Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Costs of Riding versus Caging

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Kradmelder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:58 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Costs of Riding versus Caging Reply with quote

I just did a calc of the costs of running my bike (KTM 990) versus if I had used my cage (4x4 turbo D/C mitsubihi). My BMW bike may be only a little cheaper. Shocking.

Costs are in Rand Per Km
Bike Cage
Depreciation 0.75 0.5
Fuel 0.70 1.5
insurance 0.25 0.175
Tyres 0.3 0.1
services 0.4 0.4
ATGATT 0.33
registration 0.006 0.014

2.74 2.68



Assumptions
Purchase price of bike is R150 000, and cage R300 000. The cage depreciates 50% over 300 000 km, and the bike 50% over 100 000 km

Fuel consumption is 17 km/l of bike and 8 km/l for cage

Insurance is R500 per month for bike and R350 for cage and based on 2000 km per month

Tyres are average 10000 km per set for bike ( rear is less and front is more), and cost R3000 per set. Cage is 70 000 km and 7000 per set

Services are every 7500 km and each averages R3000

ATGATT is R20 000 for full kit and lasts 60 000 km

registration is R150 per year for bike and R350 per year for cage and based on 24 000 km for each.



Ai. Bike is more expensive than cage.
____________________
2011 KTM 990 Dakar
2009 BMW 1200 GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DrDonnyBrago
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:10 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: Costs of Riding versus Caging Reply with quote

It really depends on the bike/car being compared.

The bike equivalent of my car is something like a CG125/CB250 which would be cheaper to own than my car. The car equivalent of my bike would be something pretty tasty and would cost a fortune to own.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kradmelder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:12 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: Costs of Riding versus Caging Reply with quote

DonnyBrago wrote:
It really depends on the bike/car being compared.

The bike equivalent of my car is something like a CG125/CB250 which would be cheaper to own than my car. The car equivalent of my bike would be something pretty tasty and would cost a fortune to own.


Of course it would, but would not be fair to compare like a 250 to an expensive cage. I have an expensive cage and 2 expensive bikes. So it is more reasonable. Would be interesting to see a cheap bike versus a small cage, but I dsont have the figures for that.

What I ignore is finance charges, which would be higher on the cage, but that is because all my vehicles are paid and I buy them new cash. If I had to finance I guess the cage would be a bit more expensive. However cage dealers give very good interest rates and bike dealers do not.

I guess I could factor in lost opportunity costs of the price difference of the cage versus bike in terms of returns on investments, but I must have cage to transport kids and large items so the money must be spent anyways. So I look at strictly running costs.

That means I must have a cage but not bikes, but I would never give up my bikes. It is still worth it.
____________________
2011 KTM 990 Dakar
2009 BMW 1200 GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Shinigami
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:16 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

those figures are way off. There's no way on earth I'd get insurance for ANY car cheaper than my bike insurance
____________________
Current: Honda City Fly CLR125 2003 Honda CB600F Hornet 2008 Yamaha FZ6 S2 + 1991 Kawasaki GPZ500
"Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the Comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kradmelder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:20 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shinigami wrote:
those figures are way off. There's no way on earth I'd get insurance for ANY car cheaper than my bike insurance


It is what i actually pay, so it is not 'way off'.

So yes there is a way on earth you can get insurance for a cage cheaper than a bike. I can give you the phone number of my insurance broker if you like
____________________
2011 KTM 990 Dakar
2009 BMW 1200 GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:21 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shinigami wrote:
those figures are way off. There's no way on earth I'd get insurance for ANY car cheaper than my bike insurance

He's in South Africa in the UK, insurance for young people on cars is really stupidly high.
Generally still high for a performance car if you're not young.

I wouldn't get something like a KTM990 to be cheap transport.
Overall, I expect you can do cars cheaper if you choose a cheap car.

However, if you want (on or off road) performance per pound (or rand), then a bike will pretty much always be the one. Even cheap performance cars still tend to be a fair bit more expensive to run.
If you want to get A to B quickly through traffic, it's bike all the way.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kradmelder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:29 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Shinigami wrote:
those figures are way off. There's no way on earth I'd get insurance for ANY car cheaper than my bike insurance

He's in South Africa in the UK, insurance for young people on cars is really stupidly high.
Generally still high for a performance car if you're not young.

I wouldn't get something like a KTM990 to be cheap transport.
Overall, I expect you can do cars cheaper if you choose a cheap car.

