Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Intelligent Athiests, can't defend evolution

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Found on the 'Net Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:39 - 21 Jun 2014    Post subject: Intelligent Athiests, can't defend evolution Reply with quote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ckfrn5-86xU
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:39 - 21 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stopped at the bit where the dickhead with the microphone thought he'd stumped them with the 'millions of years ago therefore not observable current evidence' thing.

For a start, he needs to learn about carbon dating.

EDIT: Watched a bit more of it. Now he claims that attempts to recreate evolution in a lab have failed because bacteria just changed into new kinds of bacteria, and fish just changed into slightly different fish.

This moron has no idea of the physical subtleties of genetic variation over short time spans. Bacteria evolving into a new type bacteria is really quite good proof of some kind of evolutionary action.

As one of the professors in the video said, the guy is asking for examples of macro-evolution, e.g. a difference between cats and dogs. This fucking moron doesn't understand that even the smallest evolutionary hiccup (e.g. - as the professor also said - bacteria acquiring new metabolic capabilities) IS evolution.

Creationists Middle Finger Neutral Middle Finger

Rolling Eyes

Also note how it's captioned in Arabic so the Muslim cavalry are probably loving this biased piece of shite video too.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:01 - 21 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Feeding the trolls, tsk tsk.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

anthony_r6
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:27 - 21 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ray Comfort - The banana man.
Yeah, this guy has been refuted more than a handful of times for the dumb-crap he says.
____________________
Ted : "Maybe he's agoraphobic."
Dougal : "Jack scared of fighting? I don't think so, Ted."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dalemac
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:01 - 22 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

A 'change of kinds'? - Easy! Feathered dinosaurs to modern birds. Evolution is just a term that encompasses many small changes over time.

There is also evidence to suggest that Brachylophosaurus is the decendant of modern day chickens and ostriches, as 68 million year old soft tissue contained identical collagen.


This guy seems to want some proof of observable, repeatable 'change of kinds'. Unless he plans on living for 100+ million years he hasn't got a chance of the former, and the latter would be impossible. Even in an identical environment, identical adaptation is unlikely to take place.

Also, I love the following comment:

"I got an even better one for the evolutionist. How did life start. bwhahaha."

Yes, exactly how did 'God' arrange amino acids to build proteins, proteins to build cells, and cells to make organisms? He must have been a scientist!
____________________
YBR125 -> GPZ500S -> SL1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:38 - 22 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dale_Mckeown wrote:

"I got an even better one for the evolutionist. How did life start. bwhahaha."

Yes, exactly how did 'God' arrange amino acids to build proteins, proteins to build cells, and cells to make organisms? He must have been a scientist!


More to the point, how did god start?

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dalemac
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:41 - 22 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Dale_Mckeown wrote:

"I got an even better one for the evolutionist. How did life start. bwhahaha."

Yes, exactly how did 'God' arrange amino acids to build proteins, proteins to build cells, and cells to make organisms? He must have been a scientist!


More to the point, how did god start?

All the best

Keith


According to religion, magic.
____________________
YBR125 -> GPZ500S -> SL1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:20 - 22 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
how did god start

It was quite a long time ago, so probably with a good firm kick.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:24 - 22 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Dale_Mckeown wrote:

"I got an even better one for the evolutionist. How did life start. bwhahaha."

Yes, exactly how did 'God' arrange amino acids to build proteins, proteins to build cells, and cells to make organisms? He must have been a scientist!


More to the point, how did god start?

All the best

Keith


Uh oh. Laughing
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tbourner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:47 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Video selecting people who claim to be scientists but are not versed in debate, trying to answer questions which twist the meaning of words in order to confuse. I've heard that some religious people are actually taught how to trick non-believers with the way they word things and adjust the logical thought process.

Proper debates are much more interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9yQEG7mlTU

I don't know why when this question comes up people don't mention things like Tiktaalik; "missing link" between fish and reptiles. This is one of the best vids I've found on the evolution argument from the OP:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AS6rQtiEh8
I think she's one of those 'trained' ones, she's good at tripping (non-debating) people up, Dawkins got a bit frustrated I think.
____________________
Trev, now a biker?
Looking for first big bike.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:14 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
More to the point, how did god start?

Probably like me with a good cup of coffee in the morning. I don't really start without that. Of course cup, coffee and morning being metaphysical concepts.

