Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Police 'smash pensioner's car'

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

LordShaftesbu...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:56 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Police 'smash pensioner's car' Reply with quote

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10888435
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tatters
Exxon Valdez



Joined: 04 Jan 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:03 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another prime example of the police acting like thugs again.
____________________
Past:NRG50,AF1125(x2),NSR125RR,ZZR250,CX500,VFR400,KR1S,ZZR600(x2),CB400N,YZF1000(x2),KH125,Z200,FX400R,CBR954RR(x2)GPZ500S,GT550,VFR750F(x2),RD350N,XR650R,CBR600F,CB250,KDX250,YZF750R,CRM250,400EXC,KLR650,TTR600RE,DR350S,R100GSPD,RGV250,VMAX1200,DL650,KZ750 Present:G650XC,C12,CRF450X,1190ADV
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ian789
Crazy Courier



Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:04 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Police https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=202741

Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TQ
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:06 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I saw this on the news last night.

It clearly says the driver had driven off after being pulled over for not wearing a seat belt.

Judging by the car (range rover) I got the impression it was some snooty old boy who thought the law didn't apply to him and decided to just drive off. The plod were teaching him a lesson he probably thoroughly deserved.
____________________
First Bike :Gilera DNA 50 | Second: Imported 1989 NSR125
Third: 1998 Yamaha XJ600N | Currently: 1999 Yamaha FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:14 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

TQ wrote:
The plod were teaching him a lesson he probably thoroughly deserved.


If that were the case then they would need teaching a lesson about the effects of criminal damage.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

GhostRider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:18 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

TQ wrote:
I saw this on the news last night.

It clearly says the driver had driven off after being pulled over for not wearing a seat belt.

Judging by the car (range rover) I got the impression it was some snooty old boy who thought the law didn't apply to him and decided to just drive off. The plod were teaching him a lesson he probably thoroughly deserved.


Remind me of when the police also took on the role of Judge? I must not have got that memo....

GhostRider
____________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Silver
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:28 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

ian789 wrote:


What, posted in the wrong forum with extremely vague "Watching this will make you mad!" title? Tsk, how did he not spot it and why didn't he read every post on all the forums before posting this one?! Razz
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TQ
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:44 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

They were perfectly within their rights to do what they did.

They pull over a car, he then proceeds to drive off, hitting a copper in the process. That could have been for any reason what so ever, he could have had a gun or any other manner of things with him.

He pulled over before a stinger, what's to say he wasn't going to drive off again? If their was a chance someone was about to put their foot down you wouldn't find me politely tapping on the window and asking if he'd kindly step out of the car I'd want to shock the cunt into doing what I say.

He had committed a crime, the police's job is to arrest criminals. He'd tried to do a runner once so they had no choice but to go in hard and go in fast and get him into custody.
____________________
First Bike :Gilera DNA 50 | Second: Imported 1989 NSR125
Third: 1998 Yamaha XJ600N | Currently: 1999 Yamaha FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:49 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

TQ wrote:

He had committed a crime, the police's job is to arrest criminals.


Yes, but it isn't their job to commit offenses such as criminal damage.

In bike terms what you are advocating would be that when pulled over by the police on your bike they should be within their rights the drive into the bike to knock it over an pin you to the floor. After all you are a criminal for speeding and you might try and get away.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

TQ
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:59 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can see what you're saying Keith but the main point was that he had driven off before.

If I was pulled for speeding, waited for the copper to get out of his car then sped off I'd expect to be tackled to the ground when I next stopped.

As for the criminal damage point is it criminal damage to break down a drug dealer's door?
____________________
First Bike :Gilera DNA 50 | Second: Imported 1989 NSR125
Third: 1998 Yamaha XJ600N | Currently: 1999 Yamaha FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pa_broon74
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:02 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

TQ wrote:
They were perfectly within their rights to do what they did.

They pull over a car, he then proceeds to drive off, hitting a copper in the process. That could have been for any reason what so ever, he could have had a gun or any other manner of things with him.

