|
|
| Author |
Message |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 14:39 - 21 Jun 2014 Post subject: Intelligent Athiests, can't defend evolution |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 19:39 - 21 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
Stopped at the bit where the dickhead with the microphone thought he'd stumped them with the 'millions of years ago therefore not observable current evidence' thing.
For a start, he needs to learn about carbon dating.
EDIT: Watched a bit more of it. Now he claims that attempts to recreate evolution in a lab have failed because bacteria just changed into new kinds of bacteria, and fish just changed into slightly different fish.
This moron has no idea of the physical subtleties of genetic variation over short time spans. Bacteria evolving into a new type bacteria is really quite good proof of some kind of evolutionary action.
As one of the professors in the video said, the guy is asking for examples of macro-evolution, e.g. a difference between cats and dogs. This fucking moron doesn't understand that even the smallest evolutionary hiccup (e.g. - as the professor also said - bacteria acquiring new metabolic capabilities) IS evolution.
Creationists
Also note how it's captioned in Arabic so the Muslim cavalry are probably loving this biased piece of shite video too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 20:01 - 21 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
Feeding the trolls, tsk tsk. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| anthony_r6 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 anthony_r6 World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dalemac |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dalemac World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Oct 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dalemac |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dalemac World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Oct 2006 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Hetzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hetzer Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tbourner |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tbourner World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Mar 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 09:47 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
Video selecting people who claim to be scientists but are not versed in debate, trying to answer questions which twist the meaning of words in order to confuse. I've heard that some religious people are actually taught how to trick non-believers with the way they word things and adjust the logical thought process.
Proper debates are much more interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9yQEG7mlTU
I don't know why when this question comes up people don't mention things like Tiktaalik; "missing link" between fish and reptiles. This is one of the best vids I've found on the evolution argument from the OP:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AS6rQtiEh8
I think she's one of those 'trained' ones, she's good at tripping (non-debating) people up, Dawkins got a bit frustrated I think. ____________________ Trev, now a biker?
Looking for first big bike. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 10:14 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 10:22 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
TBH it doesn't even have to be genetic changes. Also I remember Amanda the resident biologist always say, individual life forms do not evolve only species
I remember all the way back to school, there were white moths and there were black moths.
Pre 1700 they lived in balance with each other relatively stable populations. Then industrial revolution came along and coal burning made soot normal, white moth populations were annilated black moths camouflaged increased as a % of the population.
No genetic changes, but this speicies propagates itself more than the other ____________________ Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Hetzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hetzer Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| anthony_r6 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 anthony_r6 World Chat Champion

Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 10:51 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| PhilDawson8270 wrote: | | Itchy wrote: | TBH it doesn't even have to be genetic changes. Also I remember Amanda the resident biologist always say, individual life forms do not evolve only species
I remember all the way back to school, there were white moths and there were black moths.
Pre 1700 they lived in balance with each other relatively stable populations. Then industrial revolution came along and coal burning made soot normal, white moth populations were annilated black moths camouflaged increased as a % of the population.
No genetic changes, but this speicies propagates itself more than the other |
Yes, but the question in the video, is that Darwin suggested all life forms started as single cells and evolved from there. For which there is no evidence.
Plenty of evidence that species evolved through natural selection and adaptation, but no evidence anywhere that 1 species evolved into another.
Note: I do believe in Darwinian Evolution, but I just thought that this video had an interesting insight into how it can be viewed differently. |
If birds are considered direct descendants of Dinosaurs, then surely that is evidence of species changing into another. ____________________ Ted : "Maybe he's agoraphobic."
Dougal : "Jack scared of fighting? I don't think so, Ted." |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Hetzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hetzer Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lihp |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lihp World Chat Champion
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 map Mr Calendar

Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 11:07 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Hetzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hetzer Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 11:29 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Lord Percy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Lord Percy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 11:42 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
I watched David Attenborough's first major BBC nature documentary series last month - Life on Earth (1979).
He specifically made it to explain how life evolved from nothing, from chemical compounds having a certain physical property causing them to be drawn to each other, leading to the eventual creation of DNA and cell walls, which at the time was nothing more than a collection of atoms fitting together in the most balanced equilibrium, just like an ionised atom will collect an electron for the same reason of equilibrium.
The reason the atoms were so comfortably drawn to each other was because of the molecular make-up and temperature/pressure of the environment they were in. It was simply the only thing that could have happened, given the circumstances of their existence at that time. Just like a dense collection of matter will melt and start to undergo fusion in its core, resulting in a star, because of the physical parameters of its own existence.
So life, although of course miraculous, is still nothing more than a logical by-product of the right set of elements being in the right conditions for long enough.
After this, the logic of evolution is obvious. Depending on the given conditions, certain collections of molecules (i.e. DNA) will more readily survive than others. That's how mutations occur.
Really interesting first episode. David Attenborough is a genius. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7qIrawmBRc&list=PLyU3x24ft_NCqfLOW8BCc96F8cUl2W9JE&index=1. You might need a proxy like Zenmate for Chrome to watch it because youtube says it's not available in the UK.
EDIT: Skip to 21:00 in the clip to see the part where he explains how life started. It's only a two minute section from the episode.
Last edited by Lord Percy on 12:24 - 26 Jun 2014; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tbourner |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tbourner World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Mar 2012 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 11:45 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| PhilDawson8270 wrote: | Plenty of evidence that species evolved through natural selection and adaptation, but no evidence anywhere that 1 species evolved into another.
I just thought that this video had an interesting insight into how it can be viewed differently. |
Erm, apart from the shitloads of evidence for it you mean?
Tiktaalic is one I mentioned earlier. Spend half an hour or so looking through talkorigins for more.
The argument of "We can't observe stuff from millions of years ago so it's not science" is nonsense, as observation isn't necessarily direct, we observe the evidence in fossils, rocks, DNA etc.
The argument of "Darwin only talked about birds evolving into other birds" is nonsense, same as with him apparently stating that they eye must have been designed - if you actually read it he explains the full spread of evolution in great detail.
The argument of "Do you believe/have faith in science? Well then why is that any different to my belief/faith?" is nonsense, having faith in your mates sticking up for you is different to religious faith, two different meanings of the word 'faith', same with belief; "I believe science is the best answer to the question" is way different to "I believe in a creator".
etc. etc.
Basically; creationists have no argument. ____________________ Trev, now a biker?
Looking for first big bike.
Last edited by tbourner on 11:46 - 26 Jun 2014; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dalemac |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dalemac World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Oct 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 11:46 - 26 Jun 2014 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Lord Percy wrote: | I watched David Attenborough's first major BBC nature documentary series last month - Life on Earth (1979).
He specifically made it to explain how life evolved from nothing, from chemical compounds having a certain physical property causing them to be drawn to each other, leading to the eventual creation of DNA and cell walls, which at the time was nothing more than a collection of atoms fitting together in the most balanced equilibrium, just like an ionised atom will collect an electron for the same reason of equilibrium.
The reason the atoms were so comfortably drawn to each other was because of the molecular make-up and temperature/pressure of the environment they were in. It was simply the only thing that could have happened, given the circumstances of their existence at that time. Just like a dense collection of matter will melt and start to undergo fusion in its core, resulting in a star, because of the physical parameters of its own existence.
So life, although of course miraculous, is still nothing more than a logical by-product of the right set of elements being in the right conditions for long enough.
After this, the logic of evolution is obvious. Depending on the given conditions, certain collections of molecules (i.e. DNA) will more readily survive than others. That's how mutations occur.
Really interesting first episode. David Attenborough is a genius. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7qIrawmBRc&list=PLyU3x24ft_NCqfLOW8BCc96F8cUl2W9JE&index=1. You might need a proxy like Zenmate for Chrome to watch it because youtube says it's not available in the UK. |
Sounds interesting! Going to watch that tonight, cheers for sharing. ____________________
YBR125 -> GPZ500S -> SL1000 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Hetzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hetzer Super Spammer

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tbourner |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tbourner World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Mar 2012 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 11 years, 297 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|