Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Are chains becoming too thin?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:20 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Are chains becoming too thin? Reply with quote

I've just had too fit a new engine to my 08 plate ER6F after the chain snapped and damaged the crank cases and so today I was ordering the required extra parts from the wholesalers and mentioned this.

Now the chain that was snapped was the heaviest duty chain DID do in a 520 and was well maintained yet still snapped with only 20k of use and I can't explain why.

Talking to the wholesalers they took a look through their application lists and the pitch of chain recommended for the ER6 is only a 520 pitch. To put this into perspective the ER6 has 71BHP yet an ER5 which has only 50ish BHP also uses a 520 pitch chain yet a BROS650 which is <60BHP uses a 525 chain. As a further example a CB500 uses a 525 chain and a normal modification is to change it to a 530 chain and sprockets. The wholesaler was actually surprised that a 70BHP Parallel twin commuter bike was being specced with such a small chain especially as it wasn't a race conversion so have manufacturers gone to far on this issue?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:34 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely wheel and sprocket sizes are a factor in how much force goes through a chain too?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rowey
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:40 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

A 520 is fine for a 600. I can only think it's them trying to improve the handling by reducing unsprung weight. It's not going to save them much money really.

Stock on my 600, putting out a little over 100bhp, is a 525 chain. Although it's a common mod to convert it to a 520 chain.

I looked into the 520 conversion as it also improves acceleration and throttle response. And from peoples experience the 520 chain wore no differently than the 525. The biggest factor was the quality of the chain.

I'm sure I've heard you say you have a chain oiler of some sorts, so I can only guess it's not oiling the chain uniformly or sufficiently or you unluckily bought a chain with some sort of manufacturing weakness in it.
____________________
ZX6R C6F.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:40 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was always of the oppinion that my GPZs and KLE had far to small a chain for their power output (again, 520 pitch). I've broken them on both. Seems to be a "feature" of middleweight kawasakis.

Hell, even the Enfield has a 530 chain (15bhp).
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:44 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

DaFrostyOne wrote:
Surely wheel and sprocket sizes are a factor in how much force goes through a chain too?


I think engine configuration has a big effect. A big single, while relatively low powered, will absolutely muller a chain in a short period of time compared to a twin or four of similar power.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

rac3r
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:48 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think my ZX6 uses 520 as well
____________________
Bikes : 2006 CBR125R - 2004 Monster 620ie - 2004 ZX-6R B1H - 2005 Monster S2R 800 - 2011 Street Triple - 2009 Streetfighter 1098 - 2014 ZX-6R 636

Chequered Flag
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tatters
Exxon Valdez



Joined: 04 Jan 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:49 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

My KLR650 also uses a 520 chain which snapped last week lucky for me it only took out the pulse genrator wiring, alot of KLR owners in the states upgrade to 530. Quite suprised a 70bhp bike such as the ER6 is being sold with only a 520.


Its got to be down to money as 520 chains are cheap?
____________________
Past:NRG50,AF1125(x2),NSR125RR,ZZR250,CX500,VFR400,KR1S,ZZR600(x2),CB400N,YZF1000(x2),KH125,Z200,FX400R,CBR954RR(x2)GPZ500S,GT550,VFR750F(x2),RD350N,XR650R,CBR600F,CB250,KDX250,YZF750R,CRM250,400EXC,KLR650,TTR600RE,DR350S,R100GSPD,RGV250,VMAX1200,DL650,KZ750 Present:G650XC,C12,CRF450X,1190ADV
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:00 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rowey wrote:
Stock on my 600, putting out a little over 100bhp, is a 525 chain. Although it's a common mod to convert it to a 520 chain.

I looked into the 520 conversion as it also improves acceleration and throttle response. And from peoples experience the 520 chain wore no differently than the 525. The biggest factor was the quality of the chain.


I would suggest you don't fit a 520. The 520 is only recommended for use on bikes on the track.

Rowey wrote:
I'm sure I've heard you say you have a chain oiler of some sorts, so I can only guess it's not oiling the chain uniformly or sufficiently or you unluckily bought a chain with some sort of manufacturing weakness in it.


No chain oiler just lubed EVERY time the bike goes out.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

yen_powell
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:26 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

My Africa twins run a 525 chain and I've had no bother with them, regularly getting 30,000 plus miles from them.

However, I was a bit concerned when I saw that my new (to me)Varadero runs the same sized chain. I'm riding with my feet up high from now on.
____________________
Blackmail is a nasty word........but not as nasty as phlegm!
XT1200Z and a DR350 in bits
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

HD
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:27 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I take it the 3 digit number is how wide the chain is?
____________________
Rusty '02 Vito Camper + CBR600F3
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rowey
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:28 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

sickpup wrote:
I would suggest you don't fit a 520. The 520 is only recommended for use on bikes on the track.


I didn't go for it in the end. But not because of my doubts on whether the 520 could cope with the strain, but due to the cost involved.

A 525 will be stronger, so to counter this, you have to get a heavy duty 520 which is naturally more expensive than the equivalent strength 525. Then on top of that the added cost of sprockets, wasn't worth it.

But I digress, you can get 520 chains that are just as strong as 525 chains, even 530's, but you have to pay for it. I can guess the OEM chains fitted to them are pretty cheap and I'd expect them to reach the tertiary creep pretty quickly. But a heavy duty DID chain? I'd think there was a manufacturing fault there.

How much more adjustment did you have left on the chain? Did it wear abnormally fast or just snap without warning?
____________________
ZX6R C6F.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

0ddball
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:31 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot of people convert the zxr750's from 530 to 520 but i'd rather stick with 530. The "supposed" acceleration/weight benefit isn't even close to worth it imo.

