Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Insurers make a loss on insurance...

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:46 - 01 Jun 2012    Post subject: Insurers make a loss on insurance... Reply with quote

Quite surprising really:

www.insuranceage.co.uk/insurance-age/news/2179589/uk-motor-insurance-industry-cor-improves-106

Essentially insurers make a 6% loss when comparing cost of policies with the payouts on policies (down from a 20% loss).

This of course is not the whole story - see the inflated costs thread and insurers make a lot from selling details and upgrades to standard (legal cover etc.).

It does make me think that the proposed gov investigation will not find a thing as insurers will hide behind this number.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:57 - 01 Jun 2012    Post subject: Re: Insurers make a loss on insurance... Reply with quote

And of course that they have to make their profit on basically ripping off the rival insurance companies so they make a loss points to why they aren't making decent profit on the policies in the first place.

A vicious circle that they can't do a massive amount about even if they wanted to I suspect.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

J.M.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:01 - 01 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

It probably wouldn't be so bad if every driver, and their 6 cousins who were totally in the car when you hit them, didn't claim for whiplash. Apparently payouts for whiplash are about £2bn a year (source). Supposedly it costs the NHS £8m a year to treat them all too (source).

And there are so many sites offering to help you claim whiplash.
____________________
2004 R1 & 2018 XSR900
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mentalboy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:38 - 01 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

So if I've understood it correctly then for every £100 that is taken off punters the companies are shelling out an extra £6 in order to meet claims, wages and running expenses,etc. And it was £20 last year!
Maybe if they weren't shelling out for City of London premises (for example) and paid lower wages to boardroom staff and actually investigated claims properly then they wouldn't be making such losses.
I don't know about you but my bank manager would have something to say if I made a habit of asking him to extend my overdraft because I couldn't work/live within my means.
As for J.M's point about scamming them, I experienced this myself when I drove my cage into a car full of holidaymakers. They claimed £600 a head for ambulance/hospital costs and £2k a head for injury's and for four people. Despite getting a ride in one ambulance all together and one sprained wrist, AND since when has mother, father and daughter equalled four people!!!
I broke my nose, wrecked my right knee, left ankle tendon and broke my left hand and although I got the ambulance to myself and was patched up by the very same (nice) NHS staff I think I may have remembered a £600 bill!
In this instance I believe my insurer's had the last laugh though as I think they were a little unimpressed by the claim for Mr. Invisible and are still sat on their total £25k claim which happened last September. Caged Biker -1: Cagers - Nil Laughing
____________________
Make mine a Corona.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

blurredman
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:31 - 02 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

No wonder it's gone up alot lately in this last 2 years Crying or Very sad
____________________
CBT: 12/06/10, Theory: 22/09/10, Module 1: 09/11/10, Module 2: 19/01/11
Past: 1991 Honda CG125BR-J, 1992 (1980) Honda XL125S, 1996 Kawasaki GPZ500S, 1979 MZ TS150.
Current: 1973 MZ ES250/2 - 18k, 1979 Suzuki TS185ER - 10k, 1981 Honda CX500B - 91k, 1987 MZ ETZ250 (295cc) - 40k, 1989 MZ ETZ251 - 51k.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Alex_B
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:22 - 04 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

No sympathy for the fekers whatsoever.

It just means any losses will be passed onto us next year and our premiums will go up. Even if we (hopefully) keep a clean slate.

The bad ones need investigating big time and this government thing will be a total whitewash and they will be given the green light to push premiums even higher.

I despair with this Insurance/whiplash culture, I really do.

It should be punishable by death if proved you're a scammer and then things might improve for the better. Very Happy

Since immigration, yea, so shoot me, I don't give a feck, someones gotta say it and I'm not talking colour of skin either, scammers have gone through the roof.

Sort that, then we may, just may get back to normal.

Why TF am I paying more on my car with 50% no claims than when I had 0% no claims?
____________________
My Lane Position is always AWESOME!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:38 - 04 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

This has been reported to the case for many years. As said there are other factors. One oft reported one was the profits to be made investing the money that was paid as a premium up front (not sure this makes that much sense, given it all goes into a pot). However another is it gives the insurer a name to try and sell more profitable insurance to.

mentalboy wrote:

Maybe if they weren't shelling out for City of London premises (for example) and paid lower wages to boardroom staff and actually investigated claims properly then they wouldn't be making such losses.