Maybe I'm god like then? My wife does say I move in a mysterious way Wink Very Happy
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:22 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

TBH it doesn't even have to be genetic changes. Also I remember Amanda the resident biologist always say, individual life forms do not evolve only species

I remember all the way back to school, there were white moths and there were black moths.

Pre 1700 they lived in balance with each other relatively stable populations. Then industrial revolution came along and coal burning made soot normal, white moth populations were annilated black moths camouflaged increased as a % of the population.

No genetic changes, but this speicies propagates itself more than the other
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:41 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:
TBH it doesn't even have to be genetic changes. Also I remember Amanda the resident biologist always say, individual life forms do not evolve only species

I remember all the way back to school, there were white moths and there were black moths.

Pre 1700 they lived in balance with each other relatively stable populations. Then industrial revolution came along and coal burning made soot normal, white moth populations were annilated black moths camouflaged increased as a % of the population.

No genetic changes, but this speicies propagates itself more than the other


Yes, but the question in the video, is that Darwin suggested all life forms started as single cells and evolved from there. For which there is no evidence.

Plenty of evidence that species evolved through natural selection and adaptation, but no evidence anywhere that 1 species evolved into another.




Note: I do believe in Darwinian Evolution, but I just thought that this video had an interesting insight into how it can be viewed differently.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:47 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhilDawson8270 wrote:


Yes, but the question in the video, is that Darwin suggested all life forms started as single cells and evolved from there. For which there is no evidence.


It's a bit Occum's razor. Do we believe the universe came into being with an inherent ability to generate life, or do we believe it came into being so something else could come into it and create life? The former is simpler and therefore more likely.

None of that constitutes evidence but duh. Laughing What watch-maker builds a watch that requires the hands to be manually moved?
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:48 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
What watch-maker builds a watch that requires the hands to be manually moved?


Now-a-days probably a lot if it was cheaper to make, and could charge you more Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

anthony_r6
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:51 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhilDawson8270 wrote:
Itchy wrote:
TBH it doesn't even have to be genetic changes. Also I remember Amanda the resident biologist always say, individual life forms do not evolve only species

I remember all the way back to school, there were white moths and there were black moths.

Pre 1700 they lived in balance with each other relatively stable populations. Then industrial revolution came along and coal burning made soot normal, white moth populations were annilated black moths camouflaged increased as a % of the population.

No genetic changes, but this speicies propagates itself more than the other


Yes, but the question in the video, is that Darwin suggested all life forms started as single cells and evolved from there. For which there is no evidence.

Plenty of evidence that species evolved through natural selection and adaptation, but no evidence anywhere that 1 species evolved into another.


Note: I do believe in Darwinian Evolution, but I just thought that this video had an interesting insight into how it can be viewed differently.


If birds are considered direct descendants of Dinosaurs, then surely that is evidence of species changing into another.
____________________
Ted : "Maybe he's agoraphobic."
Dougal : "Jack scared of fighting? I don't think so, Ted."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:56 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

AnPhonEh wrote:


If birds are considered direct descendants of Dinosaurs, then surely that is evidence of species changing into another.


I find it helpful to bin the entire notion of species and think of all forms of life as a pool of coloured water in a very large flat shallow pan where there are variations in the density of colour at thousands of different points.

Some of those points have colour so dense they can support consciousness.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lihp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:56 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

AnPhonEh wrote:


If birds are considered direct descendants of Dinosaurs, then surely that is evidence of species changing into another.


Not if they descended from flying dinosaurs.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:07 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
...think of all forms of life as a pool of coloured water...
Some of those points have colour so dense they can support consciousness.

Do you think you can mention colour in a debate and not be branded a racist? Wink Cool
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:29 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

map wrote:
Hetzer wrote:
...think of all forms of life as a pool of coloured water...
Some of those points have colour so dense they can support consciousness.

Do you think you can mention colour in a debate and not be branded a racist? Wink Cool


Yes, I do, on account of having a wife of a different race. I can even use the word 'nigger' safely. Mr. Green
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:42 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I watched David Attenborough's first major BBC nature documentary series last month - Life on Earth (1979).

He specifically made it to explain how life evolved from nothing, from chemical compounds having a certain physical property causing them to be drawn to each other, leading to the eventual creation of DNA and cell walls, which at the time was nothing more than a collection of atoms fitting together in the most balanced equilibrium, just like an ionised atom will collect an electron for the same reason of equilibrium.

