Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bikers & speed

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:22 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Bikers & speed Reply with quote

This article caught my attention; and while I don't condone the speed in that area if he did it, I have to ask why a biker would sail past a marked mobile speed van (the area is 2 miles from me,you cant 'hide' a big silver van anywhere there!) and then plead in court with an apology when the video doesn't show his brake light coming on/going off to dramatically vary speed and he's with the flow of traffic?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH0y6m-S_oo

The exact van:
https://www.scarborougheveningnews.co.uk/webimage/police_speed_camera_van_1_3994139!image/114041015.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_595/114041015.jpg

It was pointed out on the Youtube comments (and I've read it here recently too a few times) that the way he rides as is taught by the Police on the courses they do.

So, the alledged speed is OTT but his riding is described as 'disregarding safety of others"; isn't this how every biker rides (in the vid)? I know I do..

Punishment:
Quote:
A MOTORCYCLIST who rode his Suzuki at 116mph in rush-hour traffic on the A1237 at Huntington has today been banned for three months.

Matthew Michael Greenwood, 34, of Rainsborough Way, York, who pleaded guilty to speeding at Selby Magistrates’ Court today was also fined £395 and ordered to pay costs of £60.

Greenwood was captured at 9.15am on the morning of 31 October 2011, by North Yorkshire Police’s mobile safety camera. The road was wet with a significant amount of traffic, the speed limit was 60mph, the court heard.


Now when you think back a couple weeks,there was that thread about the Parish Counsellor who killed a biker and iirc virtually got away with it. Lols much?
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:30 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think some part of an irony here is only 2 days ago another biker was killed 1 mile in the opposite direction of my house doing under 30.

https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/resources/images/1843132/?type=display

Quote:
“We believe he came to the front of the traffic then accelerated away when the lights changed.”

TS Halloway said the cause of the incident was unknown, but it was not believed to be due to the motorcycle’s speed or the heavy winds during the day.


One speeds in a safe manner and dies hitting street furniture while another does nearly twice the limit and shows no issues in traffic.


Doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the issue of 'speeding' is exploited and milked a bit.
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TheSmiler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:53 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seriously that is 116mph doesn't look that fast he is keeping in line with traffic not even gaining that much on the cars so how come he is the only one that comes up at that speed.

Something seems fishy there could just be me, I'm thinking faulty camera to be honest.
____________________
CB125>CG125>GN125>ER5>K100RS>R1100RS>K100RS
A2 completed 23/07/15 Ready for the Golden Crisp Packet
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

nickGT
Nova Slayer



Joined: 07 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:01 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheSmiler wrote:
Seriously that is 116mph doesn't look that fast he is keeping in line with traffic not even gaining that much on the cars so how come he is the only one that comes up at that speed.

Something seems fishy there could just be me, I'm thinking faulty camera to be honest.


Thats exactly what I was thinking. If the speed limit was 60mph and he was 56mph over the speed limit he would be racing by the cars infront of him. Where as on the video it looks like he is just keeping up.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

doggone
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:05 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

The video's so short you can hardly see anything.
A big bike could briefly have exceeded 100mph to safely pass a few cars then be back around 60 all in a few seconds - with no danger to anyone on a wide road like that.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

UnspeedySam
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:08 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheSmiler wrote:
Something seems fishy there could just be me, I'm thinking faulty camera to be honest.


Definitely. This makes no sense to me at all...but he pleaded guilty in court...so I think the video is misleading.
____________________
Riding: BMW R1150RT `02 bought mildly crashed
Fixing: Also the BMW as I get less broken bits
Gone: ZZR600 '00, TRX850 '97, RXS100 '93, JS125-6B '07, BMW R1100RS '93, Kawasaki ZX-6R-J2 '01, Honda Bros NT400 NC25 '88
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DrDonnyBrago
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:49 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

beechbone wrote:
TheSmiler wrote:
Something seems fishy there could just be me, I'm thinking faulty camera to be honest.


Definitely. This makes no sense to me at all...but he pleaded guilty in court...so I think the video is misleading.



The video looks like the tail end of an overtake, the 1st second or two he appears to be on the line/over it, not dangerous by any means but could have been rather fast.


A load of money extorting crap nonetheless.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:44 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

[X-posted to the toobs]
I for one am glad that "safety" cameras are out there catching loads of tailgaiters, mobile phone yakkers, makeup-artists, tired-and-emotional morning-after drivers and defective vehicles.

They do that, right?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

WULFSTAN
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:54 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

theres no way thats a 116mph Thumbs Down
____________________
Your backside is better enough for you to run again, if need be – bristle up the courage of the cornered rat, put on a bold front, and to hell with them. Bluff my boy – bluff, shift and lie for the sake of your neck and the honour of Old England
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

UnspeedySam
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:54 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
[X-posted to the toobs]
I for one am glad that "safety" cameras are out there catching loads of tailgaiters, mobile phone yakkers, makeup-artists, tired-and-emotional morning-after drivers and defective vehicles.

