM does have a lot more light-weight competition spec enduro machinery on offer and BMW has a lot more heavy weight road touring machinery (yes, I'm including the GSA in that.)
Sure more people have probably gone around the world on BMWs, but then a hell of a lot have on C90s. Nick Sanders has shown that a specific make or model of bike doesn't make too much difference.
Some general impressions from reading others experiences before I made my choice:
BMW really aren't too reliable these days. Their innovations generally don't work as well as KTMs improvement of existing technology.
For the bike I wanted to get (light middle weight) the KTM seemed to hold most of the advantages; it was a decent chunk lighter, had better and 'easier' suspension (the KTM has an air rear shock, which could be good, but reality informs me isn't so great.)
The BMW only had five gears, but actually had a wider ratio.
The KTM was a fair bit smoother ride (much more noticable vibes through the bars on the beemer), but the BMW had twice as high service intervals and better fuel consumption as stock.
The BMW sales person was much more honest, while the KTM ones tried to make up stuff on the spot that I knew not to be true.
When you get to the heavy-middle weight adventure bike class, I think the new F800GS offers some very real and interesting competition to the KTM adventure.
Sadly a lot of people will have had their 'adventure' sadly reduced in scope because of the long way around and choosing a stupidly heavy bike - though whether those sorts of people would make use of a light bike off-road is another matter.
Oh and it's not a case of free bikes, I think it was something like £50k that BMW offered on top at the last minute; forget the exact details.
To some degree I'm glad they didn't take KTMs.
Anyway, to conclude; for a lot of BMWs I do immediately think silly/heavy/old/slow; but not for all of them.
Given the choice, I'd have got a cheap TE610 if I could have found one. For the bigger bikes, I'd like to try a Highland, which offers similar power and facilities but a lot less weight than the BMW and KTM offerings. Reliability would definitely be questionable however. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 194 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|