Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Car driver does 147mph gets 6 points BIKER?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

fatpies
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:30 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Car driver does 147mph gets 6 points BIKER? Reply with quote

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/police-condemn-147mph-jaguar-driver-191519243.html


TL : DR - Car driver clocked at 147mph, denied it was him gets 6 points and a totting up ban after getting a total of 12 points. 9 month ban £700 in expenses. Slap on wrist.

OTOH Kitten killing biker?

Biker 139mph

www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults/General-news/2009/July/jul2009-12-months-jail-for-speeding-biker/

Biker 122mph

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/4927401/Biker-jailed-for-speeding-at-122mph-with-14-year-old-son-on-back.html

Both went to prison.

Wut?
____________________
"It's easy to attack and destroy an act of creation. It's a lot more difficult to perform one"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Paris2
Nearly there...



Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:41 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moral of the story, dont get caught Laughing

But seriously, what the fudge!
____________________
Current Ride: Daytona 600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kingstondavo
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 10 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:45 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

As much as I agree.... 122mph with a 14yr old kid as a pillion is disgraceful. Definitely deserving of jail time.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Villers
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:48 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kingstondavo wrote:
As much as I agree.... 122mph with a 14yr old kid as a pillion is disgraceful. Definitely deserving of jail time.


Totally agree, 147mph in a car is going to cause a lot more damage on impact. Theres probably a lot more to it than meets the eye but on a tabloid-esqu first glance it steers towards us being the dirty horrible dangerous bikers rather than the innocent car drivers!
____________________
RS125 > CBR6 > SV650S > ZX636R > GSX1300RZ Hayabusa > 06 RSVR Mille > SV1000S > Street Triple 765 RS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

dsb79
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 13 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:50 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

What, we are dirty antisocial chap wearing thugs, who do nothing but harass our neighbours and fill in the old biddies that get in the way!!!! Well thats what most of the middle upper class think of us anyway.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

dsb79
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 13 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:50 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Double post!

Last edited by dsb79 on 21:52 - 11 Jan 2012; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:51 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kingstondavo wrote:
As much as I agree.... 122mph with a 14yr old kid as a pillion is disgraceful. Definitely deserving of jail time.


Why? No one was hurt. Muggers that cause actual harm to people don't go inside.

I'm not condoning it, but I think prison is OTT.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kingstondavo
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 10 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:52 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

The first one isn't so bad, and definitely not as bad as the car driver but the second biker...

"The court heard the camera picked up an image of the boy, who was not wearing gloves or protective trousers, holding the back of the seat with his bare hands."

Seriously, some bikers really don't help themselves/the general image out at all...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Villers
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:50 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Although from a purely legal standpoint its irrelevant what the kid was wearing. Theres no law about gloves or trousers so therefore it should have no bearing on whatever punishment is meted out.

To be judged liable for a punishment with what you are wearing taken into account is ridiculous in my opinion.

As a parent its a stupid thing to be doing though.
____________________
RS125 > CBR6 > SV650S > ZX636R > GSX1300RZ Hayabusa > 06 RSVR Mille > SV1000S > Street Triple 765 RS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

anthony_r6
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:05 - 11 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a rider/biker we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. All we ever see these days is bikers being killed, drivers coming up with some bullshit excuse as to why it happened, deferring the blame from themselves and effectively getting away with it, and they wonder why car drivers don't give a crap.

Start going over the speed limit on your bike and you're public enemy number 1. I don't condone the speeding with the kid on the back, especially considering the conditions and the lack of gear, but there is a real uneven balance when it comes to speeding in a car/on bike and getting caught.

It's sickening.
____________________
Ted : "Maybe he's agoraphobic."
Dougal : "Jack scared of fighting? I don't think so, Ted."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

fatpies
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:54 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Erm you've kind of missed the point.

In that the car speeds even faster yet only gets 6 points.

While bikers passing just over 100 get time in prison.