However, if you want (on or off road) performance per pound (or rand), then a bike will pretty much always be the one. Even cheap performance cars still tend to be a fair bit more expensive to run.
If you want to get A to B quickly through traffic, it's bike all the way.


Correct. Insurance on cages is expensive for young people, but cheap for established professionals with lock up garages, living in secure areas etc.

Neither my KTM nor my BMW, nor my cage are cheap transport. So Im comparing similar levels of quality/on and off road performance/comfort (a 4x4 vs a DS bike). I dont need cheap transport as I can afford to have transport I enjoy. But if you had cheap transport in terms of cheap cages and bikes, would the cage still be cheaper to run?

If I had a cheap bike I lose my grin factor. I love my long distance and gravel roads. If I had a cheap cage I would get more pissed off caging than i already do.

My point is at the approximate same entry level and functional level for cages and bikes, the cage is cheaper to run, but of course less fun and slower.

Would the same hold true at the entry level of cheap bike city commuter vs small city car. Or sports bike vs sports car?

[/code]
____________________
2011 KTM 990 Dakar
2009 BMW 1200 GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wave2k
G's Stalker



Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:40 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on the bike / car

My sportsbike (GSXR1000K6) is considerably cheaper to run than my sportcar (Nissan 350Z).
Tyres arnt cheap on either

If you are comparing say a Corsa vs a bike, it has to be something equally as braindead and shit like a Honda Bros, ER5 or Divvy6.

Bike will always come out on top.

Insurance and fuel is a hell of alot cheaper.
____________________
Ducati 1299 Panigale
2009 Corvette C6 z51
RS125->CBR400->RXS100->GSXR750K2->Ducati749S->CBR600RR5->TL1000R->DRz400->RSVR1000->Honda VTR SP1->CBR400->GSXR1000K6->Honda H100->CBR600RR3->Ducati1299
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:41 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheap cars are partly cheaper due to numbers - there's a big market for cheap tyres and aftermarket parts. Also they generally get driven less 'hard' than bikes.

Sports cars are generally a fair bit more expensive to run than sports bikes.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Shinigami
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:45 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh lordy, just thought I'd have a ganders at how much car insurance for me would be, just did it on a cheap ford ka (no idea what insurance band it's in, just first one i found at same value as bike)
and the cheapest quote confused gave me was £1300 o_O jeebus

that's kept in a garage, in a very low crime rate area for a 30 yr old.


...i'll stick to 2 wheels lol
____________________
Current: Honda City Fly CLR125 2003 Honda CB600F Hornet 2008 Yamaha FZ6 S2 + 1991 Kawasaki GPZ500
"Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the Comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kradmelder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:58 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wave wrote:
Depends on the bike / car

My sportsbike (GSXR1000K6) is considerably cheaper to run than my sportcar (Nissan 350Z).
Tyres arnt cheap on either

If you are comparing say a Corsa vs a bike, it has to be something equally as braindead and shit like a Honda Bros, ER5 or Divvy6.

Bike will always come out on top.

Insurance and fuel is a hell of alot cheaper.


According to what I am actually paying out, my cage would be cheaper. Is cage insurance really that much in the UK to tilt the balance to bikes?

If you look at fuel consumption, my KTM and BMW are on par with a small cage, but half that of a large cage. Tyres are far more for a bike. The only thing cheaper on bikes is fuel. Everythign else they cost me more.

When cagers look at my bikes and say you must save so much money on a bike, I grin. In fact I ride because I love it. I save nothing and pour money into bikes, into farkles, riding for pleasure etc.
____________________
2011 KTM 990 Dakar
2009 BMW 1200 GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Shinigami
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:00 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

mines probably not a good example as my bikes a 125cc.

but ford ka - yr 2000 model - value £900 - insurance £1300

Honda Clr125 - 2003 - value on my insurance £900 - insurance <£200
____________________
Current: Honda City Fly CLR125 2003 Honda CB600F Hornet 2008 Yamaha FZ6 S2 + 1991 Kawasaki GPZ500
"Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the Comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

shereen
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:06 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kradmelder wrote:
Is cage insurance really that much in the UK to tilt the balance to bikes?



Yes.

My car insurance is 3 times more expensive than my bike.

