Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Suzuki gsf 1200 circa 2000-2005

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

gavbriggs
Crazy Courier



Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:58 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Suzuki gsf 1200 circa 2000-2005 Reply with quote

What are they like to ride? Are they a leant over type or are they fairly sat up?

I'm considering:

Fazer 1000
Cbf 1000
Gsf 1200

As a first bike after passing test. Used for some Long distance and also commuting daily. I know there's fuel consumption to consider but I do 12 miles a day commute! Lol!!

I want a big engine for long trips. And a sat up position because my back is fooked.

I'm 5'11 so a fairly tall seat is ok. But the bike needs to be capable in the winter months, all but ice and snow and I will be riding.

Low maintainence would be an advantage. As for budget I'm looking between 2k and 3.5k roughly. With a bit of haggling involved. I could do with being on the 2k end to allow a bit of room for some new clothing and helmet although my current equipment is adequate.

All opinion appreciated

Gav
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:12 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

IMO, none of those bikes are suitable. If you want to ride through winter you need a fairing.

If you've just passed your test they are pretty much all too much bike for you.

If I were you I'd go with an ER6F or something like that, or maybe something like a CBR600F.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

gavbriggs
Crazy Courier



Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:45 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
IMO, none of those bikes are suitable. If you want to ride through winter you need a fairing.

If you've just passed your test they are pretty much all too much bike for you.

If I were you I'd go with an ER6F or something like that, or maybe something like a CBR600F.


I really don't wan a 600 type, my gut feeling is I want bigger, I can understand why it could be too much after just passing test to most but I'm no a novice and am pretty confident I want a bigger engine.

All those have fairing, at least to the Same degree as the varadero I use currently while restricted to l plates.

It's a good point I may look at few few 600's while I have time. Probably worth a test ride although I know I don't want a gladius as they are horrid and we are using the currently for the training!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:56 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gavbriggs wrote:
MarJay wrote:
IMO, none of those bikes are suitable. If you want to ride through winter you need a fairing.

If you've just passed your test they are pretty much all too much bike for you.

If I were you I'd go with an ER6F or something like that, or maybe something like a CBR600F.


I really don't wan a 600 type, my gut feeling is I want bigger, I can understand why it could be too much after just passing test to most but I'm no a novice and am pretty confident I want a bigger engine.

All those have fairing, at least to the Same degree as the varadero I use currently while restricted to l plates.

It's a good point I may look at few few 600's while I have time. Probably worth a test ride although I know I don't want a gladius as they are horrid and we are using the currently for the training!!!


Do you weigh 30 stone or something?

Seriously, if you have a 1000 then it will spit you off in a spectacular fashion. Either that or you'll never want to ride it as it will intimidate you. Particularly the Fazer 1000 which is basically an R1 with a steel frame and cheaper suspension.

A 600 will be faster than you could ever need, and IMO is still faar too fast for a new rider, however you're more likely to survive on a 600 than on a 1000.

Gladius's aren't great, granted. If you're desperate for a naked bike then I'd go with a Hornet 600, but honestly riding through winter on a naked is not that pleasant. At least a fairing takes the edge off of it.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:01 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see MarJays point.

A litre bike, regardless of what you might think, is a stupidly powerful machine.

I didn't die going from 125>600>1000 in the space of a month, but I used about 1/4 of its power/potential most of the time.

Even when I had my R1 and took it to Spain, I only ever maxed it out once, the rest was again 1/4>1/2 its usable power.

This would be my weapon of choice if I needed a little fairing and was a new rider.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Honda-CBF-600-SA-5-CBF600SA-5-ABS-2007-57-PLATE-LIKE-HORNET-FAZER-/291057332806?pt=UK_Motorcycles&hash=item43c45e7246
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:14 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:

Do you weigh 30 stone or something?

Seriously, if you have a 1000 then it will spit you off in a spectacular fashion. Either that or you'll never want to ride it as it will intimidate you. Particularly the Fazer 1000 which is basically an R1 with a steel frame and cheaper suspension.

