|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Suffolk |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suffolk Derestricted Danger
Joined: 14 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 17:21 - 14 Jan 2012 Post subject: Best Bike for a short arse |
 |
|
First of all, howdy! Am new to the forum and the world of bikes.
About 10 years ago I had a little Suzuki AP50 twist and go which at the time met my needs (was a student and needed something cheap to nip about town). Now I have a 25 mile commute to and from work 4 days a week and at the moment get the train, however, i've booked to redo my CBT in 10 days time and will be looking to get a 125 soon.
Initially I was all set on getting a scooter (probably because thats what I had before) although now am leaning more towards getting a bike, whatever I get i'll probably put a fair few miles on her until I get a car and then the bike will be used more for fun and shorter journeys. Talking of short, I am, very. About 5foot 5 (inside leg 74cm/29inches)on a good day so finding a bike that I fit may be a bit tricky?
Any advice on a first bike would be much appreciated and to reiterate it has to be ridable on just a provisional with CBT. I'm 28 years old and have kept my old scoot insured despite not riding it much so have managed to accumulate a 8 or 9 year no claims bonus which may help when I get the 125.
Thanks in advance  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| metalangel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 metalangel World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:09 - 14 Jan 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
A 125 cruiser might be an idea, like a Suzuki Marauder or Yamaha Virago.
Failing that, if you're doing your CBT again you're probably going to do it on a geared bike this time, right? See what you think of whatever you do it on as your typical 125 isn't exactly huge either. ____________________ Previous: 2002 Honda CB500 (sold), 2007 Suzuki SV650SK6 (crashed), 2005 Yamaha FZ6 Fazer (sold). Currently bikeless
"A faired bike will get you 10x more clunge than a unfaired one." -Marlboro Matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suffolk |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suffolk Derestricted Danger
Joined: 14 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:34 - 14 Jan 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| metalangel wrote: | A 125 cruiser might be an idea, like a Suzuki Marauder or Yamaha Virago.
Failing that, if you're doing your CBT again you're probably going to do it on a geared bike this time, right? See what you think of whatever you do it on as your typical 125 isn't exactly huge either. |
Cheers for the reply. I was going to do my CBT again using a twist and go just so I pass the damn thing, i've never ridden a geared bike but i'm quite lucky in that I live in Suffolk where traffic is low and there are loads of quiet roads to practice. Do you think i'd be better off doing the CBT using a geared bike?
PS the Suzuki you suggested looks quite cool, only potential problem is that i'd be buying a used bike so are the ones you suggested readily available? |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| metalangel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 metalangel World Chat Champion

Joined: 27 Feb 2009 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 19:00 - 14 Jan 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
BikeTrader, there are 43 Marauder GZ1s listed in the UK. 38 on MCN.
The best thing to do is find a local dealer who has a lot of bikes and go and sit on them... optionally, narrow it down to a few you know you like the look/price of and go somewhere that has those.
I'd say yes, do your CBT on a geared bike if you're planning on getting one, you say you've had a licence for nearly a decade, so even if you haven't ridden that much you at least know a lot of the basics... now you can throw gears into the mix and have an instructor there to help you get used to them. ____________________ Previous: 2002 Honda CB500 (sold), 2007 Suzuki SV650SK6 (crashed), 2005 Yamaha FZ6 Fazer (sold). Currently bikeless
"A faired bike will get you 10x more clunge than a unfaired one." -Marlboro Matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ninja_butler |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ninja_butler World Chat Champion
Joined: 19 Oct 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bendy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bendy Mrs Sensible

