Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


What is wrong with Harley?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:19 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: What is wrong with Harley? Reply with quote

This was a question asked in another thread, and I didn't really want to drag it off topic so I figured I'd start a new thread.

So, what exactly is wrong with Harley? Well. A number of things.

First and foremost, a reliance on 'nostalgia' over technology to sell bikes. The people who remember the 1940's Panheads and similar will soon all be dead. This means that when the kids of today grow up and look wistfully at bikes, it'll be Japanese bikes, Ducatis, MV's and the like that take on the classic status. If they do not learn how to make higher tech bikes, then they will be left behind. Pure and simple. They will not be able to meet emissions standards with air cooled motors, and then they'll go to the big ir'n hoss stable in the sky.

Secondly, corporate protectionism.

They had a great product, which was innovative and capable and yet they ditched it in order to save their 'core' values. I think this was more down to saving jobs in Milwaukee when they can eliminate jobs at the Buell factory down the road. Buell was clearly under resourced and underinvested for years, they were aware of and could have sorted their build quality issues, but obviously didn't have the investment. The only American sport (sic) bike that existed, and it has now been finished off by corporate fear.

Anyone got any other things they want to add?
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Paxovasa
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:28 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally I have nothing against Harley's or Harley riders. Just not my cup of tea.
____________________
Suzuki GSF600 K3 (in the fastest colour, black).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Marmalade
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:35 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have, they get in the way, deafen me with crap sounding exhausts and look at me like a shit from their 2 wheeled tractor on my bike thats twice as quick, twice as comfortable, twice as fuel efficient and half the price. Wankers

This does go for only about 95% of harley riders though
____________________
Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Livefast123
Nearly there...



Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:36 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Um..........

Yes i think the management at Harley D's seem to be living in the past and don't seem to want to take their bike design forward. The bikes look the same as they did back in the day. Surely they could push their designs a bit and get increased sales.

Every Harley owner I have met has been a tool and you never get a nod from a Harley rider.

Many are owned by rich bankers who have them because they 'look cool'.

You need to spend 1000's of man hours a week keeping the thing clean.

It is obligatory to have a straight through pipe that wakes the dead. To be a true Harley owner you must accelerate as hard as possible in town to impress the chicks. You must do this before the engine blows at 60 Mph.

Cornering is optional.

You must congregate in a chapter of leather waistcoat wearing men.
____________________
Current ride - Yamaha MT-07
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

truslack
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Apr 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:46 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not ALL Harleys are bad ...

https://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w215/impreza_2007/photo-4.jpg

Cool
____________________
Current: Suzuki RG 125 Gamma, Honda H100, Triumph Tiger 800XC, Suzuki SV650 (minitwin)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:46 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Livefast123 wrote:
Yes i think the management at Harley D's seem to be living in the past and don't seem to want to take their bike design forward. The bikes look the same as they did back in the day. Surely they could push their designs a bit and get increased sales.


Not sure it is the management. They have tried with the V Rod range, but not many people wanted them.

They have a market to themselves as nobody else can make a Harley with a Harley badge. It they want to compete with other cruisers then they have a far harder job with far more competition.

If I were in the market for a cruiser then a V Rod might be a possibility, as might a Victory. Both look like someone spent a bit of time making the styling flow together. However all the Japanese marques have competing models as do Triumph (and even Ducati now).

If I wanted a bitsa (as that is to me all a normal Harley looks like, styling done by a lucky dip from component boxes) then I would save money and build one rather than buy a new conventional Harley.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
N cee thirty This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:48 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

truslack wrote:
Not ALL Harleys are bad ...


Not really a Harley though, just a design they bought and built.

There are also the 2 stroke Italian Harleys produced by what became Cagiva.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

truslack
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Apr 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:50 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

Not really a Harley though, just a design they bought and built.


Not even that, it's a sidepanel from after Harley took the spare parts contract over, the bike is pre Harley take over.
____________________
Current: Suzuki RG 125 Gamma, Honda H100, Triumph Tiger 800XC, Suzuki SV650 (minitwin)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:52 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the v-rods. My brother in law has a Buell 1125? The last one anyway and he loves it.

However if I was to get a cruiser it would be a Triumph or a Victory. Harleys have just too much 'Look at me I'm a rich wanker' status
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:53 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Re: What is wrong with Harley? Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
First and foremost, a reliance on 'nostalgia' over technology to sell bikes. The people who remember the 1940's Panheads and similar will soon all be dead.


Some of us remember Knuckleheads which were the main 1940's engine as well as WLA 45's and I'm not that much older than you.


