Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


New motoring offence? = more money?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:48 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: New motoring offence? = more money? Reply with quote

I know there is the law called quitting ie it is illegal to leave your vehicle with the engine running but whats this?.



https://www.southportvisiter.co.uk/southport-news/southport-southport-news/2009/11/27/stationary-motorists-in-sefton-could-be-fined-for-leaving-engines-running-if-plans-are-approved-101022-25263545/


In that how long is too long in that there is a notorious traffic light here that changes every 6 minutes.

Monday mornings also have severe traffic jams meaning people are stuck in nose to tail traffic for hours and do not move....


Is it me or is the starting and switching off of engines constantly EVEN WORSE for emissions than keeping the engine on?.


Rolling Eyes
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:07 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Re: New motoring offence? = more money? Reply with quote

When I used to ride a push bike to work at a wood factory seven miles away or so, going through the small town where I worked with road works and thus a lot of idling cars would make me feel a bit woozy.
However, the law it's self is pretty ridiculous and not sensibly enforceable.

Fixing the problem causing cars to have to wait is a much better solution... or if you're worried about it yourself, get a bike Wink.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

paulcdb
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:56 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

so i just jump started my car and take it for a run to charge the battery up but a mile down the road i hit a railway crossing, or some a lorry blocking the road, so i have 2 choices...

1. Keep car running and charging my battery, which would cost me £20 (or whatever the penalty is)
2. Turn off engine and risk not being able to start again and thus holding up traffic.

Glad i don't live near there but guess it's only a matter of time everywhere else gets it once one town see pound signs.

Also...

Quote:
especially elderly buses and lorries.


So buses are going to start asking passengers how long they'll take to pay/get off? and how long before someone gets a ticket cos some old person can't find 20p? lol
____________________
Excersise is rubbish!
If your healthy you don't need it... if your sick you shouldn't do it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:25 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tut Tut you should be paying a VAT-registered authorised battery replacer to replace it for you at your home, not driving this dangerous vehicle on the road!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:30 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Just charge the council with several thousand counts of aiding an abetting Laughing .

Cars emissions are pretty negligable. Modern ones are not even a choice for commiting suicide.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Numptie
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 28 Oct 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:58 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Re: New motoring offence? = more money? Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:
I know there is the law called quitting ie it is illegal to leave your vehicle with the engine running but whats this?.
...

Is it me or is the starting and switching off of engines constantly EVEN WORSE for emissions than keeping the engine on?.

Rolling Eyes


The start-up process can't possibly cause as much emission damage as a ticking engine on run-over for 6 minutes, so I guess they've factored in the Carbon Monoxide and exhaust by-products to realise that it makes sense to turn the engines off.

It's quite terrible thinking about how clogged our roads and cities are becoming. Why haven't these caged drivers woken up yet?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

kes
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:06 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

all i can say you have to love living in sefton.

i can see this making traffic slower not just by old cars not starting.

but 93yr old dorris in her old micra, struggeling to start the car first time and slowing the traffic down even more...

god damn i need a bike.... filtering just doesn't work in a car Neutral
____________________
CBT - 18/11/09
Currently deciding how to go about getting a bike/test done.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:49 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Re: New motoring offence? = more money? Reply with quote

Numptie wrote:
The start-up process can't possibly cause as much emission damage as a ticking engine on run-over for 6 minutes, so I guess they've factored in the Carbon Monoxide and exhaust by-products to realise that it makes sense to turn the engines off.


Far from it. At least idling the cat is kept up to temp an working. Ignition off means the cat gets cold and then needs to warm up again to have any effect.

Numptie wrote:
It's quite terrible thinking about how clogged our roads and cities are becoming. Why haven't these caged drivers woken up yet?


Why should they? Too often the traffic jams are at best not dealt with, and sometimes deliberatly caused. Congestion in London got worse even though actual traffic levels dropped. Thats what happens when you get car hating politicians in charge.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ricky_v
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:40 - 27 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Public finances are nearly a trillion pounds in the red, EU is costing us £7,000/minute in return for having "568ml" on a pint of milk.