Last edited by 0ddball on 18:36 - 16 Feb 2011; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:33 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rowey wrote:
I can guess the OEM chains fitted to them are pretty cheap and I'd expect them to reach the tertiary creep pretty quickly.


The OEM chain fitted is an equivalent to a DID HD O-ring which is why I question if it is too small a pitch.

Rowey wrote:
How much more adjustment did you have left on the chain? Did it wear abnormally fast or just snap without warning?


Without warning, the broken link is still jammed in the old engine. Lots of adjustment left, in fact it had only been adjusted two or three times.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rowey
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:52 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been told a 520, on my bike, will get over 20k if you look after it. My bike does have more power but it also has a smoother delivery (IL4) though. So it may be about right for yours

I did see a chart detailing the tensile strength of different chains when I was looking at the 520 conversion, but can't find it now.

But the tensile strength of a cheap 525 was about 25kn and the tensile strength of the best quality 520 was around 35kn.

EDIT: Forgot to add, the best 525 chain had a tensile strength of 37kn
____________________
ZX6R C6F.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll only bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:22 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's all weird stuff. My 125 has a 428, the 250 came with a 530 even though it was cloned from a bike with a 520 and just about everything else is copied straight over. Confused

The GPZ305 has a belt. Very Happy
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:28 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
DaFrostyOne wrote:
Surely wheel and sprocket sizes are a factor in how much force goes through a chain too?


I think engine configuration has a big effect. A big single, while relatively low powered, will absolutely muller a chain in a short period of time compared to a twin or four of similar power.


Agreed, i had a 42bhp single that destroyed a chain, along with top gear as you could just leave it in top and crack the throttle open to get anywhere. That meant the power came in short sharp bursts that ate the chain. Similarly though, tall gearing big wheels etc would all lead to a slower moving chain putting strain onto a small part of it for longer periods than a faster moving chain.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:39 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

How many miles had the bike done?
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:46 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rowey wrote:
I've been told a 520, on my bike, will get over 20k if you look after it. My bike does have more power but it also has a smoother delivery (IL4) though. So it may be about right for yours

I did see a chart detailing the tensile strength of different chains when I was looking at the 520 conversion, but can't find it now.

But the tensile strength of a cheap 525 was about 25kn and the tensile strength of the best quality 520 was around 35kn.

EDIT: Forgot to add, the best 525 chain had a tensile strength of 37kn


What you have to also remember is roller surface area.

520 (6.35mm) roller width 1/4 inch. Working sprocket width 6mm.
525 (7.93mm) roller width 5/16 inch. Working sprocket width 7.25.
530 (9.52mm) roller width 3/8 inch. Working sprocket width 9mm.

So the larger the pitch of the chain the greater the surface area of the roller so a greater area to spread the load over. Tensile strength is not the whole story.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:50 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

For what it's worth. I totally fell out with DiD chains on my 500 twins and started using EK ones. Never had one of them let go.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Biker100
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 09 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:55 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

A freind of mine had a er6 with around 20k on it, well maintained, and hers snapped too, took crank case out on hers too funnily enough...... Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

27cows
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:55 - 16 Feb 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

The standard of DID chains isn't what it once was. I always use Regina for biggers bikes, RK for small ones. Never had a problem. The two chains I've had snap in the past were both DID. Nowt to do with the pitch/power they have to withstand - everything to do with DID's quality control being shite.

Have to say that 20K miles is a lot for a chain on a biggish big, irrespective of apparent wear and amount of adjustment remaining. Would personally never leave a chain on the Bandit 12 past the 10,000 mark (even if it was possible to make a chain last that long on it Laughing ) or any other middle or heavyweight bike. Even on tiddlers like the RXS I ditch a chain around 15K.
____________________
The RXS100: vehicle of choice for Chuck Norris
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

There is a gap of 243 days between these two posts...

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:18 - 17 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just going to resurrect this thread.

Just had to replace a DID X ring chain today as it was about to fail after only 15k.

Am I expecting too much from a chain?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

swiftb
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:31 - 17 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

sickpup wrote:
Just going to resurrect this thread.

Just had to replace a DID X ring chain today as it was about to fail after only 15k.

Am I expecting too much from a chain?


I thought of chain life being around 12k-18k but chains are one of them things that I would change regardless of how good condition it still looks in as the damage they can do can be tres bad as you found out.
I personally schedule a chain at around 12k - may have plenty of life left in it at that sort of mileage but for the sake of £100 or so once every 12k miles I see it as good preventive maintenance.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Marmalade
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:43 - 17 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

swiftb38 wrote:
sickpup wrote:
Just going to resurrect this thread.

Just had to replace a DID X ring chain today as it was about to fail after only 15k.

Am I expecting too much from a chain?


I thought of chain life being around 12k-18k but chains are one of them things that I would change regardless of how good condition it still looks in as the damage they can do can be tres bad as you found out.
I personally schedule a chain at around 12k - may have plenty of life left in it at that sort of mileage but for the sake of £100 or so once every 12k miles I see it as good preventive maintenance.


£500 a year then. Not something to look forward to
____________________
Nobby the Bastard: How yo tell the difference between the actual japanese and her just screaming because she's had live fish stuck up her arse? [url=https://www.nicks-shop.co.uk/bcf-goodies-15-c.aspGet BCF stickers and things here[/url] Reflective helmet stickers - Legal requirement in france - Clicky
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:44 - 17 Oct 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

sickpup wrote:
Just going to resurrect this thread.

Just had to replace a DID X ring chain today as it was about to fail after only 15k.

Am I expecting too much from a chain?


You must be turning into a fatty Very Happy
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 109 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 1.05 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 133.89 Kb