Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


LS218 video review - would you buy one?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

handbasket
Nova Slayer



Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:06 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

Looks terrifying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3DiAecsh_0

No mention of cost. They don't mention the range, either. That seems to be 'up to' 180 miles. You'd probably have to avoid 'spirited' riding to get to that range though. Realistic numbers are more likely to be under 150 miles. Could fast charge in 30 minutes. That'll be annoying if you have to stop at motorway services on a trip.

Almost $40,000 list price. So pushing £30,000 here. That'll be a select market.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bladeblaster
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 19 Jan 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:19 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

No for many reasons:-

1) It's fugly
2) It's too expensive
3) It sounds like a wind up toy
4) You have to wait around 30 minutes to charge it
5) We have all run out of fuel at some point, you can walk and buy a can of petrol, try buying a can of electric.
6) How much does it cost to charge?
7) Is it actually eco friendly? All that electric to charge it has to come from somewhere.

All that said I would love to have a blast on one.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

handbasket
Nova Slayer



Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:31 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Electric is coming more and more from renewable sources. Unlike petrol. Robert Llewllyn points out that oil refineries use electricity and claims they use more to refine the fuel used by a car than if the same car used electricity directly. To be honest that does seem a bit far fetched though.

Regardless of this, battery tech is coming on in leaps and bounds. A more sensible electric bike is going to come along at a reasonable price eventually, IMO.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:38 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

Batteries are 12 kWh to 20 kWh (I assume that's the same as their "kwh" - LERN 2 METRIK!!!)

200 "hp" is about 150 kW.

(12 to 20) * 60 / 150 = full to empty in 4.8 minutes to 8 minutes at full POWAH. You won't be doing full power, but they won't go all the way to full or empty either.

Fun track toy, or if you live very near to a (short) twisty road.

I'd want to go uphill on the way out though, so I could roll it home.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Northern Monkey
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:19 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Batteries are 12 kWh to 20 kWh (I assume that's the same as their "kwh" - LERN 2 METRIK!!!)

200 "hp" is about 150 kW.

(12 to 20) * 60 / 150 = full to empty in 4.8 minutes to 8 minutes at full POWAH. You won't be doing full power, but they won't go all the way to full or empty either.

Fun track toy, or if you live very near to a (short) twisty road.

I'd want to go uphill on the way out though, so I could roll it home.


20kwh is about £3 worth of electricity. It's not that cheap to run either
____________________
Fisty: after polishing the tank with the glistenng beads of sweat from my full hot scrotum, I filled the headrace bearings with 10cc of my manmilk
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:06 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

handbasket wrote:
Electric is coming more and more from renewable sources.

https://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/

Now -

Coal: 30.38%
Nuclear: 23.01%
Gas turbine: 32.22%
Wind: 1.75%
Solar, biomass, unicorn burps: insignificant

Dooooo go on.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

handbasket
Nova Slayer



Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:58 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
Batteries are 12 kWh to 20 kWh (I assume that's the same as their "kwh" - LERN 2 METRIK!!!)

200 "hp" is about 150 kW.

(12 to 20) * 60 / 150 = full to empty in 4.8 minutes to 8 minutes at full POWAH. You won't be doing full power, but they won't go all the way to full or empty either.

Fun track toy, or if you live very near to a (short) twisty road.

I'd want to go uphill on the way out though, so I could roll it home.


Do the same calculation based on chewing through 15L of petrol and it comes out at around 12-15 minutes.

To use the kind of power you're talking about you'd need to be flat out at 218mph (hence the model name). At 70mph power required to overcome air resistance will be 1/27 of that required at 210mph (assuming calm conditions as in your post about power generation upthread).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:52 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

handbasket wrote:
Do the same calculation based on chewing through 15L of petrol and it comes out at around 12-15 minutes.

Then refill in 5 minutes, pretty much anywhere.

I look forward to reading your owner report.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:48 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

Quote:
We've tested a number of 200-horsepower superbikes, but nothing - NOTHING - accelerates like this thing.

Stopped there. Either it's longer than a normal sports bike, harming handling, or the writer doesn't know how to ride a bike.
Modern superbikes will lift the front well into triple figures. They are limited by physics, not power. But, if you want more power, you can easily give a chunk of money to someone to 'charge it, giving you way more power than this.

Later we hear the back tyre is spinning up - so it's also got poor tyres on it or is badly setup?

So, no; I will not be buying one.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:30 - 23 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suspect he means "I've never experienced anything this quiet accelerating this fast."
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:24 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

G wrote:
Stopped there. Either it's longer than a normal sports bike, harming handling, or the writer doesn't know how to ride a bike.
Modern superbikes will lift the front well into triple figures. They are limited by physics, not power. But, if you want more power, you can easily give a chunk of money to someone to 'charge it, giving you way more power than this.