He pulled over before a stinger, what's to say he wasn't going to drive off again? If their was a chance someone was about to put their foot down you wouldn't find me politely tapping on the window and asking if he'd kindly step out of the car I'd want to shock the cunt into doing what I say.

He had committed a crime, the police's job is to arrest criminals. He'd tried to do a runner once so they had no choice but to go in hard and go in fast and get him into custody.


Not by a long shot.

Its clear the officer over reacted, I don't know what kind of right wing fascist state you imagine we should all be living in, but if you think one officer not just smashing a window but subjecting the car door to a frenzied attack while another officer leaps onto the bonnet is a reasonable response to a 70yo not wearing a seat belt, then driving off then in my opinion you need your head looked at.

I imagine like many other part-time fascists, you think the above is reasonable until something similar happens to you.

Thumbs Up
____________________
Didn't catch anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

TQ
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:04 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

pa_broon74 wrote:
a reasonable response to a 70yo not wearing a seat belt, then driving off then in my opinion you need your head looked at.


I think it is a reasonable response to driving off after the police have pulled you over and hitting a copper in the process.
____________________
First Bike :Gilera DNA 50 | Second: Imported 1989 NSR125
Third: 1998 Yamaha XJ600N | Currently: 1999 Yamaha FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:07 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

TQ wrote:
I can see what you're saying Keith but the main point was that he had driven off before.

If I was pulled for speeding, waited for the copper to get out of his car then sped off I'd expect to be tackled to the ground when I next stopped.


Through the stinger? If he wanted to do that then he had no reason to stop in the first place. And they could easily have blocked the road to prevent him heading backwards

TQ wrote:
As for the criminal damage point is it criminal damage to break down a drug dealer's door?


Possibly (especially if the door was open), but doing that AND smashing all the windows at the same time to have a bit of "shock and awe" would certainly be.

I do think the police need the power to sometimes step beyond the law as it generally applies, but it needs to be the exception not something done routinely and justified as standard procedure, and if they chose to do it then they should automatically pay for the harm / damage caused (irrespective of guilt).

TQ wrote:
and hitting a copper in the process.


Something that the video certainly doesn't show (but probably did if they wanted to show it) and which he wasn't found guilty of.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kris
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:19 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:


TQ wrote:
and hitting a copper in the process.


Something that the video certainly doesn't show (but probably did if they wanted to show it) and which he wasn't found guilty of.



In other words, it didn't happen.

Much like Menezes 'jumping a barrier' with 'wires dangling from his clothes'..

Utter horseshit. Thumbs Down
____________________
NSR125RR - ZXR750H1 - ZX9R E1 - GSF600S - GSF600SK3 - VFR400-NC30 - SV1000N - ST1100-R - CBR900RR-R - GSF1200SK5 - GSF600SK1 - VFR1200FA - GSXR1000K2 - ZZR1400 D8F
www.prisonplanet.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:36 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Hmmm, seems there was a bit of previous contact with this story.

https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/archive/2004/09/30/Gwent+Archive/4601150.Pensioner_set_to_sue_police/

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:40 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kris wrote:


Much like Menezes 'jumping a barrier' with 'wires dangling from his clothes'..

Utter horseshit. Thumbs Down


I remember watching the news coverage live.

Members of the public who witness him described the above - as well as a heavy unseasonal jacket - hours or days before the police released any details.

It turned out not to be true - but I watched civilians claim it live on the BBC. Turns out the public can lie/see what they want to see too.

On topic: The video was released by the defence solicitor, if the collision with the PC was shown then I doubt very much that they would've released that bit.

He was found not guilty of it so fair enough - that doesn't mean it didn't happen; a defence for failing to stop after an accident is that you weren't aware of the collision. It's credible that a dozy 70 yr old driving a massive 4x4 could hit a person (without causing injuries) at slow speed without noticing it.

The male made off from police for 17 minutes, ignoring a police car on Blues for that entire time because he thought he was 'getting a police escort home' - from behind, and because you're so important? Yeah, right!