They do that, right?


Hit the nail on the head sir Thumbs Up
____________________
Riding: BMW R1150RT `02 bought mildly crashed
Fixing: Also the BMW as I get less broken bits
Gone: ZZR600 '00, TRX850 '97, RXS100 '93, JS125-6B '07, BMW R1100RS '93, Kawasaki ZX-6R-J2 '01, Honda Bros NT400 NC25 '88
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:30 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Agreed, no way is that 116mph (wonder what effects an LED tail light has on the detection of bounced back laser signals).

However he might have been bullied into pleading guilty with threats that pleading not guilty would have just resulted in a harsher penalty.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mjn51
Traffic Copper



Joined: 04 Feb 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:50 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

how about he was caught with the speed gun pointing out of the back of the van and then filmed from the front of the van to get his plate details, the vid we see is the second part ! as I think we all agree he's not doing 116 mpg in the vid.
M
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:57 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

The video come up with his speed of -116mph after the sight has been on the back of the bike for a second or 2 which suggests that is the point it is getting the reading.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:32 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still looks unlikely, unless everybody else was doing 80mph+. Funny bit of footage for Plod to choose to show though, it really does make it clear look like they're just a bunch of footpads.

Heh, I guess it's time for this again:

Earl Russel wrote:
The way in which the artificial speed limit is enforced now tends to obscure that [anti-social driving is only that which endangers others]. The home counties have been specially disgraced by the manner in which the Motor-car Act has been administered. Attention is not directed to that which I think your Lordships all agree is of importance—the safety of the public. Policemen are not stationed in the villages where there are people about who might be in danger, but are hidden in hedges or ditches by the side of the most open roads in the country. Motorists may drive through villages in any way they like.

Lord Montagu of Beaulieu wrote:
I am entirely in sympathy with what the noble Earl said with regard to police traps. In my opinion they are manifestly absurd as a protection to the public, and they are used in many counties merely as a means of extracting money from the passing traveller in a way which reminds one of the highwaymen of the Middle Ages


Source: Hansard, 16 July 1907.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

weasley
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:04 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The road was wet with a significant amount of traffic, the speed limit was 60mph, the court heard.


The video quality is a bit poor, but I see no spray nor do I see any windscreen wipers in operation.

Sounds like Roger's analysis - someone bullied into a guilty plea for fear of the consequences... MWAAHAHAHAHAAA!!!
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:06 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

My replies/comments on the FB page:

Quote:
To be fair Gill, the Police teach you to ride like that on the advance courses they have for bikers. Not the speed, but they do speed on the courses. How do we know this guy doesn't have advance rider training? The press have a habit of not getting all the facts before publishing some stories.


Quote:
i agree, some bikers do act like idiots and that's where the reputation comes from. I get alot of stick from people who use the stereotype and it's unwarranted. Did you see the video? it shows a bike that overtook a van and there wasn't even any brakelights as his speed reduced to get back to the same speed of traffic so maybe the camera was wrong or not calibrated? because he was going the same speed as traffic both before and while he went round the blue van. If I was him, I would have wanted proof of the cameras calibration and reliability.


Quote:
ok, let me put it this way, (and I hope the press are noting this) this guy was supposedly caught at 116mph but the verry short video shows him the same speed as traffic, there's no brake lights showing he slowed from high speed, and he seemingly has an LED based rear light so that could affect a camera. Now, a couple of days earlier a biker died on Layerthorpe (RIP) which the police said wasn't due to his riding behaviour or speed, both roads in comparison here are similar in width. The Bypass is designed to handle speed that's why it's got a high limit, both of these in a week show speed isn't that big of a factor. now bearing in mind "anti-social riding" defines someone who is putting the lives of others at risk but in that video, where the rider clearly has full control; who's at risk? and why would a biker go flying at 116mph past a big fully marked silver police scamera van? something is wrong about this, and if he rides there like how they teach on the courses does that mean the police could be teaching people to ride with 'complete disregard' on the roads?

____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:19 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

weasley wrote:
Sounds like Roger's analysis - someone bullied into a guilty plea for fear of the consequences... MWAAHAHAHAHAAA!!!


That was Kickstart/Keith's analysis, but I'll happily swipe credit for it. Wink

We don't really know enough about the situation: I can't imagine many people would plead guilty to that license-losing speed without seeing compelling evidence first.

On the other hand, the chap might have been sitting on 9 points and gambled that a short ban is actually better than a totting-up license loss - I can't see any mention of an extended retest in the article.

Another possibility is that he's planning to just chance his luck for 3 months (maybe on a fake plate, £6 delivered from eBay) since there's pretty much sod all chance of being stopped by an actual copper as opposed to being snapped by a tax machine.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:52 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
since there's pretty much sod all chance of being stopped by an actual copper as opposed to being snapped by a tax machine.
To be fair, if ytou're referring to ANPR then they're useless.

