|
|
| Author |
Message |
| gavbriggs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 gavbriggs Crazy Courier
Joined: 11 Jun 2013 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| gavbriggs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 gavbriggs Crazy Courier
Joined: 11 Jun 2013 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 12:56 - 22 Jan 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Gavbriggs wrote: | | MarJay wrote: | IMO, none of those bikes are suitable. If you want to ride through winter you need a fairing.
If you've just passed your test they are pretty much all too much bike for you.
If I were you I'd go with an ER6F or something like that, or maybe something like a CBR600F. |
I really don't wan a 600 type, my gut feeling is I want bigger, I can understand why it could be too much after just passing test to most but I'm no a novice and am pretty confident I want a bigger engine.
All those have fairing, at least to the Same degree as the varadero I use currently while restricted to l plates.
It's a good point I may look at few few 600's while I have time. Probably worth a test ride although I know I don't want a gladius as they are horrid and we are using the currently for the training!!! |
Do you weigh 30 stone or something?
Seriously, if you have a 1000 then it will spit you off in a spectacular fashion. Either that or you'll never want to ride it as it will intimidate you. Particularly the Fazer 1000 which is basically an R1 with a steel frame and cheaper suspension.
A 600 will be faster than you could ever need, and IMO is still faar too fast for a new rider, however you're more likely to survive on a 600 than on a 1000.
Gladius's aren't great, granted. If you're desperate for a naked bike then I'd go with a Hornet 600, but honestly riding through winter on a naked is not that pleasant. At least a fairing takes the edge off of it. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Polarbear |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Polarbear Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| DrDonnyBrago |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 DrDonnyBrago World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moxey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moxey World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 May 2011 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:06 - 22 Jan 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'd say its more dependent on the nature of the machine than capacity, with reference to this thread and stinkwheels mention of riding a 1348 Harley as first ride of a litre bike.
A stock 1200 Bandit or CBF 1000 I would consider worth a punt, the weight and torque are going to be factors to consider over a 600 but they aren't really stupid choices in my opinion.
Similarly 1100/1150/1200 BMW twins, GS and R variants, relatively tame for their capacity.
Also to consider Diversion 900 (Semi-faired + shaft drive) and Varadero 1000. ____________________ Current: 02 FZS 1000 & 91 Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Some Bike Pics...
'I was too busy paying attention to pay attention' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chickenstrip |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chickenstrip Super Spammer

Joined: 06 Dec 2013 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 17:38 - 22 Jan 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
Gotta be a 2001-2005 FZS 1000 then hasn't it!
Got a fairing, great all-rounder, won't cost the earth to buy or run etc etc.
This thing about going to big bikes straight from passing your test - it can be done without killing yourself. I did it, and so have plenty of others. If you're responsible about it, careful to start with, there's no reason why you shouldn't.
https://www.motorcyclenews.com/upload/755/attachments/2001-2005%20Fazer%201000.pdf
Show me an article on this bike that slates it. I've never seen one. And no, I wouldn't compare it to a modern sports bike  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chickenstrip |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chickenstrip Super Spammer

Joined: 06 Dec 2013 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Robby |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robby Dirty Old Man

Joined: 16 May 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chickenstrip |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chickenstrip Super Spammer

Joined: 06 Dec 2013 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| BigDan1190 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 BigDan1190 Could Be A Chat Bot

Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Moxey |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Moxey World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 May 2011 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:52 - 22 Jan 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
I agree with Robby with regards to the rider development on a smaller machine, I just elected to offer some relatively 'sensible' choices.
Also to mention the CBF 1000 makes somewhere in the region of 100 bhp whereas the Fazer makes mid 140's-150, they are both de-tuned sports engines but the CBF more so making it slightly less risky imo (would consider a Bandit 1200 to be comparable to a CBF 1000).
All produce a fair bit of torque though (at least 15 ft/ib more than my VFR) which though useful for OPs intentions is possibly going to be a hindrance with regards to his rider development IMO.
All if ridden cack handed can produce unexpected front wheel lift & fishtailing plus the weight can catch a new rider out, I would personally recommend a gradual progression through the CC's over even a softly tuned 750+. But if you must have something big capacity OP I'd recommend a Divvy 900 or a Boxer Twin Beemer
Also 1200cc =1.2L by Jove you're right! Its more than a litre bike , seriously though the distinction should not be based on capacity but on intention i.e. Supersports, Tourer, Commuter, Cruiser, though I appreciate that this is not reflective of power output or rider friendliness in any way. ____________________ Current: 02 FZS 1000 & 91 Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Some Bike Pics...
'I was too busy paying attention to pay attention' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P. Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| gavbriggs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 gavbriggs Crazy Courier
Joined: 11 Jun 2013 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| 1cyl |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 1cyl World Chat Champion

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 23:42 - 22 Jan 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Robby wrote: |
For reference, I've been riding for a bit over a decade. I have never owned anything with more than 80 horsepower for a significant period of time. I like having a bike which feels quick and which I can be lazy on, I don't like having enough power to make a small mistake have big consequences. |
+ An extra year, and this is me exactly. Also, on UK roads, unless your hellbent on loosing your licence/life, I've always felt that litre bikes rarely see much of their potential. And as Donny B says, I'm far happier wringing the necks of all 60 of my horses than I would be tickling the sphinkters of a 160+.
Go 600 OP, you can always up the cc's next year if your bored, which I doubt you will be.
Or perhaps its a small penis issue?  ____________________ Chase my Witch up, Catch my Snitch up.
The SMC | The Pit | Stable
Last edited by 1cyl on 08:54 - 23 Jan 2014; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 00:07 - 23 Jan 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Gavbriggs wrote: |
I really don't wan a 600 type, my gut feeling is I want bigger, |
Because A CBR600FX will only get to 125.57mph in 10.88s, so you need the FZ1 that will do it 128.2s in 10.87s?
(About the same standing quarter as a Murcielago.)
Yea, that'll show all those silly slow 600cc bike owners!
Of course, get a 'real' litre bike (K6 GSXR 1000, as I had one) and you're talking 148.69 mph in 9.774s.
All times no doubt done by professionals and from sportrider.net list.
Now, the bigger bikes will require less input to go fast.
But you may find your actually enjoy having to work the bike a little to match a Lambo's speed, versus just turning the throttle in the bigger bike regardless of gear.
More midrange and low down power - again, we're talking speed similar to top sports cars - all going through a tiny contact patch can cause problems.
If you do get grip, the new rider may find that the next corner has come up CONSIDERABLY faster than they expected from just a gentle turn of the throttle - while on a smaller bike, it will probably go just as fast, but makes you think about it more as you have to knock it down a gear or already be at high revs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chickenstrip |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chickenstrip Super Spammer

Joined: 06 Dec 2013 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| trevor saxe-coburg-gotha |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 trevor saxe-coburg-gotha World Chat Champion

Joined: 22 Nov 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| 1cyl |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 1cyl World Chat Champion

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 08:51 - 23 Jan 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
Also OP, a 12 Mile a day commute (6/6) is barely enough for the bike to reach operating temp.
A smaller capacity tends to warm just that little bit quicker, so less engine wear daily in your scenario. As well as better MPG's.
Listen to the little voices. They know what's best for you!  ____________________ Chase my Witch up, Catch my Snitch up.
The SMC | The Pit | Stable
Last edited by 1cyl on 18:12 - 23 Jan 2014; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 12 years, 2 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|