Expect more of any, and i mean, ANY excuse to tax us even more Rolling Eyes
____________________
YBR 125
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:14 - 28 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

ricky_v wrote:
Public finances are nearly a trillion pounds in the red, EU is costing us £7,000/minute in return for having "568ml" on a pint of milk.

Expect more of any, and i mean, ANY excuse to tax us even more Rolling Eyes


Any facts to back any of that up that 7k a minute or have you just spouted everyone's second favourite random number:

https://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2007/02/is_17_the_most_random_number.php
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

ricky_v
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:22 - 28 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:
ricky_v wrote:
Public finances are nearly a trillion pounds in the red, EU is costing us £7,000/minute in return for having "568ml" on a pint of milk.

Expect more of any, and i mean, ANY excuse to tax us even more Rolling Eyes


Any facts to back any of that up that 7k a minute or have you just spouted everyone's second favourite random number:

https://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2007/02/is_17_the_most_random_number.php


according to this guy its £114,000/min gross, £96,000/min net, so my £7,000/min will make me seem like a massive EU supporter! Laughing Laughing Laughing

https://www.youtube.com/user/ukipwebmaster#p/search/5/UJsvNhYIWe4
____________________
YBR 125
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:26 - 29 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

ricky_v wrote:
according to this guy its £114,000/min gross, £96,000/min net, so my £7,000/min will make me seem like a massive EU supporter! Laughing Laughing Laughing

https://www.youtube.com/user/ukipwebmaster#p/search/5/UJsvNhYIWe4


Seems like a bit of an exaggeration to me...

It discounts any money flowing back to us through subsidies or even the rebate:

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4721307.stm#howbig

66% of the net would leave us with total payments of less than £5 billion, and because £5 bil. is such an incomprehensible number, you can compare it against some other figures:

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8381597.stm

note it's only about 2x what is spent on erectile dysfunction each year Smile

or per person:

£5,000,000,000 / 60,000,000 = £83.33 per year...

or our £35 bil. 'defence' spending:

https://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/Organisation/KeyFactsAboutDefence/DefenceSpending.htm

And, at the very least, the increased trade within the eu (little / no import duty on goods within member states) means that while we appear to be 'losing' that < £5 bil. UK companies and workers benefit from the membership thus our economy grows.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

ricky_v
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:49 - 29 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

To trade with other EU countries does not mean we have to be in a political union, thats how Switzerland, Iceland, etc managed to trade, without slowly loosing their powers.

so we get 66% back, so thats approx. 40-50,000/min we loose so they can build motorways in Poland for example, and the main advantage for this cost seems that we can trade with the EU, to which Non EU counties have a similar agreement anyway.

Part of Monnets plan is to dissolve all power fron each member state, in return for "economic benefits", there more then happy to put up the prison of stars flag all over the place, and explain that it comes from the EU social fund, or that thank god were in the EU otherwise this area will still have high unemployment. But what they dont tell you is that if Britain was out of the EU, the money saved would beable to still pump in the same ammount of cash to regional developments, plus extra, without wasting money on regulations and directives that are half arsed, or useless, or costly, etc.

They love promising riches from the EU, only a couple of months ago when Ireland was voing on the Lisbon treaty (for the second time, because they just dont know the meaning of no, and wont let a little thing such as the masses voting get in the way of the European Project), the yes campain was promising jobs with the lisbon treaty. Now they must of meant jobs for the political elite because the very next day when Ireland voted yes, one of the companies who donated 400,000 Euros to the yes campain made over 1,000 workers redundant!

So im sorry, i dont believe that im getting value for money. Smile
____________________
YBR 125
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:06 - 29 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

ricky_v wrote:
To trade with other EU countries does not mean we have to be in a political union, thats how Switzerland, Iceland, etc managed to trade, without slowly loosing their powers.


Iceland are completely bust so not a good example for you. Switzerland have very little in the way of exports - they make their money by looking after other people's money, so again not a great example for you. In fact I can't immediately think of a good example for you to use, maybe china, but they make most of their trade work by low labour rates. Middle east doesn't really count either as their major import is a product we don't have enough of ourselves (oil).


ricky_v wrote:
so we get 66% back, so thats approx. 40-50,000/min we loose so they can build motorways in Poland for example, and the main advantage for this cost seems that we can trade with the EU, to which Non EU counties have a similar agreement anyway.