He made comments about his medical condition and being fit to drop at any time - in which case, I'd rather he wasn't driving a 2 tonne Ranger Rover on a public road, thanks very much.

Smashing windows (side to access the keys/driver, windscreen to block their vision) is a standard technique used against drivers who make off - his age shouldn't be a factor. You are supposed to be as aggressive and dynamic as possible while doing it, in order to dominate the suspect and bring the matter to a speedy conclusion. I've no doubt that adrenaline added to the mix as well - that's a human physiological response to excitement (and being run over!) that even evil cynical cops have little defence against.

It certainly isn't criminal damage if used lawfully to apprehend a suspect who has committed (several) criminal offences and shown a propensity to make off. People running from the police generally have something to hide (some do it for fun, the cheeky scamps) which is something the the officers probably bore in mind as well.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:48 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:

Smashing windows (side to access the keys/driver, windscreen to block their vision) is a standard technique used against drivers who make off - his age shouldn't be a factor.


So why waste half a minute trying to smash a window without even checking to see if the door is open?

Mister James wrote:
It certainly isn't criminal damage if used lawfully to apprehend a suspect who has committed (several) criminal offences and shown a propensity to make off. People running from the police generally have something to hide (some do it for fun, the cheeky scamps) which is something the the officers probably bore in mind as well.


That is for a court to decide not the police. It is criminal damage unless they have a lawful excuse, and the act doesn't give anything like shock an awe as being a lawful excuse.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kris
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:10 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:


I remember watching the news coverage live.


Apologies. I forgot the 'anonymous police source' that claimed he was a rapist.

From another site:

"Not to mention, months and months later, the baseless accusation planted by the police in the media that Jean Charles de Menezes was a rapist -- based on the claim of a woman who, after seeing his face on the television for six months, decided that he looked like the man who raped her some years before. Never mind that such belated identifications by a victim in a traumatic episode are highly suspect, and that Jean Charles de Menezes had not yet arrived in the country at the time of the reported rape (and, for that matter, how, even if true, any of this would have even partially justified police actions at Stockwell station). Instead of acting as a competent and professional police organization, quietly waiting for DNA evidence (which of course absolved him), the police immediately pushed the story through the usual media sewer lines. Many bloggers still profess it to be true, apparently not having seen the tiny press corrections. The police disinformation campaign against Jean Charles de Menezes was no 24-hour cockup in the midst of a desperate search for terrorists. The claim that it was is just one more lie from Sir Ian Blair. It was a full-tilt demonization campaign, remarkably similar to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police campaign against Maher Arar and Rudy Giuliani's vilification campaigns against Patrick Dorismond and other victims of police killings in New York."

Police smear campaign. Simple. Middle Finger
____________________
NSR125RR - ZXR750H1 - ZX9R E1 - GSF600S - GSF600SK3 - VFR400-NC30 - SV1000N - ST1100-R - CBR900RR-R - GSF1200SK5 - GSF600SK1 - VFR1200FA - GSXR1000K2 - ZZR1400 D8F
www.prisonplanet.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:18 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

So why waste half a minute trying to smash a window without even checking to see if the door is open?


Quite possibly red mist - or perhaps because he'd made off from police, hit an officer, failed to stop for 17 mins and then sat in the car without attempting to get out, they assumed it was locked.

Or maybe they could see the little lock thing was down.

Quote:

That is for a court to decide not the police. It is criminal damage unless they have a lawful excuse, and the act doesn't give anything like shock an awe as being a lawful excuse.


No, if the police and CPS charge a person with the offence of criminal damage, it is for the court to make a judgement on the facts presented to them.

This has not happened here, as criminal damage does not apply at all.

Sect. 17 of PACE 1984 - power of entry to premises (includes vehicle) to effect an arrest for various offences, including failing to stop for police

Sect. 117 of PACE 1984 - gives a constable the power to use reasonable force to carry out any PACE power that does not specifically require the person's permission.

As with members of the public who make an arrest or defend themselves or their property, reasonable force is measured by what the user believed or knew at the time of the incident.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:26 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kris wrote:
Mister James wrote:


I remember watching the news coverage live.


