|
|
| Author |
Message |
| sulphur |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sulphur Trackday Trickster

Joined: 01 Oct 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Cashhead |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Cashhead Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 03 Jul 2011 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sulphur |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sulphur Trackday Trickster

Joined: 01 Oct 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sulphur |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sulphur Trackday Trickster

Joined: 01 Oct 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Cunnington |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Cunnington Spanner Monkey

Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:19 - 27 Nov 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
I've had a Bose 321 for over 5 years, and rate it pretty highly. I had a pretty decent system of Denon separates beforehand (the amp alone cost more than the entire Bose setup 10 years beforehand) and it is tiny in comparison. The gemstone speakers were new on the market back then and well out of my price range but the output from such a small package is well impressive.
It is more than a 2.1 as it does some clever shit with the signal processing that makes you hear things wider than just stereo. I dont think it could compete with a pucker 5.1 setup, but I would never get off with arranging my living room to get the best out of a 5.1 system.
The best feature is the processing of the vocal element of the signal to give it an even level, so you dont need to turn the volume up and down to avoid missing bits of dialogue.
The only negative is that the DVD packed in after a couple of years, but had a DVD recorder so it didn't really matter.
In summary, you could probably get a better sound output for your money, but taking account of the sound it delivers, the size of the package, and how it fits into the room make it a winner for me. ____________________ '82 C50, '81 CB100, '84 GS125, '95 NTV650, '00 Bandit 600, '06 SV650, '56 Z1000, '89 NTV600
The Shaggy D.A. wrote: "You are invisible. Those who can see you are trying to kill you." |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 Mar 2002 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 05:51 - 28 Nov 2011 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hey,
Well I've got both a full-on Home Cinema setup with a Yamaha amp etc etc and a Bose T20 connected to the PS3, XBox etc etc. I always like the sound of Bose stuff as it's all Bums and Tits.. it's kinda an in-your-face american sound that is great for gaming etc! There is no doubt that when you do a like for like comparison between the two systems, the Bose is lacking the detail and control of a proper setup, but for the convenience of an all-in-one box solution the Bose is great. The only real down side is that as they don't have a display on them you have to turn the TV on to select the right input which can be annoying when you just wanna have music on. The more expensive Bose systems have an active remove control that does the same as having a screen on the system.
I'd say, go for the Bose, yes for the same money you could piece together a much better sounding system in separates from Ebay or Richer, but hey, why bother with the stress and all the wires.. just get the all in one box with neat and tidy speakers! Remember you need to place the sub right as the main speakers are basically tweeters so you need to get everything else nicely delivered from the sub! ____________________ Love is 1050cc  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Cashhead |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Cashhead Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 03 Jul 2011 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sulphur |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sulphur Trackday Trickster

Joined: 01 Oct 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 14 years, 131 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|