The disparity in severity of punishment is what I'm on about.
____________________
"It's easy to attack and destroy an act of creation. It's a lot more difficult to perform one"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

st3v3
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:14 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I posted this a while back: https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/9398715.Motorcyclist_banned_from_road_after_riding_bike__at_116mph/

They're about 10/15 miles apart, same sort of road and layout.

The Jag driver has got a 9month ban, but still.

Shocking stuff.
____________________
Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:12 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Villers wrote:
Although from a purely legal standpoint its irrelevant what the kid was wearing. Theres no law about gloves or trousers so therefore it should have no bearing on whatever punishment is meted out.

To be judged liable for a punishment with what you are wearing taken into account is ridiculous in my opinion.

As a parent its a stupid thing to be doing though.


Agree 100%. As far as the law is concerned, that shouldn't even have been mentioned. His kid could have been wearing swimming trunks and a crashhelmet. That fufills the requirement so to make out thats a reason to give a harsher sentence is, IMO, bordering upon illegal.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

motobiker
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:37 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any crim will tell you the same.. at any court there are some judges you want to be in front of and some you definitely don't.

Judges have sentencing guidelines.. one judge might always take ah hard-line to a certain offence. Another might take a very different attitude.

If you get caught doing something so naughty that there is the possibility of a custodial sentence.. then hope you go before a lenient judge and not a hard faced one who loves to throw the book at miscreants.

Obviously.. if you think you have been treated unfairly then you are free to appeal.

My point is.. you cannot really compare different sentences for on the face of it similar offences. it doesn't work like that. there are so many factors involved.. not least the attitude of the judge, the competence of your brief. your own attitude and appearance and the evidence against you plus the way it is presented.
____________________
1999 R1100GS + 2006 F800S
(Nottingham)
Sooner or later opinions fade and the name on the tank matters not. I think that happens somewhere between 3rd and 4th gear. Enjoy the ride... everything else takes care of itself.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Villers
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:17 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:
Villers wrote:
Although from a purely legal standpoint its irrelevant what the kid was wearing. Theres no law about gloves or trousers so therefore it should have no bearing on whatever punishment is meted out.

To be judged liable for a punishment with what you are wearing taken into account is ridiculous in my opinion.

As a parent its a stupid thing to be doing though.


Agree 100%. As far as the law is concerned, that shouldn't even have been mentioned. His kid could have been wearing swimming trunks and a crashhelmet. That fufills the requirement so to make out thats a reason to give a harsher sentence is, IMO, bordering upon illegal.


The use of red scared me a little as I scrolled down the screen, thought I'd dropped a tremendous bollock Laughing
____________________
RS125 > CBR6 > SV650S > ZX636R > GSX1300RZ Hayabusa > 06 RSVR Mille > SV1000S > Street Triple 765 RS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kingstondavo
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 10 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:25 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:
Villers wrote:
Although from a purely legal standpoint its irrelevant what the kid was wearing. Theres no law about gloves or trousers so therefore it should have no bearing on whatever punishment is meted out.

To be judged liable for a punishment with what you are wearing taken into account is ridiculous in my opinion.

As a parent its a stupid thing to be doing though.


Agree 100%. As far as the law is concerned, that shouldn't even have been mentioned. His kid could have been wearing swimming trunks and a crashhelmet. That fufills the requirement so to make out thats a reason to give a harsher sentence is, IMO, bordering upon illegal.


I do agree with you absolutely, but from a member of the public seeing something like that, its doing nobody any favours...

And yeah, the car driver definitely should have got time, but as been said, some judges will always be softer than others.

To be honest, the fact that you can end up in jail just for driving/riding fast is beyond me, at the end of the day speeding on its own has never killed anyone....
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:29 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kingstondavo wrote:

I do agree with you absolutely, but from a member of the public seeing something like that, its doing nobody any favours...


We aren't on a PR mission. The dribbling public will think what they're told to think by the X-Factor/The Only Way is Essex. A few bike riders hooning around in jeans isn't going to change that.
____________________
My Flickr


Last edited by Wafer_Thin_Ham on 10:44 - 12 Jan 2012; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:39 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blame the coppers and CPS. The codger in the Jaaag was only done for speeding, both bikers were done for Dangerous Driving.

