|
|
| Author |
Message |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:33 - 23 Apr 2012 Post subject: Tyre dilemma |
 |
|
Okay.
In what difference would acceleration and speedometre reading suggest, if using a 100/100mm tyre rather than 100/90mm on 18" rims front and back?
I would prefer 90mm, but they don't seem to make any for 18" wheels...
Thanks. ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Jim Mc |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Jim Mc Nearly there...
Joined: 28 Dec 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:10 - 23 Apr 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Wow, just wow. You really can't work that out? Think about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moo. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moo. World Chat Champion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| iooi |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iooi Super Spammer

Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 18:19 - 23 Apr 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
If the old grey matter is struggling... Try here ____________________ Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:23 - 23 Apr 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
I don't understand the system. Purely imperial man myself.
What kind of difference in size is a 100/100 over 100/90 ? Physically, how much of an inch large either side/taller etcc ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rob W |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rob W World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 Nov 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:51 - 23 Apr 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
so the tyre would be 0.4 inches taller than a 90?
18" + 90mm (3.54") + 0.4 = 21.94"
VS
18" + 100mm (3.93") + 0.4 = 22.33"
In total diametre. That would be about equivilant to gearing up 1 tooth at the front right? ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MyCarVsYourHe... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MyCarVsYourHe... Nova Slayer

Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| blurredman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 blurredman World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 23:16 - 25 Apr 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
Ta ____________________ CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 335 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|