Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


New 390 Duke or S/H MT03?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

UnknownStuntm...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:56 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

For about £4k, you can get either. Lowish miles yam, or noughtish miles KTM. I've read about both, and 'Borg's low opinion of the KTM is justified to a point.

As bikes, they have similar power, but the KTM obviously has less weight and less torque. I'm not a lardass, but I think the difference would be noticeable with a 90kg rider.

What's the massive's opinion then? If guess people will be chucking about different models, but best in mind I'm looking for something with character and presence, and fun. Hornet is too boring, SV is too mainstream. I already have a Sunday toy for razzing about on, too.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:19 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've never owned or ridden either, but If 125cc KTM's have terrible build quality and level of finish issues, then you'd be taking a gamble on the 390cc being any better?

The Yam would be my choice by far, but then it's a rare bird, though interesting and has that MT street style that I quite like. The problem with spending £4k on a s/h MT-03 is even though it should be mint, it's a heavy bike for it's size and engine power, and though it doesn't look badly put together, it's still got fairly budget suspension and brakes that might not get the most out of it as std?

Also everyone is right in that £4k will buy you a lot more bike in terms of performance and capabilities than the Yam, whilst still being in good condition.

Oh and given the choice of an MT-03 or SV650 I'd choose the Yamaha every time, but maybe that's because of the Anti SV movement? Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:28 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Re: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

UnknownStuntman wrote:
I'm looking for something with character and presence, and fun.

https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/images/stories/bin2501.jpeg
Insert your £4k into here.

You'll have a more characterful and fun time with greater 'presence' than the listed bikes I reckon.

Wink

If it's a bike for fun, why not a more 'proper' supermoto?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

UnknownStuntm...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:26 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Re: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

G wrote:
If it's a bike for fun, why not a more 'proper' supermoto?

I get my primary source of fun from the RGV. Very Happy I was half hoping for something to do day long rides, fun on B roads, not too fast (because pointless and speed cameras etc)
And most supermotos have a worse case of duckface than the female contributors to Instagram... Yes, I'm that fickle.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:28 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Re: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

G wrote:
If it's a bike for fun, why not a more 'proper' supermoto?

What is it that you always recommend? DRZ400SM?














https://i.imgur.com/klVC9xr.gif

I bag on the Indian Dukes because for the money KTM are asking they shouldn't have that laundry list of problems. They may even have sorted them, but I wouldn't bet my money on it.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fladdem
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:40 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

INB4 F&FW Laughing

I would go for a proper supermoto, I was talking to a guy with a 'Berg 650 that pulled up outside Bikers World while I was buying a lid, that looked like an animal, but not daily transport, I would guess.

I also met the most stereotypical man in the world with about 93K on a CB500, he wanted to have a willy waving contest with me with the chicken strips on my 400, which were identical to his Rolling Eyes , he then insisted his bike would leave sports bikes in the twisties, I swear to god, the next guy that tells me his bike will keep up/leave sports bikes in the bends is getting a smack. If so many different bikes can keep up with them, I've had deauville owners, CB500, maxi-scooter riders, supermoto riders, which I vaguely believe, and all sorts... What the hell is the point of them and why would they design racetracks with corners when a 500 commuter will keep pace? Laughing Laughing

Anyway, back on topic, I would go for MT-03 because the Tenere 660 was a lot of fun when I had a spin on one and it looks really good, I keep thinking of one to replace my Kwak, but then I look at Duke II's and get tempted away. Laughing
____________________
Current:1991 Honda MT50 (Soon to be a H100/MTX/MT5 hybrid), 1976 Honda Cub C70, 2005 Honda Varadero 125, 1993 Yamaha TTR250 Open Enduro , 2010 Road Legal Stomp YX140, 1994 Honda CRM 250 MK III, 1999 Cagiva Mito 125, 1992 Honda CB400 Super Four, Stomp T4 230, 1984 Honda H100s, 2009 Sym XS125K
Past:2003 Aprilia RS125, 1982 Kawasaki GPZ550(FREE BIKE!)
I'm having more fun than a well-oiled midget.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:03 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

In this case, I think I'd recommend and SV650 painted pink Wink.
Ticks all the boxes - at least for someone that thinks these medium/big "my first bike" singles will have 'character'! Razz

Fladdem wrote:
What the hell is the point of them and why would they design racetracks with corners when a 500 commuter will keep pace?

Keep up? How about be above avarage in the fast group at a trackday?
(I'm not sure that was a fast group there, but the lap time I saw would put him in the top half.)

