Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


MP3 is crap!

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Geek Zone Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

ninja_butler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:27 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: MP3 is crap! Reply with quote

Why is there no public demand for anything better than MP3? If you compare it to a format like FLAC or Ogg Vorbis (yes, it is a stupid name) it sounds utterly, hopelessly crap.

Does no one these days care about sound quality? I'm sick of MP3, yes it was an excellent format in the old days when my PC had an 80GB hard drive and most MP3 players were less than 1GB, but these days media players have massive storage capacity! The only advantage of MP3 files is their small size so why are we still using them?

https://www.themusicvoid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/researching-careers-music81.jpg
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Seb
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:16 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same reason people buy Beats headphones and blare music from mobile phones frankly Neutral
____________________
2010 Triumph 1050 Sprint ST
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ninja_butler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:23 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

They're tone deaf? Sad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:26 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Re: MP3 is crap! Reply with quote

ninja_butler wrote:
Does no one these days care about sound quality?


Yes, we do. When I want to hear something in all its audio glory, I use my home system and listen to the CD or vinyl. However, if I just want some background music or am on a long car journey, I stick my MP3 player on shuffle.

Horses for courses.
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ninja_butler
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:44 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vinyl is good - some would even say it's the best - but CD's still use crappy old MP3 format so you're just listening to MP3's through better speakers. Isn't it strange that people will spend £1000 on a top quality sound system but only play low quality media on it?

edit* I should say two-channel 16-bit PCM before someone picks up on that.


Last edited by ninja_butler on 14:43 - 19 Feb 2012; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:53 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

People still use mp3? I encode as WMA, and I'm (usually) a filthy Lunix hippy.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:01 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Years ago I sat down and encoded all my CDs to MP3. I'm not going to bother doing it again to a different format.
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:25 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

ninja_butler wrote:
Vinyl is good - some would even say it's the best - but CD's still use crappy old MP3 format so you're just listening to MP3's through better speakers. Isn't it strange that people will spend £1000 on a top quality sound system but only play low quality media on it?

edit* I should say two-channel 16-bit PCM before someone picks up on that.


? I'm gonna pick up on it... MP3 and CD are in completely different leagues. MP3 is an offshoot of mpeg compression and was little used for it's original purpose (soundtrack for video). There are benefits to MP3 over CD - sample rate being the main one. But CD is an uncompressed digitised sound, sure the ADC can potentially lose something, but the data is very close to or above that of normal human hearing.

Vorbis is just another lossy compressor, probably the best but a lossy compression format nonetheless. Vorbis & a well compressed MP3 are comparable. FLAC is lossless so in a different league and is much closer to the original source - ie. matches CD or provides a very good ADC.

To claim CDs are just MP3s or even all that similar shows a lack of understanding. Also, where do you think MP3s, Ogg and FLAC files come from? They're generally ripped from CDs...

If you genuinely care about HQ sound then you have to choose DVDA. Even vinyl has massive drawbacks - dust, temperature, environment all affect playback and of course making vinyl can cause so many little variations you rarely get an exact representation of the original.

In fact that's the main idea - recreation of the original... All the formats I've mentioned do not do it exactly, but it's a sliding scale. As you say MP3 probably the worst, but can be very close to Vorbis if setup correctly. CD, FLAC, vinyl are very similar. DVDA/SACD is as close as you can get for now...
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Charlie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:59 - 19 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:
LAC is lossless so in a different league and is much closer to the original source - ie. matches CD or provides a very good ADC


May just be an honest mistake, but the format the music is stored in, isn't related to the ADC.

The ADC digitises an analogue signal and is always lossy. It is often a physical chip which spits out raw numbers, which are then converted into a usable format by software. However as you mention early, provided with enough resolution and bandwidth they can outperform the human ear.

The DAC is probably just as important as the ADC and compression used.
____________________
Past: Honda x8rs, Honda City fly, Honda Hornet 250, Honda VFR750, Yamaha xt600e.
Current: Honda CBR929RR & Yamaha XT660Z Tenere
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:49 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I get all my stuff in FLAC these days. There was some torrent site a mate showed me a while back that had all the albums properly labelled and indexed, with multiple qualities available for download for each, usually 128, 192, 320 and FLAC.

