Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Rolling In It?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Suntan Sid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 May 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:14 - 19 Mar 2014    Post subject: Rolling In It? Reply with quote

Budget says, "NO MORE ANNUITIES"!

About fcukin' time!

Although this is good for me, I still think it's a cynical move to get money moving in the economy, seeing as the banks kept hold of the money the gummerment printed for them!

Predictably, the pension and insurance companies have already started sqealing, like stuck pigs, and are trying to persuade us that letting them keep our money is the best option!

They've lost £5BN off the value of shares since the announcement, diddums, Middle Finger and I hope their yachts sink!

SPEND, SPEND, SPEND, as the saying goes! Wink
____________________
"Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!" Cool
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mentalboy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:22 - 19 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is this 'pension' you speak of? Thinking Laughing
____________________
Make mine a Corona.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

krarkol
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:49 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Where is the "opt out of paying towards a state pension" option?

I'll be dead by the time I reach the ever increasing pension age
____________________
Bandit 600 - deaded
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:09 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

You missed it...

The chancellor has said that people can take more of their money out and only have to pay 20% tax to do so. Championing the man on the street whilst grabbing a few quid off him.

The 5bn also affects pensions! What do you think pension pots are invested in?

So he's reduced the size of your pensions whilst ever so kindly offering to let you do as you wish... So long as you pay one fifth of it over to he gov...
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

syl
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:35 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

You normally pay tax on your income, including pension income - that's because you get to save into your pension before paying tax. It's only right that you pay tax on it at some point - at least you are allowed to get 25% of it tax free. The rest you pay your marginal rate of tax on, which could be 0%, 10%, 20%, 40% 45% or even 65% (if you're taking just over £100k and your personal allowance is clawed back).
____________________
Current bike: Kawasaki Z750S
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:19 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lol. Going short in the good years (youth to middle age) so one can be marginally more comfortable in the shit years (old age). And paying most of what's put in in fees and taxes.

Priceless. Laughing
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:08 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:
...can take more of their money out and only have to pay 20% tax to do so...So long as you pay one fifth of it over to he gov...

It was set at 55% Shocked
Plus it's not 20% flat rate it's the normal rate you're paying on your income. So as of now that'd be 20% for mere mortals and 40%+ for the fat cats (or wise investors/workers as you see fit).

Except it's not 20% on the total as there's the £10K tax allowance and then there's another 25% of the lump sum that'd be tax free.*

So pensioner takes out £20K, gets £10K allowance and £5K (25% of sum) tax free. So pays 20% on remaining £5K, that'd be £1000, not the £4000 (20%, or1/5th of £20K) daemonoid believes.

Just love it when the facts get in the way of a good rant Very Happy


Also according to the BBC Budget Calculator I'm better off if I stop drinking wine and drink spirits and beer. Which will be nice for my health Wink


Thumbs Up

* Information here if you want to check
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:53 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

map wrote:
It was set at 55% Shocked
Plus it's not 20% flat rate it's the normal rate you're paying on your income. So as of now that'd be 20% for mere mortals and 40%+ for the fat cats (or wise investors/workers as you see fit).

Except it's not 20% on the total as there's the £10K tax allowance and then there's another 25% of the lump sum that'd be tax free.*

So pensioner takes out £20K, gets £10K allowance and £5K (25% of sum) tax free. So pays 20% on remaining £5K, that'd be £1000, not the £4000 (20%, or1/5th of £20K) daemonoid believes.

Just love it when the facts get in the way of a good rant Very Happy


Also according to the BBC Budget Calculator I'm better off if I stop drinking wine and drink spirits and beer. Which will be nice for my health Wink


Thumbs Up

* Information here if you want to check


£20k is not a meaningful pension pot (~2k a year assuming you only live to 70)... £200k is where it starts... Your £10k allowance means a little less in that situation.

Unless you mean that they're only taking £20k of a larger pot, in which case you're a bit confused as you can take £25% of the pot tax free currently. If your figures are right then it's even worse than I thought!

And then there's this little gem:
"However, any workers younger than a cut-off age of around 40 will have to wait longer to access their savings." - private retirement age has just gone up!

As for mpd - you don't get taxed at 20% on your annuity you get taxed at standard rate, meaning most of us will get taxed virtually nothing due to tax free allowances.

The good thing will probably be that annuities will become more competitive, plus I like the chance of a couple of BTLs if I can't get a decent annuity...
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:59 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:
Unless you mean that they're only taking £20k of a larger pot, in which case you're a bit confused as you can take £25% of the pot tax free currently. If your figures are right then it's even worse than I thought!


FFS you are right - So... previously I could've had a £200k pension pot, withdrawn £50k tax free and bought an annuity with the rest.

Now... to do the same I need to retire after April 5th, then pay a minimum of 20% on £30k losing £6k in taxes. Thanks George...

If I want it all, it'll cost me even more as I'm bumped up the tax brackets.

And I have to wait longer...

<edit>Here's some good examples:

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-26653312

Quote:
For example, Emily is 60 and has taxable income of £50,000. She has £250,000 in her pension pot, and takes all this money out on 7 April, 2015. She will receive £62,500 without tax (25%) and the balance will be taxed at a mixture of 40% and 45%. She also loses her personal allowance because her total taxable income is over £100,000.


