|
|
| Author |
Message |
| MikeyBrown |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MikeyBrown Scooby Slapper
Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 20:10 - 18 Aug 2013 Post subject: GP100 tuning? |
 |
|
Hi there,
I got shut of the GP125 in the end as there were just too many problems with it (Clutch, brakes, suspension, tyres etc...)
However my quest for a little bike wasn't over and I've ended up with a GP100 instead.
It runs sweet and is currently fitted with a k&n type cone filter (but the jetting seems bob on - plug is nice and brown). This has prompted me to try and find an expansion chamber for it to release some extra power! (I am aware that there is probably not a lot of horses to be gained but a few is good enough for me). Just want a little project and there's nothing to do with this one really so a bit of tuning is in order
I cannot find an expansion chamber that will fit straight onto a GP100 so does anyone know of one readily available that can be modified to fit?
Also, would filing the exhaust port a little do a lot without having to source an expansion chamber and are there any other little mods I could do to make it a little faster (more than 60mph would be nice really but with standard gearing tbh). I'm expecting the 'its a commuting bike, leave it' responses but I just wanna tinker with it a bit and 2-stroke tuning is 'meant' to be easy... Haha
Many thanks,
Mike ____________________ Past Bikes: '97 CG125, '91 GPZ500S, '01 FZS600, '07 S/Triple, '99 ZX9R, '82 GP125, '83 GP100, '03 SV1000S, '98 ZX6R
Current Bike: '07 FZ1N
Trackdays: Darley Moor - 15/6/12, Donington - 28/8/12 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MikeyBrown |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MikeyBrown Scooby Slapper
Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:32 - 18 Aug 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
In addition, do you think the standard airbox would make it run better than the cone filter? Even if the jetting is correct at the mo for the cone filter? Thanks, mike  ____________________ Past Bikes: '97 CG125, '91 GPZ500S, '01 FZS600, '07 S/Triple, '99 ZX9R, '82 GP125, '83 GP100, '03 SV1000S, '98 ZX6R
Current Bike: '07 FZ1N
Trackdays: Darley Moor - 15/6/12, Donington - 28/8/12 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stevo as b4 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stevo as b4 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 23:03 - 18 Aug 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
If you want more mph using the same gearing, I'm assuming you want to push peak power higher up the rev range, so that the motor makes power into the red zone, and thus is how you expect to gain your extra speed?
You will obviously need close gearbox ratio's to be able to keep the engine in the power band which will get quite peaky and if tuned as above, is quite possible that when you rev out in a certain gear, that changing up to the next gear will drop the motor below the powerband, and thus you will lose speed and ruin the acceleration and ability to pull up hills etc.
I'd personally give up on trying to get a 100cc cylinder to give you more top end speed by revving harder, and work on improving midrange acceleration.
I've never worked on a GP100 engine, but I bet say another 10degrees of inlet port duration achieved by cutting the disc valve, and squaring off the inlet port opening into the crank case could be worthwhile, as could a slight increase in compression ratio, if you are prepared to run a cooler plug and use super unleaded fuel that is?
On a 125cylinder I would be thinking about trying to adapt an RG125 Gamma expansion chamber to fit the cylinder mounting point and the exhaust mounts on the bike.
Can you fit a GP125 top end to your motor? More capacity should always be the first and best option to think about when tuning a motor, and when you can't get anymore cc safely then I would turn to other tuning work like porting and carb mods etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| _Iain_ |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 _Iain_ Banned

Joined: 01 Feb 2012 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 23:20 - 18 Aug 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'm sure Nemo on here had a GP100 with a 125 top end on it. Might have been a complete 125 motor though...perhaps ask him. ____________________ Please be aware that the above post may be full of complete nonsense.
Riding: '07 KTM Duke II, Baotian BT49QT-20 Driving: '88 Volvo 340 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suntan Sid World Chat Champion

Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MikeyBrown |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MikeyBrown Scooby Slapper
Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 10:17 - 19 Aug 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Suntan Sid wrote: | | MikeyBrown wrote: | In addition, do you think the standard airbox would make it run better than the cone filter? Even if the jetting is correct at the mo for the cone filter? Thanks, mike  |
From memory, a GP100 in, standard trim, should have a top speed somwhere between 60 & 70mph!
If yours isn't hitting those speeds then I'd be looking at putting the airbox back on.
Have you de coked the exhaust, head and piston, checked the rings, etc? |
That's what I'm thinking! It will do about 67 but that is downbank and on the flat drops to around 50/55ish most of the time. My friend has a GS125 completely standard and the topspeed on that is faster...although I have him on acceleration upto 55 haha
My next jobs are to sort out the slight oil leak it has on the kickstart seal and get the engine apart and replace all the gaskets (just because I will be de-coking it etc... and I'd prefer to reassemble with new gaskets)
Do you think the cone filter isn't helping? Even though it appears to be jetted to suit? ____________________ Past Bikes: '97 CG125, '91 GPZ500S, '01 FZS600, '07 S/Triple, '99 ZX9R, '82 GP125, '83 GP100, '03 SV1000S, '98 ZX6R
Current Bike: '07 FZ1N
Trackdays: Darley Moor - 15/6/12, Donington - 28/8/12
Last edited by MikeyBrown on 10:21 - 19 Aug 2013; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MikeyBrown |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MikeyBrown Scooby Slapper
Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 10:20 - 19 Aug 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| stevo as b4 wrote: |
I've never worked on a GP100 engine, but I bet say another 10degrees of inlet port duration achieved by cutting the disc valve, and squaring off the inlet port opening into the crank case could be worthwhile, as could a slight increase in compression ratio, if you are prepared to run a cooler plug and use super unleaded fuel that is?
On a 125cylinder I would be thinking about trying to adapt an RG125 Gamma expansion chamber to fit the cylinder mounting point and the exhaust mounts on the bike.
Can you fit a GP125 top end to your motor? |
Thanks for the help, I might think about doing a bit of work with the valve and ports, but I just wanna get it to where it should be as standard first
As for the GP125 cylinder this is a straight fit and I could do this, however the barrels and heads for the GP125 seem to be all but non-existent so it doesn't really seem an option for me just yet unfortunately
Thanks again  ____________________ Past Bikes: '97 CG125, '91 GPZ500S, '01 FZS600, '07 S/Triple, '99 ZX9R, '82 GP125, '83 GP100, '03 SV1000S, '98 ZX6R
Current Bike: '07 FZ1N
Trackdays: Darley Moor - 15/6/12, Donington - 28/8/12 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Nobby the Bastard |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Nobby the Bastard Harley Gaydar

Joined: 16 Aug 2013 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Suntan Sid World Chat Champion

Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stevo as b4 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stevo as b4 World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:44 - 19 Aug 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/showthread.php/94649-Two-stroke-performance-tuning
Look at this link. It give port timings and disc valve timings for the GP100 and 125.
Based on that you need a GP125 disc valve, or cut yours to match.
But the GP125 has longer port timing and the head and barrel fit on your 100cc bottom end. With that in mind and your goal to increase performance, I'd be scouring breaker's etc to source a 125 top end that you can have re-bored and fit a new piston and rings too.
Once you get it to 125cc capacity and power levels, then other tuning like mucking about with different carbs, filter's and exhausts would start to make more sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MikeyBrown |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MikeyBrown Scooby Slapper
Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 20:15 - 19 Aug 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Suntan Sid wrote: |
There are varying opinions, as with anything, but the general opinion is that a 2T road bike will run better with the air box! |
Gonna be looking on eBay and deciding which of the airboxes on there would be best - I need to make sure it has the correct gubbins in there (with all the metal fitments to hold the filter in place etc...)
Thanks again and I look forward to any more suggestions
As for a GP125 barrel and head...no-one seems to have them (be it battered, unusable or decent :/) ____________________ Past Bikes: '97 CG125, '91 GPZ500S, '01 FZS600, '07 S/Triple, '99 ZX9R, '82 GP125, '83 GP100, '03 SV1000S, '98 ZX6R
Current Bike: '07 FZ1N
Trackdays: Darley Moor - 15/6/12, Donington - 28/8/12 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cb1rocket |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cb1rocket World Chat Champion
Joined: 30 Jan 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| moonzoomer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 moonzoomer World Chat Champion
Joined: 01 Jul 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 12 years, 187 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|