40-50/min is simply not right... Strangely you're original guess wasn't far off £5 bil. ~ £9000/min, again that's £83 per person per year. Or one seventh of what we spend on 'defence', one eighteenth of what we spend on health.

ricky_v wrote:
Part of Monnets plan is to dissolve all power fron each member state, in return for "economic benefits", there more then happy to put up the prison of stars flag all over the place, and explain that it comes from the EU social fund, or that thank god were in the EU otherwise this area will still have high unemployment. But what they dont tell you is that if Britain was out of the EU, the money saved would beable to still pump in the same ammount of cash to regional developments, plus extra, without wasting money on regulations and directives that are half arsed, or useless, or costly, etc.


You're quite right, we're a net contributor. so of course if we didn't pay the money in we'd still have it. What you fail to grasp is that the trade increases - just take one example, BAE - the major arms supplier in europe. Their profits (£1 bil in 2009), and thus employees and tertiary contribution to the UK economy, rely on the free trade within europe.

ricky_v wrote:
They love promising riches from the EU, only a couple of months ago when Ireland was voing on the Lisbon treaty (for the second time, because they just dont know the meaning of no, and wont let a little thing such as the masses voting get in the way of the European Project), the yes campain was promising jobs with the lisbon treaty. Now they must of meant jobs for the political elite because the very next day when Ireland voted yes, one of the companies who donated 400,000 Euros to the yes campain made over 1,000 workers redundant!


Don't confuse one company with the general movement of the EU. It's always possible to find some bad in a large organisation, especially if you include organisations it works with. Don't forget that €400,000 would've paid those workers (and their workspace) for somewhere between 1-3 days longer, meaning that the company in question would've had to make those workers redundant anyway.

ricky_v wrote:
So im sorry, i dont believe that im getting value for money. Smile


At the very least I think my freedom of movement is worth £83 a year - I can travel to europe with minimal checks, I could move anywhere within the EU tomorrow without visas, immigration processes.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

ricky_v
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:44 - 29 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Before the Icelandic banking crisis they had no desire to join the EU, not that they are broke, the government suddenly puts in an application to join this Union, Switzerland does make most of its money from banks, but Britain's main form of economy is the City of london, and unfortunatly thats going to be ruled by an EU financial super regulator, putting interests of the union before Britains.

appologies, im meant to say we still loose 44% of the net contributions, which would be about £25 bil/year, i.e 40,000/minute. statistics can be easily manipulated, and it wont suprise me if both sides did the manipulation to take their point accross.

the EU can have disadvantages to indistry, for example the one i work in, about half a dozen labs do the British standard fire testing for trains. once the New European equivalent comes in, this opens up my lab from about 4 or 5 competitors in the UK, to about 60 competitors in Europe. If the czech republic can do the testing cheaper, then im scratching my arse in the dole que! Laughing Laughing

Freedon of movement is absolutley fantastic if you want to move to Spain, but infortunatly makes any immigration policy in Britain as useful as a chocolate fire place.

I dont oppose the EU because of their obsessive rules and regulations, and that its costing us X ammount, its simply because not many people realise what they are doing, they are not transparant, they are corrupt, and they are willing to bypass democracy to move the European Project faster towards its goal, without the consent of 500 million people.

if they were completely open, had referendums on treaties, and generally listened to people, i wouldnt support it, but i would accept it.
____________________
YBR 125
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:08 - 29 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely the fact that Iceland want to join now they are broke tells you there is economic benefit to be had by joining? Have you noticed the SNP's policys? They want to leave the union (UK) and increase ties with Europe... wonder why one of Europe's biggest oil producers would want to do that? Maybe because it's financially sound?

As for the £25 bil. still no... the link I posted had the actual values further down:
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4721307.stm#contributes

It is definitely < £5 bil. after rebate as of 2005 (exact amounts are not available until 4 years later so 2005 is the latest final figure).

