|
|
| Author |
Message |
| iCraig |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iCraig World Chat Champion
Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 09:41 - 28 Jun 2004 Post subject: Would you still get it? |
 |
|
Well as some of you may know I was mean't to be picking up my new to me ZZR600 up today, and having just phoned the dealer its failed its MOT.
It failed on the rear shock being warn badly or something and some kind of bearing in the swing arm?!?
And I won't be getting it for another week or two while they get a new shock for it etc.
If you were me would you still get it, I have had bad experiences with Kawasaki's before (and when I had that bike it failed its MOT before I got it too, so it feels like dejavu )
Its not like I'm without a bike, I still have my GS500, which is mechanically fine and is fine, so hence why I am dubious about getting the ZZR now .
I'm scared of getting it and it being a complete lemon like the ER-5 was, and me spending loads of money on it and it spending more time in the dealers than me riding it!
It is a H Reg so its not young . |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mr C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mr C World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Feb 2003 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 09:54 - 28 Jun 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'd be amazed if you could get anything on an H plate that has actually been used and didn't have problems of this kind
the ZZR is a reliable old workhorse, this one is what 14 years old, I think the rear shock must have done a sterling job to last that long and if they are replacing it with new and also the swing arm bushes/bearings then maybe it's ok
of course without looking who can say more, it depends on what you are paying for it I guess  ____________________ 187.3bhp = 201mph |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ant |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ant World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 Feb 2003 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Josh |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Josh Traffic Copper

Joined: 20 May 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 12:05 - 28 Jun 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
On a general "which bike is cooler" level, you know what I will say
But in all honesty, at least the guys are upfront about it, and they are fixing it, maybe get someone a bit more mechanically minded to check it over for you as well, but ultimately it is up to you, if you like it, and it does go fine, go for it. ____________________ 04 Suzuki GSX-R 600 K4 - Sex on wheels :>
https://img58.imageshack.us/img58/6178/sig6dc.gif |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| priller |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 priller Brolly Dolly

Joined: 26 Jan 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| iCraig |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iCraig World Chat Champion
Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Josh |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Josh Traffic Copper

Joined: 20 May 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 12:30 - 28 Jun 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
Another option, keep your sexy, reliable GS500E for a while longer, and save up for a bigger/newer bike that won't be as likely to be a "lemon"
Just a thought. ____________________ 04 Suzuki GSX-R 600 K4 - Sex on wheels :>
https://img58.imageshack.us/img58/6178/sig6dc.gif |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| priller |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 priller Brolly Dolly

Joined: 26 Jan 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M1ke |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ke Ped Boi

Joined: 11 Jun 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:13 - 28 Jun 2004 Post subject: |
 |
|
It's hard to say really, I think G reg is getting on a bit but that doesn't mean its a nail.
I would be tempted to keep the gs500 for a touch longer and in the mean time you can save up more money and shop around for a newer bike.
I found that when I bought my old 1989 'jelly mold' CBR600 that the insurance was exactly the same for a newer 1997 model (as an example) The really new (2000 +) knock the insurance up but pre 2000 I think they are all very similar. My point being, why waste your money insuring an old one when you can get a newer one and insure for the same money.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| karen_moomin |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 karen_moomin World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Apr 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| iCraig |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iCraig World Chat Champion
Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| swaffs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 swaffs World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 21 years, 231 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|