Odd one with investigating properly is I suspect they have cut down on this to save money (and now it is getting back at them). If they investigate more, taking longer to pay out then they get it in the neck.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

c-m
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:26 - 04 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

The sooner we have a goverment owned or national insurance company the better.

I'd see it operating the same way that the government MOT centres do.

You'd then have a choice, join a private firm who's going to play fast and loose with the premium money and potential try to shaft you at ever opportunity, or join the government insurance scheme, which is bound to operate in a more ethical manner.
____________________
Motorcycle headlight bulbs and HIDs
Blogging about my bike and trips
https://ridershandbook.com/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:54 - 04 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:
The sooner we have a goverment owned or national insurance company the better.

I'd see it operating the same way that the government MOT centres do.

You'd then have a choice, join a private firm who's going to play fast and loose with the premium money and potential try to shaft you at ever opportunity, or join the government insurance scheme, which is bound to operate in a more ethical manner.


Big problem with gov is it will always be more inefficient. It would be even worse with a dual system - all the profiteering generated by the private insurance industry with an extra bit of inefficiency from the gov!

It really is a massive mess of a system - insurers lose money on each policy so they have to make more money by selling your details to claims companies. In doing that they have to pay out more, making greater losses that they have to pass on. Add fraudulent claims to that (which can't be investigated because it's too expensive) and 'honest motorists' are screwed.

If I were given the task of sorting the insurance industry I'd probably sigh, shake my head and hide under my desk until someone else took it on.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

c-m
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:00 - 04 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:

Big problem with gov is it will always be more inefficient. It would be even worse with a dual system - all the profiteering generated by the private insurance industry with an extra bit of inefficiency from the gov!

It really is a massive mess of a system - insurers lose money on each policy so they have to make more money by selling your details to claims companies. In doing that they have to pay out more, making greater losses that they have to pass on. Add fraudulent claims to that (which can't be investigated because it's too expensive) and 'honest motorists' are screwed.

If I were given the task of sorting the insurance industry I'd probably sigh, shake my head and hide under my desk until someone else took it on.


Insurers invest the money they receive. Surely it just means that they are crap at playing the markets, if they are making losses? And that they have set their prices wrong.

We have a dual system for MOTs which works. You can go to a back street guy for £30 (car) or a council centre for £50. The latter has no vested in interest in failing the vehicle.

We could include the cost of 3rd party insurance on fuel duty. Makes sense in a way. I think they do that in Finland.
____________________
Motorcycle headlight bulbs and HIDs
Blogging about my bike and trips
https://ridershandbook.com/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:24 - 04 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:

We have a dual system for MOTs which works. You can go to a back street guy for £30 (car) or a council centre for £50. The latter has no vested in interest in failing the vehicle.


Northern Ireland almost has such a dual system. You can go to the local government testing stations, after a long wait for an appointment (potentially months), or you get the ferry over to Scotland and use the first MOT station outside the port Laughing .

c-m wrote:
We could include the cost of 3rd party insurance on fuel duty. Makes sense in a way. I think they do that in Finland.


It does in a way. However you then land up with something with zero incentive to cut down on fraud, and little financial incentive to take any care driving.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Babba This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:30 - 04 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:
Insurers invest the money they receive. Surely it just means that they are crap at playing the markets, if they are making losses? And that they have set their prices wrong.


You're missing what was said in the article - it wasn't about how they make profits, it was highlighting that money paid for premiums was less than paid out. It said nothing more than that...

The insurance companies do make profit by upselling (stuff like legal cover) and selling on your details to claims companies... And probably a whole host of other ways. They don't invest your premiums though - they pay your money to the underwriters.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:22 - 05 Jun 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Factor in how much of what they pay out on the swings comes back to them on the roundabouts of billing each other for "courtesy" cars, and getting kickbacks from body shops and ambulance chasers. They're not doing so badly.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sirswali
Nova Slayer



Joined: 07 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:29 - 02 Jul 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thieving PRICKS!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:47 - 02 Jul 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

sirswali wrote:
Thieving PRICKS!

