|
|
| Author |
Message |
| donniemateno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 donniemateno Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 May 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| weasley |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 weasley World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| donniemateno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 donniemateno Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 May 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattJ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattJ World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| donniemateno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 donniemateno Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 May 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 10:56 - 02 Feb 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hello, I did this test quite recently! (Or a version of it)
If you want to calculate g:
Set up the pendulum in any form you like.
Measure the length of the string/cable/rope/whatever.
Raise the pendulum with your arm, ready to start it swinging. Don't raise it too high - it needs to swing smoothly.
Let go of the pendulum
Watch it do one full oscillation (a full journey from side to side to it ends up back where it started)
After it has completed the first oscillation, start a timer.
Count ten more oscillations with the timer running. (I repeat this is ten FULL cycles of it going from side to side),
left, right, 1
left, right, 2
left, right, 3
left, right, 4
left, right, 5
left, right, 6
left, right, 7
left, right, 8
left, right, 9
left, right, 10
Like that.
Stop the timer immediately after the tenth oscillation.
Record the time.
Divide that time by 10, to get the time per single oscillation.
Repeat that several times, then work out the average of all your results. This is all for accuracy.
So now you will have the following information.
T = (calculated using the process given above) - in seconds
g = ?
pi = pi
l = (length - measured with as much accuracy as possible) - in metres (eg 0.017m)
So, you're told that T = 2pisqrt(l/g)
Here's how to make g the subject:
T = 2pisqrt(l/g)
T/2pi=sqrt(l/g)
To get rid of the square root, you just square both sides. i.e. multiply them with themselves. It's a balanced equation so both terms will still be equal if you do that. (Consider: sqrt4=2 If you multiply both sides with themselves, you're left with 4=4)
(T^2)/(4pi^2)=l/g
g=l/(T^2)/(4pi^2)
g=4pi^2L/T^2
Now you can plug your measurements into the formula to find g.
For better accuracy, try repeating the experiment with different lengths.
And... Mechanics much more interesting? I BEG TO DIFFER! You just wait till I can quantum mechanic you to kingdom come, nyah-haaah!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattJ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattJ World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| donniemateno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 donniemateno Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 May 2011 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 11:10 - 02 Feb 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
wow saw thanks for going to all that trouble with the post. it has broken it down for me well
I think in the experiment i have to do i have to use 3 different weights and 3 different lengths and see how this affects the results
im still not sure how you end up with the final equation using 2L? i can understand it with the 2 pi becoming 4 pi.
im guessing as you have done 2pi * 2 which is 4 pi 1L becomes 2L?
and quantom mechanics esh....ill pawn ur ass at....changing a tyre? ____________________ Current bike: Honda CBR 600 F3
Previous bikes: Honda XR 125L5 , BMW 800 ST, Honda CB500 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattJ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattJ World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| donniemateno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 donniemateno Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 May 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattJ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattJ World Chat Champion

Joined: 12 Nov 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| el_oso |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 el_oso World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 May 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:19 - 02 Feb 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
I tested the formula on the dangly light switch in my toilet.
I timed 10 oscillations on my phone to get an average for T, estimated the length of the cord, plugged the numbers into the formula and got g as 10.7 or something. I then realised, since g is actually known, that I could rearrange the formula to make 'l' the subject and get an accurate measurement of the length of my toilet light switch cord WITHOUT ACTUALLY MEASURING IT! 0.78m, thank you science  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| treeno |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 treeno Crazy Courier
Joined: 26 Dec 2012 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 19 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|