Apologies. I forgot the 'anonymous police source' that claimed he was a rapist.



I'm not quite sure how your story invalidates what I saw - well, lets be honest, it doesn't. Several civilians who had nothing to do with the police swore blind on national television minutes or hours after the incident that they'd seen wires/heavy jacket/sweaty terrorists.

Quote:

From another site:


Which site?

Quote:

"Not to mention, months and months later, the baseless accusation planted by the police in the media that Jean Charles de Menezes was a rapist --

Police smear campaign. Simple. Middle Finger


Not sure the police can be blamed for some loony woman wanting to cash in on all the fracas. I imagine it was pretty upsetting for the family to have his name dragged through the mud.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:39 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
Quite possibly red mist - or perhaps because he'd made off from police, hit an officer, failed to stop for 17 mins and then sat in the car without attempting to get out, they assumed it was locked.

Or maybe they could see the little lock thing was down.


None of which are really an excuse for smashing up a car. Watch the video and he runs straight in to smash the window.

Mister James wrote:
No, if the police and CPS charge a person with the offence of criminal damage, it is for the court to make a judgement on the facts presented to them.

This has not happened here, as criminal damage does not apply at all.

Sect. 17 of PACE 1984 - power of entry to premises (includes vehicle) to effect an arrest for various offences, including failing to stop for police

Sect. 117 of PACE 1984 - gives a constable the power to use reasonable force to carry out any PACE power that does not specifically require the person's permission.

As with members of the public who make an arrest or defend themselves or their property, reasonable force is measured by what the user believed or knew at the time of the incident.


Sounds pretty much like an abuse of a law designed for other purposes, using last resort powers as routine first response. The first gives them permission to enter (so nothing about criminal damage), but the second specifies "reasonable force" and defaulting to damaging property does seem to be in any way reasonable. As such criminal damage seems a reasonable charge.

While reasonable force is what the users believes at the time of the incident, if someone has been trained to default to damaging property (which doesn't seem to be reasonable) then it would seem that those who trained or authorised them have committed Conspiracy to Cause Criminal Damage.

Attacking the windscreen at the same time as the door is being attacked for access showst that the windscreen was not being used for power of entry, so almost certainly that is criminal damage.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:25 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the old fart had knocked a biker over and the police had gone all softly softly, we would be having a very different debate, but it is anti police so it is following it's usual course.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:48 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

So why waste half a minute trying to smash a window without even checking to see if the door is open?


Trained to. It's a disorientation tactic.

The Guardian wrote:
He drove off as the police were issuing a fixed penalty notice, and later told Caerphilly magistrates court that he thought the police were finished with him and he needed his medication. When he realised he was being followed by a patrol car with flashing blue lights and sirens, he thought they were giving him a police escort home, he told the court.

"My survival instinct was such was that I was trying to assist the officer the best I could. I feared another stroke. I thought he had finished with me. I just drove off coolly and calmly and not off at speed.


Yeah, righto. Course fella.

Clearly a spacker IMO. In America he'd probably have had his tyres blown out and then been tasered 50 times for the trouble - and probably deservedly so Mr. Green
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:15 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

arry wrote:

Trained to. It's a disorientation tactic.


Which seems to be training based on bad assumptions.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MonkeyKnuckle
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:30 - 06 Aug 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's probably because most cars nowadays lock the doors automatically when you get to 10-20mph, I know mine do and that's in a 7 year old Seat.

It only takes a second to floor it and take off again so the Police can either use that second trying to open the door (which probably would be locked in a fancy Land Rover like that) or they can shock the driver by smashing his window.

The fact of the matter is he ran from the Police and therefore they are going to do whatever they can to stop him. This probably happens every day of the week to young chavs and no one bats an eye lid, just because he's 70 doesn't mean he is above the law.
____________________
MKGaming.com
2000 Honda CBR600F - Sold! 2003 Honda CBR600RR - Current!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 15 years, 209 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.96 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 149 Kb