Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


BBC articles series on cycling

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

esullivan
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:05 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: BBC articles series on cycling Reply with quote

Just pointing out that the BBC seems to be running a series on cycling safety lately that we might find interesting. Before you scream OFF TOPIC, I think these are relevant to motorbikers, even if we aren't mentioned. Today's installment, for example, points out the statistical insignificance of hi-vis (unless it says "police" or "polite" on the back), and that cars seemed to take greater risks with cyclists who appear to be better protected (i.e., wearing helmets).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29894590

I've noticed a more casual attitude toward my safety from fellow road users when I'm dressed like a chupa chups than when I'm dressed in a black t-shirt and jeans, but I thought it was my imagination. The idea seems to have some evidence behind it.

Yesterday's article on the same theme:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29878233

What was interesting about that one was how much more dangerous motorcycling is compared with cycling (see linked DfT stats -- TL/DR: it's many, many times more dangerous). In London, we get the opposite impression because we only hear about cyclists getting off'd by lorries. Motorcyclists don't count.
____________________
Current: '14 VFR800X Test passed 31/10/12.
Previous: '12 NC700S, '11 CBF 125, '04 SH 125.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:51 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Re: BBC articles series on cycling Reply with quote

Fairly well balanced. Looool that even professional pedalists still don't really believe Walker's (actual, measured) results that riding further out gets you squeezed more, although they'll happily cherry pick the part about lids.

https://bamboobadger.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/bicycle-overtaking-and-rebuttals.html


I wouldn't call motorcycling "many, many times" more dangerous.

x3.5 killed, x1.8 seriously injured, per mile.

I'll have to ride 539,665 miles to get my first serious injury, and 8,403,361 before I die. You lot can help out by getting yourselves mashed up sooner, I think that's how statistics work. Wink
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

thx1138
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:16 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember back when I was a posite guys coming up to 40+ years service and retirement, being made to wear cycle helmets for the last few months of their time, despite leading a relatively death free life up until that point

in fact, I think at around 6.30am I pedalled my postie bike at 30 mph down hill with 15kilos of mail on the front, I don't get up to that speed on the 125 in my town.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:38 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

How far out to ride from the kerb is variable dependant on the road and the amount of other traffic. Riding out from the kerb is safer as it gives you some space to play with when someone does overtake you too close for comfort and if you move over a bit when there's a vehicle behind you then that helps to keep everyone happy.

One thing I have noticed over the years is that the if you're riding relatively quickly then people give you more room when overtaking then they do when you're going slowly.

From those BBC articles I'd say that the not wearing headphones idea is significant. If you're riding along a meter out from the kerb and you've got headphones on then you've got so much less awareness of what's going on around you, about the only thing of interest is what's approaching from behind you.

Looking out for your own safety is important and you don't achieve that by pissing however many tons of metal is behind you that's wanting to go faster and wanting to not look at your sexy lycra arse.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:32 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ste wrote:
Riding out from the kerb is safer as it gives you some space to play with when someone does overtake you too close for comfort

If I were Bendy, I'd say "utter rot", but there's no need to sink to moderator levels.

IME, riding further out does results in you being overtaken too close for comfort. And by the time you realise it's happening, it's mostly about the ranting, and if vlogging, shrieking out license plate numbers in a nasal monotone.

Ste wrote:
if you move over a bit when there's a vehicle behind you then that helps to keep everyone happy.

Accepted.


Ste wrote:
One thing I have noticed over the years is that the if you're riding relatively quickly then people give you more room when overtaking then they do when you're going slowly.

Accepted.

However, since I mostly pedal slowly, I usually stick to the left because motor vehicles will overtake anyway, and (no, really) they'll do so closer if you're further out.

I suspect that the "dominate the lane" advice is aimed at SRS pedalists, with £4K Unobtanium bikes and carbon fibre nipple shields, bombing along at near to or excess of the motor vehicle speed limit.

