Will you vote for Ed Miliband?

[Bubbs]

Quick Poll Question..
____________________
Life begins at the end of your comfort zone.

[The Artist]

He is totally unvoteable for me. I am 90% sure labour will still win even with a snivelling little Miliband at the helm.

[Quornholio]

Infinitely better than Burnham, the 'prospective' leader.

[weasley]

Since I don't live in the Doncaster North constituency then I am unable to vote for Ed Milliband.

I could vote for the Labour candidate in my constituency, but I doubt I will (and anything other than a Tory win will be a miracle since they won here by twice the votes of the next party).

Besides - Ed Milliband..... Prime Minister.... pfffffft!!
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE

[angryjonny]

I will probably* vote Labour. Sometimes the best choice is simply the least bad choice. I vote because if I don't I have no right to moan about the dicks in Downing St.

* I live in a very safe Tory seat. A tactical vote for the party most likely to oust them is, in a way, a Labour vote. I may have to do that.

[pinkyfloyd]

He has a speech impediment and looks like a geek. He's as much chance of getting in as PM as Neil Kinnock did and he was Welsh and Ginger.

That said. He seems to have grown a pair recently.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.

[t121anf]

IMO he is not prime minister material.

[doggone]

https://i.imgur.com/SRURjhN.jpg

[keggyhander]

I'd rather vote for Screaming Lord Sutch.

[Raffles]

[Rogerborg]

The vast majority of those who bothered to vote in the 2011 referendum plumped for the status quo. I think it's pretty clear that the collective we are just fine with re-electing the same rosettes that our grandparents voted for.

The puppets wearing them are essentially irrelevant, since there's a Rothschild hand up all of their arses.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike

[Derivative]

Both parties are essentially the same thing with minor tinkering at the edges. I'd genuinely love to see UKIP or the BNP or the Greens get in, purely on the hope that they'd actually change something, anything significantly. Even if it's personally negative for me, it'd be nice to see something more than a 1% change in this and a 20 quid increase in that.

Given the choice between the party for winners and the party for losers, though, I know who I'd rather choose.

I just find the vitriol a bit odd, because realistically, labour or tory, you lose or gain a few tenners for a few years. Damn, game over.

[Im-a-Ridah]

Labour's constant bashing of Conservative policies without any policies of their own means I have negative respect for them. That's right, negative respect.

[Ste]

Who are the two retard who say they will be voting for Red Ed?

Have you forgotten what Labour did to the country last time they were in power?

[Raffles]

[Lord Percy]

[pinkyfloyd]

They way I see it is politics seems to be, especially with the big parties, all promise and no action. Just seems each party aims promises at different classes.

The Tories seem to aim their promises towards the higher earners, people who already own their houses and are either comfortable or well off.

Labour aim their promises towards the other end, those on low incomes, council tennants and people struggling to make ends meet.

Lib dems are just a waste of space who promise they wont let the Tories change things too much and that donut Cameron just laughs at him and does it anyways.

I will vote for Labour. Simply because his promises, if on the rare chance, he decided to implement them, will benefit me and my family more than the Tories if they decide to implement theirs.

Ultimately though they are all as bad as each other with nothing but false promises.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.

[fatpies]

[Hetzer]

Fuck yes! I'd vote for Captain Scarlett if it would get the current criminal gang of sub-human filth out. This country simply will not survive another five years of their vicious evil.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"

[Hetzer]

[Ste]

No, but they've fucked things less than Blair and Brown did.

[Hetzer]

[Ste]

You must be one of those Labour voting retards. Oh wait, no, you don't vote at all which means you've got no right to complain about any of them.

[doggone]

https://www.itv.com/news/2013-06-24/david-laws-releases-theres-no-money-note-from-liam-byrne-ahead-of-spending-review/

More of the same if Labour get back in.

[pinkyfloyd]