|
|
| Author |
Message |
| BikeNewbie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BikeNewbie Scooby Slapper
Joined: 03 Aug 2011 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| BikeNewbie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BikeNewbie Scooby Slapper
Joined: 03 Aug 2011 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tomh |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tomh Scooby Slapper
Joined: 12 Nov 2011 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tahrey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tahrey World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:20 - 04 Oct 2012 Post subject: |
 |
|
But I've just seen a supposed CG ES 14/45 kit that's got a 120 link chain?
Have they made a balls-up, or is there a chance that there's some structural difference between certain generations of the bike design that means one year needs 120 when another needs 116?
I've seen it with some of the others too... presuming all else is equal, what matters most is the number of teeth on the roughly one-half of each sprocket the chain goes around, right?
But there's a 14/45 with 116, and another 120 links... and a 14/41 with 110, and with 114. (Any significance to these both being 4 links different, despite the sets being 6 links different overall?)
Then we have:
14/45 (= 7+22.5 = 29.5 = 30) with 116 or 120
15/44 (= 7.5 + 22 = 29.5...) with 116
14/44 (= 7+22 = 29) with 116
14/43 (= 7+21.5 = 28.5) with 116
14/41 (= 7+20.5 = 27.5) with either 110 or 114. Should be approx 2 less than 14/45, both as it's 4 teeth less and seeing as chains only seem to come in even numbers for some strange reason... so, 114 or 118, not 110 or 114?
15/36 (= 7.5 + 18 = 25.5) with 112
15/34 (= 7.5 + 17 = 24.5) with 100... yes 100, not 110.
Errrrrrr?
Going by the chain length calculator linked in another thread, and assuming no slack in the thing at all, that gives...
14/45 with 21.5 or 22.5 inches between sprocket centres
15/44 with 21.5 inches
14/44 with 21.625 inches (?!)
14/43 with 21.75 inches
14/41 with with 20.5 or 21.5 inches
15/36 with 21.5625 inches (no seriously)
15/34 with 18.8125 inches (...)
So I can follow 14/45 with 116 down to 14/43 with 116 and 14/41 with 114, along with the 15/36, as those differences are only about 6mm max, the equivalent of half of one link... but what's going on with the longer, shorter, and much shorter ones?
And which one should I believe if I'm going to alter the gearing on mine a bit? Probably to one of the above, at least... but I've never had a problem so far making it pretty tight when adjusting, then having to slacken off; should I count how many links I already have then add two?
Plus, does this all include the split link? And is there such a thing as an endless chain any more? Cuz my currently fitted one doesn't appear to have a splittable link anywhere. Getting the rear wheel on and off involves undoing the spacers and brake, pushing the wheel as far forwards as possible in the frame, and lifting the chain off the sprocket to hang all folded up on the floor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
There is a gap of 1 year, 13 days between these two posts... |
 |
|
| tahrey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tahrey World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mark65 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mark65 World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 May 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:19 - 18 Oct 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
116 link is right, cut it down, 14-45 sprockets for my 07, grind pin to remove links, they send chains out with more links to cover more makes and models of bikes, probably cheaper than to cut and mess about with them at factory, mine was around 120 as well from DID. ____________________ 07 Yamaha YBR125, 07 Honda CG125 , 15 CBR300R (Chocolate Crank, Deaded), 16 CB500FA, 19 Honda Forza 300, 70 Suzuki SV650 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tahrey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tahrey World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mark65 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mark65 World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 May 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tahrey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tahrey World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 Jul 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:46 - 20 Oct 2013 Post subject: |
 |
|
That's good advice, sadly I possess no more than 50% of those things, possibly less.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mark65 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mark65 World Chat Champion

Joined: 16 May 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 12 years, 116 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|