To be honest MP3 is pretty good provided you get it in 320 bit rate. anything below 192 sounds a bit crappy when loud. 128 is basically radio quality.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

J.M.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:59 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find MP3 more than adequate enough for me. I generally have my music on in the background and not on overly loud. If I listen whilst riding then the headphones I use are too rubbish to care about HQ.

So personally I've never wondered about anything better. There's not exactly any point in converting what I have already though - you can't really add already lost quality.

What about M4A, I thought that was designed to be a higher quality version of MP3?
____________________
2004 R1 & 2018 XSR900
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Frost
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:48 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

M4A / MP4 is mostly used for video.
Though MP3 sampled at 44.2khz is twice that of the human hearing range it's the minimum to be able the do all frequencies in the hearing range. As a result it can get overwhelmed if the music has a lot of high frequencies noises. Also the hiss that comes from the music means the volume has to be bumped up to overcome it. I listen to a fuck load of classical music where it can be very noticeable.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stigger
Crazy Courier



Joined: 06 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:13 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

ninja_butler wrote:
Vinyl is good - some would even say it's the best - but CD's still use crappy old MP3 format so you're just listening to MP3's through better speakers. Isn't it strange that people will spend £1000 on a top quality sound system but only play low quality media on it?

edit* I should say two-channel 16-bit PCM before someone picks up on that.


Sorry???
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:10 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Charlie wrote:
May just be an honest mistake, but the format the music is stored in, isn't related to the ADC.


of course it is... I was trying to make the point that when you store music digitally it has gone through an ADC process. So no matter how great anyone thinks the digital compression de jour is, it is always a lossy operation.

Although reading it over my original point wasn't particularly well made.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Alpha-9
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:15 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meh, who cares. Mp3 is plenty enough quality. Anyone that says otherwise is a DJ skrillex wannabe connoisseur Dance! Dance! Clapping


Whistle
____________________
Fzr-600 1999
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:24 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure why people still use it but small file sizes are easier for downloading and transferring.

Not everyone has a 20mb internet connection.

If I want some music and FLAC is available, I will get it but if not, I am not too fussed unless it is for a specific purpose. e.g. I downloaded a bunch of FLAC THX sound check things which are pretty cool played loud.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

adamck
Crazy Courier



Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:35 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.lincomatic.com/mp3/mp3quality.html

A pretty in depth test on this site with CD vs MP3 for quality testing.
In his conclusion a 256Kbps MP3 was pretty much exactly the same as CD quality.
a 192kbps MP3 is acceptable for computer/in the car listening.

So MP3 isnt all bad if encoded with good software at a variable bit rate to a higher Kbps.

320kbps isnt noticeably different in sound to 192kbps so not worth doing.

An i agree that its crazy the amount of people buying studio quality headphones to listen to crap quality MP3's.
____________________
<insert><something><useful>Here</useful></something></insert>
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

calyx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:01 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alpha-9 wrote:
Meh, who cares. Mp3 is plenty enough quality. Anyone that says otherwise is a DJ skrillex wannabe connoisseur Dance! Dance! Clapping


Whistle


+1 to this.

This is pure techno-trans geek talking. Give a rocker 64bit Motorhead and watch him headbang to death with joy of tears.
Touchy...
____________________
Boris - London
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:42 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone with a semi decent sound system can tell you there is a big difference between 192 and FLAC
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

whitedevil
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Nov 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:50 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

mp3 sounds 95% as good as the source and is 1/4 the file size.
Whats not to like?

I'm sure if i was rich i'd have a £100,000 sound system and wank over my flac collection.
Or like most of the population i'd have a £200 system and cant tell difference, or care.
____________________
GPZ500 sold ~ CBR600FS-2 sold ~ ZX6R sold ~ Street Triple R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:52 - 20 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

If there is one thing I hate more than wannabe wine connoisseurs it has to be wannabe audiophiles.