There's a couple of lessons from the first bike case.

First, when stopped, anything that you say can and will be used as evidence against you. Say nothing.

Second, oh myyyyy:

The article wrote:
[King's barrister] proved that riding in excesses of the 60mph limit was not dangerous in itself [...] because the officer insisted his riding was not dangerous neither was theirs.


(The pretext for conviction was for an overtake on a hill brow, not for the speed itself).

And the usual arrogant tosh from the copper. You know these slapheads only get into it so that they can hoon around on a bike that we pay for and give a hypocritical lecture at the end of it. Rolling Eyes
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike


Last edited by Rogerborg on 12:32 - 12 Jan 2012; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Flemy
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 15 Dec 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:53 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Re: Car driver does 147mph gets 6 points BIKER? Reply with quote

[quote="fatpies"]Biker 122mph...
with-14-year-old-son-on-back.html

...went to prison.quote]

I'm not suprised 122mph with a child pillion...
____________________
Prev- Pug speedfight 2 50cc x3 (Write off, blown engine and stolen), Honda Xr 125-L (Nail), Suzuki GSX-R 600(stolen). Current- Kwak ninja 300
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:55 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Re: Car driver does 147mph gets 6 points BIKER? Reply with quote

Flemy wrote:
fatpies wrote:
Biker 122mph...
with-14-year-old-son-on-back.html

...went to prison


I'm not suprised 122mph with a child pillion...


Again, no way that deserves prison. Neither the rider nor the child were hurt, and no kittens were killed.

14 is also hardly a child. In some countries they can ride their own bikes at that age.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:20 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

motobiker wrote:
My point is.. you cannot really compare different sentences for on the face of it similar offences. it doesn't work like that. there are so many factors involved.. not least the attitude of the judge, the competence of your brief. your own attitude and appearance and the evidence against you plus the way it is presented.


I think the prevailing feeling is you should be able to compare sentences. The judge should not matter, everyone should receive a competent defence and appearance should certainly not have a bearing. I get in the real world it does, but this thread is about the injustice of the real world system...

*I avoided attitude as I think that does and should have an influence, it's likely to show your risk of re-offending, your remorse at your actions or at the very least your intelligence by feigning the first two even if you don't really believe.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:12 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd lock the lot of em up.
Crush all the bikes and throw all the keys away.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:59 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trouble is that I bet a good percentage of the judges & magistrates agree with you!
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

lilredmachine
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:06 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

The disparity is amazing. I'd just keep collecting examples like this so that when you are inevitably tugged over the ton (being dangerous, child killing bikers) and get taken to court you can appeal the bullshit sentence they meat out.
____________________
Bikes: too many, too much for one man to maintain anyway.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:42 - 12 Jan 2012    Post subject: Re: Car driver does 147mph gets 6 points BIKER? Reply with quote

Flemy wrote:


I'm not suprised 122mph with a child pillion...


That is such a stupid statement, I'm wondering if you have a PC stamp on your forehead.......

My favourite rant about speeding -
When I was in Germany on my busa I would ride on the autobahns at 150+. It is, according to German law perfectly safe and legal to ride my bike at that speed, with a pillion if I choose. You won't get done for it & you won't have the PC brigade fueling a witch hunt that Matthew Hopkins would have been proud of.

In UK, according to the law, to ride over 70 is illegal, now that is the law and I accept that. What I object to is this random 'over 100mph and you are on par with mass murderers' attitude. The 'what if' scenario that is seemed to be thrown at speeders. What if you had crashed, your pillion could have died so you are a bad man. Well what if I had got up this morning, taken my shotgun out and walked down the road and robbed a bank. Better lock me up so I can't do that either.

If you are done for 122mph fine, but what the hell has having a pillion got to do with it. If you are on a bike designed to carry 2 people and go and stop in excess of that speed, why should the fact you have a pillion, youth or not, have any bearing on the case. If mr Jag man had a kid in the car when he was done, would it have made an iota of difference, would it fuck.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 48 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.44 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 134.73 Kb