Basically, if you had a pension pot that was very small you can take it in one go and be marginally better off. If you have a larger pension - the kind that makes you self sufficient then you're gonna lose out. Hurrah for being careful eh?
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com


Last edited by daemonoid on 11:06 - 20 Mar 2014; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

fatpies
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:05 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not that I want to admit to it.

But Krad was correct on some aspects.

Paying SOMEBODY else to look after your money is never going to be the best paying plan.

No no, better to look after your own money and have a realistic retirement plan.
____________________
"It's easy to attack and destroy an act of creation. It's a lot more difficult to perform one"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:08 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

fatpies wrote:
Not that I want to admit to it.

But Krad was correct on some aspects.

Paying SOMEBODY else to look after your money is never going to be the best paying plan.

No no, better to look after your own money and have a realistic retirement plan.


That's true, I still think a pension is a good deal if you're in the right bracket. Just that the terms have been altered after I signed up to it!

I'd never rely on only a pension though... for reasons just like this announcement.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
Kari-On This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:03 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed on 0 hour contracts. With high unemployment and massive job competition employers have a massive incentive to only take the cream of the crop. There is no reason at all to employ people a bit "iffy" and give them a big chunk of hours. You just wait until a better candidate comes along and the "iffy" guy never gets a look in.

Seeing as we can't voluntarily agree to a lower wage with an employer, so as to reduce their risk and make them more likely to hire iffy people, due to minimum wage laws. At least the 0 hour contracts give employers an incentive to give someone a chance, as they have the option of an easy out.

My sister started off on her shitty retail job as 4 hour contract. She quickly proved good at her job at it was rare she'd be working less than 14 or so per week. Fast forward a year and she has a 25 hr contract.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Kari-On This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

fatpies
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:00 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpd72 wrote:

A "Majority of work".....? There are supposed to be around 250,000 people on zero hours contracts in the UK out of a total workforce of over 30 million, less than 1%.

In the last 2 or 3 years, unemployment has fallen by almost half a million. Where zero hours contracts don't offer security for employees, it does encourage employers to take people on. To try and pretend that all of these 460,000 jobs that have been created in the last year are all zero hours contract jobs is pessamistic at best.
.


250,000 was the government statistic

Turned out to be

1 million or 3.1% of the work force.

https://news.sky.com/story/1124549/zero-hours-contracts-for-one-million-britons

So unemployment has fallen by half a million and yet there are 1 million 0 h contracts?

Perhaps maths isn't your strong point.
____________________
"It's easy to attack and destroy an act of creation. It's a lot more difficult to perform one"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

fatpies
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:04 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kari-On wrote:


MPD - Must just be round here then, where most jobs are via agency. They're unskilled jobs for the main, too - Even something as simple as order picking or general warehouse dogsbodying is under agency now, and probably the biggest fresh food production factory in the immediate area, despite once taking on directly almost constantly, now takes agency workers on.


Teaching jobs are ALL agency these days. I have 7 jobs btw, 6 of those are 0h as agency runs that way. Every 6.5 weeks you are put onto a new contract so they dodge the agency workers rights laws.

Kari-On wrote:


Agency work is fine and dandy, if you've no liabilities. You can't be running a house on no guaranteed hours. My sister in law is managing to do it, at the moment, but she's not much more left to pay on her mortgage, which is a good job really, considering the place she's at is shedding agency staff quite regularly.




Yep, G will come along now and be sanctimonious about living cheaply in a shared house etc etc.

While you can do this for a few years while you are young, what about when you get older.

What about if you have children? what if you can't have children.

Employers are super short sighted in the UK. Employees also happen to be your customers. Pay them nowt and leave them with nowt and don't be surprised if your sales fall.
____________________
"It's easy to attack and destroy an act of creation. It's a lot more difficult to perform one"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

fatpies
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:05 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to add, go look at some jobs sites.

Lots of them state.

This is a self employed vacancy....

Quite a potemkin economy we've created.
____________________
"It's easy to attack and destroy an act of creation. It's a lot more difficult to perform one"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Kari-On This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
Kari-On This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

fatpies
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:29 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kari-On wrote:


I reckon a good 90% of people who are looking for work would be happy with a guaranteed 40 hours or whatever, at a wage where they can live modestly - not too flashy, two cars, 2 foreign holidays, and so on, but enough to get by on, and be able to save a few quid for emergencies/the occasional holiday.

I don't think it's a lot to ask for someone to be able to get a job where they are secure (providing they will put the work in and not take the piss).



The problem is the uncertainty. Running my company I made a LOT of money, but I'm not flashy, I don't want 2 cars or 2 foreign jollies a year. Hell if I knew the date of my death I would stop working at a certain point and play around with my musical instruments all day.
____________________
"It's easy to attack and destroy an act of creation. It's a lot more difficult to perform one"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Kari-On This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:00 - 20 Mar 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kari-On wrote:
some just want to have a decent standard of living.


Care to quantify that?

"Decent standard of living" is just a rhetorical device along with buzzwords like "living wage".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 119 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.62 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 148.18 Kb