The reason the atoms were so comfortably drawn to each other was because of the molecular make-up and temperature/pressure of the environment they were in. It was simply the only thing that could have happened, given the circumstances of their existence at that time. Just like a dense collection of matter will melt and start to undergo fusion in its core, resulting in a star, because of the physical parameters of its own existence.

So life, although of course miraculous, is still nothing more than a logical by-product of the right set of elements being in the right conditions for long enough.

After this, the logic of evolution is obvious. Depending on the given conditions, certain collections of molecules (i.e. DNA) will more readily survive than others. That's how mutations occur.

Really interesting first episode. David Attenborough is a genius. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7qIrawmBRc&list=PLyU3x24ft_NCqfLOW8BCc96F8cUl2W9JE&index=1. You might need a proxy like Zenmate for Chrome to watch it because youtube says it's not available in the UK.

EDIT: Skip to 21:00 in the clip to see the part where he explains how life started. It's only a two minute section from the episode.


Last edited by Lord Percy on 12:24 - 26 Jun 2014; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tbourner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:45 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

PhilDawson8270 wrote:
Plenty of evidence that species evolved through natural selection and adaptation, but no evidence anywhere that 1 species evolved into another.

I just thought that this video had an interesting insight into how it can be viewed differently.


Erm, apart from the shitloads of evidence for it you mean?

Tiktaalic is one I mentioned earlier. Spend half an hour or so looking through talkorigins for more.

The argument of "We can't observe stuff from millions of years ago so it's not science" is nonsense, as observation isn't necessarily direct, we observe the evidence in fossils, rocks, DNA etc.
The argument of "Darwin only talked about birds evolving into other birds" is nonsense, same as with him apparently stating that they eye must have been designed - if you actually read it he explains the full spread of evolution in great detail.
The argument of "Do you believe/have faith in science? Well then why is that any different to my belief/faith?" is nonsense, having faith in your mates sticking up for you is different to religious faith, two different meanings of the word 'faith', same with belief; "I believe science is the best answer to the question" is way different to "I believe in a creator".

etc. etc.
Basically; creationists have no argument.
____________________
Trev, now a biker?
Looking for first big bike.


Last edited by tbourner on 11:46 - 26 Jun 2014; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Dalemac
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:46 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Percy wrote:
I watched David Attenborough's first major BBC nature documentary series last month - Life on Earth (1979).

He specifically made it to explain how life evolved from nothing, from chemical compounds having a certain physical property causing them to be drawn to each other, leading to the eventual creation of DNA and cell walls, which at the time was nothing more than a collection of atoms fitting together in the most balanced equilibrium, just like an ionised atom will collect an electron for the same reason of equilibrium.

The reason the atoms were so comfortably drawn to each other was because of the molecular make-up and temperature/pressure of the environment they were in. It was simply the only thing that could have happened, given the circumstances of their existence at that time. Just like a dense collection of matter will melt and start to undergo fusion in its core, resulting in a star, because of the physical parameters of its own existence.

So life, although of course miraculous, is still nothing more than a logical by-product of the right set of elements being in the right conditions for long enough.

After this, the logic of evolution is obvious. Depending on the given conditions, certain collections of molecules (i.e. DNA) will more readily survive than others. That's how mutations occur.

Really interesting first episode. David Attenborough is a genius. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7qIrawmBRc&list=PLyU3x24ft_NCqfLOW8BCc96F8cUl2W9JE&index=1. You might need a proxy like Zenmate for Chrome to watch it because youtube says it's not available in the UK.


Sounds interesting! Going to watch that tonight, cheers for sharing.
____________________
YBR125 -> GPZ500S -> SL1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:47 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

tbourner wrote:


etc. etc.
Basically; creationists have no argument.


They do have an argument, it's just that they argue the wrong one.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tbourner
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:54 - 26 Jun 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
tbourner wrote:


etc. etc.
Basically; creationists have no argument.


They do have an argument, it's just that they argue the wrong one.


True enough. They have the same significance of argument as the FSM, i.e.: not much. You can literally make up anything you want, we're in the Matrix for example, it's all on the same bottom level of likelihood as creation.
____________________
Trev, now a biker?
Looking for first big bike.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 297 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Found on the 'Net All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.13 Sec - Server Load: 0.71 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 143.08 Kb