Later we hear the back tyre is spinning up - so it's also got poor tyres on it or is badly setup?

So, no; I will not be buying one.


It weighs twice as much as a litre bike though, so I suspect that has a little to do with it.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Matt B
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:35 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

G wrote:
...or the writer doesn't know how to ride a bike.


Well he did manage to drop it doing a slow turn on a road about a mile wide.
____________________
stinkwheel: He had an animated .gif of a cat performing fellatio. It's not socially acceptable. It can have real life adverse effects on other people.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:05 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
handbasket wrote:
Electric is coming more and more from renewable sources.

https://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/

Now -

Coal: 30.38%
Nuclear: 23.01%
Gas turbine: 32.22%
Wind: 1.75%
Solar, biomass, unicorn burps: insignificant

Dooooo go on.


Nuclear! That's rather enviro friendly. You're about 15% short - most of which is made up from countries shipping in power from their renewable and nuclear sources.

Electric vehicles are not completely green, they are demonstrably greener (people and planet friendly) than the majority of ICEs.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:12 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

G wrote:
Quote:
We've tested a number of 200-horsepower superbikes, but nothing - NOTHING - accelerates like this thing.

Stopped there. Either it's longer than a normal sports bike, harming handling, or the writer doesn't know how to ride a bike.
Modern superbikes will lift the front well into triple figures. They are limited by physics, not power. But, if you want more power, you can easily give a chunk of money to someone to 'charge it, giving you way more power than this.

Later we hear the back tyre is spinning up - so it's also got poor tyres on it or is badly setup?

So, no; I will not be buying one.


https://rideapart.com/articles/lightning-ls-218-fastest-electric-motorcycle

Quote:
The bike gained notoriety last year by being the first electric motorcycle to win the Pike’s Peak Challenge – and it wasn’t even close. The 2013 Pike’s Peak International Hill Climb was the first time electric bikes were allowed to compete, and the Lightning effectively silenced the critics. LS-218 rider Carlin Dunne finished about 21 seconds ahead of the closest gas-powered competitor.


Not bad for a bike with shoddy handling...
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:59 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

First off, ignoring that I was discussing basic physics and the author's lack of knowledge of it in relation to motorbikes; there seems to be no competitors in what would be a similar ICE class.
The next closest ICE rider was riding a (tweaked, no doubt) adventure bike, not a superbike.
There doesn't seem to be any competitors riding litre superbikes, from what I can see - a few 750s.

Then of course that this isn't the same road bike that the youtuber was testing, presumably.

'Sprint' racing is of course where electric really excels because you can keep the weight right down without range worries.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:53 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Re: LS218 video review - would you buy one? Reply with quote

G wrote:
First off, ignoring that I was discussing basic physics and the author's lack of knowledge of it in relation to motorbikes; there seems to be no competitors in what would be a similar ICE class.
The next closest ICE rider was riding a (tweaked, no doubt) adventure bike, not a superbike.
There doesn't seem to be any competitors riding litre superbikes, from what I can see - a few 750s.

Then of course that this isn't the same road bike that the youtuber was testing, presumably.

'Sprint' racing is of course where electric really excels because you can keep the weight right down without range worries.


The guys who came second and third in class to the Lightning were on a modified zrx1224rr... https://www.motorcycle-usa.com/550/16126/Motorcycle-Article/Jake-Holden-Tests-Custom-Kawi-for-Pikes-Peak.aspx

It may not be all plastic fairing and stickers, but that's certainly a super bike...
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:58 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:
Nuclear! That's rather enviro friendly.

Tell that to the Greens


daemonoid wrote:
Electric vehicles are not completely green, they are demonstrably greener (people and planet friendly) than the majority of ICEs.

Then please to demonstrate, if you will, being sure to cover the ecomental costs of mining, refining, construction and distribution.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

temeluchus
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:05 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, at least with batteries coming along, should the kitten preserving eco nazis force us off of dino juice machines we will have stuff that is reasonably fun to ride. Given that is likely to be some time off, battery and charging technology hopefully should be greatly improved.

Rogerborg wrote:
Then please to demonstrate, if you will, being sure to cover the ecomental costs of mining, refining, construction and distribution.


Local air pollution comes to mind, depending on how far we are willing to stretch "green".

Marjay wrote:
It weighs twice as much as a litre bike though, so I suspect that has a little to do with it.


Well comparing wet weight of a current model R1 to the LS, the LS is a bit heavier.
____________________
Some shite cruiser. Now with guns and FREEDOM!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:44 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

temeluchus wrote:
Local air pollution comes to mind, depending on how far we are willing to stretch "green".

At the (non) tailpipe.

Not so great at the coal plant, and the Chinese DEATHMINES.