MarJay wrote:
This means that when the kids of today grow up and look wistfully at bikes, it'll be Japanese bikes, Ducatis, MV's and the like that take on the classic status. If they do not learn how to make higher tech bikes, then they will be left behind. Pure and simple. They will not be able to meet emissions standards with air cooled motors, and then they'll go to the big ir'n hoss stable in the sky.


And yet people continually complain about how complex modern bikes are.

MarJay wrote:
Secondly, corporate protectionism.

They had a great product, which was innovative and capable and yet they ditched it in order to save their 'core' values. I think this was more down to saving jobs in Milwaukee when they can eliminate jobs at the Buell factory down the road. Buell was clearly under resourced and underinvested for years, they were aware of and could have sorted their build quality issues, but obviously didn't have the investment. The only American sport (sic) bike that existed, and it has now been finished off by corporate fear.

Anyone got any other things they want to add?


Bikes don't make money,parts and accessories do. Harley has one of the biggest accessory ranges of any manufacturer. They simply kept the parts of the company that made the most profit and tied in together, not protectionism but good business sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LeeR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:28 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I won't claim to know anything about 1940's american bikes, but I do know that as a discerning (read tight, or expecting vfm) consumer, I won't pay their prices for what is essentially in my opinion a throughly impractical machine.

Small tanks, small tank range, poor weather protection, and poor visibility from the seat make them a no go from my perspective. And whilst I love the look of the Night Rod Special, and would consider the Sportser if they put a proper sized tank on it, they'll not get my money while there are "better" bikes on the road.

But this applies almost equally to any cruiser and/or sports bike, I don't have an unfounded hatred of them, they just don't do the job I want at this moment, and might never if they're not what I would consider "affordable".
____________________
My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

kawashima
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:37 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

-I still don't find forward control position comfortable at all. Hip ache!
-Too heavy. Why does sportstar weigh 260kg?
-Inch screw bolts and No tool bag
-poor front brake and poor detail quality
-Modifying and Bettering little by little every year(they don't think of previous model owner?)(enlarge tank size, engine size, 6 speed etc)
-Narrow Panniers and Low square Top case of FLH series
-some old model owners laughing at new model beginners
-Over priced in Japan compared to US price.
-Expensive service and parts at HD dealers(I understand it's their business style though)
____________________
own:2020 Serow 250
owned: 2012 YB125SP, 2008 TDM900, 2005 W650, 2002 LS125R, 2002 CB400SF, NS50F, C50 / Trip to UK(2009), Hokkaido touring(2013)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:41 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

kawashima wrote:

-poor front brake and poor detail quality
-Modifying and Bettering little by little every year(they don't think of previous model owner?)(enlarge tank size, engine size, 6 speed etc)


While I appreciate what you are saying, I am not sure on the brake issue. Much of that is probably down to weight distribution giving the back brake (which seems to be the preferred brake in cruiser circles) a chance of working decently.

As to gradual improvements, I suspect that this would actually appeal to many as it would allow easy upgrades of existing older bikes.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bacon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Jan 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:35 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

fags

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7hQN4Amaeg


Last edited by bacon on 13:38 - 17 Feb 2011; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:44 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I wanted something that was slow and weighed a ton I would buy a Car.

sickpup wrote:

MarJay wrote:
This means that when the kids of today grow up and look wistfully at bikes, it'll be Japanese bikes, Ducatis, MV's and the like that take on the classic status. If they do not learn how to make higher tech bikes, then they will be left behind. Pure and simple. They will not be able to meet emissions standards with air cooled motors, and then they'll go to the big ir'n hoss stable in the sky.


And yet people continually complain about how complex modern bikes are.



I would expect to pay less for a simple bike not more.

Fact is if I wanted retro styled and a laid back bike, I would be a Hinckley Bonnie or a Truxton, chepaer, lighter, more powerful, more reliable and in my eyes look better to boot.

The riders tend to be arseholes too.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Gone
Nearly there...



Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:45 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Re: What is wrong with Harley? Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
This was a question asked in another thread, and I didn't really want to drag it off topic so I figured I'd start a new thread.

So, what exactly is wrong with Harley? Well. A number of things.

First and foremost, a reliance on 'nostalgia' over technology to sell bikes. The people who remember the 1940's Panheads and similar will soon all be dead. This means that when the kids of today grow up and look wistfully at bikes, it'll be Japanese bikes, Ducatis, MV's and the like that take on the classic status. If they do not learn how to make higher tech bikes, then they will be left behind. Pure and simple. They will not be able to meet emissions standards with air cooled motors, and then they'll go to the big ir'n hoss stable in the sky.

Secondly, corporate protectionism.