You start a thread claiming MP3s are rubbish and then basically claim that a CD is just like an mp3. I'm not even remotely interested in the subject yet I know you can store 700MB of mp3s on a CD, so clearly a normal CD is not in mp3 format otherwise you'd be able to fit more than 20 songs on it!

I'm just disappointed that my current golf stereo, which whilst being touchscreen and a DAB unit, iPod connectivity, 6 CD changer blah blah has worst audio quality output than my old golf which only read MP3 CDs.
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Howling TerrorOutOfOffice
Super Spammer



Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:39 - 21 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm no audiophile, an obsessive music listener and music maker I am.

There are times I want music just in the background, so quality isn't important..encoded music does ok for this. There are times I want to pick up a guitar and just thrash the knackers off it for an hour. I'm not interested in tone or whether the strings are old and dull.

Then there are moments when I need to hear the sound of a squeaking Bass Drum pedal on a record, the reverb tail of a low minor chord played on a piano. The full frequency force of a Minimoog bassline.
For music made with traditional instruments you can get a 'sense' of the room the song was recorded in (although if may of been added later).

It's the lack subtlety in lossy compression that I don't want when I'm sitting back relaxing with the speakers pointed at my ears.
Same as I don't want to hit an A major powerchord on the Gibson with crusty strings, only for it to disappear faster than coke at Whitney's house.

Music producers factor-in, that their tracks will be heard through crappy buds or phone speakers. It's not a new thing. They've always used domestic equipment to field-test. Now they have the technology to make the Bass sound as though it's actually moving air, the hi-hats to sizzle.

If I really like a piece of music I buy it on LP or CD and listen to it using decent equipment. I also love my cassettes, the hiss, the overdriven sound even the flutter and because I'm an emotional type of bloke I like the drop-outs on old mixtapes traded many many moons ago.
What's to like about an MP3 glitch (or any digital glitch) They destroy the listening experience instantly, unlike a 40yr old piece of vinyl that crackles just so before the music starts.




In short. MP3 have no soul. Invented by Ginger haired people.
____________________
Diabolical homemade music Bandcamp and Soundcloud
Singer songwriter, Artist and allround good bloke Listen to Andrew Susan Johnston here
The Harry Turner Project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:27 - 21 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd take the pepsi challenge between MP3 and FLAC given a decent quality amp and speakers.

Although if you want to hear how good audio can be, try listening to a white stripes vinyl LP. They use analogue masters and high quality pressings.

I'll agree there is absolutely no point in having high quality audio in the car but there is in my living room.

What I hate more than anything else though is an amp turned up way too high and clipping off the signal and people do this a hell of a lot. Especially in cars. I've even heard it being done in a nightclub fairly recently. When people are prepared to volountarily sit and listen to their music like that, it doesn't come as a surprise to me that they are totally comfortable with the sound quality of the most highly compressed MP3 they can find.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Alpha-9
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:33 - 21 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Howling Terror wrote:
I'm no audiophile,
STUFF
I'm an audiophile


I agree Thumbs Up


That's different, though. Producers yeah, of course they will notice the difference from their original track, from the moment its compressed at all

But to the average user, listening on shitty headphones or with shitty speakers in their shitty house on their shitty mac, this shit doesnt matter, mp3 is enough.

In the same sense I can't hear the difference betwwen 380p on youtube and 720p, yet people are in the commnets are liek OMG 720P IS SEXXXX

I've had plenty of audio kit and speakers and headphones, some cheap, some expensive, and yet.


What music do you produce? :-j
I've fingered around on fruity loops and stuff but never really made anything

but I have a kaoss pad 3 and a kaosillator pro i have a wonderful time on making sounds, and it sounds great, even through my shitty guitar amp Thumbs Up
____________________
Fzr-600 1999
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:48 - 21 Feb 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alpha-9 wrote:
In the same sense I can't hear the difference betwwen 380p on youtube and 720p, yet people are in the commnets are liek OMG 720P IS SEXXXX:


Can you smell colours though?
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 14 years, 51 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Geek Zone All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.13 Sec - Server Load: 1.33 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 135.18 Kb