Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bennetts bike insurance fraud

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

bugeye_bob
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:16 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Bennetts bike insurance fraud Reply with quote

Has anyone else had issues with Bennetts regarding insurance ?

I took a policy out 12 days ago with them for a 2nd bike thinking it will be plain sailing,
After 2 days of my new ride I get pulled by a rather snotty police officer, giving it the "Cant be bothered with insurance" and the " didnt think we would catch you" comments as he walks over,
I'm a little taken back as Im mid 40`s and completely legal, not some 16 yr old trying it on or something,
I politely ask what his problem is, he says no insurance and he is impounding my bike,
this is almost as he walks over, doesnt give me 10 seconds to really answer,
as we dont get a proper Certificate my minds racing as to just wtf is going on here,

Luckily I have my mobile which had the email from Bennetts,
He starts giving me grief about it not being on MID etc etc, I point out its feck all to do with me all I do is pay the premium !

So on to Bennetts, a nice polite conversation with an apology and promise it will be sorted and we move on,

Well 2 days later I get another pull, again copper jumps to wrong conclusion but this time I meet him halfway and almost shove my mobile down his throat just for the attitude,
So back again to Bennetts who say it isn't them its the Underwriter go ask them, so I do,
They have NO record of ANY POLICY for me, name, address reg, etc, nothing,
So I ask a simple question, "If I was to make a claim would they honour it", They wouldn't answer it,
So yes yet again back to Bennetts, they blame computers but still cant answer why Aviva cant find me on the system as having a policy, this worries me but not Bennetts,

So this has carried on now and 10 days in still not on MID or Aviva computers,

Do you think this is Iffy?

I cant use the bike now as I really don't believe I'm covered and if I want to cancel Bennetts are happy too as long as I pay the fee . . . . .
the best answer today was, well it can take up to 7 days to show on MID, I mention it well over that so what now, answer, "Oh".

Aviva have launched their own investigation as to why Bennetts are using their name on certificates yet aren't starting policies .
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

covent.gardens
World Clap Champion



Joined: 09 Jun 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:21 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bennets is a massive broker so it's incompetence rather than fraud, you paid them so they should be sorting it out, not down to you to ring the underwriter. Ring and demand to speak to a manager.

You can use https://www.askmid.com/ to check the database yourself to see when they've fixed it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:21 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think you've kicked up enough of a stink with Bennetts yet. They need to be doing a proper internal investigation by someone who isn't just a telephone monkey. You need to get the name and number of a manager and also the name of someone who understands the technical aspects well enough to find out why the databases and computer systems are not synchronised properly (one of their IT bods I guess?).

I'd not take anything from them until they've given you a definitive answer. Not wishy washy "Oh it can take a few days". It clearly hasn't been done, and the underwriter has no record of it. That would ring mega alarm bells with me to be honest.

Don't get angry with them, be firm and polite but don't let them fob you off, don't end the call until you speak to someone who can give you a definitive answer. If they genuinely can't give you an answer then they need to investigate and get back to you within 24 hours else you'll consider going to the insurance ombudsman.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:30 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for that link covent.gardens.
My insurance recently wrote to me about the company being taken over by another, and kept meaning to check everything still ok. I'm safe Smile

I added breakdown recovery when I insured, as an optional extra, and I've never been able to find out who I call in the event of a breakdown. The dopey gits answer my emails, but never answer that question!

In the dictionary, look up insurance companies under "incompetence" Rolling Eyes
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bugeye_bob
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:02 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
I don't think you've kicked up enough of a stink with Bennetts yet. They need to be doing a proper internal investigation by someone who isn't just a telephone monkey. You need to get the name and number of a manager and also the name of someone who understands the technical aspects well enough to find out why the databases and computer systems are not synchronised properly (one of their IT bods I guess?).

I'd not take anything from them until they've given you a definitive answer. Not wishy washy "Oh it can take a few days". It clearly hasn't been done, and the underwriter has no record of it. That would ring mega alarm bells with me to be honest.

Don't get angry with them, be firm and polite but don't let them fob you off, don't end the call until you speak to someone who can give you a definitive answer. If they genuinely can't give you an answer then they need to investigate and get back to you within 24 hours else you'll consider going to the insurance ombudsman.