They had a great product, which was innovative and capable and yet they ditched it in order to save their 'core' values. I think this was more down to saving jobs in Milwaukee when they can eliminate jobs at the Buell factory down the road. Buell was clearly under resourced and underinvested for years, they were aware of and could have sorted their build quality issues, but obviously didn't have the investment. The only American sport (sic) bike that existed, and it has now been finished off by corporate fear.

Anyone got any other things they want to add?


I can't see why you consider any of these things to be a problem, there are many types of bikes to choose from. I know lots of people with Harleys, none of them feel the need to sneer at my little Honda. I see a lot more of them on the road here in Finland than I ever have in the UK despite the fact that they cost twice as much here. Horses for courses.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:54 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't have a problem with people selling bikes based on designs made in the 1950's and I don't have a problem with the way they ride, sound and handle. It'd be a funny world if everyone liked the same thing and there is actually something quite refreshing about pottering along on an underpowered, overweight bike that simply looks, sounds and feels good. Kind of harking back to a byegone era and enjoying the ride for the rides sake without feeling you have to be gong at it hammer and tongs all the time.

What I object to is that they set themselves up as a cutting-edge, premium brand and charge astonishing amounts of money for what amounts to a slightly updated post-war bike of dubious relaibility and build quality. Most owners land up replacing half the parts on them as soon as they roll out of the shop.

Hell, I own a bike of 50's design which performs astonishingly poorly compared to modern machines and is of dubious build quality. It's a Royal Enfield. The thing is, it's not pretending to be something it is not and is priced accordingly.

And for the record, I have ridden a Harley. They are overweight, underpowered, underbraked and handle poorly. They do however turn heads and are a pretty comfortable way of cruising a lot of miles at 55mph on American highways. That was riding the model that several Harley enthusiasts recommended to me as the one to try if I wanted to see what it was all about. I didn't get it. You could buy a 650 Dragstar for less than half the price of the bike I was riding that would fulfill the exact same purpose and outperform the Harley in every measureable way.
https://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f216/stinkwheel/heritage.jpg

The Americans really do believe they are something special though. When I rented that one they asked what bikes I rode at home. I told them a GPZ500 ("huh?" "A 500 ninja" "Oh right, one of them.") and a MZ supermoto ("Huh?" "Like a 660cc dirtbike with road wheels" "A what?" "Oh, never mind."). I then got a huge speil about "Well you're riding a proper bike now son, not that crappy small Jap. stuff. This has an 82 cubic inch motor in it. Just take care how fast you open the throttle or it'll bite ya.".

Yeah. 95mph flat-out up a shallow gradient. I for one was shitting my pants (no really, the brakes were apalling).
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stigg
Nova Slayer



Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:41 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have to remember that Harley's are for Americans! they dont like complicated things that you have to think about like sportsbikes. Harleys don't go round corners, great don't have to set the bike up! Harleys dont stop, great don't have to think about braking or going fast ect, ect. Made from pig iron for the good old boy's!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:45 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are crude cheaply-made piles of low-quality material sold for obscene amounts of money that are not even remotely reflected in the quality of what you get.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ms51ves3
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:06 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
There are also the 2 stroke Italian Harleys produced by what became Cagiva.


My dad had one. Said it was the worst bike he ever bought Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:19 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

90% of Harleys ever made are still on the road.

The other 10% made it home.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ZRX61
Victor Meldrew



Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:22 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
While I appreciate what you are saying, I am not sure on the brake issue. Much of that is probably down to weight distribution giving the back brake (which seems to be the preferred brake in cruiser circles) a chance of working decently.
Keith


Nope, Harley brakes are absolute fucking crap, which given the weight of the damn things just makes them an even bigger joke. 50% of the Harley wrecks I see are where they have rear-ended something, the other 50% are from running out of ground clearance and/or talent mid corner.
My 3 ton F350 pickup can out brake a Harley.
____________________
They're not one night stands, they're auditions.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:26 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Not surprised, more aimed at the front brake comment. Low and far back centre of gravity will bias things towards the rear brake whether the front is dire or just poor. Stick someone on used to using the front for most things and it will be even worse.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

hmmmnz
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:34 - 15 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

my step father had a harley when i was growing up,
when i turned 15 and got my licence i bought a rgv250,
he only went for 1 ride with me Sad
i think being beaten by a 250cc "jap crap" bike by a 15 year old didnt do much for his manlyness Very Happy
____________________
the humans are dead
I kick arse for the lord
Wiring Diagrams BIDNIP it bitches
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 351 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 1 of 8

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.13 Sec - Server Load: 1.06 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 143.38 Kb