Car 1998 1.8 Ford Focus. Driving 4 years, 1 years no claims. £970

Bike - K4 GSXR750, Riding 1.5 years ish. 1 year no claims. £325

Go figure.
____________________
"The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Shinigami
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:07 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just quoted on an Yamaha FZ6 2005,

£350 fully comp
____________________
Current: Honda City Fly CLR125 2003 Honda CB600F Hornet 2008 Yamaha FZ6 S2 + 1991 Kawasaki GPZ500
"Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the Comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:12 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was paying £130 TPFT on a K6 GSXR1000.
An E36 M3 was around £800 for TPFT.
This is lots of no claims on both for a 31 year old. The car is reasonably good performance for a car, but not up to the bike still, of course.

Apparently on street parking these days can be cheaper than garaged here by the way - too many houses getting burgled for the keys of the car in the garage.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kradmelder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:12 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shinigami wrote:
mines probably not a good example as my bikes a 125cc.

but ford ka - yr 2000 model - value £900 - insurance £1300

Honda Clr125 - 2003 - value on my insurance £900 - insurance <£200


WTF? My cage is now worth 160 000. New was 300 000. Insurance R350 per month

My bike insured for 100 000. New was 145 000. Insurance R500 per month.

For a lower insured value, bikea are far more expensive to insure.
____________________
2011 KTM 990 Dakar
2009 BMW 1200 GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

multijoy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:20 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kradmelder wrote:

For a lower insured value, bikea are far more expensive to insure.


Perhaps in your neck of the woods. Round these parts, if I were to have bought a car for the same price as my CBF, I'd be lucky to get insurance for less than a 1/6 of it's value. With the bike, it's about 1/20th of the value to insure it.

What your calculation shows is that in S.Africa, it's more expensive to run a piece of Austrian exotica than it is to run a Japanese work-horse.
____________________
'11 CBF1000A, '99 C90, '98 CB500
silky666: He rode amazingly well considering his bike is the weight of a small van and had slicks on.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Derivative
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:21 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kradmelder wrote:
For a lower insured value, bikea are far more expensive to insure.


Not so in the UK. Especially for younger drivers.

I can pass my test tomorrow and jump on a CB500 and pay <£200 per year in insurance costs.

I've not yet found a car that I can insure (tried corsa, fiesta, prius, mondeo, focus, beetle, basically every type of reasonably standard car you could imagine) for less than £2900 per year.

I can get insured on a 600 supersport for less than an econobox.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:30 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the UK, the value of the vehicle isn't a massive issue; it's the likelihood of you having a claim.

Young drivers are more likely to crash and quite possibly more likely to crash with mates in the car. 4 people claiming for whiplash in most cars will vastly outweigh the cost of the car it's self being replaced.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

dransy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:34 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gs500 worth about 500 quid
Road tax 45 quid
Insurance 576 for year
Licence held less than a year

Citroën xsara 1.4 again worth about 500 quid
Road tax .140 for year
Insurance 2200 a year
Licence held for nearly 3 years

About 16 - 17 quid to fill up gs tank get about 120 miles riding like q Cunt till I need reserve

Never filled the car up so can't comment

Anything that brakes I fix myself but parts for the car at more expensive
____________________
Being shot out of a cannon will always be better than being squeezed out of a tube. That is why God made fast motorcycles
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

robbieguy2003
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:42 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

For me, cars have 'generally' been cheaper to run unless something major has gone tits on them, especially if chewing through miles.

I used to do ~2,000 miles a month on my first 600RR. I ran it on reasonably BT020 tyres but I was still changing the rear every 2.5/3 months and the front every 5-6 months. It was serviced every 4,000 Miles (minimum oil/filter change), Chain Sprockets when needed, fork oil changed - I didn't scrimp, the bike was looked after.

I do less miles now, but for mile munching I either use my car (bmw e46 330ci) or my GSX1250. I think the car is marginally cheaper because the consumables last so much longer.

Obviously, if you were driving around town, I don't think you'd get cheaper than a 125 when you factor in parking costs, insurance, maintenance and all the rest of it, but when you swap to motorway miles, I think the rate you go through consumables on a bike is too high.

The most fair comparison would be picking a workhorse TDI car - say a Skoda Octavia or VW Passat, and a shaft drive bike with good service intervals. Take all costs - congestion charges, parking, fuel, safety gear for bike, maintenance, insurance, tax, purchase price, expected resale etc. Once you had all that, you could then do a fair comparison between the two.
____________________
Current Bikes: Honda CBR 600RR - '07, Suzuki GSX1250 FA ST '11
Old Bikes: Suzuki Intruder 125 LC - '2001, Honda CBR 600F - '92, Honda CBR 600RR - '03
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

symonh2000
Crazy Courier



Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:09 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

For me bikes have always been cheaper to run.