Sums it up well I think.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TheBikerStig
Crazy Courier



Joined: 15 Dec 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:46 - 06 Aug 2012    Post subject: Re: Insurers make a loss on insurance... Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:
Quite surprising really:

www.insuranceage.co.uk/insurance-age/news/2179589/uk-motor-insurance-industry-cor-improves-106

Essentially insurers make a 6% loss when comparing cost of policies with the payouts on policies (down from a 20% loss).

This of course is not the whole story - see the inflated costs thread and insurers make a lot from selling details and upgrades to standard (legal cover etc.).

It does make me think that the proposed gov investigation will not find a thing as insurers will hide behind this number.


GOOD!

I wish all insurance companies would go down the pan. I hate the fuckin bastards. Im my opinion you shouldnt be allowed to profit at the expense of peoples misfortunes.
____________________
I am usually naked when posting to this forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:00 - 06 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:
The sooner we have a goverment owned or national insurance company the better.
.


Since when has ANY gov run department been better than a private run one.......

If they did run ins, it would be out of the DVLA..... Nuf said Laughing


We can't even get something simple like RFT added to petrol to stop the untaxed. So no chance of Ins being added.....
If they ever did who would like to guess at a price per ltr Twisted Evil

WTF should I pay the same ins as a driver with a mass of claims....
To me doing something like that will make the roads full of people who don't give a fuck about hitting anyone, as they know they won't have to pay a penny more...
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mrdelmonti
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 06 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:33 - 07 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:
c-m wrote:
The sooner we have a goverment owned or national insurance company the better.
.


Since when has ANY gov run department been better than a private run one.......

If they did run ins, it would be out of the DVLA..... Nuf said Laughing


Shudder...

That's not the way to go, but clearly there is more to the this than the initial numbers let on, why would insurers operate at a loss?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:40 - 07 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Supermarkets often sell some products at a loss (though less so now) as 'loss leaders' to get the customers in to buy their higher mark-up items.

Similar for console manufacturers that will sell the console it's self at a loss to get money back from game licensing sales.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:45 - 07 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

mrdelmonti wrote:
but clearly there is more to the this than the initial numbers let on, why would insurers operate at a loss?


While they say its a loss on paper on motor ins. Any loss will be covered by profit from another area.

I would guess that these figures are basic income v expenditure. And do not take into account any other income related to motor side of their buissness.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:54 - 07 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

mrdelmonti wrote:

That's not the way to go, but clearly there is more to the this than the initial numbers let on, why would insurers operate at a loss?


Hi

As above. Various ways of getting profit from a loss making basic 'product'. Invest the premiums and profit from it. Use it as a marketing opportunity for more profitable policies. Make money on administrative charges and exorbitant interest charges.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

el_oso
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:54 - 11 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

c-m wrote:

WTF should I pay the same ins as a driver with a mass of claims....
To me doing something like that will make the roads full of people who don't give a fuck about hitting anyone, as they know they won't have to pay a penny more...


I'm fairly sure that there are countries that do this. I think it's Australia that ties in 3rd party insurance with road tax. I've quite often found as a younger driver that fully comp insurance is cheaper than 3rd party anyway. So something doesn't add up.
____________________
Duke 390
Previous: '05 XR125L | '96 XJ600S Diversion |'05 Suzuki GSXR1000 | '05 Honda CBR125-R | '97 YZF 600R Thundercat | '11 Honda CBR250
Car: Jeep Wrangler 4.0L
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:43 - 11 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Invest the premiums and profit from it.


Investment income is practically zilch nowadays - used to roll in ~3% but you're lucky to get a third of of that now. Investment income used to mean that your 100+ COR was still turning you a coin, but nowadays you have to rely on a solid underwriting result and, believe me, they're hard to come by.

It's actually an extremely complicated industry and as much as I'd love to sit here typing up the wealth of knowledge I have on it, I've learned from experience that no matter what rational debate you put forward you get replies like this:

Quote:
wish all insurance companies would go down the pan. I hate the fuckin bastards.

Quote:
Thieving PRICKS!


That make it all seem somewhat not worth the effort.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:52 - 11 Aug 2012    Post subject: Reply with quote

arry wrote:
That make it all seem somewhat not worth the effort.


Don't let the odd idiot ruin it for the rest of us. I'd like to hear your insights.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 13 years, 191 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 0.58 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 144.69 Kb