|
|
| Author |
Message |
| st3v3 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 st3v3 Super Spammer

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 19:35 - 11 Jan 2016 Post subject: Probably nothing |
 |
|
But I noticed a link that a few might find worth spending 30seconds on:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/116065 was on facebook.
I've had a bike nicked, and Police can refuse to let you take them home but you still get slapped with a needless bill, less cash to fix your broken machine  ____________________ Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P.addy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P.addy Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| P.addy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 P.addy Red Rocket
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| matto |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 matto Crazy Courier
Joined: 18 Apr 2012 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| st3v3 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 st3v3 Super Spammer

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Snod Blatter |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Snod Blatter Crazy Courier

Joined: 21 Nov 2014 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 23:30 - 11 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
| st3v3 wrote: | It might do for the fraction of cases, but not the massive majority; "recovery and storage" is legislated, I've been charged myself as a victim. |
But the legislation says the thief must pay, not the victim. The only thing that says the victim should pay is the case law 'borg points to, which is now outdated..
I was had by this myself almost a year ago, still can't sit down without wincing Everyone except the victims of vehicle theft is happy with the status quo though. I mean, who else would pay for it? They'd have to catch the thief to start with. What a jape. Better to petition for the police to actually ask the owner if they want their vehicle recovering for £150 or leaving where it is, might possibly get somewhere with that. ____________________ 1994 CB250, 1984 CBX250RS-E, 1989 K100RS, 1995 TRX850, 2016 Z250SL |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Rogerborg nimbA

Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| st3v3 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 st3v3 Super Spammer

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 21:55 - 12 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Snod Blatter wrote: | | st3v3 wrote: | It might do for the fraction of cases, but not the massive majority; "recovery and storage" is legislated, I've been charged myself as a victim. |
But the legislation says the thief must pay, not the victim. The only thing that says the victim should pay is the case law 'borg points to, which is now outdated..
| Where are you reading?
The massive majority of thiefs are never caught, so cannot be charged?
Yet the owner/registered keeper has to show up and collect, so it's no a brainer.
Well, I signed it, because sitting with the opinion that a national rag hasn't pushed with it, so it's not my time is what screws us over constantly.
Good luck  ____________________ Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Snod Blatter |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Snod Blatter Crazy Courier

Joined: 21 Nov 2014 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 23:05 - 12 Jan 2016 Post subject: |
 |
|
| st3v3 wrote: | Where are you reading?  |
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/27/section/102
Section 8. If the owner doesn't know it was left somewhere where the vehicle is in the way and needs to be removed, they are not responsible.
My bike (and most stolen vehicles, as I understand it) was recovered under Section 99, Section 100 deals with the fees for this practice. It says Sections 101 or 102 can be used, except if you actually look at the legislation Section 101 is for vehicles that should never see the road again, has no tax (licence?), has no number plate or the owner cannot be found. It's right there in (3). None of these are usually the case for stolen vehicles, we're all being had.
No one I spoke to at the police or through FOI requests could answer why this was, we only found out about the pertinent piece of case law from someone who asked the Met. Except it's out of date now.. All I ever got from Leicestershire police was "but who else would pay??". Ha, thanks guys! It's a no brainer if you can't read or look stuff up for sure. ____________________ 1994 CB250, 1984 CBX250RS-E, 1989 K100RS, 1995 TRX850, 2016 Z250SL |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 10 years, 231 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|