Contacted them, they are contacting both parties for me.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Knacker
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:32 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

And this is why I stick with Adrian Flux regardless of price.
____________________
Current: Gsxr 600 Srad - GS125 - DT125
Previous: K1 GSXR 1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bugeye_bob
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:43 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Knacker wrote:
And this is why I stick with Adrian Flux regardless of price.


Hmm not a company id recommend either tbh,
They have poor history when it comes to claims for cars and they send all your personal details to total strangers, I know as the said stranger contacted me with all my information !
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:54 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Print off the certificate of insurance, carry it on you, be confident that you will end up claiming back every penny of loss or expense from the police Farce if your bike is seized.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Knacker
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:58 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

bugeye_bob wrote:
Knacker wrote:
And this is why I stick with Adrian Flux regardless of price.


Hmm not a company id recommend either tbh,
They have poor history when it comes to claims for cars and they send all your personal details to total strangers, I know as the said stranger contacted me with all my information !


Feel a bit left out now. Iv not had any strangers call me Sad
____________________
Current: Gsxr 600 Srad - GS125 - DT125
Previous: K1 GSXR 1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bugeye_bob
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:01 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Print off the certificate of insurance, carry it on you, be confident that you will end up claiming back every penny of loss or expense from the police Farce if your bike is seized.


I understand what you are saying but the fact the under writer has no record of a policy makes me more concerned if I had to claim, as they"aviva" wouldn't say if I would be covered if a claim did arise, I asked that question several times.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:07 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why does it matter what they say on the phone either way?

They only way that you can prove it where it ultimately matters, before a court, is by showing the certificate of insurance. That (at the moment) is the document that is both necessary and sufficient.

That's the position taken by your Englander Court of Appeals, and I'd be happy riding on that basis.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Disapproving Brit
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:11 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Print off the certificate of insurance, carry it on you, be confident that you will end up claiming back every penny of loss or expense from the police Farce if your bike is seized.


What this man says. While there is any dispute, it is vital that you carry your cert with you, because that cert is your argument against seizure.

See this case for details: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/749.html

Basically, in order to be able to seize, the law says:

Quote:
(a) a constable in uniform requires, under section 165, a person to produce evidence that a motor vehicle is not or was not being driven in contravention of section 143,
(b) the person fails to produce such evidence, and
(c) the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the vehicle is or was being so driven.


Their honours interpreted this as below:

Quote:
To justify seizure each of the three facts set out in section 165A(3) must be present:
(1) A constable in uniform must require under section 165 that the driver produce evidence that the vehicle was not being driven in contravention of section 143. By virtue of 165A(9) the reference to that evidence is a reference to a document within section 165(2)(a), namely, "the relevant certificate of insurance". In summary the police constable must require the driver to produce the relevant certificate of insurance.

(2) The driver must fail to produce the relevant certificate.

(3) It is only then that the third element arises – the constable's reasonable grounds for believing that the vehicle was being driven in contravention of section 143. The Recorder, perhaps misled by the way the case was argued before him, fell into error in that, having found that Mr Burton was driving with consent and with insurance cover, he nevertheless rested his judgment on whether the police officers had reasonable grounds for believing that the vehicle was being driven without there being in force in relation to the use of the vehicle by the driver such a policy of insurance in respect of third party risks as complies with Part VI of the Act.

Thus condition 165A(3)(b) was not satisfied. He did not fail to produce what was required. The police constables' belief, misled as they may have been by some person within Saga that the cover was only extended if the car actually being driven was itself insured by its owner, was flatly contradicted by the plain words of the certificate: the police constable's belief, no doubt honestly held, that the certificate did not mean what it said is neither here nor there. Having failed to satisfy condition (3)(b) of section 165A, we simply do not get to section 165A(c).


TL;DR: if you produce evidence of insurance at the roadside, then there is no power to seize
____________________
Current Bikes: 1983 Honda VF400FD / 2003 Honda VT750 Shadow
Bike Test Passed 18/03/09, Car Test Passed 14/05/13
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Motorhate
Nearly there...