A 600 will be faster than you could ever need, and IMO is still faar too fast for a new rider, however you're more likely to survive on a 600 than on a 1000.

Gladius's aren't great, granted. If you're desperate for a naked bike then I'd go with a Hornet 600, but honestly riding through winter on a naked is not that pleasant. At least a fairing takes the edge off of it.


I totally do not agree with this. I went from 250's to 1000cc bikes that handled like bendy buses and am still here to tell the tale.

I do agree a faired bike will be better for long distances and commuting in winter but a 1000cc bike will spit you off or intimidate you? Only if you wear assless chaps!
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:16 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I felt very intimidated by the GSXR1000, was in my first few years of riding.

The R1, I was more the one in control, so I see what he's on about.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:04 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:

I totally do not agree with this. I went from 250's to 1000cc bikes that handled like bendy buses and am still here to tell the tale.


Perhaps their poor handling is why you are still around to tell the tale. Maybe the handling was the natural limiter for your right wrist. Also, in those days 1000cc bikes made about 80bhp. A Fazer 1000 makes something like 160bhp which is a stupid amount of power for a n00b.

He might be OK with an old stock 1200 bandit, but a Fazer 1000 is far too much for a newbie. Anyone who says otherwise is setting people up for a fall IMO.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DrDonnyBrago
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:17 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I felt like my face was going to peel off the first time I redlined my CBR600. Hornets have older model CBR engines in them, fazer 6 have thundercat engines.

Don't write off smaller capacity bikes, they are still blisteringly quick, you just need to work them harder. It also turns out that working a revvy and peaky engine is quite pleasurable.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Moxey
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 May 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:06 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say its more dependent on the nature of the machine than capacity, with reference to this thread and stinkwheels mention of riding a 1348 Harley as first ride of a litre bike.

A stock 1200 Bandit or CBF 1000 I would consider worth a punt, the weight and torque are going to be factors to consider over a 600 but they aren't really stupid choices in my opinion.

Similarly 1100/1150/1200 BMW twins, GS and R variants, relatively tame for their capacity.

Also to consider Diversion 900 (Semi-faired + shaft drive) and Varadero 1000.
____________________
Current: 02 FZS 1000 & 91 Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Some Bike Pics...
'I was too busy paying attention to pay attention'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:20 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

But what I think MarJay is pointing out (I am anyway...) is that the Fazer is an R1 engine, detuned a little, the CBF1000 is a Fireblade engine, again detuned. Those are both 2 potent engines.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:38 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gotta be a 2001-2005 FZS 1000 then hasn't it! Very Happy

Got a fairing, great all-rounder, won't cost the earth to buy or run etc etc.
This thing about going to big bikes straight from passing your test - it can be done without killing yourself. I did it, and so have plenty of others. If you're responsible about it, careful to start with, there's no reason why you shouldn't.

https://www.motorcyclenews.com/upload/755/attachments/2001-2005%20Fazer%201000.pdf

Show me an article on this bike that slates it. I've never seen one. And no, I wouldn't compare it to a modern sports bike Rolling Eyes
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:54 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:
And no, I wouldn't compare it to a modern sports bike Rolling Eyes


Because the handling and frame are sub par for it to be a sports bike.

It still has immense power. I have survived going from diddy engines to a litre sports in a few weeks. I just couldn't handle that power, I don't think anyone could without being scared.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:06 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paddy. wrote:
Because the handling and frame are sub par for it to be a sports bike.

It still has immense power. I have survived going from diddy engines to a litre sports in a few weeks. I just couldn't handle that power, I don't think anyone could without being scared.


Yes, obviously.

I had a couple of scares on my 750 turbo after learning on a CB100. But that just made me show it more respect - to begin with. I put 20,000 miles on that turbo in 8 months and never dropped it. And I caned that baby!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:15 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jumping on a bike that size after your test isn't a great idea.

Any of those bikes are going to be seriously powerful. You will end up riding like a massive pussy.

In time you will get used to it. That means that after riding for a couple of years, you are used to the power of a 1000cc bike. Not much to aim for after that.