Turns out skill does make up a fair bit for the bike.
As opposed to cars, most not-silly (ie cruiser) bikes can hustle reasonably well and a bit of a skill gap easily makes up for a gap in bike performance, which is often not as far as you might think.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:15 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I used to find it easy to go faster at times on a CB500 than my ZX6R, especially until I raised the rear ride height. (It used to run on wide in sweeping bends) But crap rider on a bike with non optimised suspension alert! Laughing

The thing is until you start running out of ground clearance for tight or fast corners the CB500's etc are not really limited handling wise, on the road against sports bikes in a way. If both rider's stuck to the same top speed 70mph? then the best rider would be either ahead or relaxing behind the slower/less confident/capable rider.

There's too many variables on the road to even out all the differences between different bikes and rider's of different levels of skill/sense/ability.

There are BCF member's that talk about now you have 190bhp litre bikes with TCS/Anti Wheelie/ABS etc that you can use nearly all of their engine power on the road, where as 20year's ago Blade and R1 rider's could not, with 60bhp less.

I don't buy that argument personally, but it does make me wonder what electronics are doing for bikes these days?

It's the same with cars in that you can have these Mega hatchbacks now with 300-370bhp, and apparently they are useable on the road and the power can be put down to the road effectively?

Coming from the owner of a shit handling torque steer central Rover 220 fwd'er, I don't see how the above is possible? More weight dampening everything down maybe? Or have tyres and electronics come on so much since the 90's it's un-recognisable?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:46 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevo as b4 wrote:
I don't see how the above is possible?

For bikes you are limited by either doing a wheelie or losing traction. The electronics can stop you doing a wheelie, but can't make the bike any faster than that.
Better tyres improves traction, meaning less loss of traction when getting on the power leant over. Electronics replace skill/balls in allowing you to use lots of power while leant over.

In the end, at legal speeds certainly, there's only so much power you can use without the front lifting up.
As speeds increase, you need more and more power to overcome air resistance.

In cars it's a bit different - your limit is generally the tyres losing traction. On top of better traction for bigger better tyres, there's all sorts of things they can do to get the maximum out of what they have.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fladdem
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:02 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, but that's boring though, ain't it?

The new Type R is fast, but linear with no torque-steer nor character. It's why I preferred my Micra to the Fiat Stilo, because there was no PAS, cable operated clutch, skinny little wheels, basic brakes, and even had torque-steer and lift-off over-steer! Thumbs Up The Fiat was too advanced to be fun. And started getting too fast before it felt like you were pushing it to the edge. Give me an old Rover any day of the week. In fact someone traded in an F reg 216 at work but I was told I couldn't have it because it was already assigned to auction and it couldn't be pulled out. They wrongly assumed that no one would be interested in it. Crying or Very sad

G wrote:
Keep up? How about be above avarage in the fast group at a trackday?
(I'm not sure that was a fast group there, but the lap time I saw would put him in the top half.)


OK, OK, I know they have there own race series and that. The bloke just annoyed me, alright? Laughing I would still like to own one though Embarassed

I still basic cars and basic bikes. I would love to get a big old air-cooled 90's Jap bike just for the look, love me an XJR1200, CB1300 or ZRX1100. But a Yammy single is the one for me, I am torn between a TT600R Belgarda or a Tenere 660. I don't I am always looking at different bikes but the same handful keep coming into play each time.
____________________
Current:1991 Honda MT50 (Soon to be a H100/MTX/MT5 hybrid), 1976 Honda Cub C70, 2005 Honda Varadero 125, 1993 Yamaha TTR250 Open Enduro , 2010 Road Legal Stomp YX140, 1994 Honda CRM 250 MK III, 1999 Cagiva Mito 125, 1992 Honda CB400 Super Four, Stomp T4 230, 1984 Honda H100s, 2009 Sym XS125K
Past:2003 Aprilia RS125, 1982 Kawasaki GPZ550(FREE BIKE!)
I'm having more fun than a well-oiled midget.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:19 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fladdem wrote:
But a Yammy single is the one for me, I am torn between a TT600R Belgarda or a Tenere 660. I don't I am always looking at different bikes but the same handful keep coming into play each time.

Why not a 690/610/G650?

Or hell; a KTM 950 adventure/F800GS, both of which weigh similar to the Tenere 660, but have much more flexible engines.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Matt B
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:28 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to the question - a lot of the 2nd hand MT03s I've seen have been pretty rough and scabby. Not sure that they hold up too well in the long term.

Spend half your £4k and have more fun. I just spent a day at Santa Pod having a lot of giggles on a 1200 bandit.
____________________
stinkwheel: He had an animated .gif of a cat performing fellatio. It's not socially acceptable. It can have real life adverse effects on other people.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

P.
Red Rocket



Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:36 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

4k is Street Triple cash. That's entertainment and a nice package in 1 go.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

SQL
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:57 - 04 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

MT-03 is great fun at legal speeds, I love mine!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

badgermat
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 22 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:22 - 05 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Caveat - this is based on running a Duke 390 for 2 years, and a couple of hours larking around on an MT-03.