Joined: 02 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:30 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Strange - I'm insured with MCE and recently swapped the insurance over. The wallah on the other end of the phone had no record of one of the bikes on my policy which I had paid for. I kicked up a fuss to the extent that they insured my CB500 for free. It turned out that it was a "computer error" and that I would have been covered. Not good enough I say as they couldn't give me a definite yes or no as to I'd have been covered in the event of a claim. I'm seriously considering going elsewhere when the policy expires.
____________________
Current - Harley Davidson FXDB Street Bob | Harley Davidson FLTR Road Glide | Harley Davidson Road King
GONE - Honda CB500 Ratbike | Yamaha FZ750 | Yamaha XVS1100 | Kawasaki VN2000 | Kawasaki ER-6 F | Harley Davidson XL883L Sportster
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

FLV
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:12 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm on the MID and am insured with bennetts as of about 10 days ago.
____________________
parp...brap....parp
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

janner_10
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Sep 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:38 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Knacker wrote:


Feel a bit left out now. Iv not had any strangers call me Sad


Not happened to me either. In fact they were pretty decent for my claim.
____________________
Yamaha FZS600 (Now gone to heaven) > CBR600F4i (SOLD) > '99 YZF-R1
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Baffler186
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:40 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

FLV wrote:
I'm on the MID and am insured with bennetts as of about 10 days ago.


Me too, will start carrying my insurance cert from now on though
____________________
Current: 2009 SV650 S, 1990 Kawasaki GT550
Previous: 2009 CBF125, 1998 GSF600, 2004 FZ6 Fazer, 1978 CB400a Hondamatic
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Teflon-Mike
tl;dr



Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:00 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

According to test case where Judge made ruling over bloke having car seized for driving on the 'extension' cover of another policy, when Police said that the car wasn't covered, so they were having it, and Ins Co said that extension cover only applied if vehicle was other wise insured on its own policy; Judge ruled, NOPE, whats on the paper is what matters, NOT what insurance brokers or half clued coppas say or would like to believe.

The Actual, insurance company issued paper cirtificate.

And according to what is actually written in the statutes of the Road Traffic act, you ought to have that actual bit of paper, as issued by the ins co, in your possession, before you use motor-vehicle on public roads.

Not a promice of one over the telephone; not something in the post; not some e-mail on a phone; nor ink-jet self-print.. the actual real Ins-Co issued, certificate of insurance.

So you are doing the 'right' thing as far as not riding till you get proper papers.

MID is not a 'legal entity' as far as the RTA, as it stands at this moment, to my knowledge; fact that police and insurance companies and DVLA would like to take it as gospel, and are happy to let folk rely on it as they do, making thier life easier, doesn't make it law; just common practice.

Believe its due to change come November, when they get rid of the tax disc; but even then, I dont know hoe much legal standing there will be to the MID; DVLA advice sheet says you will still be able to pay tax at the post-office presenting paper ins-cert, so I presume they still admit its 'fallible'.

Fraud? Probably not. Just lazy people; bean counters and computers, conspiring as normal, to cause 'fuck-ups' no-one has to take responsibility for, as computers make it SO much easier to simply pass the buck. Modern Life, eh?

Call Bennets; yell at them; demand to talk to a manager, or higher.

Be unbrittish. Make a fuss, and don't be fobbed off with buck passing; Remember, THEY are the ones who have taken your money, THEY are the ones who you have a contract to provide insurance with; so THEY are the ones to damn well deliver the goods YOU have paid for, and you want them NOW, here, TODAY... IN WRITING, and if that means some-one has to pedal to timbucktu to find a type-writer to make you a propper ins-cert,, then THAT is what they will have to do, NOT YOUR PROBLEM... they have sold you goods, DELIVER them!

Law says you need genuine Insurance Cert. End of. No 'buts', 'ifs' or explanations, that's just fobbing you off.

Immeterial whether they think you need one, or what they think the law says.

You have paid for, and expect an insurance cert. and you want 'goods' you have paid for. End of! Why you need them is NOT thier bludy concern or business.

And you have paid THEM for it.

If they have to get it from some-one else, well, that's THEIR problem, not yours, YOU shouldn't have to go sorting THEIR bludy supply chain problems.

Chuck the buck back at them. Make them earn their bludy money. They are quick enough to take it, aren't they?
____________________
My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Knacker
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:41 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:
A lot of stuff...


Have you ever written a less than 5 word answer?

Thinking
____________________
Current: Gsxr 600 Srad - GS125 - DT125
Previous: K1 GSXR 1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:54 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:
...according to what is actually written in the statutes of the Road Traffic act, you ought to have that actual bit of paper, as issued by the ins co, in your possession, before you use motor-vehicle on public roads...

FYI there is an amendment that allows you to have an electronic copy. So pdf on your smart phone should be ok.