I tend to buy bikes that are older and do them up so that depreciation isn't really an issue. In fact I have made a small profit on most of the bikes I have had.

Where as with cars I have almost always lost money even at the lower end of the market.

That is before you factor in more expensive Tax, MOT, Insurance and fuel.
____________________
Four strokes is two strokes too many.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:11 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Often can find cheaper car MOT - as again, there's more competition, so get one for £25, while it's the full £30 for a bike.

If you choose carefully, can get a cheap car that does pretty good fuel economy. Doubly so if you're actually transporting people and working out a price per person - ie Fiesta diesel taking 5 people at 65mpg say - comes out at very cheaply per person.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kradmelder
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:27 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

multijoy wrote:
Kradmelder wrote:

For a lower insured value, bikea are far more expensive to insure.


Perhaps in your neck of the woods. Round these parts, if I were to have bought a car for the same price as my CBF, I'd be lucky to get insurance for less than a 1/6 of it's value. With the bike, it's about 1/20th of the value to insure it.

What your calculation shows is that in S.Africa, it's more expensive to run a piece of Austrian exotica than it is to run a Japanese work-horse.


Super bikes are also expensive to insure here. I think it has to do with accident rates and parts. We have a car industry and parts for cages made locally. For bikes everything is imported, so even a small prang writes off a bike. It cant be theft as bike theft is not common while vehicle hijacking is.

Most of the jap cars, even mercedes, VW etc all assembled here. But no bikes are made here. Therefore parts for bikes are also very expensive.

I also cannot fathom why bike insurance is per year 6% of the bike value, while for cages far less, except the accident rates and repair costs. It is also difficult to get bike insurance alone. Most companies only insure you if you have a cage with them as well.

In europe, is there a surcharge on insurance companies because they want to keep cages off the road due to congestion?


Insurance here is based on brand (affects theft rates), value, year, business use, where you live (also affects theft), and where you park overnight, also age and number of years you have been driving, and previous claims.


I think what they do by brand is look at average cost of repairs per accident, and accident rates by brand. Frequent bike crashes and expensive parts means insurance premiums go up.


Parking fees??? Never pay them. I skip the booms. I dont even use their parking bays. I park on the pavement.


Watch it. What you refer to as austrian exotica happens to be my mistress and the number one female in my life Mr. Green She is not some exotic tart, there just to look pretty. I ride her every day, and she gives me great thrills. Mr. Green

Do i call your better half some rice burning fast jap tart? Laughing
____________________
2011 KTM 990 Dakar
2009 BMW 1200 GS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

multijoy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:21 - 20 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kradmelder wrote:

I think what they do by brand is look at average cost of repairs per accident, and accident rates by brand. Frequent bike crashes and expensive parts means insurance premiums go up.


A better question, then, is what are you insuring against in SA? In the UK, the bulk of the premium relates to the potential for a claim by a 3rd party against your 3rd party liability insurance. If I rear end a car on the bike, the chances are every occupant will have a go for a whiplash injury, which will push the claim into 5 figures. The damage to the bike and the car would barely factor into the costs. The likelihood of the policyholder incurring 3rd party costs is the key factor, I imagine the odds of a fully-comp policy holder claiming for significant repairs against their own insurers are much less.


Kradmelder wrote:
Watch it. What you refer to as austrian exotica happens to be my mistress and the number one female in my life Mr. Green She is not some exotic tart, there just to look pretty. I ride her every day, and she gives me great thrills. Mr. Green

Do i call your better half some rice burning fast jap tart? Laughing


Rolling Eyes

The fact that we're discussing vehicles aside, my point is that you're not comparing like with like.

The KTM 990 isn't an especially common machine, especially outside Europe. I suspect you can count the dealers in SA on one hand. KTM's can be a bit highly strung and their QA can be hit and miss and they depreciate like an inbound artillery shell, and I used to have a 690 as my regular bike so I speak with some level of experience.

Your Mitsubishi is a workhorse, with dealers across the continent and a pretty extensive support network. I'd be very surprised if it specified a service interval of 7500km.

Of course your bike is going to be expensive by comparison, and I'm amazed that that has come as a surprise.
____________________
'11 CBF1000A, '99 C90, '98 CB500
silky666: He rode amazingly well considering his bike is the weight of a small van and had slicks on.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 234 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.87 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 141.79 Kb