Joined: 10 Jun 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 19:24 - 14 Jan 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Cruisers are the 'obviouse' and often wrong answer for short legs; they are certainly not the 'best' answer for a Learner-Bike.
So, you are a short-arse... so cruiser with a low seat, would seem a good idea, you dont have so far to 'hop' to throw a leg over....
BUT: how wide is the saddle? Broader the saddle more leg is taken up before you can start reaching it to the floor....
NEXT; distance from floor to seat only counts when you have your foot down. Where will your feet be when you are actually riding along....
AND Cruisers, often have forward controls, the pegs unstead of under your bum in the 'Jokey' possition, they are often stretched right out infront of the engine, in the 'Lancer' possition....
Ever got in a car after a lanky git like me has been driving, and slid the seat all the way back?..... Hmmm.... cant slide the seat forward on a bike..... on a regular bike, though you CAN 'ball the tank' and slide your bum forwards.... not so easy on a cruiser with the sculpted seat that supports the back of the bum, and a peanut tank sloping up from it......
So, that takes care of the erganomics & pro's and cons of the legs.... short legs, USUALLY mean shorty arms... unless you are a gorilla....
Cruisers have a 'lad back' riding position; the seat reclining you backwards, putting shoulders behind your bum.... means more of a 'stretch' to the handlebars.....
And, them bars... not at or around the level of the head stock falling easily to hand, they are big and wide high rise, pull back things, that spread you out in the shape of a human parachute.....
If you have short arms to go with your short legs, you are as likely to find the 'spread' to accross the bars to take up a lot of arm length, the height more, and the whole lot pull you awkwardly forwards from that reclined seating possition...
THEN you have to make the thing go round a corner....
Wide bar, for teh same degree of steering angle, the handlebar grip is going to move further... so you will have to lean even further forwards to keep hold of it... and THAT will be on the opposite side of the bike to the way you want to 'lean' to go round a corner...
So, to turn, and cruisers with 'lazy' steering geometry, take more steering and more leaning for the same turning circle... but you will be having to lean the wrong way to get the steering angle, and may even struggle to get that angle, your little arms that stretched to begin with, without standing on the pegs... exept you cant, becouse they are actually ahead of the ruddy handle-bars!
JUST becouse they have a 'low' seat height doesn't mean that cruisers suit short people!
And these problems were all discovered trying to find out why Snowie, my O/H had so much trouble with an AJS Honda Rebel Copy, and she is exactly 5'5"...
Meanwhile 125 Cruisers just DONT WORK.... they LOOK like a cruiser, but that's all. Cruisers are all about 'lazy' easy riding. You cant DO that with a bike that has only 10bhp, struggles to hold 60mph, and needs three gear changes to get it to 30mph!
As a Training & Test tool, even if you dont have erganomic problems to contend with; that 'lazy' geometry is just NOT suited to hustling one through CBT or Mod 1 cones!
I know I used to instruct CBT, and I watched cruiser riders struggle enormously; and trying one or two of them to work out why; concluded it was easier to do CBT/Mod 1 manouvers on a Super-Black-Bird!
For Mod 1, they are also disadvantaged by being heavy, lower powered and lower geared, so they dont have the acceleration for the speed-trap manouvers that many struggle with even on lighter, more powerfuil and more nimble commuters.
They are REALLY a 'Bad' place to start your riding career!
Bench-Mark learner-commuter, is a Yamaha YBR125. It's about the best value Learner-Commuter on the market and a damned hard package to beat; there are more or less ecconomic alternatives; BUT the regulation Learner commuter LIKE the YBR is what you ought to be looking for.
If you CANT ride one of them; and your height ought to be no impediment; then you probably ought to give up on the idea of bikes altogether; they are the BEST starting point; one size pretty much fits all; and erganomically they are 'neutral', and make riding and learning to ride just about as easy as it can be for you.... which is what you want from a learner bike, really! ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kernowscoot |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kernowscoot L Plate Warrior
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Clanger |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Clanger Stirrer

Joined: 27 May 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:40 - 14 Jan 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
What I would like to know was...did you read this https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=230544 before posting your question??
If not, why not?? It's a sticky...which means it's important that you read it before starting your thread.
Because Bendy wrote it, it is VERY likely to cover many of the questions that you may have as a new biker....
Read it. It's good for you.  ____________________ Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter won't mind - Dr. Seuss |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suffolk |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suffolk Derestricted Danger
Joined: 14 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kingstondavo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kingstondavo Spanner Monkey
Joined: 10 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| moppy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 moppy World Chat Champion

Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| millymols |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 millymols Derestricted Danger
Joined: 11 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 00:03 - 15 Jan 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
TL:DR
Im shorter than you by one inch, and also one inch off the inside leg,
If you look at my sig you should be able to ride all those bikes without problems.
Only now im starting to look at dual sport / off road bikes is height becoming a concern... ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suffolk |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suffolk Derestricted Danger
Joined: 14 Jan 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bendy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bendy Mrs Sensible

Joined: 10 Jun 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 18:30 - 16 Jan 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
| suffolkpompeymike wrote: | I had a walk into town at lunch time and stalked out a few car parks to see a few bikes in the flesh. I saw a CBF125 and a YBR125 and both of them look like they'd fit me. I've started looking online at what my local dealers have got and as i'm now edging closer to getting my cbt and buying my bike I wanted to ask a few questions. Here goes.
What are the pros and cons of the two bikes I mentioned above, is one significantly better than the other?
As i'll be riding about 200 miles a week i'm going to want something reliable and not knackered, am thinking something with around 5000 miles or less - what price should I be paying assuming its in good condition?
I'm most likely going to be paying for my bike with my credit card and using the £80 a month saved by biking rather than getting train to work to pay it back but have also some cash saved, all in all I will be looking to pay around £1800 tops
Lastly, when checking the bike and its service history what are the important things to look out for?
Thanks and sorry if these are stupid questions, i'm a newbie and therefore am stupid (for now). |
Read around teh forum; this is debated frequently and I have JUST answered virtually teh same Q.
You want a Training & Test tool to get a licence. You want 'cheap' you want 'easy'.... nothing else. 200miles a week reliability? Comfort? Ecconomy? Performance?
You can have all of those things in SPADES.... ONCE you have a licence.
125's are low capacity machines; and not just engine displacement. That low engine capacity does not endow them with the sort of power thatthey can lug heavy duty parts around for great high mile reliability, nor be fitted with big plush seats or accessories or fairings.... so if you want 'more' out of a 125, you are going to have to put more in, and make more compromises.
Learning, you want EASY, you dont NEED any more compromises than you have to; you want to get on and do, and ONLY have to worry about what you are doing, and not making a hash of it.
Make sense?
200 miles a week, whats that? 20 miles each-way a day? A 'good' 125 would cope with that, but it's never going to be ideal, and the miles and strain will take its toll and you will have to do a fair bit of maintenence quite frequently. Bigger bike would do that job a LOT better, and need not, in overall costs be much if any more expensive... BUT here and now, you want a training & test tool, nothing more, and while commuting can be a great way to get some extra experience for tests... NOT really the best thing to be PLANNING on doing straight off.
Rush hour is THE most dangerouse place to be.... an L-Plater on a 125 the MOST likely to get hurt..... silly, unnecessary risk.
Get your bike, get some miles under your belt OUT of rush hour, riding JUST for the fun of it where there's nbo other pressure, and work UP to commuting...
By the time you can tackle that comfortably... you're ready for test... and you can do THEM and get a bike far more suited and capable of that commute, with the reliability and everythiung else you suggest you want from it.
Choose your 125 for the job its designed; Training & Tests... IF you can or do commute on it; that's bonus; but save all your 'wants' from a bike for the one you choose AFTER you have the licence.
for now:
YBR is bench-mark Learner commuter; not hugely inspiring; but very 'useful', and brilliant ecconomics if you buy used, under five years old.
CBF is good competition for the YBR and another considered choice. Bit more expensive to buy, and probaly to run. More sophisticated, which can mean more expensive to service and maintain; latest ones are fuel injected, so less DIY Serviceable' , but perhaps a tad more inspiring to own or ride.
Between the two, not much in it; both would do the job. Training & Tests, they would each do well;' Your commute; warnings heeded, 'adequetly', but for THAT secondary job, REALLY is for your NEXT bike to do. ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 14 years, 22 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|