|
|
| Author |
Message |
| AJSawyer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 AJSawyer L Plate Warrior
Joined: 17 Apr 2013 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Tuffers |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Tuffers Scooby Slapper

Joined: 29 Oct 2011 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| suburban myth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 suburban myth Spanner Monkey
Joined: 13 Feb 2013 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| AJSawyer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 AJSawyer L Plate Warrior
Joined: 17 Apr 2013 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 10:08 - 20 Jul 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
If it's legit to "soft" restrict a bike down to 70kW - which is what they're doing - just in order to further restrict it down to 35kW, then that would apply to pretty much any bike and make a mockery of the 70kW limit.
Of which I fully approve actually.
The 70kW starting point is a ridiculous piece of pedant spackery. What matters is whether the bike is making 35kW now, yes or no. What it might be capable of is neither here nor there. So round of applause for Triumph trolling those Brussels Eurotards.  ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 13 years, 92 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|