Perhaps your industry will be moved out, but as someone who's been in one that has been possible to offshore for years (software engineering) it doesn't seem to be happening to any great level. Maybe your industry will suffer, maybe it won't be as bad as you think... but on average I expect we benefit, although it is very difficult to measure so I can't say for definite.

Corruption and opacity are claims that you can throw at all political entities - our government especially! Just look at the stories about the Iraq war that are coming out at the moment (although I don't think they really surprise anyone)! I just feel closer to the views of the EU - data protection / human rights & reduced borders - than I do to the current government, and I don't think the other parties will be significantly different! Maybe Europe will... As for referendums on treaties - they do, you mentioned the Irish* one, the Dutch had them as did many others - it's our government not offering a choice, not the EU.

*Yes I know the EU/Irish government bludgeoned through the Lisbon treaty by renaming it, altering it slightly and trying again, but the Irish government was more to blame than the EU.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:14 - 29 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Going back to the OP, it is a typical knee jerk reaction to a basic problem. many motorists park up in car parks and the like and just leave their engines running while they read the paper, eat lunch, have a chat on the phone or what ever. Many lorries park up and leave their engines running too. taxis are the worst for it, you can see a massive gaggle of taxis all with engines running for hours. In the sefton area as in m ost areas, they are an issue.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ingah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:26 - 29 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

And they pay for their laziness in petrol.

Which as we all know is so heavily taxed that leaving your engine running is a self-inflicted financial injury.

The way i look at it; if my battery is dead / dying, my starter motor has problems, someone else's crappy car refuses to start again and causes a big traffic jam, i/someone else is freezing/boiling their ass off and needs the engine running to keep themselves from extreme discomfort, and any one of the myriad of the other reasons it would be a bad idea to allow some busybody to force people to turn their engine off - this is overall a bad idea, and to be frank, none of the establishment's business to go meddling in, as they go out of their way to make our lives as miserable and regulated as possible, as it is.

I can't see it going through in the end anyway, the government likes its taxes too much.
____________________
-- Ingah
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

damz
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:08 - 30 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:


Cars emissions are pretty negligable. Modern ones are not even a choice for commiting suicide.

All the best

Keith


hybrids just dont cut it either
____________________
Current Bikes RVF400 - 94
Cars: RX7 FD, Eunos Roadster
Former Bikes: FZR 250R 89, ZX7R 98
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

EUMP
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:38 - 06 Dec 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mmm, to be fair when im stuck in traffic and can't get past I normally turn off the engine anyway, but when its cold out and I'm having doubts if it will come back on easily i'll leave it on.
____________________
C.B.T - Expired
MOD1 04/08/10
MOD2 10/08/10
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Alasdair Murison
Nova Slayer



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:44 - 07 Dec 2009    Post subject: Re: New motoring offence? = more money? Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:

Is it me or is the starting and switching off of engines constantly EVEN WORSE for emissions than keeping the engine on?.


Rolling Eyes


uh, in a way yes, because starting the engine produces heaps more NOx gasses than leaving it running, and NOx gases contribute far more to creating acid rain than CO2 ever did to intensifying the greenhouse effect.

not sure how much of a defence this would be if you're caught for it..... suppose you'd be aswell showing off the picture of the 33BHP restriction cat Razz
____________________
MY 2008 Aprilia RS 125
Passed test : 15/08/08
Riding since : 15/06/08 (17th Birthday)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Alasdair Murison
Nova Slayer



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:49 - 07 Dec 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Damz wrote:
Kickstart wrote:


Cars emissions are pretty negligable. Modern ones are not even a choice for commiting suicide.

All the best

Keith


hybrids just dont cut it either


"Frickin' hybrids man, they just don't do the trick anymore"

South Park "elementry school musical"

lol!!
____________________
MY 2008 Aprilia RS 125
Passed test : 15/08/08
Riding since : 15/06/08 (17th Birthday)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 35 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.13 Sec - Server Load: 0.55 - MySQL Queries: 16 - Page Size: 136.28 Kb