|
|
| Author |
Message |
| TUG |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TUG World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 May 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| panrider_uk |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 panrider_uk World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Artist |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Artist Super Spammer

Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TUG |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TUG World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 May 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:37 - 19 Oct 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
what do i need if i was to source my windows 7 install from a non genuine organisation?  ____________________ Haz ER-5, innit! |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Artist |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Artist Super Spammer

Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Frost |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Frost World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 May 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| el_oso |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 el_oso World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 May 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TUG |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TUG World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 May 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Frost |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Frost World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 May 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 00:40 - 21 Oct 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| the_godfather wrote: | | DaFrostyOne wrote: | 7 Is nearly as bloated and slow as Vista, but so far everything seems to work. |
disagree completely with that statement. |
7 Boots to desktop faster than vista, but once it's there the hard disk keeps thrashing about over a minute and the whole OS is still slow to use. From clicking a program to run to actually getting it takes my PC the same time on vista as it does on 7, so unless you restart your PC a lot i find the 2 to be about the same speed.
My judgement may well be tainted by running linux as my main OS which boots faster than either and once it's on the desktop it's done. Zero hard drive activity. Programs load about 3 times quicker too. My mates mac i used was a damn site quicker too.
Speed wise i'd rate them:
Linux: 9/10
Mac: 7/10
7: 3/10
Vista: 2.5/10
So yeah, compared to vista 7 is faster by a reasonable amount. But then in the grand scheme of things that's like saying compared to a shit a fart doesn't smell that bad.
I'd recommend 7 over Vista any day though as they seem to have toned down on the:
Do you want to view or run this program?
Are you sure that you wish to run this program?
WARNING a program is attempting to run! Allow?
The following program is attempting to access the internet. Allow?
That stuff just made me want to kick the monitor through,
*Edit*
I know this is no use to someone trying to decide between windows 7 and Vista, but like we all said, go for 7. Anyway i thought it might be nice to put some numbers to my feelings on how slow even 'fast' windows is so here we go...
Boot time.
Windows 7
time to mouse: 25
time to desktop: 38
time to google: 52
Linux
time to mouse: 20
Time to desktop: 22
time to google: 28
Windows 7 does get you to the desktop quicker than vista. It also gives you the mouse earlier so you feel like it's almost there quite early on. But loading a program once it gets to the desktop goes slowly as the PC is actually still loading. Network connections get made quickly enough for them not to slow down an internet page load.
Linux gives you a blank screen with no feedback on load progress until the hard disk goes silent and the desktop appears. Programs load at normal speed, but there is a noticeable hang time between the browser opening and the page loading. I suspect this is waiting for the internet connection.
System load showing system usage after boot, then after running and closing a bunch of programs.
Windows 7
https://www.bikechatforums.com/files/win-before.png
Boot
https://www.bikechatforums.com/files/win-after.png
Afterwards
840mb / 980mb
Linux
https://www.bikechatforums.com/files/before.png
Boot
https://www.bikechatforums.com/files/after.png
Afterwards
460mb / 500mb
So windows 7 is still slow, system heavy and hogs memory after programs have stopped running. Yeah it's better than Vista by a big, but it's got a long way to go. Linux isn't even optimised towards speed but it makes microsofts claims of complex and advanced optimisations for speed look laughable |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 144 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|