If your primary kicks come from an RGV, I'd go for the MT03 for contrast and comfort.

The Duke 390 is a bit frantic, and not massive fun at less than 5k RPM. The MT just chugs along, barely troubling you to change gear.

The MT actually has an upholstered seat too (the Duke just has a vinyl covered plank), and is probably the only choice if you're over 6ft.

Reliability-wise, it probably has to be the Yamaha too, even though the KTM isn't nearly as bad as some suggest. The only problems I had with mine were a faulty dash (replaced under warranty) and comedically poor fuelling, which seems to be endemic but can be ridden around.

bm
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

grr666
Super Spammer



Joined: 16 Jun 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:58 - 05 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with Paddy on this one.
Wish I'd bought a triple as my first bike, I recently took a 2015 one out and ragged it something rotten and can't wait
until there's one in my shed, probably going to wait until winter now as deals are better usually, I'm looking for 2013
onward really. Don't suppose OP fancies a VERY low miles 2013 ER6F as a daily? It's in your budget Thumbs Up Laughing
____________________
Currently enjoying products from Ford, Mazda and Yamaha
Ste wrote: Avatars are fine, it's signatures that need turning off. Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

UnknownStuntm...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:16 - 06 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

grr666 wrote:
Don't suppose OP fancies a VERY low miles 2013 ER6F as a daily? It's in your budget Thumbs Up Laughing

I think it's between the Dukette and the Yam, but thanks for the offer Smile

I know a whole world of bigger, or more powerful bikes are about for the same cash, yes.

I like the idea of a low output bike, mostly because I'd hardly be getting it warmed up on the commute - and I genuinely appreciate going places at speeds only just quicker than cars.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:21 - 06 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have you considered the older but pretty KTM Duke's 620/640 like the nice one that Iain used to have?

You never see them around, but it did seem like a nice bike, and had a good suspension and brake spec too, with over 55bhp, so should have been fun enough!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Alawson68
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 26 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:09 - 06 Oct 2015    Post subject: Re: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

i brought a brand new Duke 390, absolutely love everything about it. Rides well, handles well, love the styling 80-90 mpg what's not to like.
Ignore the the haters and put a smile on your face.
2 year warranty, so why should reliability trouble you, also a little bit more unusual than your average jap bike. As for build quality, on par with my friends Ducati scrambler
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:12 - 06 Oct 2015    Post subject: Re: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

Alawson68 wrote:
what's not to like.
Ignore the the haters and put a smile on your face.

That I could get a bike that costs less per month to own for under half the price and spend the other £2-3k on fun things like trackdays.
I'd suggest everyone 'ignore the haters' and do that Razz.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Diggs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:27 - 06 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

You'd get your fun on one of these - and it'd be worth more than you paid for it at the end...
____________________
Now - Speed Triple, old ratty GS550, GSXR750M
Gone (in order of ownership) - Raleigh Runabout, AP50, KH125, GP125, KH250, CBX550, Z400, CB750FII, 250LC, GS550, ZXR750H1, Guzzi Targa, GSX750F, KH250 x2, Bimota SB6R and counting...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

deadwolf
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 24 Jan 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:51 - 07 Oct 2015    Post subject: Re: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

Alawson68 wrote:
2 year warranty, so why should reliability trouble you


Because I prefer to get the most out of the bike during the first two years of ownership, rather than have it languishing away at some dealer?
____________________
Motorsapien Art
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

UnknownStuntm...
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:29 - 07 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

Diggs wrote:
You'd get your fun on one of these - and it'd be worth more than you paid for it at the end...

Nope, no no. It's heavy, ugly and made from old Morris Ital panels and coal.
I appreciate if I had a longer commute involving some NSL roads it probably would do exactly as you say. But I'm all about something lighter, newer technology and then using more of it's operational envelope - so the envelope must by definition be ... er ... smaller.
I like the idea of a big engine in a 125, it's hilarious. More manufacturers should do it. Never mind theses poncy 300 cc 'sportsbikes', just get a VFR engine in a CG. (But like, newer...)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:32 - 07 Oct 2015    Post subject: Reply with quote

UnknownStuntman wrote:

I like the idea of a big engine in a 125, it's hilarious. More manufacturers should do it. Never mind theses poncy 300 cc 'sportsbikes', just get a VFR engine in a CG. (But like, newer...)

Varadero 125 = 155kg or so no-fuel weight.
KTM690SMC - 138kg no fuel weight. Over 4x the power.

Basically is a 'bigger engine in a 125' Smile.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:43 - 07 Oct 2015    Post subject: Re: New 390 Duke or S/H MT03? Reply with quote

Alawson68 wrote:
2 year warranty, so why should reliability trouble you

Well, if it's only failing dashes and endemic fuelling issues, not that much.

What happens after 2 years though?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 10 years, 127 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 1.85 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 137.63 Kb