There might have been a couple of instances where Shifty a freind Thinking of mine went driving round in his blue car between the old tax disk expiring and the new one actually coming...

Couple of said ANPR 'traps' were unavoidable and nothing was chased back, no DVLA letters or police notifcation of potential prosecution letters I happened to know about.

That said, one instance I knew about first hand when said car was stopped in said period of naughtiness a cop checked the car over and declared it fine and sent on the way, despite afore mentioned possible lapse. They don't always check the pretty little disks and ANPR would seem to be a 'lack of insurance' pinging machine; but since I wouldn't use a vehicle without all papers and checks in order I'm not one to test the theory. Wink
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DrDonnyBrago
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:58 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

st3v3 wrote:
Rogerborg wrote:
since there's pretty much sod all chance of being stopped by an actual copper as opposed to being snapped by a tax machine.
To be fair, if ytou're referring to ANPR then they're useless.

There might have been a couple of instances where Shifty a freind Thinking of mine went driving round in his blue car between the old tax disk expiring and the new one actually coming...

Couple of said ANPR 'traps' were unavoidable and nothing was chased back, no DVLA letters or police notifcation of potential prosecution letters I happened to know about.

That said, one instance I knew about first hand when said car was stopped in said period of naughtiness a cop checked the car over and declared it fine and sent on the way, despite afore mentioned possible lapse. They don't always check the pretty little disks and ANPR would seem to be a 'lack of insurance' pinging machine; but since I wouldn't use a vehicle without all papers and checks in order I'm not one to test the theory. Wink



I drove a car around for 3 months untaxed, I park in a hospital/in busy side streets, commute on a busy motorway, go through city centres on a regular basis and didn't get stopped/lettered etc. I eventually got dobbed in by a traffic warden.

In my defence, my car has a VIC marker against it so I don't get tax reminders (a DVLA bright idea). I am of the same opinion as you, ANPR is crap. If we were proper pikeys we would be using someone else's plate anyway.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bikertomm
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:40 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Speeding as an offence is one that really does my head in.

Why can't people just be considerate and go nice steady by schools ect, but when conditions allow we should be allowed to use our own common sense and 'progress'

I understand why it has to be the way it is (Because of useless drivers and loads of other shit)

It's just annoying. Meh.

Thumbs Down

Oh and where the FB page? Interested to see it!
____________________
07' Honda Hornet now full powaah! My guide on performing an oil change!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:19 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

bikertomm wrote:
Why can't people just be considerate and go nice steady by schools ect, but when conditions allow we should be allowed to use our own common sense and 'progress'

Becouse we have a system of Driving tests to establish that we can safely and accurately assess and manage risk, like judging the speed of an on coming jugganaut before we over take...
But cannot POSSIBLY work out for ourselves what an apropriate speed to drive at for the conditions would be; whether its a good idea to wear a seat-belt or crash-helmet, or work out that trying to txt while driving could be a little bit distracting to the attension we have to pay to the road, so despite there being a law against driving withoit due care and attension we need a new, specific one to clear that one up for us...

I mean, if its against the law to smoke in a car, why do they fit ash-trays to them?

If its against the law to drink and drive, why do they have drinks holders?

Did you know that technically it is not illegal to change teh CD or casette in your car radio while driving, becouse it doesn't contravene any other laws unless its blatently causing you distraction.

However, due to the mobilke phone law, it IS legal to prod and poke a sat nav hung in the middle of the windscreen, but NOT legal to change the music station on the radio, unless that station has traffic anouncements!

In the small print of the mobile phone law amendments aparently; they redefined the mobilke phone as ANY device recieving broad-cast 'signals', then made exemptions if they were a driver 'aid'!?

The law is an ass, (and frequently made by asses) but unfortunately still law!
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:54 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:
Stuff


The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2003.

Can't find the 2007 regulations or anything covering "driver aids" or "traffic announcements". Anybody?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:28 - 02 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lol at the 116 mph. I think he needed a better lawyer.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:55 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:


Did you know that technically it is not illegal to change teh CD or casette in your car radio while driving, becouse it doesn't contravene any other laws unless its blatently causing you distraction.

However, due to the mobilke phone law, it IS legal to prod and poke a sat nav hung in the middle of the windscreen, but NOT legal to change the music station on the radio, unless that station has traffic anouncements!

In the small print of the mobile phone law amendments aparently; they redefined the mobilke phone as ANY device recieving broad-cast 'signals', then made exemptions if they were a driver 'aid'!?
It's not illegal to flick about with a radio..
It's not illegal to flick about with a SatNav..
It's not illegal to drink a can of coke while driving..

I do the above, and as it goes none of them cause me to be adversely distracted and crash.

Oh, er, what sources have you got to verify that last bit?
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lllN30lll
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:01 - 03 Dec 2011    Post subject: Reply with quote

Instead of using the laser as the main evidence why not count how many white lines he passes in a set amount of time to confirm his speed?

*edit

Just noticed the type of lines on the road and the camera work Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 215 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 2.14 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 145.28 Kb