|
|
| Author |
Message |
| zzzzz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zzzzz Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 14 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Asharin |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Asharin World Chat Champion

Joined: 05 Oct 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| zzzzz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zzzzz Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 14 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| SweenyT |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 SweenyT Trackday Trickster

Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 14:18 - 17 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| SweenyT wrote: | | Rogerborg wrote: | ............If you sit your test on an A2 bike, you get an "A" license with a 2 year power restriction, effectively an endorsement For all other purposes, it's a proper A license and the endorsement is automagically removed after 2 years. |
The restriction is not automatically removed. It expires after 2 years but remains on the licence until you are 70 unless you get it removed. You have to apply to have it removed at the end of the 2 years and then pay DVLA £20 atm for the privilege
If you decide to apply for it to be removed then get a copy of your licence certified by a Solicitor/Commissioner of Oaths/Magistrate... before you send it off or make sure you still have your original Pass Certificate as the DVLA have been known to make mistakes and remove the entitlement all together  |
If police were to see the code (a bit like 122 on Moped entitlement for new licences) then they were to look it up and find that the code specific to the two year restriction says something like "2 year 33hp restriction", at which point- there is no real point in removing it unless you were to add yet another category to the licence  ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| SweenyT |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 SweenyT Trackday Trickster

Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:29 - 17 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| SweenyT wrote: | A restricted licence doesn't actually state a numerical code it just shows: =<25KW in the codes section. The from date is the only indicator as the end date is the day before your 70th birthday.
In my case my restriction ends almost exactly 4 months after my licence needs renewing so I have to decide whether to leave it or fork out to get rid. If I leave it then I have to hope that any PC that does pull me actually looks at the from date and works it out for himself rather than give me unnecessary grief.
At the end of the day it's down to the individual whether they want to leave it or pay to get rid of it at the end of their restriction. |
You have to renew your licence? Why? ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moo. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moo. World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Feasty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Feasty World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:48 - 17 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| asharin wrote: | The 2 yrs is just a restriction on power, it's still a full licence. |
This is partly true, however when I was getting towards the end of my restriction period I started looking round for a bigger bike. A couple of bike shops had bikes I wanted to test ride however their insurance states a rider must have had a full licence for 2 years before they will be insured to test ride a bike. I asked about the restriction and they stated this is NOT classed as a full licence and therefore theroetically I'd need to ride for another 2 years after my restriction ended before I could test ride their bikes.
They did however offer to ride the bikes down to a local car park where I could try them out...
My insurance company ask how long I've held a 'bike' licence, well I consider the A2 licence to still be a bike licence so I include that in the length of time. However I've come across companies that ask how long you've held a 'full' licence for and I don't believe that includes the restriction period...
 ____________________ Previous: Aprilia Habana Retro 50cc (beauty), Yamaha SR125 (fell apart), Honda XR125 (nippy little commuter), Honda SLR650 (Geewhizz), Yamaha Diversion 900S (Smoooooth) written off courtesy of a stupid escaped horse.
(7 year gap), BMW F650 (Relaxing ride). Aprilia Caponord ETV1000 (Big and bold). Yamaha FZS600 (got me in trouble too quick!).
Current: Yamaha TDM 900 (Comfy, light but big, power when needed). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Feasty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Feasty World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Feasty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Feasty World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 09:58 - 18 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| chris-red wrote: | How about this one, code 78 - restricted to vehicles with automatic transmission, would that be more apt? They all go in section 12 of your licence. |
Much better mate, well done. That's just the sort of analogy we were looking for.  ____________________ Previous: Aprilia Habana Retro 50cc (beauty), Yamaha SR125 (fell apart), Honda XR125 (nippy little commuter), Honda SLR650 (Geewhizz), Yamaha Diversion 900S (Smoooooth) written off courtesy of a stupid escaped horse.
(7 year gap), BMW F650 (Relaxing ride). Aprilia Caponord ETV1000 (Big and bold). Yamaha FZS600 (got me in trouble too quick!).
Current: Yamaha TDM 900 (Comfy, light but big, power when needed). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 10:37 - 18 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
They are all the same, conditions imposed on the licence, having a restriction for horsepower on your licence is no different to having to wear glasses. and If 33bhp isn't a full licence then neither is one that says you must wear glasses. ____________________ Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| SweenyT |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 SweenyT Trackday Trickster

Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Feasty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Feasty World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 11:55 - 18 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| chris-red wrote: | They are all the same, conditions imposed on the licence, having a restriction for horsepower on your licence is no different to having to wear glasses. and If 33bhp isn't a full licence then neither is one that says you must wear glasses. |
Ah well now that's where you are going wrong, these are conditions imposed on the 'rider' or 'bike'. The licence just shows what is being imposed.
That's why your analogy was crap, you were comparing conditions imposed on the bike to conditions imposed on the rider - 2 different things.
You can have a full licence but have to wear glasses, or a 33bhp limited bike and have to wear glasses. So if a company decides to see the 33bhp limit as not having a full licence, then wether you're wearing glasses or not you still don't have a full licence... and vice versa.  ____________________ Previous: Aprilia Habana Retro 50cc (beauty), Yamaha SR125 (fell apart), Honda XR125 (nippy little commuter), Honda SLR650 (Geewhizz), Yamaha Diversion 900S (Smoooooth) written off courtesy of a stupid escaped horse.
(7 year gap), BMW F650 (Relaxing ride). Aprilia Caponord ETV1000 (Big and bold). Yamaha FZS600 (got me in trouble too quick!).
Current: Yamaha TDM 900 (Comfy, light but big, power when needed). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 12:15 - 18 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Feasty wrote: | | chris-red wrote: | They are all the same, conditions imposed on the licence, having a restriction for horsepower on your licence is no different to having to wear glasses. and If 33bhp isn't a full licence then neither is one that says you must wear glasses. |
Ah well now that's where you are going wrong, these are conditions imposed on the 'rider' or 'bike'. The licence just shows what is being imposed.
That's why your analogy was crap, you were comparing conditions imposed on the bike to conditions imposed on the rider - 2 different things.
You can have a full licence but have to wear glasses, or a 33bhp limited bike and have to wear glasses. So if a company decides to see the 33bhp limit as not having a full licence, then wether you're wearing glasses or not you still don't have a full licence... and vice versa.  |
Crap, anything applied to the vehicle is instantly implied to the driver there is no difference. It's irrelevant what the company thinks it is what the DVLA say. Which is why the insurance will ask about conditions on your licence.
I can tell you that in my house black is white doesn't make it right. ____________________ Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Feasty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Feasty World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 12:33 - 18 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| chris-red wrote: | Crap, anything applied to the vehicle is instantly implied to the driver there is no difference. It's irrelevant what the company thinks it is what the DVLA say. Which is why the insurance will ask about conditions on your licence.
I can tell you that in my house black is white doesn't make it right. |
Now that was a beautiful move, completely off topic in one single post. Well done mate.
We were talking about the fact a bike shop said their insurance didn't see a 33bhp restricted licence as being a full licence. Then you whipped out the glasses thing.
Well if I turned up at the bike shop with a non-restricted licence (i.e a full one) wearing glasses, they'd still let me ride a bike because I would still have a 'full' licence in their eyes. The glasses wouldn't make a blind bit of difference (that pun was done on purpose by the way! ).
Meaning your analogy of the glasses thing was pointless... now consider it kicked high into orbit never to return!  ____________________ Previous: Aprilia Habana Retro 50cc (beauty), Yamaha SR125 (fell apart), Honda XR125 (nippy little commuter), Honda SLR650 (Geewhizz), Yamaha Diversion 900S (Smoooooth) written off courtesy of a stupid escaped horse.
(7 year gap), BMW F650 (Relaxing ride). Aprilia Caponord ETV1000 (Big and bold). Yamaha FZS600 (got me in trouble too quick!).
Current: Yamaha TDM 900 (Comfy, light but big, power when needed). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 12:42 - 18 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Which is where my point about black and white comes in. This thread wasn't about what a garages insurance says, it was about whether a restricted licence is a full one and it is. Either the garage was wrong or the insurance has a condition that says they will not cover people on 33bhp licence. Regardless they cannot declare a 33 licence not a full one the DVLA see it as a full one and they are the ones who issue it. ____________________ Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Feasty |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Feasty World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 12:54 - 18 Nov 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| chris-red wrote: | Which is where my point about black and white comes in. This thread wasn't about what a garages insurance says, it was about whether a restricted licence is a full one and it is. Either the garage was wrong or the insurance has a condition that says they will not cover people on 33bhp licence. Regardless they cannot declare a 33 licence not a full one the DVLA see it as a full one and they are the ones who issue it. |
And this takes us riiiiiigggggggghhhhhhht back round again, to my previous post stating: 'I'll let you dispute with the shop wether they are right or wrong'.
Dear me, am I bored now... The problem is you know I'm right yet you seem to think you can still argue about it when taken out of context, which is pointless! ____________________ Previous: Aprilia Habana Retro 50cc (beauty), Yamaha SR125 (fell apart), Honda XR125 (nippy little commuter), Honda SLR650 (Geewhizz), Yamaha Diversion 900S (Smoooooth) written off courtesy of a stupid escaped horse.
(7 year gap), BMW F650 (Relaxing ride). Aprilia Caponord ETV1000 (Big and bold). Yamaha FZS600 (got me in trouble too quick!).
Current: Yamaha TDM 900 (Comfy, light but big, power when needed). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 207 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|