For reference, I've been riding for a bit over a decade. I have never owned anything with more than 80 horsepower for a significant period of time. I like having a bike which feels quick and which I can be lazy on, I don't like having enough power to make a small mistake have big consequences.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:27 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Robby wrote:
Jumping on a bike that size after your test isn't a great idea.

Any of those bikes are going to be seriously powerful. You will end up riding like a massive pussy.

In time you will get used to it. That means that after riding for a couple of years, you are used to the power of a 1000cc bike. Not much to aim for after that.

For reference, I've been riding for a bit over a decade. I have never owned anything with more than 80 horsepower for a significant period of time. I like having a bike which feels quick and which I can be lazy on, I don't like having enough power to make a small mistake have big consequences.


Which I think just shows it's horses for courses. I couldn't wait to get on a big, powerful bike - so I didn't Laughing

Still here though Very Happy

I might possibly add the caveat that a modern litre sports bike may not be the wisest choice from passing your test - a lot more powerful than my old turbo. But then again, it would handle that power a darn sight better than the heavy old things of the GPz era. All in all, maybe things would even out?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

BigDan1190
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:44 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

A Bandit 12 is not to be considered a "litre bike" in terms of what the people above me are saying.

An R1 is a litre bike. A GSXR1000 is a litre bike. A bandit 1200 makes slightly less torque, and SIGNIFICANTLY less horsepower than those machines. A CBR 600F is more powerful, but has less torque.

A Bandit 1200 will be fine for what you are looking for, especially if you choose a Mk2 "S" model, because the fairing is actually quite good at keeping the weather off your chest.

Fairly upright seating position, is improved with a set of bar risers or high rise renthals.

EDIT: Have any of the above posters ever owned a Bandit 1200?? Thats the question.

I hopped on a B12 6 months after my test, and it really isn't that powerful. Its slightly heavy though.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Moxey
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 May 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:52 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Robby with regards to the rider development on a smaller machine, I just elected to offer some relatively 'sensible' choices.

Also to mention the CBF 1000 makes somewhere in the region of 100 bhp whereas the Fazer makes mid 140's-150, they are both de-tuned sports engines but the CBF more so making it slightly less risky imo (would consider a Bandit 1200 to be comparable to a CBF 1000).

All produce a fair bit of torque though (at least 15 ft/ib more than my VFR) which though useful for OPs intentions is possibly going to be a hindrance with regards to his rider development IMO.

All if ridden cack handed can produce unexpected front wheel lift & fishtailing plus the weight can catch a new rider out, I would personally recommend a gradual progression through the CC's over even a softly tuned 750+. But if you must have something big capacity OP I'd recommend a Divvy 900 or a Boxer Twin Beemer Thumbs Up

Also 1200cc =1.2L Thinking by Jove you're right! Its more than a litre bike Very Happy, seriously though the distinction should not be based on capacity but on intention i.e. Supersports, Tourer, Commuter, Cruiser, though I appreciate that this is not reflective of power output or rider friendliness in any way.
____________________
Current: 02 FZS 1000 & 91 Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Some Bike Pics...
'I was too busy paying attention to pay attention'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:39 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I still spin the rear of the ZXR up through being far too hamfisted with go go juice in the wet.

Something with a few oodles more torques would probably result in a bad day for a new rider.

I say ham fisted, seeing a gap and going for it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

gavbriggs
Crazy Courier



Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:41 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the fazer is going to be too much, I was keeping under 100bhp in the bikes I was looking at but the looks of the fazer seemed to jump out as similar to the cbf.

As said I do intend to ride most of the year and need a comfortable commuter and tourer but certainly not sports as it's painful on my glass back and the gsxr I road was silly fast. That had been tweaked and has updated stuff on it for track days etc. horrible ride and the only reason it needed to be fast is so you didn't stay on it for long and could get off ASAP.

Regarding spitting me off, and I bow to superior knowledge, but surely entering a corner at the correct speed in the correct position etc is the same no matter what engine size? That's assuming the cbf 600 and 1000 are exactly the same bike but different capacity for the example. Or maybe a 100 bhp restricted to 50bhp?

