|
Author |
Message |
arry |
This post is not being displayed .
|
arry Super Spammer
Joined: 03 Jan 2009 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
RhynoCZ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
RhynoCZ Super Spammer
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Karma :
|
Posted: 22:29 - 11 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Citizen Kane (1941) - 7/10
So, I ''finally'' saw this film last night. Some say it's the best film ever made. Well, I wouldn't go this far, but it was surprisingly good. Being 1941 release also makes you appreciate some of the camera angles and special effects and trickery. Also, the film was full of modern references and concepts, that I even questioned its release date, at various places.
Anyway, I can only compare this film to Czech 30's and 40's films and this American classic sure showed a lot of inovation, but the story telling was very tiresome. The last 30 minutes of the film I was wondering, why am I even watching this, but then the final scene made it all worth it.
TL; DR, the film is rather overrated, yet I enjoyed watching it. Not worth the second view though. ____________________ '87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Suntan Sid World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :
|
Posted: 22:37 - 11 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
RhynoCZ wrote: | Citizen Kane (1941) - 7/10
So, I ''finally'' saw this film last night. Some say it's the best film ever made. Well, I wouldn't go this far, but it was surprisingly good. Being 1941 release also makes you appreciate some of the camera angles and special effects and trickery. Also, the film was full of modern references and concepts, that I even questioned its release date, at various places.
Anyway, I can only compare this film to Czech 30's and 40's films and this American classic sure showed a lot of inovation, but the story telling was very tiresome. The last 30 minutes of the film I was wondering, why am I even watching this, but then the final scene made it all worth it.
TL; DR, the film is rather overrated, yet I enjoyed watching it. Not worth the second view though. |
I remember trying to watch it years ago, got bored and turned it off before the end. ____________________ "Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!" |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Suntan Sid World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :
|
Posted: 22:43 - 11 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Aftermath 2/10
It got 2 because there were two facts about the real life events included in the film.
Boring, depressing, slow, predictable, Arnie not being Arnie, an hour and half of your life you won't get back, just don't bother!
Barry Norman, eat yer heart out! ____________________ "Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!" |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
CaNsA |
This post is not being displayed .
|
CaNsA Super Spammer
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
RhynoCZ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
RhynoCZ Super Spammer
Joined: 09 Mar 2012 Karma :
|
Posted: 09:02 - 12 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Suntan Sid wrote: | I remember trying to watch it years ago, got bored and turned it off before the end. |
I nearly turned it off after the Newsreel about Mr. Kane. It was completely pointless and it didn't explain nor add anything to the story. Just like some of the interviews in the second half of the film, that were supposed to explain, or atleast try to explain, the Kane's last word.
The ending did give me the ''aha'' moment, but as said, not worth the second run. ____________________ '87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
MarJay But it's British!
Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :
|
Posted: 10:16 - 12 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Ghost in the Shell (2017)
I really enjoyed the original Ghost In The Shell anime movie, and so I had to go and see this. The box office figures so far have been poor for such a high budget movie, and the reviews have been OK but brought down by the 'whitewashing' scandal.
So, what do I think? Good solid movie. Nothing spectacular. The problem is the same as in so many kids school reports; Potential.
It had the potential to be a masterpiece. The script was there, the effects are there, the cast is mostly there but it was really let down by what I felt to be a phoned in performance by Scar Jo. I'm not a fan of hers anyway, I'm fairly convinced she has no acting ability and just plays herself in every movie. All she did in this was add a funny walk (unless she just walks like that, dunno) and look gruff for a lot of the movie. There were also some clangy plot points which differed from the Anime which stuck out like the sorest of sore thumbs as inappropriate at best, but whitewashing at worst. No spoilers, but you'll probably know it when you see it. The GF wasn't too bothered by it, but it made me a little uncomfortable.
The action was very good, but there was quite a lot of telegraphing of the action and I felt like there was a very harsh switch in tone between the talkie bits and the action bits, like they had tacked in the action afterwards.
The stand out performance was Pilou Asbaek as Batou. Takeshi Kitano was also pretty good although I felt like he thought he was on stage rather than film. His lines were delivered as if a soliloquy, but perhaps the switch between Japanese and English triggered that. Fun fact, he's the Takeshi from Takeshi's castle and Takeshi's Challenge. Good hairstyle in the movie too, and his character is a total badass.
Scar Jo wasn't bad per se, she was just bad compared to the rest of the cast... dull... flat... Could have been done better by a thousand other actresses. There are probably a ton of Japanese actresses who could have done a better job, and I know there are plenty of Hollywood actresses who could have done better. I know the filmmakers were looking for a certain 'look' (classic Manga Anime big eyes big lips etc) and she does have that, she looks like the Major, but I'm sure someone better could have been found.
5/10 a couple of points taken off for failing to meet potential. If it had a different lead it could have reached the heady heights of a 9 I think. As a movie in isolation ignoring my prejudice for Scar Jo and the fact I'd seen the Anime first it could have been a 7/10. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
hellkat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
hellkat Super Spammer
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
duhawkz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
duhawkz World Chat Champion
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Karma :
|
Posted: 10:10 - 14 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
hellkat wrote: | Bronson
Self-aggrandising nutters banging their own drum - no thanks.
I don't really care about the violence, I'm old enough to have seen plenty of violent films.
I just haven't got the patience to watch people pretending to be nutters and then end up becoming actual nutters. Been there, done that, seen it happen in front of my own eyes, yawn.
Tom Hardy (I am sure) is an increasingly accomplished actor, but I didn't even finish watching it, I couldnt be bothered with all the shouting - it was like watching that mad cunt in Sexy Beast. So even though that's supposed to be a classic performance by Ben Kingsley, all I want to do is drop a large brick on his head from a great height.