For the rest of us, wheezing and wobbling along - and that's most of us if cycling is to really take off - domination is best saved for birthdays and Xebusmass.

We ain't got the roads for it, that's the problem.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

thx1138
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:40 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hat to pedal slowly. My bicycle psyche has two speeds, stopped and absolutely hell for leather flat out. Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:41 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
IME, riding further out does results in you being overtaken too close for comfort. And by the time you realise it's happening, it's mostly about the ranting, and if vlogging, shrieking out license plate numbers in a nasal monotone.

How far out to ride from the kerb is balanced against how much traffic there is, how much space there is for traffic to overtake you, how much visibility there is, how fast you're going, how fast the traffic is going, etc etc etc. How fast you're going compared to how fast the traffic is going is probably the most important point to consider.

As you say, the dominate the lane advice is aimed at srs cyclists. We do have the roads for it but in general we don't have the manners for it. Cyclists dominating their lane but not caring about the traffic behind them aren't helping their cause. Just the same as how drivers overtaking with millimeters between them and the cyclist aren't helping their cause.

Cyclists flying along the pavements (because the roads are too dangerous) weaving around pedestrians aren't helping their cause. If you want to cycle on the pavements then you're going at walking pace and you give way to all pedestrians as well as giving them a wide berth when going around them.

It all just requires having some consideration for everyone else on the roads.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:55 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyclists could also help themselves by not attempting to direct the traffic behind them. Most of them have no concept of the room it takes to safely pass them or where an appropriate overtaking site is.

I had one today on a narrow B-road I know very well who almost agressively waved me past him at a point where I know for an absolute fact he couldn't see more than two car lengths ahead of him.

I duly ignored both his signals and the dirty look over his shoulder I got for doing so and was rewarded seconds later by a car appearing from the other direction. Had I given his signals any creedence whatsoever, I'd have had a massive head-on and he'd have landed up pulped between a vito van and a six foot high drystone wall (just enough room for two cars to pass there without clipping mirrors, not even near to there being enough for a cyclist as well).

He's not the first one to pull that kind of shit either. I just ignore the fuckers and pass when I'm ready.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

thx1138
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:57 - 05 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

cyclists that wobble about and give redundant hand signals, much better just to look over shoulder then move across, instead of wobbling about with arm flapping
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

WD Forte
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:03 - 06 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm glad they pointed out the Highway code bit
"You MUST NOT cycle on a pavement.
Laws HA 1835 sect 72 & R(S)A 1984, sect 129"

The self righteous assholes still ignore it round here
and give me dirty looks if I dont jump out their way
Walked up the local shop 100 yards away yesterday and had to dodge
5 cycling assholes on the way.

The thing is when driving or riding I have never had an incident with a cyclist I try to be solicitous towards them and they don't piss me off at all, but when I want to saunter up the shops the fuckers are everywhere but the road !.
came out of Morrisons this evening and saw a cyclist do stoppie
to avoid folk walkin out of the door
I hate them all with a vengeance and wish them under buses.
https://s2.quickmeme.com/img/04/0404ad07eab19bed089f0e6fdfb25aba47ac73584074927c1441a0a8aa69cf63.jpg
____________________
bikers smell of wee
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:28 - 06 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

WD Forte wrote:


The self righteous assholes still ignore it round here
and give me dirty looks if I dont jump out their way
Walked up the local shop 100 yards away yesterday and had to dodge
5 cycling assholes on the way.


The trick is to make sure you get both brake levers with your thumbs as you grab the handlebars.

This both stops the bike AND traps their fingers.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

thx1138
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:03 - 07 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kid crashes bicycle live on telly, at bicycle safety event. Laughing

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ac5_1415349898
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:33 - 07 Nov 2014    Post subject: Reply with quote

thx1138 wrote:
Kid crashes bicycle live on telly, at bicycle safety event. Laughing

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ac5_1415349898

His hi-vis must have been defective.

Orange, people, orange.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 11 years, 111 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.91 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 85.81 Kb