|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Glenben92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Glenben92 Nearly there...

Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:10 - 08 Mar 2011 Post subject: Webcam Exposure Software |
 |
|
Right, I have two webcams, one of which is old, the other is VERY old. The VERY old one is lesser in image quality than the other. Using Vista, the newer one was HOPELESSLY dark unless I ticked "Low Light Compensation" or something like that in the 2nd tab of the cam settings menu. But since switching back to XP (which doesn't allow me to tick said box) that webcam is unusable in anything but good daylight. It's obviously a software issue as that very cam HAS been well bright enough in the past. Anybody got any ideas on how/where to find a solution?
The newer cam (i.e the one that matters) is a "Trust" ____________________ 57 Huoniao HN125-8 - , 97 Kawasaki GPZ500S -
99 Yamaha FZS 600 -
Mod 2 Passed - 01/10/2010
Last edited by Glenben92 on 22:40 - 08 Mar 2011; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Frost |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Frost World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 May 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Glenben92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Glenben92 Nearly there...

Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 22:40 - 08 Mar 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
why the fuck i had logitec in my mind i dont know, it's a trust webcam. and i know about having the light behind the camera and everything, i've tried my best to get it brighter using all of the coloration / gamma / brightness / contrast settings etc. but nothing. It's all to do with this low light compensation mode that vista had (it was vista basic as well!) i'll go correct the OP ____________________ 57 Huoniao HN125-8 - , 97 Kawasaki GPZ500S -
99 Yamaha FZS 600 -
Mod 2 Passed - 01/10/2010 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Frost |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Frost World Chat Champion

Joined: 26 May 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 22:48 - 08 Mar 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Trust = bollocks. Total and utter.
I had one that claimed to do video at 30fps. It took about 1/4 of a second for the streaks to go away when you moved so i'd say it was more like 4fps
I've analysed every aspect of most webcams sold and generally the only ones worth using are phillips or logitech.
I think this one is about the nicest cheap one i have |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Hetzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hetzer Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Glenben92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Glenben92 Nearly there...

Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 23:42 - 08 Mar 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
That's the thing though Frosty, this cam has ALWAYS been dark without the low light compensation mode. With it, it was excellent. So it's not just the fact that its a shite cam, it's capable of being good enough for me to deal with. but it's just the software side of it, XP doesn't have the ability to add the low light compen into the equation.
And hetzer, as i say, it's always been dark as standard, it wasn't a gradual thing, it was just... plug it into the same computer but running XP instead of Vista and it's shite ____________________ 57 Huoniao HN125-8 - , 97 Kawasaki GPZ500S -
99 Yamaha FZS 600 -
Mod 2 Passed - 01/10/2010 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tahrey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tahrey World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Glenben92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Glenben92 Nearly there...

Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tahrey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tahrey World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:52 - 24 Mar 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
£11? I might go for one of those myself. Been after something essentially disposable I can use as a handlebar/helmet/dashcam to blackbox all the insanity that goes on around in case I get smeared at some point. Usually they've come out at stupidly high prices for what they are, so I've been waiting for my regular digicam to break down a bit more til it's no good as an everyday shooter.
Pretty good... wouldn't say it's the smoothest picture quality or sound (which seems to be the thing with these little ones, particularly when the wind gets on them - need to wrap 'em in foam...), but then it is being viewed through the haze of youtube's default settings.
Lol... says it all really.
Ah, now you can see what's happening with it here quite plainly. It's massively increasing the exposure time with each frame, similar to what my phone does on "video nightshot", and probably ditching a lot of dynamic range too. You've maybe got about 4-6fps effective rate instead of 15+. Your hand is just an occasionally jerky blur.
Also, your demo videos are SO much better than the things I come up with which are generally walking around and waving at it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Glenben92 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Glenben92 Nearly there...

Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 02:51 - 25 Mar 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 176 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|