Not that, in my experience, it makes a difference. I have it in writing that it's Manchester Police policy to ignore this amendment to the law. Really, I'm not making it up. Police policy to ignore the actual law in favour of what they want to do.

However, I believe there's another amendment planned (or is it law now) to say no need for paper as that costs money and we'll just check online like car tax and MOTs (might be same law that did away with car tax discs, I'll check unless someone else knows).

So given the MID database is about a trustworthy as a politician's promise I can see much grief for people.

Also BTW the police often quoted statute that they must seize the vehicle to take it off the streets. Guess what, the actual statute doesn't say anything like that. So if you're uninsured and can get it insurance at the roadside and show police an electronic copy of the certificate you should be good to go. Good luck with that though, it'd mean the police would actually have to know the law, not what they've been told to do by management.
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:08 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teflon-Mike wrote:
And according to what is actually written in the statutes of the Road Traffic act, you ought to have that actual bit of paper, as issued by the ins co, in your possession, before you use motor-vehicle on public roads.

Not a promice of one over the telephone; not something in the post; not some e-mail on a phone; nor ink-jet self-print.. the actual real Ins-Co issued, certificate of insurance.

E-mail or on a web site is fine, see The Motor Vehicles (Electronic Communication of Certificates of Insurance) Order 2010.


map wrote:
However, I believe there's another amendment planned (or is it law now) to say no need for paper as that costs money and we'll just check online like car tax and MOTs (might be same law that did away with car tax discs, I'll check unless someone else knows).


DfT consulation "Removal of motor insurance certificates".

I made a representation which seems to have been omitted from the respondents (Whistle) but the good news is:

"In the light of the responses to the consultation we will not pursue the proposal as consulted on [...] Instead we will legislate for the ABI’s suggestion of removing the present requirement for a policyholder to return their certificate if they cancel their policy in mid-term and to use the MID as evidence of the cancellation."

So, still some chance of them cocking it up by recording on the MID that you're not covered, but at least they'll have to take deliberate action to do so, rather than us being done through inaction.

And: "We will also alter slightly the existing legislation regarding the provision of insurance certificates: retaining the requirement for insurers to issue an insurance certificate, but removing the link between the insurance policy having no effect until an insurance certificate is delivered to the policyholder, as the police and insurers hardly ever recognise delivery of the insurance certificate as significant."

Huzzah for common sense.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:21 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got a new policy with ebike last saturday, and it's has only come up on the MID today. First thing I did was print out the insurance cert pdf and keep it in my bike jacket pocket, just to cover my arse.

I also keep a copy of my sisters insurance to prove I'm a named rider on her bike in case of being tugged and cops getting in a fuss because I'm not the reg'd keeper.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:34 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

smegballs wrote:
...print out the insurance cert pdf and keep it in my bike jacket pocket, just to cover my arse....a copy of my sisters insurance to prove I'm a named rider on her bike...

I'll not ask how your bike jacket pocket fits over your arse as I wouldn't want to discriminate against the physically malformed Confused Wink

Suggest keeping pdf copy on phone if you can as well. Together with the pdf of The Motor Vehicles (Electronic Communication of Certificates of Insurance) Order 2010 mentioned by Roger.

FWIW I was once told to get a plastic pocket thingy and keep any document in that and put down the back protector pocket in bike jacket. That way you have it but not in the way and not obviously a pick-pocket target area ('twas a touring person who informed me).
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

doggone
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:38 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd double check it isn't some silly mistake like one digit wrong in the registration number for a start.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bugeye_bob
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:03 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

doggone wrote:
I'd double check it isn't some silly mistake like one digit wrong in the registration number for a start.


Damn I wish I had thought of that . . . .
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Doovy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:52 - 09 Apr 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

bugeye_bob wrote:
doggone wrote:
I'd double check it isn't some silly mistake like one digit wrong in the registration number for a start.


Damn I wish I had thought of that . . . .


I had that once with my car, pulled over twice for no insurance.

Turned out to be a Zero that had been entered as the letter O.
____________________
Yamaha RXS 100 > Honda CD 250 > Honda Hornet 600 > Honda CBR 600RR > Yamaha RXS 100 > Kawasaki ZX6R J2 > Yamaha FZ1
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 291 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.18 Sec - Server Load: 0.45 - MySQL Queries: 16 - Page Size: 146.71 Kb