Same with Bronson.
2/10
If I managed to watch it the whole way through, I doubt I'd give it more than 5 anyway. |
I agree with both points, bronson was on late one night on tv, i pretty sure I turned it off and went to bed half way through.
Sexy beast I ended up watching (becau of the supposed iconic performance of kingsly) to the end but felt i wasted a portion of my life that i can never have again ____________________ "The guy is a worthless cunt and I honestly believe I would be a slightly happier person if he died." - Chris-Red |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Pjay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Pjay World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Jan 2016 Karma :
|
Posted: 10:23 - 14 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
duhawkz wrote: | hellkat wrote: | Bronson
Self-aggrandising nutters banging their own drum - no thanks.
I don't really care about the violence, I'm old enough to have seen plenty of violent films.
I just haven't got the patience to watch people pretending to be nutters and then end up becoming actual nutters. Been there, done that, seen it happen in front of my own eyes, yawn.
Tom Hardy (I am sure) is an increasingly accomplished actor, but I didn't even finish watching it, I couldnt be bothered with all the shouting - it was like watching that mad cunt in Sexy Beast. So even though that's supposed to be a classic performance by Ben Kingsley, all I want to do is drop a large brick on his head from a great height.
Same with Bronson.
2/10
If I managed to watch it the whole way through, I doubt I'd give it more than 5 anyway. |
I agree with both points, bronson was on late one night on tv, i pretty sure I turned it off and went to bed half way through.
Sexy beast I ended up watching (becau of the supposed iconic performance of kingsly) to the end but felt i wasted a portion of my life that i can never have again |
I liked Gangster No1, it had some kind of honesty to it and the protagonist was not some over bearing shouty twat, that has become the default demeanour for British hardmen in films.
I rank it as one of the finer films of the genre.
As a side note, I think Dead Mans Shoes is overrated, a 6/10 at best. ____________________ struan80 - I'll go first - satisfied tick 1 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Pjay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Pjay World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Jan 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
hellkat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
hellkat Super Spammer
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 11:28 - 14 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Pjay wrote: | I liked Gangster No1, it had some kind of honesty to it and the protagonist was not some over bearing shouty twat, that has become the default demeanour for British hardmen in films. |
See I don't mind the hardman type of films in general, hard men are alright as a genre, god knows I'm used to them in real life, LOL - and as we all know, the Guy Ritchie films brought about advent of the "hardman lite" with the comedy aspect. Yeah, so we'd all like our hard men to be like that - and I know it's not how life always is, you don't get to choose the nutters that invade your life ... but really I just can't stand that particular brand (shouty) of hard nut. So all due respect to both Hardy and Kingsley for portraying them so realistically.
In fact, one of my favourite British films is 44 Inch Chest, where I think the character played by John Hurt really is an excellent portrayal of classic British hard-nut shouty type. I actually liked Old Man Peanut as a person, even though he was an annoying braying old cunt
TL;DR: I quite like hard men and even nutters in general, just not the shouty non-stop type. ____________________ Not nearly as interesting in real life. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
hellkat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
hellkat Super Spammer
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 14:31 - 14 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
No mate, I would have smashed the telly.
Mind you, it was quite late, about 1.30am, and decided bed as a more interesting option.
Might give it another go, but only if I can guarantee myself I don't have to sit through the first half again.
____________________ Not nearly as interesting in real life. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogue_Shadow |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogue_Shadow World Chat Champion
Joined: 10 May 2012 Karma :
|
Posted: 19:45 - 14 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Sload |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Sload World Chat Champion
Joined: 28 Aug 2011 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Jayy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Jayy Mr. Ponzi
Joined: 08 Jun 2009 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 23:02 - 14 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Pjay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Pjay World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Jan 2016 Karma :
|
Posted: 23:32 - 14 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
The thing is, he spelled it 'Allot' which means to give out or distribute.
Maybe he just missed the comma?
'I enjoyed this, allot.' ____________________ struan80 - I'll go first - satisfied tick 1 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
WD Forte |
This post is not being displayed .
|
WD Forte World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jun 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Poundshop Dave |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
Poundshop Dave Crazy Courier
Joined: 24 Dec 2016 Karma :
|
Posted: 01:45 - 15 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Fast 8.
The only good thing about it was Charlie Theron, she had nice hair. Her hair was stunning, thought to myself "Dave get the wife a wig that resembles Therons hair and you could pretend that you are banging Charlie Theron". This would only work with the lights off so sort of defeats the object.
I digress, the film was 4.5/10. 3.5 out of that was for Theron's hair. The film was totally 'A team'. I half expected Vin Diesel to say "I love it when a plan comes together". It was crap. Half a dozen good action scenes a good film does not make. How they got Helen Mirren to appear in it I'll never know.
Download from the usual places. Don't do what I did and end up paying over £20 to see it. £11.60 for XPlus screening of said film, £3.80 for a Coke Zero large cup and £5.18 for a handful of pick and mix. I was robbed.
https://i63.tinypic.com/2r3gym9.jpg ____________________ Proud to be from Birmingham |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 22:13 - 15 Apr 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Split 5.5/10 - probably deserves a higher rating but psychological thrillers aren't my kinda thing, however this film did keep me engaged. Really good performance by James McAvoy. I'm going to discuss the spoiler hopefully without spoiling it; it's not a twist, it's launching yet another f'ing superhero franchise. Really? Is that what the world of film needs? Another f**king one?
It's fair to say I was not amused by that |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Poundshop Dave |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
Poundshop Dave Crazy Courier
Joined: 24 Dec 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 7 years, 11 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|