I am more worried about the slow speed stuff, obviously an icy patch on a 125 is gonna be as much a disaster as one on a 1000 if you slip at the same speed.

I do have a respect for my limitations as a new(hopefully) licence holder and certainly don't intend leathering a bike around like I do the 125, I just want to be a big boy and have a big bike before I'm to old and weak to cope! I'm sure that won't happen for quite a while yet and maybe it's a midlife crisis coming on but that's the way I'm feeling!

And I'm just shy of 16stone so not a complete fatty!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

1cyl
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:42 - 22 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Robby wrote:

For reference, I've been riding for a bit over a decade. I have never owned anything with more than 80 horsepower for a significant period of time. I like having a bike which feels quick and which I can be lazy on, I don't like having enough power to make a small mistake have big consequences.


+ An extra year, and this is me exactly. Also, on UK roads, unless your hellbent on loosing your licence/life, I've always felt that litre bikes rarely see much of their potential. And as Donny B says, I'm far happier wringing the necks of all 60 of my horses than I would be tickling the sphinkters of a 160+.

Go 600 OP, you can always up the cc's next year if your bored, which I doubt you will be.
Or perhaps its a small penis issue? Wink
____________________
Chase my Witch up, Catch my Snitch up.
The SMC | The Pit | Stable


Last edited by 1cyl on 08:54 - 23 Jan 2014; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:07 - 23 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gavbriggs wrote:

I really don't wan a 600 type, my gut feeling is I want bigger,

Because A CBR600FX will only get to 125.57mph in 10.88s, so you need the FZ1 that will do it 128.2s in 10.87s?
(About the same standing quarter as a Murcielago.)

Yea, that'll show all those silly slow 600cc bike owners!

Of course, get a 'real' litre bike (K6 GSXR 1000, as I had one) and you're talking 148.69 mph in 9.774s.

All times no doubt done by professionals and from sportrider.net list.

Now, the bigger bikes will require less input to go fast.
But you may find your actually enjoy having to work the bike a little to match a Lambo's speed, versus just turning the throttle in the bigger bike regardless of gear.
More midrange and low down power - again, we're talking speed similar to top sports cars - all going through a tiny contact patch can cause problems.

If you do get grip, the new rider may find that the next corner has come up CONSIDERABLY faster than they expected from just a gentle turn of the throttle - while on a smaller bike, it will probably go just as fast, but makes you think about it more as you have to knock it down a gear or already be at high revs.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:19 - 23 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Robby wrote:
I like having a bike which feels quick and which I can be lazy on, I don't like having enough power to make a small mistake have big consequences.


Actually, the fact that you can virtually ride around all day in 6th gear is one of the reasons I like the Fazer thou. Below 7 grand, they're pussycats.
But I don't want to push the idea if you're not comfortable with it, and you should go with what makes you confident.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

trevor saxe-coburg-gotha
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:38 - 23 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gavbriggs wrote:
obviously an icy patch on a 125 is gonna be as much a disaster as one on a 1000 if you slip at the same speed.


A 220kg bike coming down on your leg is going to feel like a bit more of a disaster than a 120 one.
____________________
"Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is one hundred percent."

Mobylette Type 50 ---> Raleigh Grifter ---> Neval Minsk 125


Last edited by trevor saxe-coburg-gotha on 12:08 - 23 Jan 2014; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

1cyl
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:51 - 23 Jan 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also OP, a 12 Mile a day commute (6/6) is barely enough for the bike to reach operating temp.
A smaller capacity tends to warm just that little bit quicker, so less engine wear daily in your scenario. As well as better MPG's.

Listen to the little voices. They know what's best for you! Rolling Eyes Wink
____________________
Chase my Witch up, Catch my Snitch up.
The SMC | The Pit | Stable


Last edited by 1cyl on 18:12 - 23 Jan 2014; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 12 years, 2 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.88 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 140.76 Kb