I understand the signs on the gates say "Work Brings Final Blessed Relief From the Horror of Existence". Folded arms
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:23 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
daemonoid wrote:
Electric vehicles are not completely green, they are demonstrably greener (people and planet friendly) than the majority of ICEs.

Then please to demonstrate, if you will, being sure to cover the ecomental costs of mining, refining, construction and distribution.


I don't care whether the greens don't like nuclear - that's their choice... It is, however, one of the best and cleanest solutions to our power requirements.

Anyway...

Let's start with the the big thing everyone forgets about petrol - the emissions per mile are all everyone bothers to compare against electric vehicles. There's the refining process (6.1 kWh to refine crude into a gallon of petrol, there are other by products so we'll just count the 42% of which becomes petrol, so that's 2.6 kWh of electricity).

2.6kWh vs a 40mpg superbike means you'll get half a charge 'for free' in the leccy vs petrol argument.

That significantly skews the emissions argument back in the favour of leccy vehicles, without even taking into account the get it out of the ground and transport it figures.

The manufacturing environmental cost comes down to whether the electric can save more in its lifetime. The anti-leccy people suggest it costs the equivalent of 37,000 miles of pollution (yes, they're definitely not SI units...) to produce a conventional car and 'up to' double that to produce an electric one. And that becomes a tricky question, were it not for that half tank for free... As far as I estimate it, that's somewhere between 37,000miles (hugely optimistic MPGe figures) and 80,000miles (very conservative figures) to tip the balance.

That's for a car... Bikes likely have lower tipping points, but they're probably not going to become green as they'll likely hit a tree before that.
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Matt B
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:34 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:
I don't care whether the greens don't like nuclear - that's their choice... It is, however, one of the best and cleanest solutions to our power requirements.


Despite the high level waste we are piling up in interim storage facilities with no real long term disposal solution for?
____________________
stinkwheel: He had an animated .gif of a cat performing fellatio. It's not socially acceptable. It can have real life adverse effects on other people.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

daemonoid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:57 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt B wrote:
Despite the high level waste we are piling up in interim storage facilities with no real long term disposal solution for?


Yep, even despite that...

Did you know that burning coal produces more nuclear waste than comes from a nuclear plant?

Or that eating a banana would fill you with more radioactive isotopes than drinking a glass of some of the water that is considered nuclear waste?
____________________
current: ducati monster 750
past: hyosung gt250r, bajaj pulsar 180, hyosung gt 125 comet
@thomasgarrard | www.straitjkt.com | www.racingseven.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

temeluchus
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Oct 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:02 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt B wrote:
Despite the high level waste we are piling up in interim storage facilities with no real long term disposal solution for?


The anti nuclear lobby is responsible.

They have successfully inhibited development of safer, cleaner reactor designs.

Rogerborg wrote:

At the (non) tailpipe.

Not so great at the coal plant, and the Chinese DEATHMINES.

I understand the signs on the gates say "Work Brings Final Blessed Relief From the Horror of Existence". Folded arms


Well I did say LOCAL!

https://christotaylor.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/tumblr_m4w5pajb4f1qdg05vo1_1280.jpg
____________________
Some shite cruiser. Now with guns and FREEDOM!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Northern Monkey
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:11 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

daemonoid wrote:


Did you know that burning coal produces more nuclear waste than comes from a nuclear plant?



It also happens to be one of the largest sources of mercury released into the air.

But nuclear is evil. EEEVVVIILLL.
____________________
Fisty: after polishing the tank with the glistenng beads of sweat from my full hot scrotum, I filled the headrace bearings with 10cc of my manmilk
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:10 - 24 Apr 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't give a stuff about all the bollocks people say when talking charging electric vehicles and the electric usage and Co2, and power station emissions it generates.

The electric is often generated anyway, and we need loads of it. It won't hurt the environment to have a million electric vehicles plugged in for 8hours a night charging up, much more than it does already.

There are green options for electric vehicle charging too. You can't have a green option for running an ICE vehicle. Large offices could easily have underground car parks for stuff with Plug in charge points, and a few hundred square metres of solar panel on the roof for charging off grid when possible?

Anyway back to the bike linked in this thread. I believe it's so far off on a tangent and irrelevant to what people want and need in an electric bike? who out there wants or is looking for an electric R1 with a 150mile range??

Electric bikes would and will be immensely useful in the moped sector and in the up to 25bhp sector for everyday commuter machines and cheap to run personal transport for urban shoppers and scooter/125/commuter bike markets.

A 50-60mile range when the full performance is available for most of it, will be more than sufficient for most folks, as will a 3-5hour re-charge time. It's this market electric bike developments need to be perfecting and refining, as currently for anything other than the novelty factor an electric BMW S1000RR is totally pointless and un-sellable IMO to anyone who wants an EV.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 342 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.21 Sec - Server Load: 1.86 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 146.62 Kb